Published

2016-09-01

Finite element analysis of a solar collector plate using two plate geometries

Análisis de elemento finito de dos geometrías de placa plana de un colector solar

Keywords:

Absorber plate, finite element analysis, solar collector, efficiency, geometry (en)
Plato absorbedor, análisis de elemento finito, colector solar, eficiencia, geometría (es)

Downloads

Authors

  • Diego Manuel Medina Carril Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán
  • José Gonzalo Carrillo Baeza Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán
  • Ruben Dominguez Maldonado Universidad Anahuac Mayab
  • Francis Aviles Cetina Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán

The thermal behavior of an absorber plate in a solar collector is investigated using finite element analysis. The thermal behavior and efficiency of two absorber plate geometries are studied, using a typical solar collector with a rectangular profile as reference, and a proposed absorber plate with curved geometry. An analysis of the most important parameters involved in the design of the absorber plate was carried out, indicating that the curved geometry of the absorber plate yields an average efficiency ~25% higher than the conventional rectangular geometry. The results suggest that a curved profile made of materials such as aluminum with thermal conductivity higher than 200W/m°C, plate thickness of the order of 2-3mm and with a large density of tubes per unit area of the collector´s plate greatly benefits the thermal efficiency of the solar collector.

El comportamiento térmico de una placa de absorción en un colector solar se investigó usando análisis de elemento finito. Se investiga el comportamiento térmico y la eficiencia de dos geometrías de plato absorbedor, un colector solar típico con plato absorbedor rectangular, utilizado como referencia, y una propuesta con geometría curva. Un análisis de los parámetros más importantes que intervienen en el diseño de la placa de absorción se llevó a cabo, indicando que la geometría curva de la placa de absorción ofrece una eficiencia media ~25% mayor que la geometría rectangular convencional. Los resultados sugieren que un perfil curvado hecho de materiales tales como aluminio con conductividad térmica mayor a 200W/m°C, espesor de placa del orden de 2 a 3mm y una mayor densidad de tubos por unidad de área de la placa de absorción, beneficia en gran medida la eficiencia térmica del colector solar.

References

Abdolzadeh, M., & Mehrabian, M. A. (2011). Heat gain of a solar collector under an optimum slope angle in Kerman, Iran. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Enviromental Effects, 33, 1375-1385.DOI: 10.1080/15567036.2010.499417

Abdolzadeh, M., & Mehrabian, M. A. (2012). The optimal slope angle for solar collectors in hot and dry parts or Iran. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Enviromental Effects, 34, 519-530.DOI: 10.1080/15567036.2011.576413

Alvarez, A., Cabeza, O., Muñiz, M.C., & Varela, L.M. (2010). Experimental and numerical investigation of flat-plate solar collector. Energy, 35, 3707-3716.DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.05.016

Duffie, J. A., & Beckman, W. A. (2006). Solar engineering of thermal processes. Third ed. New York: Wiley & Sons.

Eisenmann, W., Vajen K., & Ackermann, H. (2004). On the correlations between collector efficiency factor and material content of parallel flow flat-plate solar collectors. Solar Energy, 76, 381-387.DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2003.10.005

Garg, H. P., & Rani, U. (1980). Loss coefficients from solar flat-plate collectors. Applied energy, 7, 109-117. DOI: 10.1016/0306-2619(80)90052-5

Hahne E. (1985). Parameter effects on design and performance of flat plate solar collectors. Solar energy, 34 (6), 497-504. DOI: 10.1016/0038-092X(85)90023-4

Hollands, K.G.T., & Stedman, B.A. (1992). Optimization of an absorber plate fin having a step-change in local thickness. Solar Energy, 49, 493–495.DOI: 10.1016/0038-092X(92)90157-6

Hottel, H.C., & Woertz, B.B. (1942). Performance of a flat-plate solar-heat collectors. Trans ASME, 64, 91-104.

Hottle H.C., Whiller A. (1958). Evaluation of flat-plate solar collector performance. Transaction of conference on the use of Solar Energy, University of Arizona, 2, 74–104.

Incropera, F.P., DeWitt, D.P., & Bergman, T.L. (2007). Fundamental of heat and mass transfer. 6th. Ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Joudi, K. A., & Abd-Alzahra, H. A. A. (1984). An experimental investigation into the performance of a domestic forced circulation solar water heater under varying operating conditions. Energy Conversion Management, 24 (4), 377-384.DOI: 10.1016/0196-8904(84)90017-7

Klein, S. A. (1975). Calculation of flat-plate loss coefficients. Solar energy, 17, 79-80.DOI: 10.1016/0038-092X(75)90020-1

Kovarik, M. (1978). Optimal distribution of heat conducting material in the finned pipe solar energy collector. Solar Energy, 21, 477–484.DOI: 10.1016/0038-092X(78)90071-3

Kundu, B. (2002). Performance analysis and optimization of absorber plates of different geometry for a flat-plate solar collector: a comparative study. Applied thermal engineering, 22, 999-1012.DOI: 10.1016/S1359-4311(01)00127-2

Kundu, B. (2008). Performance and optimum design analysis of absorber plate fin using recto-trapezoidal profile. Solar Energy, 88, 22–32.DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2007.05.002

Lamnatou, Chr., Mondol, J.D., Chemisana, D., & Maurer C. (2016). Modelling and simulation of Building-Integrated solar thermal systems: Behaviour of the system. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45, 36-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.024

Leone, G., & Beccali, M. (2016). Use of finite element models for estimating thermal performance of façade-integrated solar thermal collectors. Applied Energy, 171, 392-404. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.039

Matrawy, K.K., & Farkas, I. (1997). Comparison study for three types of solar collectors for water heating. Energy Conversion and Management, 38, 861–869.DOI: 10.1016/S0196-8904(96)00089-1

Mohsen, M. S., Al-Ghandoor, A., & Al-Hinti, I. (2009). Thermal analysis of compact solar water heater under climatic conditions. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 36, 962-968.DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2009.06.019

Nahar, N.M., & Gupta, J.P. (1989). Studies on gap spacing between absorber and cover glazing in flat plate solar collectors. International Journal Energy Research, 13, 727-732. DOI: 10.1002/er.4440130611

Rama, S. R. G. (1997). Finite element analysis of a flat plate solar collector. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 24, 283-290.DOI: 10.1016/S0168-874X(96)00067-4

Rommel, M., & Moock, W. (1997). Collector efficiency factor F´ for absorbers with rectangular fluid ducts contacting the entire surface. Solar Energy, 60, 199–207. DOI: 10.1016/S0038-092X(97)00006-6

Selmi, M., Al-Khawaja, M.J., & Marafia, A. (2008). Validation of CFD simulation for flat plate solar energy collector. Renewable energy, 33, 383–387.DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2007.02.003

Soteris, A. K. (2009). Solar Energy Engineering Processes and Systems. 1st ed. San Diego, California: Academic Press.

Shukla, R., Sumathy, K., Erickson, P., & Gong, J. (2013). Recent advances in the solar water heating systems: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 19, 173-190. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.048

Ulgen, K. (2006). Optimum tilt angle for solar collectors. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 28(13), 1171-1180. DOI: 10.1080/00908310600584524

Viorel, B. (2006). Optimum fin geometry in flat plate solar collector systems. Energy Conversion and Management, 47, 2397–2413.DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2005.11.006

Yeh, H.M., Ho, C.D., & Yeh, C.W. (2003). Effect of aspect ratio on the collector efficiency of sheet-and-tube solar water heaters with the consideration of hydraulic dissipated energy. Renewable Energy, 28, 1575-86. DOI:10.1016/S0960-1481(03)00006-5