Published

2026-02-04

Extending the TOE Framework for Digital Twin Adoption in Latin American Project Management

Ampliación del marco TOE para la adopción de gemelos digitales en la gestión de proyectos en América Latina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.120958

Keywords:

digital twin, emerging economies, project management, sociotechnical systems, technology adoption, TOE framework (en)
gemelo digital, economías emergentes, gestión de proyectos, sistemas sociotécnicos, adopción de tecnología, marco TOE (es)

Downloads

Authors

This study uses an explanatory mixed-methods design to develop and validate a DT–PM (digital twins-project management) maturity framework. To this effect, it combines a cross-sectional survey of 200 professionals working in PM, six in-depth case studies, and, as part of a design science research (DSR) cycle, a representative sample of individuals working in PM. The results extend the technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework by incorporating time-based project factors such as stakeholder movement and workflow plasticity. Taken together, these factors account for 71% of the difference in implementation success. The analysis reveals significant sociotechnical contradictions with direct effects on PM practice, namely an authority paradox and a 15% threshold phenomenon for initial project viability, which provides managers with a clear way to assess whether benefits are being realized. The maturity framework validated in this study is an organized diagnostic tool that ensures that DT capabilities are aligned with project lifecycle stages and PM knowledge areas. This study concludes that successful DT adoption in the cases examined entails not only upgrading technology but also addressing sociotechnical alignment. This involves moving from a technology-centered implementation towards adaptive project governance and organizational learning in environments with limited resources.

Este estudio utiliza un diseño explicativo de métodos mixtos para crear y confirmar un marco de madurez DT-PM (gemelos digitales-administración de proyectos). Para ello, combina una encuesta transversal a 200 personas que trabajan en la gestión de proyectos, seis estudios de caso en profundidad y, como parte de un ciclo de investigación en ciencias del diseño (DSR), una muestra representativa de personas que trabajan en la gestión de proyectos. Los resultados se suman al marco tecnología-organización-entorno (TOE) al incluir factores temporales del proyecto, como el movimiento de las partes interesadas y la plasticidad del flujo de trabajo. Estos factores juntos representan el 71 % de la diferencia en el éxito de las implementaciones. Se observan contradicciones sociotécnicas significativas en el análisis que tienen efectos directos en la práctica de la gestión de proyectos, i.e., una paradoja de autoridad y un fenómeno de umbral del 15 % para la viabilidad inicial del proyecto, lo que ofrece a los gestores una forma clara de medir si se está obteniendo un beneficio. El marco de madurez que se valida en este trabajo es una herramienta de diagnóstico organizada que garantiza que las habilidades de DT estén en consonancia con las etapas del ciclo de vida de un proyecto y las áreas de conocimiento de la gestión de proyectos. Este estudio concluye que la adopción exitosa de DT en los casos estudiados significa no solo actualizar la tecnología, sino también abordar la alineación sociotécnica. Esto implica pasar de una implementación centrada en la tecnología a una gobernanza de proyectos adaptable y a un aprendizaje organizacional en entornos con recursos limitados.

References

[1] Y. Pan and L. Zhang, "A BIM-data mining integrated digital twin framework for advanced project management," Autom. Constr., vol. 124, art. 103564, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103564

[2] J.-F. Yao, Y. Yang, X.-C. Wang, and X.-P. Zhang, "Systematic review of digital twin technology and applications," Vis. Comput. Ind. Biomed. Art, vol. 6, no. 1, art. 10, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42492-023-00137-4

[3] M. Attaran and B. G. Celik, "Digital Twin: Benefits, use cases, challenges, and opportunities," Decis. Anal. J., vol. 6, art. 100165, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100165

[4] J. P. Tamvada, S. Narula, D. Audretsch, H. Puppala, and A. Kumar, "Adopting new technology is a distant dream? The risks of implementing Industry 4.0 in emerging economy SMEs," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 185, art. 122088, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122088

[5] S. R. Newrzella, D. W. Franklin, and S. Haider, "5-dimension cross-industry digital twin applications model and analysis of digital twin classification terms and models," IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 131306–131321, 2021. https://doi/org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3115055

