Published
Lean Six Sigma Tools for Efficient Milking Processes in Small-Scale Dairy Farms
Herramientas lean six sigma para un proceso de ordeño eficiente en granjas lecheras de pequeña escala
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.101868Keywords:
rural management, small entrepreneurs, lean six sigma production, dairy farming, productivity improvement (en)gestión rural, pequeños empresarios, producción lean six sigma, ganadería lechera, mejora de la productividad (es)
This research paper aims to use lean six sigma tools to handle milk in small Brazilian dairy estates. The search for efficiency in this process preponderates in all productive sectors. However, it is still not exploited in the dairy chain, specifically by small-scale producers, although milking is the main income for many of them. In Brazil, small producers are the main suppliers of the chain, and maintaining their competitiveness requires specific actions. Therefore, through the action-research method, four small producers in the center-west of the state of São Paulo, Brazil, were involved in identifying problems in their milking management process, investigating and implementing practical solutions. To this effect, lean tools such as flowcharts, Ishikawa diagrams, value stream mapping, and PDCA cycles were employed, and six feasible improvements were defined. The successful implementation of said improvements led to the acquisition of knowledge by small producers, who received financial returns, i.e., an increase in the amount paid per liter of milk. This research shows that, through interdisciplinarity, positive solutions to problems of different and complex natures, such as those in the dairy chain, can be obtained.
Este artículo de investigación tiene por objetivo utilizar herramientas lean six sigma en el manejo de la leche en propiedades pequeñas de Brasil. La búsqueda de la eficiencia en este proceso es preponderante en todos los sectores productivos. Sin embargo, esta aún no se ha explotado en la cadena láctea, específicamente en el caso de productores de pequeña escala, si bien el ordeño representa el principal ingreso de muchos de ellos. En Brasil, los productores pequeños son los principales proveedores de la cadena, y mantener su competitividad requiere acciones específicas. Por lo tanto, mediante el método de investigación-acción, se involucró a cuatro pequeños productores del centro-oeste del estado de São Paulo, Brasil, investigando e implementando soluciones prácticas. Para este fin, se emplearon herramientas lean como diagramas de flujo, diagramas Ishikawa, mapas de flujo de valor, y ciclos PDCA, definiendo seis mejoras viables. La implementación exitosa de dichas mejoras llevó a la adquisición de conocimientos por parte de los pequeños productores, que recibieron rendimientos financieros, i.e., un aumento en la cantidad pagada por litro de leche. Esta investigación muestra que, a través de la interdisciplinaridad, se pueden obtener soluciones a problemas de naturalezas distintas y complejas, como es el caso de aquellos en la cadena láctea.
References
Bichler, M., Heinzl, A., and van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2017). Business analytics and data science: Once again? Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59, 77-79. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-016-0461-1
Bodenmueller Filho, A., Damasceno, J. C., Previdelli, I. T. S., Santana, R. G., Ramos, C. E. C. O., and dos Santos, G.T. (2010). Typology of production systems based on the milk characteristics, Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 39, 1832-1839. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010000800028
Casali, M., de Mendonça, B. S., de Brito, M. M., dos Santos, M. G. R., Lima, P. G. L., Siqueira, T. T. S., Damasceno, J. C., and Bánkuti, F. I. (2020). Information asymmetry among dairy producers in Paraná, Brazil. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 41, 293-304. http://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n1p293
Coughlan, P., and Coghlan, D. (2002). Action research for operations management. International Journal of Opera-tions & Production Management, 22, 220-240. http://doi.org/10.1108/01443570210417515
Fagnani, R., Nero, L. A., and Rosolem, C. P. (2021). Why knowledge is the best way to reduce the risks associated with raw milk and raw milk products. Journal of Dairy Re-search, 88, 238-243. http://doi.org/10.1017/S002202992100039X
