Publicado

2017-09-01

Sex expression, breeding system and pollinators of Piper caldense (PIPERACEAE) in the Brazilian Atlantic forest

Expresión sexual, sistema reproductivo y polinizadores de Piper caldense (Piperaceae) en un bosque Atlántico

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/abc.v22n3.61556

Palabras clave:

andromonoecy, entomophily, incomplete protogyny, self-incompatibility, social bees. (en)
abejas sociales, andromonoica, autoincompatibilidad, entomofilia, protoginia incompleta. (es)

Autores/as

  • Milene Faria Vieira Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa.
  • Diana Lucia Vargas Rojas Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa.

Neotropical Piper species have bisexual flowers. Such reproductive trait is considered basal in this pantropical genus. However, neotropical species having unisexual (staminate) flowers along with bisexual ones have also been reported. Dichogamy is common in the genus, associated with either self-compatibility or -incompatibility, as well as with entomophily. We analyzed a natural population of Piper caldense in a Atlantic Forest area (Viçosa municipality, Minas Gerais state, southeastern Brazil). Preliminary observations indicated that the species produces two flower types. We analyzed flower sex in spikes of 50 plants. We obtained additional information through morphological and anatomical studies and scanning electron microscopy analyses. The longevity and exposure dynamics of stigmatic papillae and the pollen release sequence of all four stamens were investigated to verify the degree of dichogamy. Pollination tests were performed, pollinators were identified and their visitation frequency was recorded. Piper caldense has both bisexual and staminate flowers, each flower type being located on separate spikes. These spikes occurred on the same plant, thus indicating andromonoecy; furthermore, plants having only spikes with staminate flowers were also observed. This gender had not yet been reported to the genus. Gradual and sequential exposure of stigmatic papillae associated with asynchronous pollen release (one stamen a day) resulted in incomplete protogyny. Hand pollination tests showed that the species is self-incompatible. Social bees, mainly Apis mellifera and Melipona spp., were the major pollinator group. Our study reinforces the need to associate morphological analysis with floral biology and indicates future changes in studies addressing reproductive traits associated with the phylogeny of the Piper genus

Las especies neotropicales de Piper presentan flores bisexuales, condición considerada basal al interior de este género pantropical. Sin embargo, fueron observadas especies neotropicales con flores unisexuales (estaminadas), además de las bisexuales. La dicogamia es común en el género y se encuentra asociada a la autocompatibilidad o incompatibilidad, al igual que la entomofilia. Fue analizada una población natural de Piper caldense en un área de bosque Atlántico (municipio de Viçosa, Minas Gerais, sureste de Brasil). Las observaciones preliminares indicaron que esta especie produce dos tipos florales, para lo cual fue analizada la sexualidad de las flores en 50 espigas a través de estudios morfológicos, anatómicos y análisis con microscopia electrónica de barrido. La longevidad y dinámica de exposición de las papilas estigmáticas y la secuencia de liberación de los granos de polen en los cuatro estambres fueron observados para verificar el grado de dicogamia. El sistema reproductivo se evaluó mediante el test de autopolinización espontánea y polinización abierta. Los visitantes florales fueron identificados y se registró su frecuencia de visita. Piper caldense presenta flores bisexuales y estaminadas, cada tipo floral se encuentra en espigas separadas. Estas espigas se encuentran en la misma planta, lo que indica que es andromonoica; adicionalmente, fueron observadas plantas que solo presentaban espigas con flores estaminadas, lo que se constituye en una combinación sexual inédita para el género. La exposición gradual y secuencial de las papilas estigmáticas asociada con la liberación asincrónica de los granos de polen (un estambre por día) indica una protoginia incompleta. Los test de polinización mostraron que la especie es autoincompatible. Las abejas sociales, principalmente Apis mellifera y Melipona spp., fueron los polinizadores principales. Este estudio refuerza la necesidad de asociar los analisis morfológicos con la funcionalidad de las estructuras florales, además indica los cambios futuros en estudios que abordan características reproductivas asociadas a la filogenia de las especies de Piper

Recibido: 14 de diciembre de 2016; Revisión recibida: 11 de julio de 2017; Aceptado: 15 de agosto de 2017

ABSTRACT

Neotropical Piper species have bisexual flowers. Such reproductive trait is considered basal in this pantropical genus. However, neotropical species having unisexual (staminate) flowers along with bisexual ones have also been reported. Dichogamy is common in the genus, associated with either self-compatibility or -incompatibility, as well as with entomophily. We analyzed a natural population of Piper caldense in a Atlantic Forest area (Viçosa municipality, Minas Gerais state, southeastern Brazil). Preliminary observations indicated that the species produces two flower types. We analyzed flower sex in spikes of 50 plants. We obtained additional information through morphological and anatomical studies and scanning electron microscopy analyses. The longevity and exposure dynamics of stigmatic papillae and the pollen release sequence of all four stamens were investigated to verify the degree of dichogamy. Pollination tests were performed, pollinators were identified and their visitation frequency was recorded. Piper caldense has both bisexual and staminate flowers, each flower type being located on separate spikes. These spikes occurred on the same plant, thus indicating andromonoecy; furthermore, plants having only spikes with staminate flowers were also observed. This gender had not yet been reported to the genus. Gradual and sequential exposure of stigmatic papillae associated with asynchronous pollen release (one stamen a day) resulted in incomplete protogyny. Hand pollination tests showed that the species is self-incompatible. Social bees, mainly Apis mellifera and Melipona spp., were the major pollinator group. Our study reinforces the need to associate morphological analysis with floral biology and indicates future changes in studies addressing reproductive traits associated with the phylogeny of the Piper genus.

Keywords:

andromonoecy, entomophily, incomplete protogyny, self-incompatibility, social bees.