[6] D. Wu et al., "Digital twin technology in transportation infrastructure: A comprehensive survey of current applications, challenges, and future directions," Appl. Sci., vol. 15, no. 4, art. 1911, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15041911

[7] H. Zribi, B. A. T., E. A., Y. Hani, B. Bechir Graba, and A. Elmhamedi, "Industry 4.0: Digital twins characteristics, applications, and challenges in-built environments," Prod. Manuf. Res., vol. 13, no. 1, art. 2456277, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2025.2456277

[8] J. Sweller, S. Roussel, and A. Tricot, "Cognitive load theory and instructional design for language learning," in The Cambridge Handbook of Working Memory and Language, J. W. Schwieter and Z. Wen, Eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2022, pp. 859–880. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108955638.045

[9] E. Miehling et al., "Agentic ai needs a systems theory," arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.00237, 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.00237

[10] M. W. Grieves, "Digital twins: Past, present, and future," in The Digital Twin, N. Crespi, A. T. Drobot, and R. Minerva, Eds. Cham, Germany: Srpinger, 2023, pp. 97–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21343-4_4

[11] E. VanDerHorn and S. Mahadevan, "Digital twin: Generalization, characterization and implementation," Decis. Support Syst., vol. 145, art. 113524, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2021.113524

[12] M. Singh, E. Fuenmayor, E. P. Hinchy, Y. Qiao, N. Murray, and D. Devine, "Digital twin: Origin to future," Appl. Syst. Innov., vol. 4, no. 2, art. 36, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi4020036

[13] T. D. Nguyen and S. Adhikari, "The role of BIM in integrating digital twin in building construction: A literature review," Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 13, art. 10462, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310462

[14] J. Whyte et al., "Using digital twins for managing change in complex projects," in Proc. Int. Conf. Sustain. Dev. Smart Built Environ., 2024, pp. 1575–1582. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.00325

[15] S. Infante, J. Robles, C. Martín, B. Rubio, and M. Díaz, "Distributed digital twins on the open-source OpenTwins framework," Adv. Eng. Inform., vol. 64, art. 102970, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2024.102970

[16] C. Lin and P. Critchley, "Quantum Computing and Digital Twins," in Hybrid Healthcare, M. Al-Razouki and S. Smith, Eds. Cham, Germany: Springer, 2022, pp. 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04836-4_14

[17] K. Lyytinen, B. Weber, M. C. Becker, and B. T. Pentland, "Digital twins of organization: implications for organization design," J. Organ. Des., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 77–93, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41469-023-00151-z

[18] J. Zhou, S. Zhang, and M. Gu, "Revisiting digital twins: Origins, fundamentals, and practices," Front. Eng. Manag., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 668–676, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-022-0216-2

[19] H. H. Hosamo, H. K. Nielsen, A. N. Alnmr, P. R. Svennevig, and K. Svidt, "A review of the Digital Twin technology for fault detection in buildings," Front. Built Environ., vol. 8, art. 1013196, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2022.1013196

[20] M. A. Guinea-Cabrera and J. A. Holgado-Terriza, "Digital twins in software engineering—A systematic literature review and vision," Appl. Sci., vol. 14, no. 3, art. 977, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14030977

[21] M. Grieves, "Digital twins and their role in reengineering engineering education," in Digital Twin: Fundamentals and Applications, S. Sabri, K. Alexandridis, and N. Lee, Eds. Cham, Germany: Springer, 2024, pp. 237–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67778-6_11

[22] C. Su, Y. R. Han, X. Tang, Q. Jiang, T. Wang, and Q. He, "Knowledge-based digital twin system: Using a knowlege-driven approach for manufacturing process modeling," Comput. Ind., vol. 159-160, art. 104101, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2024.104101

[23] H. Ünlü, O. Demirörs, and V. Garousi, "Readiness and maturity models for Industry 4.0: A systematic literature review," J. Softw. Evol. Process, vol. 36, no. 7, art. e2641, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2641

