A simulation model of assistants’ and technicians’ engagement in processing generated requests at a university
Un modelo de simulación de la participación de asistentes y técnicos para procesar las solicitudes generadas en una universidad
Keywords:
Education, teaching process optimization, queueing system, simulation model, unwanted states (en)Educación, optimización de procesos de enseñanza, sistema de colas, modelo de simulación, estados no deseados (es)
This paper presents a simulation model for the optimization of assistants’ and technicians’ engagement in a university teaching process. This model enables us to obtain the values of important parameters for the analysis of the process; even in the case of complex processes at large university departments, which cannot be easily analyzed using analytical methods. In the case when the number of technicians available is not sufficient to process all generated requests of professors and assistants, the assistants take over the processing of the requests, which cannot be processed immediately by the technicians. The characteristics of the system are compared for three different situations: when all technicians are processing the requests of all assistants and all professors; when technicians and assistants are separated in smaller groups; and when the technicians are processing only the requests of the professors and the assistants from their group.
En este trabajo se presenta un modelo de simulación para la optimización de la participación de asistentes y técnicos en el proceso de enseñanza de una universidad. Este modelo nos permite obtener los valores de los parámetros importantes para el análisis del proceso, incluso en el caso de un proceso complejo en departamentos de universidades grandes, que no se puede analizar fácilmente utilizando métodos analíticos. Si los técnicos disponibles no son suficientes para procesar todas las solicitudes generadas por profesores y asistentes, los asistentes asumen el control la tramitación de las solicitudes, que no pueden ser procesadas inmediatamente por los técnicos. Se lleva a cabo una comparación de las características del sistema para tres situaciones diferentes: cuando los técnicos están procesando las peticiones de todos los asistentes y los profesores; cuando los técnicos y asistentes se separan en grupos más pequeños; y cuando los técnicos están procesando sólo las peticiones de los profesores y los asistentes de su grupo.
Downloads
References
Aizpun, M., Sandino, D., & Merideno, I. (2015). Developing students’ aptitudes through University-Industry collaboration. Ingeniería e Investigación, 35(3), 121–128. DOI: 10.15446/ing.investig.v35n3.48188.
Bogoya, J. D., & Bogoya, J.M. (2013). An academic value-added mathematical model for higher education in Colombia. Ingeniería e Investigación, 33(2), 76–8. Retrieved from http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ingeinv/
article/view/39521/41407#.
Filipowitz, B., & Kwiecien, J. (2008). Queueing systems and networks. Models and applications. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Technical Sciences, 56(4), 379-390. Retrieved from http://bluebox.ippt.pan.pl/~bulletin/(56-
379.pdf.
Kleinrock, L. (1975). Queueing Systems. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Kosten, K. M. (1970). Simulation in traffic theory. Proceedings of 6th ITC, Münich.
Kotnour, T. (1999). Developing and evaluating an organizational learning process to continuously improve teaching. IEEE Transactions on Education, 42(4).DOI: 10.1109/13.804561.
Lebl, A., & Mitić, D. (2014). Financial cost model of hiring technicians in teaching operations at the faculty. Proceedings of International Scientific Conference Management 2014, Union University Belgrade. Retrieved from http://www.
meste.org/konf/Arhiva/Man_2014/PDF/068.pdf.
Macias, J. A. (2012). Enhancing Project-Based Learning in Software Engineering Lab Teaching Through an E-Portfolio Approach. IEEE Transactions on Education, 55(4), 502-507. DOI: 10.1109/TE.2012.2191787.
Mbarika, V. W., Sankar, C.S., & Raju, P.K. (2003). Identification of factors that lead to perceived learning improvements for female students. IEEE Transactions on Education, 46(1),
- 36. DOI: 10.1109/TE.2002.804407.
Nikolic, S., Vial, P.J., Sankar, C.S., Ros, M., Stirling, D., & Ritz, C. (2015). Improving the Laboratory Learning Experience: A Process to Train and Manage Teaching Assistants. IEEE Transactions on Education, 58(2), 130-139. DOI: 10.1109/TE.2014.2335712.
Olsson, K.M. (1970). Simulation on computers. A method for determining the traffic-carrying capacities of telephone systems, TELE, XXII(1).
Ingeniería e 42 Investigación vol. 36 n.° 2, august - 2016 (35-42) Pardede. E., & Lyons. J. (2012). Redesigning the assessment of an entrepreneurship course in an information technology degree program: Embedding assessment for learning
practices. IEEE Transactions on Education, 55(4), 566-572.DOI: 10.1109/TE.2012.2199757.
Petrović, G., Petrović, N., & Marinković, Z. (2008). Application of the Markov Theory to Queueing Networks. Facta Universitatis, Series Mechanical Engineering, 6(1), UDC 519.217: 519.61, 45-56. Retrieved from http://facta.junis.ni.ac.rs/me/me2008/me2008-05.pdf.
Rodrigues, A., & De los Mozos, J.R. (1972). Roulette model for the simulation of delay-loss systems. ITT Electrical Communication, 47(2).
Siddiqi, R., Harrison, C. J., & Siddiqi, R. (2010). Improving Teaching and Learning through Automated Short-Answer Marking. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 3(3), 237-249. DOI: 10.1109/TLT.2010.4.
Šuh, T., Mitić, D., Lebl-Antonić, D., & Lebl, A. (2014). Determination of the Necessary Number of Technicians on the Faculty. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 11(1), 21-36. Retrieved from http://uni-obuda.hu/journal/Suh_Mitic_Lebl-Antonic_
Lebl_47.pdf
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Aleksandar Lebl, Dragan Mitic, Djurdje Perisic, Branislav M. Todorovic

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors or holders of the copyright for each article hereby confer exclusive, limited and free authorization on the Universidad Nacional de Colombia's journal Ingeniería e Investigación concerning the aforementioned article which, once it has been evaluated and approved, will be submitted for publication, in line with the following items:
1. The version which has been corrected according to the evaluators' suggestions will be remitted and it will be made clear whether the aforementioned article is an unedited document regarding which the rights to be authorized are held and total responsibility will be assumed by the authors for the content of the work being submitted to Ingeniería e Investigación, the Universidad Nacional de Colombia and third-parties;
2. The authorization conferred on the journal will come into force from the date on which it is included in the respective volume and issue of Ingeniería e Investigación in the Open Journal Systems and on the journal's main page (https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ingeinv), as well as in different databases and indices in which the publication is indexed;
3. The authors authorize the Universidad Nacional de Colombia's journal Ingeniería e Investigación to publish the document in whatever required format (printed, digital, electronic or whatsoever known or yet to be discovered form) and authorize Ingeniería e Investigación to include the work in any indices and/or search engines deemed necessary for promoting its diffusion;
4. The authors accept that such authorization is given free of charge and they, therefore, waive any right to receive remuneration from the publication, distribution, public communication and any use whatsoever referred to in the terms of this authorization.