RESUMEN

Las especies neotropicales de Piper presentan flores bisexuales, condición considerada basal al interior de este género pantropical. Sin embargo, fueron observadas especies neotropicales con flores unisexuales (estaminadas), además de las bisexuales. La dicogamia es común en el género y se encuentra asociada a la autocompatibilidad o incompatibilidad, al igual que la entomofilia. Fue analizada una población natural de Piper caldense en un área de bosque Atlántico (municipio de Viçosa, Minas Gerais, sureste de Brasil). Las observaciones preliminares indicaron que esta especie produce dos tipos florales, para lo cual fue analizada la sexualidad de las flores en 50 espigas a través de estudios morfológicos, anatómicos y análisis con microscopia electrónica de barrido. La longevidad y dinámica de exposición de las papilas estigmáticas y la secuencia de liberación de los granos de polen en los cuatro estambres fueron observados para verificar el grado de dicogamia. El sistema reproductivo se evaluó mediante el test de autopolinización espontánea y polinización abierta. Los visitantes florales fueron identificados y se registró su frecuencia de visita. Piper caldense presenta flores bisexuales y estaminadas, cada tipo floral se encuentra en espigas separadas. Estas espigas se encuentran en la misma planta, lo que indica que es andromonoica; adicionalmente, fueron observadas plantas que solo presentaban espigas con flores estaminadas, lo que se constituye en una combinación sexual inédita para el género. La exposición gradual y secuencial de las papilas estigmáticas asociada con la liberación asincrónica de los granos de polen (un estambre por día) indica una protoginia incompleta. Los test de polinización mostraron que la especie es autoincompatible. Las abejas sociales, principalmente Apis mellifera y Melipona spp., fueron los polinizadores principales. Este estudio refuerza la necesidad de asociar los analisis morfológicos con la funcionalidad de las estructuras florales, además indica los cambios futuros en estudios que abordan características reproductivas asociadas a la filogenia de las especies de Piper.

Palabras clave:

abejas sociales, andromonoica, autoincompatibilidad, entomofilia, protoginia incompleta.

INTRODUCTION

Piper is a pantropical genus with around 2000 species, being one of the most important components of the understory in tropical forests (Quijano-Abril et al., 2006), including the Brazilian one (Rossetto and Vieira, 2013). The genus is represented in Brazil by 290 species, 179 of which are endemic, like P. caldense C. DC. (Guimarães et al., 2015). Despite the species richness of the genus and its ecological importance, information on the reproductive biology of its representatives is available for only 6 % of the species occurring in the country (A. Valentin-Silva, pers. comm.).

Floral morphology is similar among Piper representatives. Flowers in the genus are small, usually arranged in spikes, bisexual or unisexual, perianthless, and fully protected by a bract at the flower bud stage (Yuncker, 1972; Yuncker, 1973; Jaramillo and Manos, 2001). In view of such similarity in flower morphology among Piper representatives, sexual expressions were considered important reproductive traits to distinguish paleotropical from neotropical species: those from Asia and the South Pacific are dioecious, while those from Africa are monoecious or dioecious and those from the neotropics are hermaphrodite (Jaramillo and Manos, 2001). However, in the neotropical P. arboreum Aubl. (Figueiredo and Sazima, 2000) and P. gaudichaudianum Kunth (Valentin-Silva and Vieira, 2015), unisexual (staminate) flowers were observed along with bisexual ones in andromonoecious populations from southeastern Brazil. Additionally, in preliminary observations made on a P. caldense population from the same area of the present study, both flower types have also been observed in the analyzed individuals. These findings show that, conversely to what was described above, sex expression may not be a diagnostic feature for neotropical species.

Dichogamyis common among species with bisexual flowers (Figueiredo and Sazima, 2000; Valentin-Silva et al., 2015), being associated with either self-compatibility (Marquis, 1988; Sasikumar et al., 1992; Figueiredo and Sazima, 2000, Valentin-Silva et al., 2015) or self-incompatibility (Figueiredo and Sazima, 2000; Kikuchi et al., 2007). In the latter case, studies have shown that insects, especially bees and flies, as well as wind, are pollinators (Martin and Gregory, 1962; Semple, 1974; Fleming, 1985; Figueiredo and Sazima, 2000; Thomazini and Thomazini, 2002; Kikuchi et al., 2007; Valentin-Silva et al., 2015). On species having unisexual flowers, Merrett et al. (2007) concluded that pollination is anemophilous in Macropiper excelsum Miq. (= Piper excelsum G. Forst.), a dioecious species, due to the absence of biotic pollinators and to the high pollen:ovule ratio. On species having both bisexual and staminate flowers, P. arboreum was considered self-incompatible and ambophilous (Figueiredo and Sazima, 2000).

The purpose of this study was to analyze the sexuality, morphology and biology of Piper caldense flowers, aiming to clarify the species sex expression and degree of floral dichogamy. We also investigated the species breeding system and identified flower visitors, including pollinators.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area and species

The studies were conducted from July 2013 to September 2014 at the Station of Research, Environmental Training and Education Mata do Paraíso, (hereafter, Mata do Paraíso; 20°48' S and 42°51' W, 690 m.a.s.l.), the largest forest fragment in Viçosa municipality, Minas Gerais state, southeastern Brazil. The fragment has Atlantic Forest vegetation (Oliveira-Filho and Fontes, 2000), being classified as montane seasonal semideciduous forest (Veloso et al., 1991).

According to Köppen's classification, climate in Viçosa is type Cwa, i.e., mesothermal with hot wet summers and cold dry winters. Annual means of rainfall, relative humidity and temperature are, respectively, 1221.4 mm, 81 %, and 19.4 °C. The dry cold season extends from April to September while the warm rainy season begins in October and lasts until March.

Piper caldense is a 2-3 m high shrub. The hanging spikes are 3 to 5 cm long. Flowers are protected by a triangular subpeltate bract with fringed margins; the androecium consists of four stamens; the gynoecium has a superior ovary, short style and three stigmas; and the fruit is a drupe (Carvalho-Okano and Alves, 1998). A voucher specimen was deposited in the VIC Herbarium (A Valentin-Silva 82, DL Vargas-Rojas).

At Mata do Paraíso, P. caldense plants occur in moist and partially shaded areas of the understory. All analyzed plants had spikes with flower buds throughout the study period. These spikes remained latent for up to 12 months and were approximately 0.5 cm long. Spikes with flowers at anthesis were observed in the dry season, between August and September 2013 and 2014.

