Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Published
Transición paradigmática en la industria agro-biotecnológica mundial
Paradigmatic transition in the global agrobiotechnology industry
Transição paradigmática no setor global de agrobiotecnologia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/ede.v33n63.107479Keywords:
Innovación fundamental, Biotecnología agrícola, Transición paradigmática, Estructura mundial (es)Fundamental innovation, Agrobiotechnology, Paradigmatic transition, World structure (en)
inovação fundamental, biotecnologia agrícola, transição de paradigma, estrutura global (pt)
Downloads
En este artículo se realiza una caracterización del proceso de transición paradigmática que se está viviendo en la industria agro-biotecnológica mundial. El resultado principal del análisis realizado señala que la trayectoria de innovación que se viene desplegando en esta industria a partir de la emergencia de la edición génica como innovación fundamental implica un corte relativo respecto de lo ocurrido con la transgénesis vegetal. En el marco de un conjunto de factores de continuidad, emergen elementos de cambio que tienden a promover una reducción de las barreras tecnológicas e institucionales para el desarrollo de nuevos productos. Esta reconfiguración de las condiciones productivas existentes representa, a su vez, una oportunidad para el reposicionamiento de los países que tradicionalmente han jugado un papel subordinado en la dinámica innovativa de esta industria.
In this article, we characterize the process of paradigmatic transition that is taking place in the global agrobiotechnology industry. As a main result, the study shows that the trajectory of innovation that is being deployed in this industry from the emergency of the genetic edition as a fundamental innovation implies a relative cut regarding that of the plant transgenesis. Despite some continuity factors, elements of change are emerging and tend to promote a reduction in the technological and institutional barriers to the development of new products. This reconfiguration of the productive conditions also represents an opportunity for countries that have traditionally played a subordinate role in the industry’s innovative dynamic.
Este artigo caracteriza o processo de transição paradigmática que está ocorrendo no setor global de agrobiotecnologia. O principal resultado da análise realizada indica que a trajetória de inovação que vem se desenvolvendo nesse setor desde o surgimento da edição de genes como uma inovação fundamental implica uma ruptura relativa em relação ao que aconteceu com a transgênese de plantas. Dentro da estrutura de um conjunto de fatores de continuidade, surgem elementos de mudança que tendem a promover uma redução das barreiras tecnológicas e institucionais ao desenvolvimento de novos produtos. Essa reconfiguração das condições de produção existentes representa, por sua vez, uma oportunidade para o reposicionamento dos países que tradicionalmente desempenham um papel subordinado na dinâmica inovadora desse setor.
References
Abernathy, W., & Utterback, J. (1978). Patterns of Industrial Innovation. Technology Review, 64(7), 254-228. http://teaching.up.edu/bus580/bps/Abernathy%20and%20Utterback%2C%201978.pdf
Altenburg, T., Scmitz, H., & Stamm, A. (2008). Breakthrough? China’s and India’s Transition from Production to Innovation. World Development, 36(2), 325-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.06.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.06.011
Bagley, M. (2021). Edición génica aplicada a la agricultura: políticas de patentes y licencias CRISPR en América Latina [documento para discusión No. 876]. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (BID). https://doi.org/10.18235/0003409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18235/0003409
Bisang, R. (2022). Del sector agropecuario a las redes agroindustriales: revisando supuestos del modelo de Stop and Go. Desarrollo Económico, 62(236), 1-26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48695943
Bonny, S. (2017). Corporate Concentration and Technological Change in the Global Seed Industry. Sustainability, 9(9),1632. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091632 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091632
Brookes, G., & Barfoot, P. (2006). GM crops: The First Ten Years-Global Socio-Economic and Environmental Impacts. PG Economics Limited.
