Published

2024-01-22

Lessons Learned from Construction Site Layout Planning Practices

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.107160

Keywords:

construction site, empirical case study, Indonesia, project planning (en)
sitio de construcción, estudio de caso empírico, Indonesia, planificación de proyectos (es)

Downloads

Authors

Proper layout planning is necessary to prepare a site for construction activities, prevent potential delays, and ensure project safety and security. Despite the considerable amount of studies regarding construction site layout planning, most research has relied on fabricated data using simulations, while, in fact, site layout is unique for each construction project, and its planning requires previous experience. This paper presents an in-depth study on site layout planning practices, as observed in four actual project cases. Using an empirical case study approach, these practices are collected through site observations, document examinations, and semi-structured interviews. Several discussions related to site layout planning practices are described, including the considerations, types, tasks and benefits related to proper site layout planning. The contribution of this paper is the ability to capture some lessons learned regarding construction site layout planning from actual project cases, which can be utilized by other parties for the benefit of future projects. The lessons learned allow developing appropriate strategies required by construction project teams in order to increase their response capability and hence be able to proactively make decisions regarding proper site layout planning.

La planificación adecuada de diseño es necesaria para preparar un sitio para actividades de construcción, prevenir posibles demoras y garantizar la seguridad de un proyecto. A pesar de la cantidad considerable de estudios sobre la planeación del diseño de sitios de construcción, la mayoría de las investigaciones se han basado en datos fabricados mediante simulaciones, si bien, de hecho, el diseño de sitio es único para cada proyecto de construcción y su planeación requiere experiencia previa. Este artículo presenta un estudio a profundidad sobre prácticas de planeación para el diseño de sitio en cuatro casos de proyectos reales, Empleando un enfoque de estudio de caso empírico, se recolectan estas prácticas por medio de observaciones en sitio, examen documental y entrevistas semiestructuradas. Se describen varias discusiones relacionadas con las prácticas de planeación para el diseño de sitio, incluyendo las consideraciones, los tipos, las tareas y los beneficios relacionados con una planeación adecuada para diseño de sitio. La contribución de este artículo radica en la posibilidad de capturar algunas lecciones aprendidas con respecto a la planeación del diseño de sitios de construcción de casos reales de proyectos, las cuales pueden ser aprovechadas por otras partes para el beneficio de proyectos futuros. Las lecciones aprendidas permiten desarrollar estrategias apropiadas según lo requieran los equipos de proyectos de construcción para aumentar su capacidad de respuesta y , por tanto, ser capaces de tomar decisiones de manera proactiva respecto a la planeación adecuada del diseño de sitio.

References

Abdel-Fattah, A. (2013). Dynamic site layout planning model [Doctoral thesis, University of Calgary]. https://prism.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/handle/11023/545/ucalgary_2013_abdel-fattah_aly.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y

Adhika, H. D., and Nurcahyo, C. B. (2017). Optimasi site layout menggunakan multi-objectives function pada proyek pem-bangunan transmart rungkut surabaya. Jurnal Teknik ITS, 6(1), C22-C26. https://ejurnal.its.ac.id/index.php/teknik/article/viewFile/21535/3510 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12962/j23373539.v6i1.21535

Alanjari, P., Razavialavi, S., and AbouRizk, S. (2014). A simula-tion-based approach for material yard laydown planning. Au-tomation in Construction, 40, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.12.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.12.010

Alavi, S. R. R., and Rizk, S. A. (2017). Site layout and construction plan optimization using an integrated genetic algorithm simu-lation framework. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 31(4), 04017011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000653 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000653

Alavi, S. R. R., and Rizk, S. A. (2021). Construction site layout planning using a simulation-based decision support tool. Lo-gistics, 5(65), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics5040065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics5040065

Anbari, F., Carayannis, E., and Voetsch, R. (2008). Post-project reviews as a key project management competence. Tech-novation, 28(10), 633-643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.12.001

Andayesh, M., and Sadeghpour, F. (2013). Dynamic site layout planning through minimization of total potential energy. Au-tomation in Construction, 31, 92-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.11.039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.11.039