Sex expression and floral morphology and biology

To define the sex expression of plants and flowers, we analyzed flowers on spikes of 50 plants with a hand lens (30 x). Additionally, spike length and diameter (central portion) were measured in 49 spikes (14 with bisexual flowers and 35 with unisexual ones) having flowers at late anthesis. To assess the average number of flowers per spike, the number of flowers per inflorescence was counted in ten spikes for each flower type.

Fresh spikes were stored in 70 % ethanol and examined under a stereomicroscope (model EZ4D, Leica Microsystems, Deerfield, Illinois, USA) to verify the presence of androecium and/or gynoecium. In addition, stigma receptivity, which was characterized by the exposure of turgid stigmatic papillae (Valentin-Silva et al., 2015), was monitored in bisexual flowers of 15 spikes from different plants in the field, for 10 consecutive days, with a hand lens. The dynamics of pollen release from the four stamens of both bisexual and unisexual flowers was observed. Pollen grain viability was tested with acetic carmine (Radford et al., 1974). To this end, 40 spikes (20 per floral type) were fixed in FAA50 (formaldehyde, acetic acid, and 50 % ethanol, 1:1:18 v/v/v) for 48 h and then stored in 70 % ethanol (Johansen, 1940). Completely exposed stamens (not protected by the floral bract) were used. On each slide, five anthers of flowers from the same spike were squashed in a drop of acetic carmine. A total 200 pollen grains were counted per slide, being then separated into viable and non-viable (Kearns and Inouye, 1993).

To obtain further information on floral morphology and biology, morphoanatomical studies were performed at the Laboratory of Plant Anatomy of Federal University of Viçosa, and scanning electron microscope analyses were conducted at the Center for Microscopy and Microanalysis at the same institution. We used samples of spikes having bisexual and staminate flowers at different stages, previously fixed in FAA50 and stored in 70 % ethanol (Johansen, 1940). The adopted techniques were similar to those described by Valentin-Silva et al. (2015).

Breeding system and flower visitors

Following the methods proposed by Dafni et al. (2005), two tests were conducted in spikes with bisexual flowers: spontaneous selfing-15 spikes were bagged at pre-anthesis until fruit formation or inflorescence abortion; and open pollination-15 spikes were labelled and left exposed to pollinators. Spikes were isolated with cloth (fully closed mesh) bags. The percentage of fruiting in these tests was computed, considering the mean number of flowers per spike.

We recorded the visitation frequency on five non-consecutive days in August 2014, from 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM, totalizing a sampling effort of 40 h. Floral visitors were captured to localize the pollen deposition sites on their bodies. Voucher specimens were deposited in the Entomology Museum of Federal University of Viçosa.

Statistical analysis

The above-mentioned measurements, as well as those of pollen grain viability, were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) with software R, version 3.0.1 (R Development Core Team, 2010). We assessed the number of flowers with a means test (t test), using the same software.

RESULTS

Sex expression and floral morphology

Piper caldense has bisexual and unisexual (staminate) flowers, each flower type being located on separate spikes. In 15 of the 50 analyzed plants, all spikes having flowers still at the bud stage were aborted, which rendered flower sex identification impossible. Of the other 35 plants, 14 had spikes with staminate flowers as well as spikes with bisexual flowers, while the other 21 plants had only spikes with staminate flowers. Therefore, the number of plants having only staminate flowers was 1.5 times higher than that of plants having both flower types. There were size differences between spikes with bisexual flowers and spikes with staminate flowers (Table 1), with statistical differences being detected in both spike length (F = 16.7, p = 3.6 e-6) and diameter (F = 33.2, p = 1.18 e-9). Moreover, spikes with bisexual flowers had on average more flowers than spikes with staminate flowers: 252.8 ± 27.2 and 198.3 ± 27.5, respectively. These averages differed from each other (t =-4.5, p = 0.003).

Table 1: Size (mean ± standard deviation) of Piper caldense spikes having both bisexual and staminate flowers and viability (mean ± standard deviation) of pollen grains from all four stamens. Values in a same column followed by the same letter do not differ statistically.

Bisexual flowers have a floral bract which, at the bud stage, fully protects all four stamens; white, dithecous anthers (Fig. 1A); a pistil with trifid stigma; and a superior, unilocular, uniovular ovary with basal placentation. Staminate flowers also have a floral bract that fully protects all four stamens, having the same characteristics of the androecium of bisexual flowers and also a pistillode (nonfunctional, reduced pistil; Fig. 1B).


 
 Piper caldense 
 
 flowers. A) bisexual flower, with two of the four stamens and the pistil; note the abscission tissue in the filament (arrow). B) staminate flower, with two of the four stamens and the pistillode. C) bisexual flower with partially exposed anthers of stamens 1, 2 and 3 and upright, juxtaposed stigmas. D) bisexual flower with three stamens; note the filament scar of the first stamen that released pollen. E) bisexual flower with stamens 3 and 4. F) bisexual flower with stamen 4. G) staminate flower with partially exposed anthers of three stamens (1, 2 and 3). H) staminate flower with stamens 3 and 4; note the filament scar of stamens 1 and 2. I) staminate flower with exposed anther of stamen 4. The bract apex is directed toward the distal region of the spike. br = bract, fs = filament scar, ov = ovary, pi = pistillode, st = stigma, s1 = stamen 1, s2 = stamen 2, s3= stamen 3, s4 = stamen 4. Scale bars: 400 mm.

Figure 1: Piper caldense flowers. A) bisexual flower, with two of the four stamens and the pistil; note the abscission tissue in the filament (arrow). B) staminate flower, with two of the four stamens and the pistillode. C) bisexual flower with partially exposed anthers of stamens 1, 2 and 3 and upright, juxtaposed stigmas. D) bisexual flower with three stamens; note the filament scar of the first stamen that released pollen. E) bisexual flower with stamens 3 and 4. F) bisexual flower with stamen 4. G) staminate flower with partially exposed anthers of three stamens (1, 2 and 3). H) staminate flower with stamens 3 and 4; note the filament scar of stamens 1 and 2. I) staminate flower with exposed anther of stamen 4. The bract apex is directed toward the distal region of the spike. br = bract, fs = filament scar, ov = ovary, pi = pistillode, st = stigma, s1 = stamen 1, s2 = stamen 2, s3= stamen 3, s4 = stamen 4. Scale bars: 400 mm.

