Literatura: teoría, historia, crítica

Aiden, Erez, y Jean-Baptiste Michel. Uncharted: Big Data as a Lens on Human Culture. Nueva York, Riverhead Books, 2013.

Blei, David M. “Topic Modeling and Digital Humanities”. Journal of Digital Humanities, vol. 2, núm. 1, 2013, s. p.

Burrows, John. Computation into Criticism. Clarendon, Oxford, 1987.

Busa, Roberto. “The Annals of Humanities Computing: The Index Thomisticus”. Computers and the Humanities, vol. 14, núm. 2, 1980, págs. 83-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02403798

Caldarelli, Guido, y Michele Catanzaro. Networks: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199588077.001.0001

Ciotti, Fabio. “A landscape of Digital Humanities in Italy: backgrounds, institutions and infrastructures”. Testo e senso, vol. 16, 2015, s. p.

Ciotti, Fabio. “Distant Reading in Literary Studies: A Methodology in Quest of Theory”. Testo e Senso, núm. 23, 2021, págs. 195-213.

Ciotti, Fabio. Il manuale tei Lite. Milán, Bonnard, 2004.

Ciotti, Fabio. “La rappresentazione digitale del testo: il paradigma del markup e i suoi sviluppi”. La macchina nel tempo: studi di informatica umanistica in onore di Tito Orlandi. Editado por Lorenzo Perilli y Domenico Fiormonte. Florencia, Le lettere, 2011.

Ciotti, Fabio.“Sul distant reading: una visione critica”. Semicerchio, vol. LIII núm. 2, 2015, págs. 12-20.

Ciotti, Fabio. “Toward a Formal Ontology for Narrative”. MATLIT: Materialidades Da Literatura, vol. 4, núm. 1, 2016, págs. 29-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14195/2182-8830_4-1_2

Clancy, Eileen. “A Fabula of Syuzhet: A Contretemps of Digital Humanities (with Tweets)”. Storify. Web.

Condello, Federico. I filologi e gli angeli. È di Eugenio Montale il “Diario postumo”? Boloña, BUP, 2014.

Craig, Hugh, y Arthur F. Kinney, eds. Shakespeare, Computers, and the Mystery of Authorship. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605437

Dinsman, Melissa. “The Digital in the Humanities: An Interview with Franco Moretti”. Los Angeles Review of Books. Web. 2 de marzo de 2016.

Eco, Umberto. I limiti dell’interpretazione. Milán, Bompiani, 1990.

Eyers, Tom. “The Perils of the ‘Digital Humanities’: New Positivisms and the Fate of Literary Theory.” Postmodern Culture, vol. 23 núm. 2, 2013, s. p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/pmc.2013.0038

Feldman, Ronen, y James Sanger. The Text Mining Handbook: Advanced Approaches in Analyzing Unstructured Data. Cambridge/Nueva York, Cambridge University Press, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546914

Fish, Stanley. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge (Mass.)/Londres, Harvard University Press, 1980.

Fish, Stanley. “Mind your P’s and B’s: The Digital Humanities and Interpretation”. Opinionator Blog, The New York Times. Web. 23 de enero de 2012.

Fortier, Paul A. “Analysis of Twentieth-Century Prose Fiction: Theoretical Context, Results, Perspective”. Literary Computing and Literary Criticism. Theoretical and Practical Essays on Theme and Rhetoric. Editado por Rosanne G. Potter. Filadelfia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1989, págs. 77-95.

Fortier, Paul A., y J. Colin McConnell. theme: A System for Computer-Aided Theme Searches of French Texts. Winnipeg, Department of French and Spanish/University of Manitoba, 1975.

Gigliozzi, Giuseppe. “Memoriale di Paolo Volponi”. Letteratura italiana. Le opere. Vol. IV. Turín, Einaudi, 1995, págs. 729-69.

Goldstone, Andrew, y Ted Underwood. “The Quiet Transformations of Literary Studies: What Thirteen Thousand Scholars Could Tell Us”. New Literary History, vol. 45, núm. 3, 2014, págs 359-384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2014.0025

Gruber, Tom. “Ontology”. Encyclopedia of Database Systems. Editado por Ling Liu y M. Tamer Özsu. Nueva York, Springer, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_1318

Guarino, Nicola, Daniel Oberle y Steffen Staab. “What is an Ontology?”. Handbook on ontologies. Berlin/Heidelberg, Springer, 2009, págs. 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_0

Han, Jiawei. Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. Burlington, Elsevier, 2011.