Baroncini, M., and Wong, C. (2022). Lessons learnt in construc-tion projects. Swiss Re Corporate Solutions Ltd. https://corporatesolutions.swissre.com/dam/jcr:f330d163-b624-4b29-9dbd-f7632be30dba/lessons-learnt-in-construction-projects.pdf

Binhomaid, O. S. (2019). Construction. [Doctoral thesis, Universi-ty of Waterloo] https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/185636963.pdf

Caldas, C. H., Gibson, G. E., Weerasooriya, R., and Yohe, A. M. (2009). Identification of effective management practices and technologies for lessons learned programs in the con-struction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(6), 531-539. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000011

Cheng, M.Y., and O’Connor, J.T. (1996). ArcSite: Enhanced GIS for construction site layout. Journal of Construction Engineer-ing and Management, 122(4), 329-336. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1996)122:4(329) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1996)122:4(329)

Costa, D. B., Formoso, C. T., Kagioglou, M., Alarcon, L. F., and Caldas, C. H. (2006). Benchmarking initiatives in the construc-tion industry: lessons learned and improvement opportunities. Journal of Management in Engineering, 22(4), 158-167. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2006)22:4(158) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2006)22:4(158)

Dio, A. H., and Frenky, E. P. (2022). Evaluasi penataan pelaksa-naan pekerjaan pada sebuah site layout proyek konstruksi dari aspek waktu dan biaya dengan building information modeling 4d (studi kasus proyek X dan proyek Y) [Bachelor thesis, Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata]. http://repository.unika.ac.id/29392/1/21.B1.0060-Evi%20Parnius%20Frenky-COVER_a.pdf

El-Rayes, K., and Said, H. (2009). Dynamic site layout planning using approximate dynamic programming. Journal of Compu-ting in Civil Engineering, 23(2), 119-127. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2009)23:2(119) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2009)23:2(119)

Fadhlan, D., Wiguna, I. P. A., and Rohman, M. A. (2020). Opti-masi penataan site layout pada proyek grand dharmahusada surabaya dengan metode logika fuzzy AHP. Jurnal Teknik ITS, 9(2), D250-D256. https://doi.org/10.12962/j23373539.v9i2.58373 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12962/j23373539.v9i2.58373

Gordon, R. L, and Curlee, W. (2011). The virtual project man-agement office: Best practices, proven methods. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Hammad, A. W. A., Akbamezhad, A., Rey, D., and Waller, S. T. (2016). A computational method for estimating travel fre-quencies in site layout planning. Journal of Construction Engi-neering and Management, 142(5), 04015102. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001086 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001086

Hansen, S. (2021). Characterizing interview-based studies in construction management research: Analysis of empirical lit-erature evidences. International Conference on Innovations in Social Sciences Education and Engineering (ICOISSEE), 1(1), 1-12. https://proceedings.conference.unpas.ac.id/index.php/icoissee/article/view/724

Hansen, S., Rostiyanti, S.F., and Rif’at, A. (2020). Causes, effects, and mitigations framework of contract change orders: Les-sons learned from GBK aquatic stadium project. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Con-struction, 12(1), 05019008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000341

Hansen, S., Too, E., and Le, T. (2018). Lessons learned from a cancelled urban transport project in a developing country: The importance of the front-end planning phase. International Journal of Technology, 9(5), 898-909. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v9i5.1559 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v9i5.1559

Harrison, W. (2003). A software engineering lessons learned repository [Conference presentation]. 27th Annual NASA Goddard/IEEE Software Engineering Workshop, Los Alamitos, California.