Biology of bisexual flowers

In bisexual flowers, there was a partial opening of the bract and exposure of the anthers of three stamens (stamens 1-3, Fig. 1C) for two to three days (stamens were numbered according to the position of the floral bract; Fig. 1C). Subsequently, for up to three additional days, the upright, juxtaposed stigmas were visible among those three stamens, as was the apical portion of the anther of stamen 4 in some flowers (Fig. 1C), due to the continuous bract opening. Thus, these changes occurred in the flowers for three to six days before anthesis.

Anthesis of bisexual flowers began with stigma receptivity, being characterized by the exposure of turgid papillae at the distal portion; stamens remained as shown in Fig. 1C, with indehiscent anthers. The occurrence of stigma receptivity in the period prior to pollen release indicates protogynous dichogamy. The pistillate flower phase lasted an average two days.

The bisexual phase began with pollen being released from flowers while stigmas were still receptive, a characteristic of incomplete protogyny. Either stamen 1 or 2 was the first one to release pollen. One of these stamens was higher than the other, due to complete exposure (filament and an ther), and released pollen first, beginning in late morning but occurring mainly in the afternoon, at around 2:00 PM (same time of release of the other stamens). Thereat, the distance among stigmas increased, almost completely exposing the still-turgid stigmatic papillae.

On the second day of the bisexual phase, the second stamen to undergo anther dehiscence (either stamen 1 or 2; Fig. 1D) released pollen. By then, the stamen that had released pollen the day before may either still have residual pollen, in which case such stamen has characteristics that indicate senescence, such as anther darkening and wilting; or it may have already been aborted (note the filament scar of the stamen that first released pollen, in Fig. 1D). At this stage, the bract is fully open, further exposing the anther of stamen 4. Furthermore, in some flowers, the distal portion of stigmas was darkened and had plasmolyzed papillae, indicating the onset of cell senescence.

On the third day, stamen 3 was completely exposed and pollen was released from the anther (Fig. 1E). The stamen that had released pollen the day before may either have already been aborted or still have a senescent anther with residual pollen. In that occasion, the anther of stamen 4 remained indehiscent. Stigmas then were totally exposed (Fig. 1E); from this stage, the darkened portion of stigmatic surface was quite variable, but was thereat observed on the middle portion of the stigma towards its base.

On the fourth day, senescence- or abortion-related characteristics were observed on the anther of stamen 3 (Fig. 1F). Stamen 4 was completely exposed and its anther released pollen. Most flowers had completely darkened stigmas with collapsed papillae, indicating the end of stigma receptivity; however, thereat some flowers may have turgid papillae in the proximal third of stigmas.

Anthesis of bisexual flowers thus lasted six days. Thereafter, ovary size increased due to fruit formation in fertilized flowers.

Biology of staminate flowers

In staminate flowers, with the beginning of bract opening for two to three days, the anthers of three stamens (stamens 1-3; Fig. 1G) were partially exposed. At the end of this period, stamens 1 and 2 were more exposed than stamen 3. Flowers may remain at this stage for up to five additional days. Therefore, these changes occurred in the flower at three to eight days before anthesis.

Anthesis began with pollen release (see the filament scar of stamens that had already released pollen, in Fig. 1H-I), with similar dynamics to the one of bisexual flowers, for four consecutive days. In stamen 4, we observed that some flowers might have residual pollen for up to two days. Thereafter, spikes dried out and were aborted.

Pollen viability, breeding system and flower visitors

Pollen grain viability was similar between stamens of bisexual and staminate flowers, as well as among stamens of each flower (Table 1). Means did not differ statistically (F = 0.5, p = 0.861).

No fruiting was observed in the spontaneous self-pollination test, while a 63.3 % fruit set was observed in the open-pollination test, thus indicating the occurrence of self-incompatibility in P. caldense. The fact that the number of fruits/spike (=161.5 ± 93.1) was smaller than the one of flowers/spike (= 252.8 ± 27.2) indicates that not all flowers were pollinated and/or fertilized.

Spikes were visited by insects of two orders, each being represented by one family: Hymenoptera, Apidae (bees, Fig. 2) and Diptera, Syrphidae (flies) (Table 2). These insects collected pollen, the only floral resource available.

Bees on spikes of Piper caldense. A). Melipona mondury. B). Schwarziana quadripunctata.

Figure 2: Bees on spikes of Piper caldense. A). Melipona mondury. B). Schwarziana quadripunctata.

Table 2: Visitation frequency (number and percentage of visits per insect) of flower visitors on Piper caldense flowers at Mata do Paraíso, Viçosa municipality, Minas Gerais state, southeastern Brazil.

Among bees, we observed eight species grouped into six genera (Table 2). These insects made 349 flower visits. Apis mellifera accounted for the highest visitation frequency, followed by Melipona quadrifasciata, M. bicolor, Trigona spinipes, M. mondury (Fig. 2A), and Swarziana quadripunctata (Fig. 2B); these bees altogether performed 79.9 % of all visits (Table 2). As for flies, we observed seven species grouped into four genera (Table 2). These insects made 67 flower visits. The highest visitation frequencies were of three Ocyptamus species; these flies altogether accounted for 14.6 % of all visits (Table 2).

Bees began visiting at around 8:00 AM, which lasted until 4:00 PM. Visits peaked between 9:00 and 11:00 AM, with another minor peak at 2:00 PM (Fig. 3). The timetables and visitation peaks of flies and bees were similar, differing only in number of visits (Fig. 4).

Number ofvisits ofthe most frequent bees on Piper caldense flowers, from 7:00 AM to 4:00 PM, at Mata do Paraíso, Viçosa municipality, Minas Gerais state, southeastern Brazil. • = Apis mellifera, ▲ = Melipona bicolor, ◊ = Melipona mondury, o = Melipona quadrifasciata, ■ = Schwarziana quadripunctata, Δ= Trigona spinipes.

Figure 3: Number ofvisits ofthe most frequent bees on Piper caldense flowers, from 7:00 AM to 4:00 PM, at Mata do Paraíso, Viçosa municipality, Minas Gerais state, southeastern Brazil. • = Apis mellifera, ▲ = Melipona bicolor, ◊ = Melipona mondury, o = Melipona quadrifasciata, ■ = Schwarziana quadripunctata, Δ= Trigona spinipes.