Hoover, David L. “Textual Analysis”. Literary Studies in the Digital Age: An Evolving Anthology. Editado por Kenneth M. Price y Ray Siemens. Nueva York, Modern Language Association, 2013, s. p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1632/lsda.2013.3

Hoover, David L. “The End of the Irrelevant Text: Electronic Texts, Linguistics, and Literary Theory”. Digital Humanities Quarterly, vol. 1, núm. 2, 2007, s. p.

Italia, Paola y Paolo Canettieri. “Un caso di attribuzionismo novecentesco: il ‘Diario Postumo’ di Montale”. Cognitive Philology, núm. 6, 2013, s. p.

Jaimes Alejandro, Nicu Sebe y Daniel Gatica-Pérez. “Human-centered

computing: a multimedial perspective”. Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia. Nueva York, ACM Press, 2006, págs. 855-864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1180639.1180829

Jaimes, Alejandro et al. “Human-Centered Computing: Toward a Human Revolution”. IEEE Computer, vol. 40, núm. 5, 2007, págs. 30-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/mc.2007.169

Jockers, Matthew L. “A Novel Method for Detecting Plot”. Matthew L. Jockers. Web. 5 de junio de 2014.

Jockers, Matthew L. “Computing Ireland’s Place in the 19th Century Novel: A Macroanalysis”. Breac: A Digital Journal of Irish Studies. Web. 7 de octubre de 2015.

Jockers, Matthew L. Macroanalysis: Digital Methods and Literary History. Urbana/Chicago/Sprignfield, University of Illinois Press, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5406/illinois/9780252037528.001.0001

Jockers, Matthew L. Matthew L. Jockers. Web. https://www.matthewjockers.net/

Jockers, Matthew L. “Revealing Sentiment and Plot Arcs with the Syuzhet Package”. Matthew L. Jockers. Web. 2 de febrero del 2015.

Jockers, Matthew L. y David Mimno “Significant themes in 19th-century literature”. Poetics, núm. 41, 2013, págs. 750-769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2013.08.005

Jockers, Matthew L. y Ted Underwood. “Text-Mining in the Humanities”. A New Companion to Digital Humanities. Editado por Susana Schreibman, Ray Siemens y John Unsworth Malden, Wiley Blackwell, 2016, págs. 291-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118680605.ch20

Johnson, R. Burke, Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie y Lisa A. Turner. “Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research”. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, vol. 1, núm. 2, 2007, págs. 112-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224

Jones, Steve E. Roberto Busa, S.J. and the Emergence of Humanities Computing: The Priest and the Punched Cards. Nueva York, Routledge, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315643618

Joula, Patrick. “Authorship Attribution”. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval vol. 1, núm. 3, págs. 233-334. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1561/1500000005

Kadushin, Charles. Understanding Social Networks: Theories, Concepts, and Findings. Nueva York, Oxford University Press, 2012.

“Kurt Vonnegut on the Shapes of Stories”. Youtube, publicado por David Comberg. Web. 30 de octubre de 2010.

Liu, Bing. Sentiment Analysis: Mining Opinions, Sentiments, and Emotions. Nueva York, Cambridge University Press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084789

Love, Harold. Attributing Authorship: An Introduction. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511483165

Marche, Stephen. “Literature is not Data: Against Digital Humanities”. Los Angeles Review of Books. Web. 28 de octubre del 2012.

McCarty, Willard. “Literary enquiry and experimental method: What has happened? What might?”. Storia della Scienza e Linguistica Computazionale: Sconfinamenti Possibili. Editado por Liborio Dibattista. Milán, Franco Angelli, 2009, págs. 32-54

McGann, Jerome. Radiant Textuality: Literature after the World Wide Web. Nueva York, Palgrave, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10738-1

Moretti, Franco. “Conjecturas sobre la literature mundial”. The New Left Review, vol. 3, 2000, págs. 65-76.