Deconinck, K. (2020). Concentration in Seed and Biotech Markets: Extent, Causes, and Impacts. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 12(1), 129-147. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-102319-100751 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-102319-100751
Dederer, H. G., & Hamburger, D. (2019). Regulation of Genome Editing in Plant Biotechnology. Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17119-3
Drahos, P., & Braithwaite, J. (2017). Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy? Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315092683
Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of economic literature, 16(3), 1120-1171. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2726526
Feingold, S. E., Bonnecarrére, V., Nepomuceno, A., Hinrichsen, P., Cardozo Tellez, L., Molinari, H., Barba, P., Eyherabide, G., Ceretta, S., & Dujack, C. (2018). Edición génica: una oportunidad para la región. RIA. Revista de investigaciones agropecuarias, 44(3), 424-427. http://ref.scielo.org/7f5c49
Freeman, C. (2002). Continental, National and Sub-National Innovation Systems— Complementarity and Economic Growth. Research Policy, 31(2), 191-211. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035306176.00011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00136-6
Freeman, C., & Pérez, C. (1988). Structural Crises of Adjustment: Business Cycles and Investment. En G. Dosi et al. (eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory (pp. 39-62). Pinter.
Fukuda-Parr, S. (2006): The Gene Revolution: GM Crops and Unequal Development. Taylor & Francis.
Goberna, M. F., Whelan, A. I., Godoy, P., & Lewi, D. M. (2022). Genomic Editing: The Evolution in Regulatory Management Accompanying Scientific Progress. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.835378 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.835378
González, M., Massa, G., & Feingold, G. (2021). Edición génica con el sistema CRISPR/Cas9: historia de su descubrimiento y alcances en agricultura. Avances en Química, 16(1), 11-20. https://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/handle/20.500.12123/13347
Goulet F., & Hubert M., (2020). Making a Place for Alternative Technologies: The Case of Agricultural Bio-Inputs in Argentina. Review of Policy Research 37(4), 535-555. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12384
International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA). (2017). Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops in 2017: Biotech Crop Adoption Surges as Economic Benefits Accumulate in 22 Years, ISAAA Brief Nº53. https://www.agi.gov.vn/files/files/ISAAA/ISAAA%20Brief%20No_%2053%20-%202017_compressed.pdf
International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA). (2019). Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops in 2019: Biotech Crops Drive Socio-Economic Development and Sustainable Environment in the New Frontier. ISAAA Brief, 55. https://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/55/
James, C., & Krattiger, A. F. (1996). Global Review of The Field Testing and Commercialization of Transgenic Plants: 1986 to 1995. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA). https://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/01/download/isaaa-brief-01-1996.pdf
Kalaitzandonakes, N., & Zahringer, K.A. (2018). Structural Change and Innovation in the Global Agricultural Input Sector. En: N., Kalaitzandonakes, E., Carayannis, E., Grigoroudis, & S., Rozakis (eds.), From Agriscience to Agribusiness. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management (pp. 75-99). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67958-7_4
Kaplinsky, R. (1998). Globalisation, Industrialisation and Sustainable Growth: The Pursuit of the Nth Rent. [IDS Discussion Paper No. 365] University of Sussex. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Globalisation%2C-Industrialisation-and-Sustainable-of-Kaplinsky/43e088d605eb1ed00c31c17b8b9888b3b7305d79
Kiran, U., & Pandey, N. K. (2020). Transgenic Food Crops: Public Acceptance and IPR. En U. Kiran, M. Abdin, & A. Kamaluddin (eds.), Transgenic Technology Based Value Addition in Plant Biotechnology (pp. 273-307). Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818632-9.00012-5
Lema, M. (2019). Regulatory Aspects of Gene Editing in Argentina. Transgenic Research, 28(2), 147-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-019-00145-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-019-00145-2
Malerba, F., & Orsénigo, L. (1997). Technological Regimes and Sectoral Patterns of Innovative Activities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(1), 83-117. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/6.1.83 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/6.1.83
Massa, G. A., González, M. N., & Feingold, S. E. (2021). Avances y desafíos para la edición génica para el mejoramiento de plantas. Revista Farmacéutica, 162(2). 36-42. https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/149636