Number of visits of the most frequent flies on Piper caldense flowers, from 7:00 AM to 4:00 PM, at Mata do Paraíso, Viçosa municipality, Minas Gerais state, southeastern Brazil. • = Ocyptamus sp.1, ▲ = Ocyptamus sp.2, ■ = Ocyptamus sp.3.

Figure 4: Number of visits of the most frequent flies on Piper caldense flowers, from 7:00 AM to 4:00 PM, at Mata do Paraíso, Viçosa municipality, Minas Gerais state, southeastern Brazil. • = Ocyptamus sp.1, ▲ = Ocyptamus sp.2, ■ = Ocyptamus sp.3.

The insect visitation frequencies and deposition sites of pollen grains on insect bodies (in the ventral region and legs) both suggest that the two groups of flower visitors, especially bees, are effective pollinators of P. caldense.

DISCUSSION

Bisexual flowers, which were observed in P. caldense, are considered basal in Piperaceae (Tebbs, 1993) and represent one of the characteristics that define the clade of neotropical Piper species (Jaramillo et al., 2008). However, besides bisexual flowers, this species has also staminate flowers. This result contradicts the report by Jaramillo et al. (2008), who claimed that all neotropical Piper species have only bisexual flowers. The similarity in floral morphology among species in this genus must have motivated that statement, along with an almost complete lack of information on the sexual reproduction characteristics of those species. Our study reinforces the need to associate floral morphology analysis with data on flower biology, and indicates future changes in studies involving reproductive traits associated with the phylogeny of the genus.

According to Richards (1997), the presence ofspikes with bisexual flowers and spikes with staminate flowers on a same plant characterizes andromonoecy, a gender which has been observed in two other neotropical Piper species (Figueiredo and Sazima, 2000, Valentin-Silva and Vieira, 2015). However, the presence of plants that produce only spikes with staminate flowers, in addition to the presence of andromonoecious plants, is reported here for the first time to the genus. There is no term that defines this combination between andromonoecious plants (a monomorphic population sensu Sakai and Weller, 1999) and male plants. Therefore, according to the terminology of Sakai and Weller (1999), the studied P. caldense population is dimorphic, i.e., it has two kinds of individuals, each one having different gender. This sex expression of the plants might be a derived character, bearing in mind that most neotropical Piper species are hermaphrodite (Jaramillo and Manos, 2001; Jaramillo et al., 2008).

Incomplete protogyny, as observed in P. caldense, has also been described for other species of the genus (Figueiredo and Sazima, 2000, Valentin-Silva et al., 2015). Temporal separation between the functions of the gynoecium and androecium is considered a strategy that favors cross-pollination (Lloyd and Webb, 1986). Nevertheless, incomplete protogyny does not prevent self-pollination due to the occurrence of the bisexual flower phase. In this case, self-incompatibility, as observed here, is a strategy that prevents autogamy. Figueiredo and Sazima (2000) found this combination of incomplete protogyny with self-incompatibility in six Piper species from southeastern Brazil.

The long-lived stigmas (at least four days) of P. caldense seem to favor incomplete protogyny, as reported to P. vicosanum Yunck. by Valentin-Silva et al. (2015). Another similarity between these two species is the gradual and sequential exposure and senescence ofthe stigmatic papillae, in a basipetal direction. According to these authors, this mode of stigmatic exposure is the mechanism that explains stigma longevity, which is related to the long flower duration.

In addition, the darkening of P. caldense stigmas associated with senescence of stigmatic papillae should be the result of accumulation of phenolic compounds, as found in P. vicosanum (Valentin-Silva et al., 2015).

The asynchronous sequence of pollen release in P. caldense is a trait that has also been described by Valentin-Silva et al. (2015) for P. vicosanum. The pattern (see Valentin-Silva et al., 2015) involving the species studied here determines that pollen from stamens 1 and 2 must be released on subsequent days, separated by an interval of at least 24 h. Stamens 3 and 4 also released pollen on subsequent days, yet we observed no such one-day interruption, as observed in P. vicosanum (Valentin-Silva et al., 2015). Pollen release from each stamen on different days should be advantageous to the species, since thereat the period of offering of this resource in the flower is extended, and the chances of cross-pollination are consequently increased. In addition, asynchronous pollen release is also associated with long flower duration (Valentin-Silva et al., 2015).

Spikes with staminate flowers in P. caldense might be related to the attraction of pollinators, as suggested by Primack and Lloyd (1980) and O'Brien (1994), since pollen is the only floral resource in the species. Diurnal flower anthesis, especially regarding pollen release time, combined with insect visitation frequency, favor entomophily in P. caldense. Most species of Piper are entomophilous (Martin and Gregory, 1962; Semple, 1974; Fleming, 1985; Figueiredo and Sazima, 2000; Thomazini and Thomazini, 2002; Kikuchi et al., 2007).

Among the insect pollinators, bees stand out in species richness, behavior and visitation frequency. Apis mellifera and Melipona quadrifasciata were the most frequently observed bees on spikes. These two species are social and polyletic, and therefore exploit floral resources of several plant species (Minussi and Alves-Santos, 2007, Nogueira and Augusto, 2007), including the one studied herein.

On the other hand, the lower visitation frequency by flies indicates that these insects are secondary pollinators. Flies commonly feed on pollen (Gilbert, 1981, Larson et al., 2001), and the flowering of P. caldense in a time of low availability of this resource (dry season) might have stimulated their visit to flowers of this species. According to Gilbert (1981), the activity of flies in flowers is more related to the availability of floral resources.

Although intensely visited, the spikes with bisexual flowers of P. caldense produced less fruits than flowers. This reproductive feature seems to be common among andromonoecious species (Primack and Lloyd, 1980; O'Brien, 1994). However, the prevalence of spikes with staminate flowers over those with bisexual flowers apparently rules out pollen limitation in the studied population. A likely explanation for these results may be the visitation behavior. Bees and flies tend to visit several flowers per spike and more than one spike per plant, thus promoting geitonogamy in self-incompatible species. Another explanation could be a limitation on plant nutrients, as suggested by O'Brien (1994), which also might have contributed to a decreased fruit set. Additional studies are required to clarify this issue.

