Published
Strategies Instruction to Improve the Preparation for English Oral Exams
Instrucción en estrategias para mejorar la preparación para las pruebas orales en inglés
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v18n1.49592Keywords:
Language learning strategies, oral assessment, preparation for oral exams, rubrics, strategies instruction (en)estrategias de aprendizaje en lenguas, evaluación oral, instrucción en estrategias, preparación para pruebas orales, rúbricas (es)
This article presents the results of an inter-institutional research study that assessed the impact of strategies instruction on students’ preparation for and performance in oral exams. Two teacher-researchers at different universities trained 26 students in their respective B1-English-level courses in using language learning strategies. The study included pre- and post-intervention tests and on-line questionnaires after each oral exam. After comparing the test scores and analyzing the questionnaire responses, we arrived at two main conclusions: First, that strategies instruction, especially in combination with evaluation rubrics, promotes students’ autonomy and enhances their oral test performance. Second, that students’ use of language learning strategies is influenced by instructional variations tied to the relative importance that teachers ascribe to specific aspects of oral communication.
References
Arias, C. I., & Maturana, L. M. (2005). Evaluación en lenguas extranjeras: discursos y prácticas [Evaluation in foreign languages: Discourses and practices]. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 10(16), 63-91.
Arias, C. I., Maturana, L. M., & Restrepo, M. I. (2012). Eva-luación de los aprendizajes en lenguas extranjeras: hacia prácticas justas y democráticas [Evaluation in foreign language learning: Towards fair and democratic practices]. Lenguaje, 40(1), 99-126.
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Bauer-Ramazani, C. (2005). Presentation rubric [Assessment rubric]. Retrieved from http://academics.smcvt.edu/cbauer-ramazani/IEP/SPKG/present_rubric2.htm.
Bell, J. (2010). Doing your research project: A guide for first-time researchers in education, health and social science. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2010). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.
Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190505000061.
Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1994). The CALLA handbook: How to implement the Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Chamot, A. U., Barnhardt, S., Beard, P., Carbonaro, G., & Robbins, J. (1993). Methods for teaching learning strategies in the foreign language classroom and assessment of language skills for instruction: Final report. Washington, DC: Georgetown University. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED365157)
Cohen, A. D. (2011). Second language learner strategies. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning: Vol. II (681-698). New York, NY: Routledge.
Cohen, A. D., & Weaver, S. J. (2006). Styles-and-strategies-based instruction: A teachers’ guide. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
Cohen, A. D., Weaver, S. J., & Li, T. (1996). The impact of strategy-based instruction on speaking a foreign language. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Strasbourg, FR: Author. Retrieved from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_en.pdf.
Coyle, Y., & Valcárcel, M. (2002). Children’s learning strategies in the primary FL classroom. CAUCE, Revista de filología y su didáctica, 25, 423-458.
Diaz, I. (2015). Training in metacognitive strategies for students’ vocabulary improvement by using learning journals. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 17(1), 87-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/profile.v17n1.41632.
Ellis, R. (1994). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
González Monteagudo, J. (2000). El paradigma interpretativo en la investigación social y educativa: nuevas respuestas para viejos interrogantes. [The interpretivist paradigm in social and educational research: New answers for old questions]. Cuestiones Pedagógicas: Revista de Ciencias de la Educación, 15, 227-246. Retrieved from http://institucional.us.es/revistas/cuestiones/15/art_16.pdf.
Griffiths, C. (2004). Language learning strategies: Theory and research. Retrieved from http://www.crie.org.nz/research-papers/c_griffiths_op1.pdf.
Griffiths, C. (2007). Language learning strategies: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions. ELT Journal, 61(2), 91-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm001.
Hadji, C. (1997). L’évaluation démystifiée [Evaluation demystified]. Paris, FR: ESF Editeur.
Hernández, G. (1997). Caracterización del paradigma constructivista [Characterization of the constructivist paradigm]. Retrieved from https://comenio.files.word press.com/2007/10/paradigma_psicogenetico.pdf.
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224.
Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002.
