Publicado
Cesare Beccaria y la percepción (estética) como fundamento en su política-criminal
Cesare Beccaria and Perception (Aesthetics) as the Basis of his Criminal Policy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v72n181.108109Palabras clave:
C. Beccaria, castigo, estética, criminología (es)C. Beccaria, penalty, aesthetics, criminology (en)
El artículo hace un análisis del discurso de Beccaria contenido en su libro Dei delitti e delle pene y extrae las ideas relativas a la percepción como argumento considerable dentro de su propuesta político-criminal para fundar la utilización de ciertos instrumentos de la penalidad, con base en su pensamiento sobre la estética, entendida como un estudio sobre la percepción, realizado en algunas investigaciones personales. Igualmente, toma ciertas ideas de la epistemología gravitante de la época, para fundar su desiderátum político-criminal.
The purpose of the article is to analyze Beccaria's discourse contained in his book Dei delitti e delle pene, extracting from him the ideas related to perception, which are a considerable argument within his political-criminal proposal, to found the use of certain instruments of penalties. For this it is based on his thinking about aesthetics, which was understood as a study on perception, and which Beccaria had analyzed in some personal research on the subject. Likewise, he takes certain ideas from the gravitating epistemology of the time, to found his political-criminal desideratum.
Referencias
Adriaenssen, An, and Ivo Aertsen. “Punitive Attitudes: Towards an Operationalization to Measure Individual Punitivity in a Multidimensional Way.” European Journal of Criminology 12.1 (2015): 92-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370814535376
Aitkin, Donald; Michael Kahan and Donald E. Stokes. “Australian National Political Attitudes, 1967: Version 1.” ADA, 1984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07282
Allport, Gordon W. “The Composition of Political Attitudes.” American Journal of Sociology 35.2 (1929): 220-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/214980
Armborst, Andreas. “How Fear of Crime Affects Punitive Attitudes.” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 23.3 (2017): 461-481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-017-9342-5
Arroyo Zapatero, Luis Alberto. “Cesare Beccaria y la moderna política criminal en España.” Revista jurídica de Castilla - La Mancha 10 (1990): 7-16.
Asua Batarrita, Adela. “Reivindicación o superación del programa Beccaria.” La pena de muerte. Problemática histórica y contemporánea. Editado por Asua Batarrita, Adela. Universidad de Deusto, 1990.
Audegean, Philippe. “Droit Naturel et Droit a La Vie. Beccaria Lecteur de Hobbes.” Diciottesimo Secolo 4 (2019): 33-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/rdl.004.0363
Aumont, Jacques. De l’esthétique au présent. De Boeck Supérieur, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.aumon.1998.01
Bacigalupo, Enrique. “Filosofía e ideología de las teorías de la pena.” Derecho y Humanidades 1.16 (2010). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-2517.2010.16000
Badawy, Adam, Kristina Lerman, and Emilio Ferrara. “Who Falls for Online Political Manipulation?” Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Conference. ACM, 2019. 162–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3308560.3316494
Baker, Joseph O, and Alexis L Booth. “Hell to Pay: Religion and Punitive Ideology among the American Public.” Punishment & Society 18.2 (2016): 151-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474516635886
Balthasar, Nicolas. “Art, esthétique, beauté, philosophie de l’art et métaphysique.” Revue Philosophique de Louvain 34.33 (1932): 70–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/phlou.1932.2649
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Meditationes Philosophicae de Nonnullis Ad Poema Pertinentibus: Ristampa Dell’unica Edizione del 1735. Forgotten Books, 2018.
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Reflexiones Filosóficas Acerca de La Poesía. Traducido por José Antonio Miguez Aguilar. Biblioteca de Iniciación filosófica, 1964.
Beccaria, Cesare. De los delitos y de las penas. Traducido por Juan Antonio de las Casas. Alianza Editorial, 2002.
Beccaria, Cesare. Dei delitti e delle pene. Édité par Renato Fabietti, 1973.
Bedggood, David R. “The Measurement of Political Attitudes and the Concept of Ideology: USA and NZ.” Political Science 24.1 (1972): 15-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003231877202400102
Behrends, Okko, and Ralf Dreier. Gerechtigkeit und Geschichte: Beiträge eines Symposions zum 65. Geburtstag von Malte Diesselhorst. Wallstein Verlag, 1996.