CONCLUSIONS

In P. caldense, the observed sexual traits - two flower types, incomplete protogyny, gradual and sequential exposure of stigmatic papillae, asynchronous pollen release, self-incompatibility, and entomophily - seem to favor the maintenance of the studied population. The combination of spikes having bisexual flowers and spikes having staminate flowers in one plant with spikes having only staminate flowers in another is a new observation in the Piper genus. Staminate spikes seem to extend pollen availability, pollen being the only floral resource available to pollinators, which are mainly social bees.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We thank OEA and CAPES for granting a Master's scholarship to the first author and CNPq for granting a scientific productivity scholarship to the second author. This research is part of the dissertation of the first author, produced in the Graduate Program in Botany, Federal University of Viçosa, Brazil.

REFERENCES

Carvalho-Okano RM, Alves AS, Piperaceae C. Agardh da Estação Experimental Mata do Paraíso, Viçosa, MG. Acta Bot Bras. 1998; 12(3):497-513.

Dafni A, Kevan PG, Husbans BC, editors. Practical Pollination Biology. Cambridge: Enviroquest Ltd.; 2005. 315 p.

Figueiredo RA, Sazima M. Pollination Biology of Piperaceae Species in Southeastern Brazil. Ann Bot. 2000; 85(4):455- 460. Doi:10.1006/anbo.1999.1087 p.[CrossRef]

Fleming TH. Coexistence of Five Sympatric Piper (Piperaceae) Species in a Tropical Dry Forest. Ecology. 1985; 66(3):688-700.

Gilbert FS. Flower Visiting by Hoverflies (Syrphidae). J Biol Educ. 1981; 14(1):70-74.

Guimarães EF, Carvalho-Silva M, Monteiro D, Medeiros ES, Queiroz GA. Piperaceae. Retrieved July 11, 2015 from Lista de Espécies da Flora do Brasil, Rio de Janeiro: Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. 2015.

Jaramillo M, Manos P. Phylogeny and Patterns of Floral Diversity in the Genus Piper (Piperaceae). Am J Bot. 2001; 88(4):706-716.

Jaramillo M, Callejas R, Davidson C, SmithJF, Stevens AC, Tepe EA. Phylogeny of the tropical genus Piper using ITS and the Chloroplast intron psbJ-petA. Syst Bot. 2008; 33(4):647-660. Doi: 10.1600/036364408786500244.[CrossRef]

Johansen DA. Plant Microtechnique. New York: McGraw Hill Book; 1940. 523 p.

Kearns CA, Inouye DW. Techniques for Pollinations Biologists. Niwot: University Press of Colorado; 1993. p. 586.

Kikuchi DW, Lasso L, Dalling JW, Nadav N. Pollinators and Pollen Dispersal of Piper dilatatum (Piperaceae) on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. J Trop Ecol. 2007; 23(5):603-606. Doi: 10.1017/S0266467407004397.[CrossRef]

Larson BMH, Kevan PG, Inouye DW. Flies and Flowers: Taxonomic Diversity of Anthophilesand Pollinators. Can Entomol. 2001; 133(4):439-465. Doi: 10.4039/Ent133439-4.[CrossRef]

Lloyd DG, Webb CJ. The avoidance of interference between the presentations of pollen stigmas in angiosperms I. Dichogamy. N Z J Bot. 1986; 24(1):135-162.

Marquis RJ. Phenological variation in the Neotropical understory shrub Piper arieianum: causes and consequences. Ecology. 1988; 69(5):1552-1565.

Martin FW, Gregory LE. Mode of pollination and factors affecting fruit set in Piper nigrum L. in Puerto Rico. Crop Sci. 1962; 2(4):295-299.

Merrett M.F, Robertson AW, Peterson PG. Pollination Performance and vulnerability to pollination breakdown of sixteen native shrub species from New Zealand. N Z J Bot. 2007; 45(4):579-591. Doi: 10.1080/00288250709509740.[CrossRef]

Minussi LC, Alves-Santos I. Abelhas Nativas Versus Apis mellifera Linnaeus, Espécie Exótica (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Biosci J. 2007; 23(1):58-62.

Nogueira FH, Augusto SC. Amplitude de nicho e similaridade no uso de recursos florais por abelhas eussociais em uma área de Cerrado. Biosci J. 2007; 23(1):45-51.

O'Brien SP. Andromonoecy and fruit set in Leptospermum myrsinoides and L. continentale (Myrtaceae). Aust J Bot. 1994; 42(6):751-762.

Oliveira-Filho AT, Fontes MAL. Patterns of floristic differentiation among Atlantic Forests in Southeastern Brazil and the influence of climate. Biotropica. 2000; 32(4):793-810. Doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2000.tb00619.x.[CrossRef]

Primack RB, Lloyd DG. Andromonoecy in the New Zealand Montane Shrub Manuka, Leptospermum scoparium (Myrtaceae). Am J Bot. 1980; 67(3):361-368.

Quijano-Abril MA, Callejas-Posada R, Miranda-Esquivel DR. Areas of endemism and distribution patterns for Neotropical Piper species (Piperaceae). J Biogeogr. 2006; 33(7):1266-1278. Doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01501.x.[CrossRef]

R Development Core Team. R: A language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2010.

Radford AE, Dickison WC, Massey JR, Bell CR. Vascular Plant Systematics. New York: Harper and Row; 1974. p. 891.

Richards AJ. Plant Breeding Systems. 2 ed. London: Chapman and Hall; 1997. p. 529.

Rossetto FS, Vieira AOS. Vascular Flora of the Mata dos Godoy State Park, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil. Check List. 2013; 9(5):1020-1034.

Sakai AK, Weller SG. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants: a review of terminology, biogeographic patterns, ecological correlates, and phylogenetic approaches. In: Geber MA, Dawson TE, Delph LF, editor(s). Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering Plants. Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1999. p. 1-31.

Sasikumar B, George JK, Ravindran PN. Breeding behavior of black pepper. Indian J Genet Plant Breed. 1992; 52(1):17-21.