McDougall, P. (2016). The Cost of New Agrochemical Product Discovery, Development and Registration in 1995, 2000, 2005-8 and 2010-2014. https://croplife.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Cost-of-CP-report-FINAL.pdf
Nishimoto, R. (2019) Global Trends in The Crop Protection Industry. Journal of Pesticide Science, 44(3), 141-147. https://doi.org/10.1584/jpestics.D19-101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1584/jpestics.D19-101
Organización Mundial del Comercio (1994). Acuerdo sobre los aspectos de los derechos de propiedad intelectual relacionados con el comercio. https://www.wto.org/spanish/docs_s/legal_s/27-trips.pdf
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2009). The Bioeconomy to 2030. Designing a Policy Agenda. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/futures/long-termtechnologicalsocietalchallenges/thebioeconomyto2030designingapolicyagenda.htm
Parayil, G. (2003). Mapping Technological Trajectories of the Green Revolution and the Gene Revolution from Modernization to Globalization. Research Policy, 32(6), 971-990. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00106-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00106-3
Patton, D. (25 de enero de 2022). China to Allow Gene-Edited Crops in Push for Food Security. Reuters. Disponible en https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-drafts-new-rules-allow-gene-edited-crops-2022-01-25/
Pérez, C. (2010). Dinamismo tecnológico e inclusión social en América Latina: una estrategia de desarrollo productivo basada en los recursos naturales. Revista CEPAL, 100, 123-145. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/11357/100123145_es.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.18356/0b1cb6b0-es
Pistorius, C. and Utterback, J. (1997). Multi-Mode Interaction among Technologies. Research Policy, 26(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00916-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00916-X
Qaim, M. (2015). Genetically Modified Crops and Agricultural Development. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137405722
Rapela, M. (2020). La interacción entre los derechos de propiedad intelectual y los procesos de innovación abierta aplicados en el mejoramiento vegetal moderno. Revista Iberoamericana de la Propiedad Intelectual,13, 9-33. https://riu.austral.edu.ar/handle/123456789/1086 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26422/RIPI.2020.1300.rap
Ruttan, V. W. (1986). Technical Change and Innovation in Agriculture. En R. Landau, & N. Rosenberg (eds.). The Positive Sum Strategy (pp. 333-356). National Academy Press.
Secretaría del Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica (2000). Protocolo de Cartagena sobre Seguridad de la Biotecnología del Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica: texto y anexos. Montreal: Secretaría del Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica. https://bch.cbd.int/protocol/outreach/new%20protocol%20text%202021/cbd%20cartagenaprotocol%202020%20es-f%20web.pdf
Sovová, T., Kerins, G., Demnerová, K., & Ovesna. J. (2016). Genome Editing with Engineered Nucleases in Economically Important Animals and Plants: State of The Art in The Research Pipeline. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 21(1), 41-62. https://doi.org/10.21775/cimb.021.041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21775/cimb.021.041
Sztulwark, S., & Girard, M. (2020). La edición génica y la estructura económica de la agrobiotecnología mundial. Una mirada desde los países adoptantes, Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad-CTS, 15(44), 11-41. http://ojs.revistacts.net/index.php/CTS/article/view/157
Sztulwark, S., & Girard, M. (2016). Genetically Modified Seeds and The De-Commodification of Primary Goods. International Journal of Biotechnology, 14(2), 132-150. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBT.2016.077955 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBT.2016.077955
Teece, D. (2006). Reflections on “Profiting from innovation”. Research Policy, 35(8), 1131–1146. DOI: 1016/j.respol.2006.09.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.009
Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy. Research policy, 15(6), 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2
Tylecote, A. (2019). Biotechnology as a New Techno-Economic Paradigm that Will Help Drive the World Economy and Mitigate Climate Change. Research Policy, 48(4), 858–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.001
Wunderlich, S., & Gatto, K. A. (2015). Consumer Perception of Genetically Modified Organisms and Sources of Information. Advances in Nutrition, 6(6), 842-851. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.115.008870 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3945/an.115.008870
How to Cite
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Reproduction is authorized nonprofit materials, citing the source.