Moretti, Franco. Distant Reading. Londres, Verso, 2015.

Moretti, Franco.Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History. Londres, Verso, 2005.

Moretti, Franco. “Network Theory, Plot Analysis”. The New Left Review, vol. 2 , núm. 68, 2011, págs. 80-102.

Moretti, Franco. “Operationalizing: Or, the Function of Measurement in Literary Theory”. The New Left Review, vol. 2, núm. 84, 2013, págs. 103-119.

Mueller, Martin. “Shakespeare His Contemporaries: collaborative curation and exploration of Early Modern drama in a digital environment”. Digital Humanities Quarterly, vol. 8 núm. 3, 2014, s. p.

North, Joseph. “What’s ‘New Critical’ about ‘Close Reading’?: IA Richards and His New Critical Reception”. New Literary History, vol. 44, núm. 1, 2013, págs. 141-157. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2013.0002

Orlandi, Tito. “Per una storica dell’informatica umanistica”. Dall’Informatica umanistica alle culture digitali, Atti del convegno di studi (Roma, 27-28 ottobre 2011) in memoria di Giuseppe Gigliozzi. Editado por Fabio Ciotti y Gianfranco Crupi. Roma, Università Sapienza/Digilab, 2012, págs. 49-102.

Piper, Adrew. “Novel Devotions: Conversional Reading, Computational Modeling, and the Modern Novel”. New Literary History, vol. 46, núm. 1, 2015, págs. 63-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2015.0008

Prado, Sandra D. et al. “Temporal Network Analysis of Literary Texts”. Advances in Complex Systems, vol. 19 núm. 3 y 4, 2016, s. p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219525916500053

Reagan, Andrew J. et al. “The emotional arcs of stories are dominated by six basic shapes”. EPJ Data Sci, vol. 5, núm. 31, 2016, s. p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0093-1

Richards, I. A. Practical Criticism. Londres, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co, 1930.

Schreibeman, Susan y Ray Siemens, editores. Companion to Digital Literary Studies. Malden, Blackwell, 2007.

Schreibman, Susan, Ray Siemens y John Unsworth, eds. A Companion to Digital Humanities. Malden, Blackwell, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9781405103213.2004.00003.x

Schreibman, Susan, Ray Siemens y John Unsworth, eds. A New Companion to Digital Humanities. Malden, Wiley Blackwell, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118680605

Schmidt, Benjamin M. “Words Alone: Dismantling Topic Models in the Humanities”. Journal of Digital Humanities, vol. 2, núm. 1, 2012, s. p.

Sculley, D. y Bradley M. Pasanek. “Meaning and Mining: The Impact of Assumptions in Data Mining for the Humanities”. Literary and Linguistic Computing, vol. 23, núm. 4, 2008, págs. 409-424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqn019

So, Richard Jean y Hoyt Long. “Network Analysis and the Sociology of Modernism”. Boundary, vol. 2, núm. 1, 2013, págs. 147-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/01903659-2151839

TEI Consortium. Text Encoding Initiative. Web. https://tei-c.org/

Terras, Melissa, Julianne Nyhan y Edward Vanhoutte, eds. Defining Digital Humanities. A reader. Ashgate, Farnham, 2013.

Trickle, Peer. “Social Network Analysis (sna) als Methode einer textempirischen Literaturwissenschaft”. Empirie in der Literaturwissenschaft. Editado por Philip Ajouri, Katja Mellmann y Cristoph Rauen. Münster, Mentis, 2013, págs. 201-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30965/9783957439710_012

Underwood, Ted. The Stone and the Shell. Web. https://tedunderwood.com/

Underwood, Ted. “Topic modeling made just simple enough”. The Stone and the Shell. Web. 7 de abril de 2012.

Underwood, Ted. Why Literary Periods Mattered: Historical Contrast and the Prestige of English Studies. Stanford, Stanford University Press, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804788441

Unsworth, John et al. “How Not to Read a Million Books”. John M. Unsworth. Web.

Vonnegut, Kurt. A Man without a Country. Nueva York, Seven Stories Press, 2005.

Vonnegut, Kurt. Palm Sunday. Nueva York, Dial Press Trade Paperbacks, 2006.