Semple KS. Pollination in Piperaceae. Ann Mo Bot Gard. 1974; 61(3):868-871.

Tebbs MC. Piperaceae. In: Kubitzki K, Rohwer JG, Bittrich V, editors. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1993. p. 516-520.

Thomazini MJ, Thomazini APBW. Diversidade de abelhas (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) em inflorescencias de Piper hispidinervum (C.DC.). Neotrop Entomol. 2002; 31(1):27-34.

Valentin-Silva A, Vieira MF. Phenology of two co-occurring Piper (Piperaceae) species in Brazil. Aust J Bot. 2015; 63(7):581-589. Doi: 10.1071/BT14332.[CrossRef]

Valentin-Silva A, Coelho VPM, Ventrella MC, Vieira MF. Timing of pollen release and stigma receptivity period of Piper vicosanum (Piperaceae): new insights into sexual reproduction of the genus. Am J Bot. 2015; 102(4):626-633. Doi: 10.3732/ajb.1400419.[CrossRef]

Veloso H.P, Rangel Filho ALR, Lima JCA. Classificação da vegetação brasileira, adaptada a um sistema universal. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 1991. p. 123.

Yuncker TG. The Piperaceae of Brazil I: Piper-Group I, II, III, IV. Hoehnea. 1972; 2:19-366.

Yuncker TG. The Piperaceae of Brazil II: Piper: Group V; Ottonia; Pothomorphe; Sarcorhachis. Hoehnea. 1973; 3:29-284.

John Charles Donato Rondón.
Vargas-Rojas DL, Vieira MF. Sex expression, breeding system and pollinators of Piper caldense (Piperaceae) in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Acta biol. Colomb. 2017; 22(3):370-378. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/abc.v22n3.61556

Referencias

Carvalho-Okano RM, Alves SA. Piperaceae C. Agardh da Estação Experimental Mata do Paraíso, Viçosa, MG. Acta Bot Bras. 1998;12(3):497-513.

Dafni A, Kevan PG, Husbans BC, editors. Practical Pollination Biology. Cambridge: Enviroquest Ltd.; 2005. 315 p.

Figueiredo RA, Sazima M. Pollination Biology of Piperaceae Species in Southeastern Brazil. Ann Bot. 2000;85(4):455-460. Doi:10.1006/anbo.1999.1087 p.

Fleming TH. Coexistence of Five Sympatric Piper (Piperaceae) Species in a Tropical Dry Forest. Ecology. 1985;66(3):688-700.

Gilbert FS. Flower Visiting by Hoverflies (Syrphidae). J Biol Educ. 1981;14(1):70-74.

Guimarães EF, Carvalho-Silva M, Monteiro D, Medeiros ES, Queiroz GA. Piperaceae. Retrieved July 11, 2015 from Lista de Espécies da Flora do Brasil, Rio de Janeiro: Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. 2015.

Jaramillo M, Manos P. Phylogeny and Patterns of Floral Diversity in the Genus Piper (Piperaceae). Am J Bot. 2001;88(4):706-716.

Jaramillo M, Callejas R, Davidson C, Smith JF, Stevens AC, Tepe EA. Phylogeny of the tropical genus Piper using ITS and the Chloroplast intron psbJ-petA. Syst Bot. 2008;33(4):647-660. Doi:10.1600/036364408786500244

Johansen DA. Plant Microtechnique. New York: McGraw Hill Book; 1940. 523 p.

Kearns CA, Inouye DW. Techniques for Pollinations Biologists. Niwot: University Press of Colorado; 1993. p. 586.

Kikuchi DW, Lasso L, Dalling JW, Nadav N. Pollinators and Pollen Dispersal of Piper dilatatum (Piperaceae) on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. J Trop Ecol. 2007;23(5):603-606. Doi:10.1017/S0266467407004397

Larson BMH, Kevan PG, Inouye DW. Flies and Flowers: Taxonomic Diversity of Anthophilesand Pollinators. Can Entomol. 2001;133(4):439-465. Doi:10.4039/Ent133439-4

Lloyd DG, Webb CJ. The avoidance of interference between the presentations of pollen stigmas in angiosperms I. Dichogamy. N Z J Bot. 1986;24(1):135-162.

Marquis RJ. Phenological variation in the Neotropical understory shrub Piper arieianum: causes and consequences. Ecology. 1988;69(5):1552-1565.

Martin FW, Gregory LE. Mode of pollination and factors affecting fruit set in Piper nigrum L. in Puerto Rico. Crop Sci. 1962;2(4):295-299.

Merrett M.F, Robertson AW, Peterson PG. Pollination Performance and vulnerability to pollination breakdown of sixteen native shrub species from New Zealand. N Z J Bot. 2007;45(4):579-591. Doi:10.1080/00288250709509740

Minussi LC, Alves-Santos I. Abelhas Nativas Versus Apis mellifera Linnaeus, Espécie Exótica (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Biosci J. 2007;23(1):58-62.

Nogueira FH, Augusto SC. Amplitude de nicho e similaridade no uso de recursos florais por abelhas eussociais em uma área de Cerrado. Biosci J. 2007;23(1):45-51.

O’Brien SP. Andromonoecy and fruit set in Leptospermum myrsinoides and L. continentale (Myrtaceae). Aust J Bot. 1994;42(6):751-762.

Oliveira-Filho AT, Fontes MAL. Patterns of floristic differentiation among Atlantic Forests in Southeastern Brazil and the influence of climate. Biotropica. 2000;32(4):793-810. Doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2000.tb00619.x

Primack RB, Lloyd DG. Andromonoecy in the New Zealand Montane Shrub Manuka, Leptospermum scoparium (Myrtaceae). Am J Bot. 1980;67(3):361-368.

Quijano-Abril MA, Callejas-Posada R, Miranda-Esquivel DR. Areas of endemism and distribution patterns for Neotropical Piper species (Piperaceae). J Biogeogr. 2006;33(7):1266-1278. Doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01501.x

R Development Core Team. R: A language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2010.

Radford AE, Dickison WC, Massey JR, Bell CR. Vascular Plant Systematics. New York: Harper and Row; 1974. p. 891.