Bretschneider, Falk. “Michel Porret, Élisabeth Salvi, Cesare Beccaria. La controverse pénale, xviiie-xxie siècle, Rennes, Presses universitaires de Rennes, 2015, 349” Revue dhistoire moderne contemporaine 66-4.4 (2019): 210-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/rhmc.664.0210
Bueno Arús, Francisco. “Los fines de la pena y la pena de prisión en Beccaria y en la política criminal española contemporánea.” Cuadernos de política criminal 38 (1989): 301-312.
Butler, William E. The Nakaz of Catherine the Great: Collected Texts. Edited by Vladimir A. Tomsinov. Edición: Multi-language. The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd., 2010.
Calamandrei, Piero. “Prefazione.” Dei delitti e delle pene. Firenze: F. Le Monnier, 1945.
Carrara, Francesco. Programma del corso di diritto criminale II. Giusti, 1877.
Castro, Vítor, and Rodrigo Martins. “Budgets, Expenditure Composition and Political Manipulation.” International Review of Applied Economics 33.2 (2019): 172-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2017.1379474
Cerezo Domínguez, Ana Isabel. “Origen y evolución histórica de la prisión.” La prisión en España: una perspectiva criminológica. Coords. Editado por Ana Isabel Cerezo Domínguez y Elisa García España. Comares, 2007. 1-22.
Condillac, Étienne Bonnot de. Tratado de Las Sensaciones. Traducido por Gregorio Weinberg. Editorial Universitaria de Buenos Aires, 1963.
DeLisi, Matt. “The Affordable Hypothesis: Punitive Beliefs, Violent Beliefs, and Race.” Journal of Criminal Justice 29.2 (2001): 101-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2352(00)00085-4
Elliott, Bridget, and Michael Windover. The Routledge Companion to Art Deco. Routledge, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429032165
Feuerbach, Paul Johann Anselm. Lehrbuch Des Gemeinen In Deutschland Gültigen Peinlichen Rechts. Heyer, 1840.
Foucault, Michel. Surveiller et punir: naissance de la prison. Gallimard, 1975.
Froman, Lewis A. “Learning Political Attitudes.” Western Political Quarterly 15.2 (1962): 304-313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/106591296201500208
Ganser, Daniele. NATO’s Secret Armies: Operation GLADIO and Terrorism in Western Europe. Routledge, 2004.
Ganser, Daniele. “The 'Strategy of Tension' in the Cold War Period.” Journal of 9/11 Studies 39 (2014): 1-19.
Goldberg, Philip A., and M. J. Stark. “Some Personality and Attitude Correlates of Political Choice.” Psychological Reports 17 (1965): 627-631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1965.17.2.627
Hatemi, Peter K., and Brad Verhulst. “Political Attitudes Develop Independently of Personality Traits.” PLOS ONE 10.7 (2015): e0134072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134072
Haviland, Jeannette M. “The Punitive Beliefs and Behaviors of Adolescent Delinquent Boys.” Developmental Psychology 13.6 (1977): 677-678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.13.6.677
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Vorlesungen über die Aesthetik. Duncker und Humblot, 1835.
Higgins, Jerry. “Authoritarianism and Candidate Preference.” Psychological Reports 16.2 (1965): 603–604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1965.16.2.603
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Penguin Books, 1968. Penguin Classics.
Hume, David. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Simon & Brown, 2011.
Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2012.
Idrovo, René, and Sandra Pauletto. “Immersive Point-of-Audition.” Music, Sound, and the Moving Image 13.1 (2019): 31-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/msmi.2019.3
Jiménez Villarejo, José. “Estudio preliminar: Releyendo a Beccaria tras medio siglo de experiencia jurisdiccional.” Tratado de los delitos y de las penas. Comares, 2008.
Kerpelman, Larry C. “Personality and Attitude Correlates of Political Candidate Preference.” Journal of Social Psychology 76.2 (1968): 219–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1968.9933616
Kinder, Donald R. “Political Person Perception: The Asymmetrical Influence of Sentiment and Choice on Perceptions of Presidential Candidates.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36.8 (1978): 859-871. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.36.8.859
Klein, Naomi. The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. Penguin, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/194277860800100215
Koessler, Trent, and Harold Hill. “Focusing on an Illusion: Accommodating to Perceived Depth?” Vision Research 154 (2019): 131-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2018.11.001
Lau, Richard R. “Negativity in Political Perception.” Political Behavior 4.4 (1982): 353-377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986969
Machiavelli, Niccolò. Il Principe: edizione del cinquecentennale. Edito da Carmine Donzelli and Gabriele Pedullà. Donzelli, 2013.