Klimenko, O., & Álvarez, J. L. (2009). Aprendizaje autorregulado y motivación escolar [Self-regulated learning and school motivation]. Pensando Psicología, 5(9), 21-35.
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2004). A handbook for teacher research: From design to implementation. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Macaro, E. (2006). Strategies for language learning and for language use: Revising the theoretical framework. Modern Language Journal, 90(3), 320-337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00425.x.
Maturana, L. M., Restrepo, M. I., & Ferreira, M. P. (2009). Módulo-guía en evaluación de los aprendizajes en lenguas extranjeras [Guidelines in evaluation of foreign languages]. Medellín, CO: Universidad de Antioquia.
Ministerio de Educación Nacional, MEN. (2006). Estándares básicos de competencias en lenguas extranjeras: inglés. Serie Guías No. 22 [Basic standards for foreign language competences: English]. Bogotá, CO: Author. Retrieved from http://www.mineducacion.gov.co/cvn/1665/article-115174.html.
Ministerio de Educación Nacional, MEN. (2014). Colombia Very Well: Programa Nacional de Inglés, 2015-2025. Documento de Socialización. [National English Program, 2015-2025. Presentation Document]. Bogotá, CO: Author. Retrieved from http://www.colombiaaprende.edu.co/html/micrositios/1752/articles-343287_recurso_1.pdf.
NVivo (Version 10). [Computer software]. Burlington, MA: QSR International.
Ortiz, J. R. (2000). Paradigmas de la investigación [Research paradigms]. UNAdocumenta, 14(1), 42-48. Retrieved from http://postgrado.una.edu.ve/filosofia/paginas/ortizunadoc.pdf.
Oxford, R. L. (1989). Strategy inventory for language learning. New York, NY: Newbury House. Retrieved from http://www.santurtzieus.com/gela_irekia/materialak/laguntza/nolaikasi/evaluacion_estrategias.htm.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Oxford, R. L. (1994). Language learning strategies: An update. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED376707)
Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. New York, NY: Routledge.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1.
Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002.
Peláez, O., Roldán, A., & Usma, J. (2014, September). The national English program in Colombia: Plans, realities, delusions, and challenges. Plenary session presented at the Sixth Academic Sessions: Participating and Creating, Fundación Universitaria Luis Amigó, Medellín, Colombia.
Picón Jácome, E. (2013). La rúbrica y la justicia en la evaluación [The role of rubrics in fair assessment practices]. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 18(3), 1-16.
República de Colombia. (2013, July). Ley de Bilingüismo (Ley No 1651) [Law of bilingualism]. Retrieved from http://wsp.presidencia.gov.co/Normativa/Leyes/Documents/2013/LEY%201651%20DEL%2012%20DE%20JULIO%20DE%202013.pdf.
Restrepo, M. I., & Medina, M. I. (2014). Factores y estrategias que inciden en la preparación para la evaluación en inglés en la Funlam [Factors and strategies that influence preparation for the evaluation in English at Funlam]. In J. D. Ruíz Roldán & C. Orrego Moscoso (Eds.), La investigación, un compromiso con la sociedad: memorias del Encuentro Nacional de Investigación Funlam 2014 (pp. 303-315). Retrieved from http://www.funlam.edu.co/uploads/centroinvestigaciones/129_LA_INVESTIGACION_Un_compromiso_con_la_sociedad_2014.pdf.
Rubin, J. (1975). What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3586011.
Tragant, E., & Victori, M. (2012). Language learning strategies, course grades, and age in EFL secondary school learners. Barcelona, ES: Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.
Usma, J. A. (2009). Education and language policy in Colombia: Exploring processes of inclusion, exclusion, and stratification in times of global reform. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 11(1), 123-141.
Wenden, A., & Rubin, J. (Eds). (1991). Learner strategies in language learning. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.
Dimensions
PlumX
Article abstract page views
Downloads
How to Cite
License
You are authorized to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format as long as you give appropriate credit to the authors of the articles and to Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development as original source of publication. The use of the material for commercial purposes is not allowed. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
Authors retain the intellectual property of their manuscripts with the following restriction: first publication is granted to Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development.






