FAO (2021). Crops and livestock products – FAOSTAT. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
FAO and IDF (2013). Guide to good dairy farming practice. Animal production and health guidelines. http://www.fao.org/3/ba0027e/ba0027e00.htm
Foshchii, M., and Krasnokutska, N. (2021). Features of the lean production implementation at the enterprises of Ukraine’s dairy industry. Three Seas Economic Journal, 2, 48-53. http://doi.org/10.30525/2661-5150/2021-2-8
Francescatto, M., Neuenfeldt Júnior, A., Kubota, F.I., Guimarães, G. and de Oliveira, B. (2023). Lean Six Sigma case studies literature overview: Critical success factors and difficulties. International Journal of Productivity and Perfor-mance Management, 72, 1-23. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2021-0681
Gabler, M. T., Tozer, P. R. and Heinrichs, A. J. (2000). Devel-opment of a cost analysis spreadsheet for calculating the costs to raise a replacement dairy heifer. Journal of Dairy Science, 83, 1104-1109. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74975-7
Groenendaal, H., Zagmutt, F. J., Patton, E. A., and Wells, S. J. (2015). Cost-benefit analysis of vaccination against Myco-bacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis in dairy cattle, given its cross-reactivity with tuberculosis tests. Journal of Dairy Sci-ence, 98, 6070-6084. http://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8914
Grunitzky, L., Centenaro, J. R., Oliveira, A. G., Cheffer, I. M., and Braz, P. H. (2020). Vaccination in dairy cattle: An animal welfare practice known to producers? PUBVET, 14, 1-4. http://doi.org/10.31533/pubvet.v14n6a582.1-4
Hansen, B.G. and Stræte, E.P. (2020). Dairy farmers’ job satis-faction and the influence of automatic milking systems. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 92, 100328. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2020.100328
Hogeveen, H., and Ouweltjes, W. (2003). Sensors and man-agement support in high-technology milking. Journal of An-imal Science, 81, 1-10. http://doi.org/10.2527/2003.81suppl_31x
IBGE (2017). Censo Agropecuário 2017. https://sidra.ibge.gov.br/pesquisa/censo-agropecuario/censo-agropecuario-2017
IBGE (2021). Cidades e Estados. https://www.ibge.gov.br/cidades-e-estados/sp/tupa.html
IEA (2018). Valor da produção: estatísticas de produção dos principais produtos agrícolas paulistas. http://www.iea.sp.gov.br/out/verTexto.php?codTexto=14543
IFCN (2018). The IFCN Dairy Report 2018: For a better under-standing of dairy world. https://ifcndairy.org/wp content/uploads/2018/10/Dairy-Report-Article-2018.pdf
Jamil, N., Gholami, H., Saman, M. Z. M., Streimikiene, D., Sha-rif, S. and Zakuan, N. (2020). DMAIC-based approach to sus-tainable value stream mapping: Towards a sustainable manufacturing system. Economic Research, 33, 331-360. http://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1715236
Koerich, G., Damasceno, J. C., Bánkuti, F. I., Parré, J. L. and Santos, G. T. (2019). Influence of forage production area, concentrate supply, and workforce on productive results in milk production systems. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 48, e20170177. http://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4820170177
Krömker, V., and Leimbach, S. (2017). Mastitis treatment –Reduction in antibiotic usage in dairy cows. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 52, 21-29. http://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13032
Kuwahara, K. C., Damasceno, J. C., Bánkuti, F. I., Prizon, R. C., Rossoni, D. F., and Eckstein, I. I. (2018). Sustainability and typology of dairy production systems. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 39, 2081-2092. http://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2018v39n5p2081
Lima, P. G. L., Bánkuti, F. I., Damasceno, J. C., dos Santos, G. T., Borges, J. A. R., and Ferreira, F. C. (2023). Factors influenc-ing concentrate feeding: Dairy farmers' perceptions of dairy production system characteristics and market relations. Ani-mal - Open Space, 2, 100041-8. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anopes.2023.100041
Lopes, M. A., and Lopes, D. C. F. (1999). Desenvolvimento de um sistema computacional para cálculo do custo de pro-dução do leite de cabras. Revista Brasileira de Agroinformá-tica, 2, 1-12. https://infoagro.deinfo.uepg.br/artigos/pdf/info_030.pdf
Madkar, A. R., Dutt, T., Boro, P., and Bharti, P. K. (2020). Health care managemental practices followed by dairy owners in western Maharashtra. Journal of Entomology and Zoology, 8, 417-419. https://www.entomoljournal.com/archives/2020/vol8issue6/PartF/8-5-151-830.pdf