Hawarneh, A. A., Bendak, S., and Ghanim, F. (2021). Construc-tion site layout planning problem: Past, present and future. Expert Systems with Application, 168, 114247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114247

Hegazy, T. M., and Elbeltagi, E. (1999). EvoSite: Evolution-based model for site layout planning. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 13(3), 198-206. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1999)13:3(198) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1999)13:3(198)

Hetemi, E., Gemunden, H. G., and Mere, J. O. (2020). Embed-dedness and actors’ behaviors in large-scale project life cy-cle: Lessons learned from a high-speed rail project in Spain. Journal of Management in Engineering, 36(6), 05020014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000849 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000849

Hu, Y., Chan, A. P. C., Le, Y., Jiang, W. P., Xie, L. L., and Hon, C. H. K. (2012). Improving megasite management performance through incentives: Lessons learned from the Shanghai Expo construction. Journal of Management in Engineering, 28(3), 330-337. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000102

Jiang, W., Zhou, Y., Ding, L., Zhou, C., and Ning, X. (2020). UAV-based 3D reconstruction for hoist site mapping and layout planning in petrochemical construction. Automation in Con-struction, 113, 103137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103137

Kamil, A. K. A., and Adnan, A. Z. A. (2020). Planning of con-struction site layout: A review. Journal of Science and Engi-neering Application, 4(1), 43-51. https://journals.iunajaf.edu.iq/index.php/JSEA/article/view/1

Khalafallah, A., and El-Rayes, K. (2006). Optimizing airport con-struction site layouts to minimize wildlife hazards. Journal of Management in Engineering, 22(4), 176-185. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2006)22:4(176) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2006)22:4(176)

Kim, M., Ryu, H. G., and Kim, T. W. (2021). A typology model of temporary facility constraints for automated construction site layout planning. Applied Sciences, 11(3), 1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031027

Kumar, S., and Bansal, V. K. (2015). Framework for safe site layout planning in hilly regions. European Journal of Advances in Engineering and Technology, 2(4), 14-19. https://ejaet.com/PDF/2-4/EJAET-2-4-14-19.pdf

Liang, C. J., Kamat, V. R., and Menassa, C. M. (2018). Real-time construction site layout and equipment monitoring [Confer-ence presentation]. Construction Research Congress, Reston, VA, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481264.007

Ma, Z., Shen, Q., and Zhang, J. (2005). Application of 4D for dynamic site layout and management of construction pro-jects. Automation in Construction, 14(3), 369-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2004.08.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2004.08.011

Marx, A., and Konig, M. (2011). Preparation of constraints for construction simulation [Conference presentation]. Interna-tional Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering, Reston, VA, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/41182(416)57

Mawdesley, M. J., Al-Jibouri, S. H., and Yang, H. (2002). Genetic algorithms for construction site layout in project planning. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(5), 418-426. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:5(418) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:5(418)

Ning, X., Qi, J., and Wu, C. (2018). A quantitative safety risk assessment model for construction site layout planning. Safety Science, 104, 246-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.01.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.01.016

Osman, H., Georgy, M., and Ibrahim, M. (2003). An automated system for dynamic construction site layout planning [Confer-ence presentation]. 10th International Colloquium in Structur-al and Geotechnical Engineering (ICSGE 2003), Cairo, Egypt.

Petroutsatou, K., Apostolidis, N., Zarkada, A., and Ntokou, A. (2021). Dynamic planning of construction site for linear pro-jects. Infrastructures, 6(21), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures6020021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures6020021

Pheng, L. S., and Hui, M. S. (1999). The application of JIT philos-ophy to construction: A case study in site layout. Construction Management & Economics, 17(5), 657-668. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461999371268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/014461999371268

Pradana, H. Y. (2021). Site layout optimization using multi-objectives function on dormitory building project (studi kasus: Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Asrama MTSN 1 Kebumen) [Bachelor thesis, Universitas Islam Indonesia]. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/35883

Resende, C. B., Volk, M. J., and Shane, J. S. (2020). Post-project evaluation and lessons learned [Conference presentation]. Construction Research Congress 2020, Reston, VA, USA. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/9780784482889.046 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482889.046

Rezania, D., and Lingham, T. (2009). Towards a method to dis-seminate knowledge from the post project review. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 7(2), 172-177. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/kmrp.2009.9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2009.9