Richards AJ. Plant Breeding Systems. 2 ed. London: Chapman and Hall; 1997. p. 529

Rossetto FS, Vieira AOS. Vascular Flora of the Mata dos Godoy State Park, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil. Check List. 2013;9(5):1020-1034.

Sakai AK, Weller SG. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants: a review of terminology, biogeographic patterns, ecological correlates, and phylogenetic approaches. In: Geber MA, Dawson TE, Delph LF, editor(s). Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering Plants. Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1999. p. 1-31.

Sasikumar B, George JK, Ravindran PN. Breeding behavior of black pepper. Indian J Genet Plant Breed. 1992;52(1):17-21.

Semple KS. Pollination in Piperaceae. Ann Mo Bot Gard. 1974;61(3):868-871.

Tebbs MC. Piperaceae. In: Kubitzki K, Rohwer JG, Bittrich V, editors. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; ,1993. p. 516-520.

Thomazini MJ, Thomazini APBW. Diversidade de abelhas (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) em inflorescências de Piper hispidinervum (C.DC.). Neotrop Entomol. 2002;31(1):27-34.

Valentin-Silva A, Vieira MF. Phenology of two co-occurring Piper (Piperaceae) species in Brazil. Aust J Bot. 2015;63(7):581-589. Doi:10.1071/BT14332

Valentin-Silva A, Coelho VPM, Ventrella MC, Vieira MF. Timing of pollen release and stigma receptivity period of Piper vicosanum (Piperaceae): new insights into sexual reproduction of the genus. Am J Bot. 2015:102(4):626-633. Doi:10.3732/ajb.1400419

Veloso H.P, Rangel Filho ALR, Lima JCA. Classificação da vegetação brasileira, adaptada a um sistema universal. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 1991. p. 123.

Yuncker TG. The Piperaceae of Brazil I: Piper - Group I, II, III, IV. Hoehnea. 1972; 2:19-366.

Yuncker TG. The Piperaceae of Brazil II: Piper: Group V; Ottonia; Pothomorphe; Sarcorhachis. Hoehnea. 1973; 3:29-284.

Cómo citar

APA

Faria Vieira, M. y Vargas Rojas, D. L. (2017). Sex expression, breeding system and pollinators of Piper caldense (PIPERACEAE) in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Acta Biológica Colombiana, 22(3), 370–378. https://doi.org/10.15446/abc.v22n3.61556

ACM

[1]
Faria Vieira, M. y Vargas Rojas, D.L. 2017. Sex expression, breeding system and pollinators of Piper caldense (PIPERACEAE) in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Acta Biológica Colombiana. 22, 3 (sep. 2017), 370–378. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/abc.v22n3.61556.

ACS

(1)
Faria Vieira, M.; Vargas Rojas, D. L. Sex expression, breeding system and pollinators of Piper caldense (PIPERACEAE) in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Acta biol. Colomb. 2017, 22, 370-378.

ABNT

FARIA VIEIRA, M.; VARGAS ROJAS, D. L. Sex expression, breeding system and pollinators of Piper caldense (PIPERACEAE) in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Acta Biológica Colombiana, [S. l.], v. 22, n. 3, p. 370–378, 2017. DOI: 10.15446/abc.v22n3.61556. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/actabiol/article/view/61556. Acesso em: 19 abr. 2024.

Chicago

Faria Vieira, Milene, y Diana Lucia Vargas Rojas. 2017. «Sex expression, breeding system and pollinators of Piper caldense (PIPERACEAE) in the Brazilian Atlantic forest». Acta Biológica Colombiana 22 (3):370-78. https://doi.org/10.15446/abc.v22n3.61556.

Harvard

Faria Vieira, M. y Vargas Rojas, D. L. (2017) «Sex expression, breeding system and pollinators of Piper caldense (PIPERACEAE) in the Brazilian Atlantic forest», Acta Biológica Colombiana, 22(3), pp. 370–378. doi: 10.15446/abc.v22n3.61556.

IEEE

[1]
M. Faria Vieira y D. L. Vargas Rojas, «Sex expression, breeding system and pollinators of Piper caldense (PIPERACEAE) in the Brazilian Atlantic forest», Acta biol. Colomb., vol. 22, n.º 3, pp. 370–378, sep. 2017.

MLA

Faria Vieira, M., y D. L. Vargas Rojas. «Sex expression, breeding system and pollinators of Piper caldense (PIPERACEAE) in the Brazilian Atlantic forest». Acta Biológica Colombiana, vol. 22, n.º 3, septiembre de 2017, pp. 370-8, doi:10.15446/abc.v22n3.61556.

Turabian

Faria Vieira, Milene, y Diana Lucia Vargas Rojas. «Sex expression, breeding system and pollinators of Piper caldense (PIPERACEAE) in the Brazilian Atlantic forest». Acta Biológica Colombiana 22, no. 3 (septiembre 1, 2017): 370–378. Accedido abril 19, 2024. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/actabiol/article/view/61556.

Vancouver

1.
Faria Vieira M, Vargas Rojas DL. Sex expression, breeding system and pollinators of Piper caldense (PIPERACEAE) in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Acta biol. Colomb. [Internet]. 1 de septiembre de 2017 [citado 19 de abril de 2024];22(3):370-8. Disponible en: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/actabiol/article/view/61556

Descargar cita

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations3

1. Daniel de Brito-Machado, Ygor Jessé Ramos, Anna Carina Antunes e Defaveri, George Azevedo de Queiroz, Elsie Franklin Guimarães, Davyson de Lima Moreira. (2022). Volatile Chemical Variation of Essential Oils and Their Correlation with Insects, Phenology, Ontogeny and Microclimate: Piper mollicomum Kunth, a Case of Study. Plants, 11(24), p.3535. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11243535.

2. Sandeep Sen, Ganesan Rengaian. (2022). A Review on the Ecology, Evolution and Conservation of Piper (Piperaceae) in India: Future Directions and Opportunities. The Botanical Review, 88(3), p.333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-021-09269-9.

3. Adriano Valentin-Silva. (2023). Reproductive biology of Piper species (Piperaceae): a review to link the past to the future. Rodriguésia, 74 https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-7860202374030.

Dimensions

PlumX

Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo

842

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.