Maki, Takuma, and Hideyoshi Yanagisawa. “A Methodology for Multisensory Product Experience Design Using Cross-Modal Effect: A Case of SLR Camera.” Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design 1.1 (2019): 3801-3810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.387
Markus, Gregory B. “Stability and Change in Political Attitudes: Observed, Recalled, and ‘Explained.’” Political Behavior 8.1 (1986): 21-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987591
Mazza, Emilio. “Mille Choses de Sa Part. Hume, Ramsay and Beccaria.” Diciottesimo Secolo 4 (2019): 121-129.
Mondolfo, Rodolfo. “Beccaria Filosofo.” Rivista di Filosofia 16.1 (1925): 1.
Mondolfo, Rodolfo. Cesare Beccaria. Nuova Accademia Editrice, 1960.
Monroe, Kristen R. “Political Manipulation of the Economy: A Closer Look at Political Business Cycles.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 13.1 (1983): 37-49.
Mon-Williams, Mark, and James R. Tresilian. “Ordinal Depth Information from Accommodation?” Ergonomics 43.3 (2000): 391-404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/001401300184486
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Also sprach Zarathustra. Nikol Verlagsges, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/9783050057385
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Die fröhliche Wissenschaft: La gaya scienza. Anaconda Verlag, 2009.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Zur Genealogie der Moral: Eine Streitschrift. Reclam, Philipp, jun. GmbH, Verlag, 1998.
Paulo, Norbert, and Christoph Bublitz. “Pow(d)Er to the People? Voter Manipulation, Legitimacy, and the Relevance of Moral Psychology for Democratic Theory.” Neuroethics 12.1 (2019): 55-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-016-9266-7
Payne, Brian K et al. “What Drives Punitive Beliefs?: Demographic Characteristics and Justifications for Sentencing.” Journal of Criminal Justice 32.3 (2004): 195-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2004.02.007
Porret, Michel, and Philippe Audegean, eds. Cesare Beccaria: la controverse pénale (XVIIIe-XXIe siècle). Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pur.88333
Radbruch, Gustav, and Gerhard Haney. Feuerbach. Müller GmbH, 1997.
Rosenberg, Max. “Analyzing Political Attitudes.” The Social Studies 33.2 (1942): 68-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1936.11016681
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Discours sur l’economie politique. Flammarion, 1990.
Schofield, Philip. “The First Steps Rightly Directed in the Track of Legislation: Jeremy Bentham on Cesare Beccaria’s Essay on Crimes and Punishments.” Diciottesimo Secolo: Rivista della Società Italiana di Studi sul Secolo 18.4 (2019): 65-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21428/cb6ab371.0c7a3b13
Schüneman, Bernd. Consideraciones críticas sobre la situación espiritual de la ciencia jurídico penal alemana. Universidad Externado, 2001.
Shamir, Boas and Amos Drory. “Some Correlates of Prison Guards’ Beliefs.” Criminal Justice and Behavior 8 (1981): 233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009385488100800208
Shikiar, Richard. “The Perception of Politicians and Political Issues : A Multidimensional Scaling Approach.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 9.4 (1974): 461-477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0904_6
Smith, M. Brewster. “Personal Values as Determinants of a Political Attitude.” The Journal of Psychology 28.2 (1949): 477-486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1949.9916024
Tomás y Valiente, Francisco. “Estudio Preliminar.” De los delitos y las penas. Folio, 2002.
Torío, Ángel. “La pena de muerte. Problemática histórica y contemporánea.” El Pensamiento penal de Beccaria: su actualidad: ciclo de conferencias de Derecho penal con ocasión del 250 aniversario del nacimiento de Beccaria. Editado por Adela Asua. Universidad de Deusto, 1990. 95-102.
Verri, Pietro. Osservazioni sulla tortura. BUR, 2013.
White, Mark D. “Political Manipulation of a Public Firm’s Objective Function.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 49.4 (2002): 487-499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00009-4
Cómo citar
MODERN-LANGUAGE-ASSOCIATION
ACM
ACS
APA
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Los derechos son del autor(es), quien(es) puede re-publicar en parte o en su totalidad el documento ya publicado en la revista siempre y cuando se dé el debido reconocimiento a Ideas y Valores

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
De acuerdo con la Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional. Se autoriza copiar, redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato, siempre y cuando se conceda el crédito a los autores de los textos y a Ideas y Valores como fuente de publicación original. No se permite el uso comercial de copia o distribución de contenidos, así como tampoco la adaptación, derivación o transformación alguna de estos sin la autorización previa de los autores y de la dirección de Ideas y Valores. Para mayor información sobre los términos de esta licencia puede consultar: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.