MAPA (2018). Instrução normativa n° 76, de 26 de novembro de 2018. https://pesquisa.in.gov.br/imprensa/jsp/visualiza/index.jsp?data=30/11/2018&jornal=515&pagina=9
Niţă, C. G., and Ştefea, P. (2014). Cost control for business sustainability. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124, 307-311. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.490
Paixão, M. G., Lopes, M. A., Costa, G. M., Souza, G. N., Abreu, L. R., and Pinto, S. M. (2017). Milk quality and finan-cial management at different scales of production on dairy farms located in the south of Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Rev. Ceres, 64, 213-221. http://doi.org/10.1590/0034-737X201764030001
Paliy, A. P. (2017). Innovations in the establishment physiology technologies milking high-productive cows. Scientific Mes-senger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series: Agricultural Sciences, 19(74), 12-14. http://doi.org/10.15421/nvlvet74
Patel, A. S., and Patel, K. M. (2021). Critical review of literature on Lean Six Sigma methodology. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 12, 627-674. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-04-2020-0043
Powell, D., Lundeby, S., Chabada, L., and Dreyer, H. (2017). Lean Six Sigma and environmental sustainability: The case of a Norwegian dairy producer. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 8, 53-64. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-06-2015-0024.
Rosa, M. S., Costa, M. J. R. P., Sant’Anna, A. C., and Madurei-ra, A. P. (2014). Boas práticas de manejo - ordenha. Funep.
Sabapara, G. P., Desai, P. M., Singh, R., and Kharadi, V. B. (2012). Constraints of tribal dairy animal owners of South Gu-jarat. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 82, 538. http://epubs.icar.org.in/ejournal/index.php/IJAnS/article/view/17713/8540
Samanta, M., Virmani, N., Singh, R. K., Haque, S. N., and Jamshed, M. (2023). Analysis of critical success factors for successful integration of lean six sigma and Industry 4.0 for organizational excellence. The TQM Journal, 2022, 0215. http://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-07-2022-0215
Satolo, E. G., Hiraga, L. E. S., Goes, G. A., and Lourenzani, W. L. (2017). Lean production in agribusiness organizations: mul-tiple case studies in a developing country. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 8, 335-358. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-03-2016-0012
Silva, A. S., Medeiros, C. F., and Vieira, R. K. (2017). Cleaner production and PDCA cycle: Practical application for re-ducing the Cans Loss Index in a beverage company. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 324-338. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.033
Simões, G. H., Pozza, M. S. P., Zambom, M. A., Lange, M. J., and Neumann, M. E. (2015). Dairy production system type and critical points of contamination. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 36, 3923-3934. http://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n6p3923
Souliotis, A., Giazitzi, K., and Boskou, G. (2018). A tool to benchmark the food safety management systems in Greece. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25, 3206-3224. http://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-02-2017-0028
Tonet, R. M., Bánkuti, F. I., Damasceno, J. C., da Silva Siquei-ra, T. T., Bouroullec, M. D. M., and Loddi, M. M. (2023). Ty-pology of Brazilian dairy farms based on vulnerability char-acteristics. Animal-Open Space, 2, 100040. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anopes.2023.100040
Tramontini, R. C. M., Bánkuti, F. I., Pozza, M. S. S., Massuda, E. M., Damasceno, J. C., Dias, A. M., Ítavo, L. C. V., and San-tos, G. T. (2021). Typology of dairy production systems based on management strategies in Paraná State, Brazil. Tropical Animal Science Journal, 44, 123-130. http://doi.org/10.5398/tasj.2021.44.1.123
Trubetskaya, A., McDermott, O., and McGovern, S. (2023). Implementation of an ISO 50001 energy management system using Lean Six Sigma in an Irish dairy: a case study. The TQM Journal, 35, 1-24. http://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-08-2022-0252
Tupy, O., Manzano, A., Esteves, S. N., Novaes, N. J., Camar-go, A. C., Freitas, A. R., and Machado, R. (2002). Planilha para cálculo do custo de produção de leite na agricultura familiar. Circular Técnica Embrapa, 32, 1-11.