Rowe, S. F, and Sikes, S. (2006). Lessons learned: Taking it to the next level [Conference presentation]. PMI Global Congress 2006, Seattle, Washington. https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/lessons-learned-next-level-communicating-7991

Sadeghpour, F., and Andayesh, M. (2015). The constructs of site layout modeling: An overview. Canadian Journal of Civil Engi-neering, 42(3), 199-212. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2014-030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2014-0303

Sadeghpour, F., Moselhi, O., and Alkass, S. T. (2006). Computer-aided site layout planning. Journal of Construction Engineer-ing and Management, 132(2), 143-151. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:2(143) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:2(143)

Said, H., and El-Rayes, K. A. (2011). Optimizing material pro-curement and storage on construction sites. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(6), 421-431. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000307

Sanad, H. M., Ammar, M. A., and Ibrahim, M. E. (2008). Optimal construction site layout considering safety and environmental aspects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Manage-ment, 134(7), 536-544. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:7(536) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:7(536)

Sezer, A. A., and Fredriksson, A. (2021). Environmental impact of construction transport and the effects of building certification schemes. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 172, 105688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105688 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105688

Shiferaw, A. T., and Klakegg, O. J. (2013). Project evaluation: Accomplishments, shortfalls, and lessons learned in housing development projects in Ethiopia. Journal of Management in Engineering, 29(3), 289-301. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000138 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000138

Sjøbakk, B., and Skjelstad, L. (2015). Proposing a standard tem-plate for construction site layout: A case study of a Norwe-gian contractor. In S. Umeda, M. Nakano, H. Mizuyama, N. Hibino, D. Kiritsis, and G. von Cieminski (Eds.), Advances in Production Management Systems: Innovative Production Management Towards Sustainable Growth (APMS 2015) (pp, 316-323). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22756-6_39 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22756-6_39

Skejlbred, S., Fossheim, M. E., and Drevland, F. (2015, July 13-22). Comparing site organization and logistics in the construction industry and the oil industry: A case study [Conference presentation]. 23rd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Perth, Australia. https://iglc.net/Papers/Details/1178

Su, X. (2013). Spatial temporal information model for construc-tion planning [Doctoral thesis, Purdue University]. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/dissertations/AAI3605150/

Su, X., Andoh, A.r., Cai, H., Pan, J., Kandil, A., and Said, H. M. (2012). GIS-based dynamic construction site material layout evaluation for building renovation projects. Automation in Construction, 27, 40-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.04.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.04.007

Tam, C. M., and Tong, T. K. L. (2003). GA-ANN model for optimiz-ing the locations of tower crane and supply points for high-rise public housing construction. Construction Management and Economics, 21(3), 257-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619032000049665 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619032000049665

Tam, C. M., Tong, T. K. L., Leung, A. W. T., and Chiu, G. W. C. (2002). Site layout planning using nonstructural fuzzy decision support system. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(3), 220-231. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:3(220) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:3(220)

Tsegay, F. G., Mwanaumo, E., and Mwiya, B. (2023a). Mathe-matical optimization methods for inner-city construction site layout planning: A systematic review. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 24, 3781-3795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00713-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00713-2

Tsegay, F. G., Mwanaumo, E., and Mwiya, B. (2023b). Construc-tion site layout planning practices in inner-city building pro-jects: Space requirement variables, classification and rela-tionship. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 11(1), 2190793. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2023.2190793 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2023.2190793

Vashishtha, A. U. (2022). A Framework to Optimize Construction Site Layout Planning. International Research Journal of Engi-neering and Technology, 9(3), 1911-1919. https://www.irjet.net/archives/V9/i3/IRJET-V9I3347.pdf

von Zedtwitz, M. (2003). Post-project reviews in R&D. Research-Technology Management, 46(5), 43-49.

Weber, R., Aha, D. W., Munoz-Avila, H., and Breslow, L. A. (2000). An intelligent lessons learned process. In Z. W. Raś and S. Ohsuga (Eds.) Foundations of Intelligent Systems (pp. 358–367). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-39963-1_38 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39963-1_38

Williams, T. (2007). Post-project reviews to gain effective lessons learned. PMI.