[24] E. J. Omol, L. W. Mburu, and P. A. Abuonji, "Digital maturity assessment model (DMAM): Assimilation of design science research (DSR) and capability maturity model integration (CMMI)," Digit. Transform. Soc., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 128–152, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1108/DTS-04-2024-0049

[25] A. w. AL-Khatib, A. Shuhaiber, I. Mashal, and M. Al-Okaily, "Antecedents of Industry 4.0 capabilities and technological innovation: a dynamic capabilities perspective," Eur. Bus. Rev., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 566–587, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-05-2023-0158

[26] D. de Kerckhove, "The personal digital twin, ethical considerations," Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. A, vol. 379, no. 2207, art. 20200367, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0367

[27] J. Barata and I. Kayser, "How will the digital twin shape the future of industry 5.0?," Technovation, vol. 134, art. 103025, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103025

[28] C. Kober, F. Gomez Medina, M. Benfer, J. P. Wulfsberg, V. Martinez, and G. Lanza, "Digital twin stakeholder communication: Characteristics, challenges, and best practices," Comput. Ind., vol. 161, art. 104135, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2024.104135

[29] H. Zhu, B.-G. Hwang, Y. Z. Tan, and F. Wei, "Building on digital twin: Overcoming barriers and unlocking success in the construction industry," J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 150, no. 10, art. 04024142, 2024. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2024.008

How to Cite

APA

Silva Atencio, G. & Bonelli Alzamra, R. (2025). Extending the TOE Framework for Digital Twin Adoption in Latin American Project Management. Ingeniería e Investigación, 45(3), e120958. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.120958

ACM

[1]
Silva Atencio, G. and Bonelli Alzamra, R. 2025. Extending the TOE Framework for Digital Twin Adoption in Latin American Project Management. Ingeniería e Investigación. 45, 3 (Dec. 2025), e120958. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.120958.

ACS

(1)
Silva Atencio, G.; Bonelli Alzamra, R. Extending the TOE Framework for Digital Twin Adoption in Latin American Project Management. Ing. Inv. 2025, 45, e120958.

ABNT

SILVA ATENCIO, G.; BONELLI ALZAMRA, R. Extending the TOE Framework for Digital Twin Adoption in Latin American Project Management. Ingeniería e Investigación, [S. l.], v. 45, n. 3, p. e120958, 2025. DOI: 10.15446/ing.investig.120958. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ingeinv/article/view/120958. Acesso em: 6 feb. 2026.

Chicago

Silva Atencio, Gabriel, and Roberto Bonelli Alzamra. 2025. “Extending the TOE Framework for Digital Twin Adoption in Latin American Project Management”. Ingeniería E Investigación 45 (3):e120958. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.120958.

Harvard

Silva Atencio, G. and Bonelli Alzamra, R. (2025) “Extending the TOE Framework for Digital Twin Adoption in Latin American Project Management”, Ingeniería e Investigación, 45(3), p. e120958. doi: 10.15446/ing.investig.120958.

IEEE

[1]
G. Silva Atencio and R. Bonelli Alzamra, “Extending the TOE Framework for Digital Twin Adoption in Latin American Project Management”, Ing. Inv., vol. 45, no. 3, p. e120958, Dec. 2025.

MLA

Silva Atencio, G., and R. Bonelli Alzamra. “Extending the TOE Framework for Digital Twin Adoption in Latin American Project Management”. Ingeniería e Investigación, vol. 45, no. 3, Dec. 2025, p. e120958, doi:10.15446/ing.investig.120958.

Turabian

Silva Atencio, Gabriel, and Roberto Bonelli Alzamra. “Extending the TOE Framework for Digital Twin Adoption in Latin American Project Management”. Ingeniería e Investigación 45, no. 3 (December 15, 2025): e120958. Accessed February 6, 2026. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ingeinv/article/view/120958.

Vancouver

1.
Silva Atencio G, Bonelli Alzamra R. Extending the TOE Framework for Digital Twin Adoption in Latin American Project Management. Ing. Inv. [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 15 [cited 2026 Feb. 6];45(3):e120958. Available from: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ingeinv/article/view/120958

Download Citation

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations0

Dimensions

PlumX

Article abstract page views

0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.