van Schaik, G., Kalis, C. H., Benedictus, G., Dijkhuizen, A. A., and Huirne, R. B. (1996). Cost-benefit analysis of vaccination against paratuberculosis in dairy cattle. Veterinary Record, 139, 624-627
Vicario, G., and Coleman, S. (2020). A review of data science in business and industry and a future view. Applied Stochas-tic Models in Business and Industry, 36, 6-18. http://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.2488
Züge R. M. (2015). Boas práticas na produção de leite. In. P. do C. Martins, G. A. Piccinini, E. E. B. Krug, C. E. Martins, and F. C. F. Lopes (Eds.), Sustentabilidade ambiental, social e econômica da cadeia produtiva do leite (pp. 415-432). Em-brapa. https://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/bitstream/doc/1021902/1/Livro2015Sustentabilidadecompleto.pdf
How to Cite
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Retno Astuti, Firdausin Nuzula Putri Rolanda, Aunur Rofiq Mulyarto, Lestari Rahayu, Z. Rozaki, Triyono, Widodo, Susanawati, M. Senge, A.A. Aziz, M.M. Tjale, A.B. Robani, P. Saiyut, M.F. bin Kamarudin, J. Sharifuddin, H. Basha, Z. Pengfei, Y. Witono, J.H. Mulyo, B. Krisnamurthi. (2025). Green Lean Six Sigma for Waste and Emissions Reduction in Small-Scale Pasteurized Milk Production. E3S Web of Conferences, 665, p.03003. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202566503003.
2. Laiane Cuer, Andréa Rossi Scalco, Eduardo Guilherme Satolo. (2024). Lean production in family farming: application of its principles in the production of vegetables. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-10-2020-0178.
Dimensions
PlumX
Article abstract page views
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Eduardo Satolo, Guilherme A. Ussuna, Priscilla A. B. Mac-Lean

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors or holders of the copyright for each article hereby confer exclusive, limited and free authorization on the Universidad Nacional de Colombia's journal Ingeniería e Investigación concerning the aforementioned article which, once it has been evaluated and approved, will be submitted for publication, in line with the following items:
1. The version which has been corrected according to the evaluators' suggestions will be remitted and it will be made clear whether the aforementioned article is an unedited document regarding which the rights to be authorized are held and total responsibility will be assumed by the authors for the content of the work being submitted to Ingeniería e Investigación, the Universidad Nacional de Colombia and third-parties;
2. The authorization conferred on the journal will come into force from the date on which it is included in the respective volume and issue of Ingeniería e Investigación in the Open Journal Systems and on the journal's main page (https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ingeinv), as well as in different databases and indices in which the publication is indexed;
3. The authors authorize the Universidad Nacional de Colombia's journal Ingeniería e Investigación to publish the document in whatever required format (printed, digital, electronic or whatsoever known or yet to be discovered form) and authorize Ingeniería e Investigación to include the work in any indices and/or search engines deemed necessary for promoting its diffusion;
4. The authors accept that such authorization is given free of charge and they, therefore, waive any right to receive remuneration from the publication, distribution, public communication and any use whatsoever referred to in the terms of this authorization.