Xu, J., and Li, Z. (2012). Multi-objective dynamic construction site layout planning in fuzzy random environment. Automation in Construction, 27, 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.05.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.05.017

Xu, S., Fu, D., Xie, Y., Hou, L., and Bu, S. (2020). Integrating BIM and VR for highway construction site layout planning [Conference presentation]. 20th COTA International Conference of Transportation Professional, Reston, VA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482933.093 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482933.093

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Zhang, H., and Yu, L. (2021). Site layout planning for prefabri-cated components subject to dynamic and interactive con-straints. Automation in Construction, 126, 103693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103693 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103693

Zhou, F. (2006). An integrated framework for tunnel shaft con-struction and site layout optimization [Master’s thesis, Universi-ty of Alberta]. https://era.library.ualberta.ca/items/ea82c2a6-b006-4618-b911-3a3c5587a541

Zolfagarian, S., and Irizarry, J. (2014). Current trends in construc-tion site layout planning [Conference presentation]. Con-struction Research Congress 2014, Reston, VA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413517.176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413517.176

Zouein, P., Harmanani, H., and Hajar, A. (2002). genetic algo-rithm for solving site layout problem with unequal-size and constrained facilities. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineer-ing, 16(2), 143-151. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2002)16:2(143) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2002)16:2(143)

Zouein, P., and Tommelein, I. (1999). Dynamic layout planning using a hybrid incremental solution method. Journal of Con-struction Engineering and Management, 125(6), 400-408. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:6(400) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:6(400)

How to Cite

APA

Hansen, S. (2024). Lessons Learned from Construction Site Layout Planning Practices. Ingeniería e Investigación, 44(1), e107160. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.107160

ACM

[1]
Hansen, S. 2024. Lessons Learned from Construction Site Layout Planning Practices. Ingeniería e Investigación. 44, 1 (Jan. 2024), e107160. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.107160.

ACS

(1)
Hansen, S. Lessons Learned from Construction Site Layout Planning Practices. Ing. Inv. 2024, 44, e107160.

ABNT

HANSEN, S. Lessons Learned from Construction Site Layout Planning Practices. Ingeniería e Investigación, [S. l.], v. 44, n. 1, p. e107160, 2024. DOI: 10.15446/ing.investig.107160. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ingeinv/article/view/107160. Acesso em: 1 feb. 2025.

Chicago

Hansen, Seng. 2024. “Lessons Learned from Construction Site Layout Planning Practices”. Ingeniería E Investigación 44 (1):e107160. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.107160.

Harvard

Hansen, S. (2024) “Lessons Learned from Construction Site Layout Planning Practices”, Ingeniería e Investigación, 44(1), p. e107160. doi: 10.15446/ing.investig.107160.

IEEE

[1]
S. Hansen, “Lessons Learned from Construction Site Layout Planning Practices”, Ing. Inv., vol. 44, no. 1, p. e107160, Jan. 2024.

MLA

Hansen, S. “Lessons Learned from Construction Site Layout Planning Practices”. Ingeniería e Investigación, vol. 44, no. 1, Jan. 2024, p. e107160, doi:10.15446/ing.investig.107160.

Turabian

Hansen, Seng. “Lessons Learned from Construction Site Layout Planning Practices”. Ingeniería e Investigación 44, no. 1 (January 2, 2024): e107160. Accessed February 1, 2025. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ingeinv/article/view/107160.

Vancouver

1.
Hansen S. Lessons Learned from Construction Site Layout Planning Practices. Ing. Inv. [Internet]. 2024 Jan. 2 [cited 2025 Feb. 1];44(1):e107160. Available from: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ingeinv/article/view/107160

Download Citation

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations1

1. Seng Hansen. (2025). Exploratory Factor Analysis of Construction Industry Problems in a Developing Country. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 17(1) https://doi.org/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1205.

Dimensions

PlumX

Article abstract page views

293

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.