Published

2017-05-01

Response surface methodology for estimating missing values in a pareto genetic algorithm used in parameter design

Metodología de superficie de respuesta para estimar valores faltantes en un algoritmo genético de pareto usado en diseño de parámetros

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v37n2.57152

Keywords:

Robust design, parameter design, pareto genetic algorithm, response surface methodology (en)
Diseño robusto, diseño de parámetros, algoritmo genético de pareto, metodología de superficie de respuesta. (es)

Downloads

Authors

  • Enrique Canessa Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez
  • Sergio Chaigneau Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez
We present an improved Pareto Genetic Algorithm (PGA), which finds solutions to problems of robust design in multi-response systems with 4 responses and as many as 10 control and 5 noise factors. Because some response values might not have been obtained in the robust design experiment and are needed in the search process, the PGA uses Response Surface Methodology (RSM) to estimate them. Not only the PGA delivered solutions that adequately adjusted the response means to their target values, and with low variability, but also found more Pareto efficient solutions than a previous version of the PGA. This improvement makes it easier to find solutions that meet the trade-off among variance reduction, mean adjustment and economic considerations. Furthermore, RSM allows estimating outputs’ means and variances in highly non-linear systems, making the new PGA appropriate for such systems.
En este artículo se presenta un Algoritmo Genético de Pareto (AGP) mejorado que encuentra soluciones a problemas de diseño robusto en sistemas multi-respuesta con 4 respuestas y hasta 10 factores de control y 5 de ruido. Ya que algunas respuestas podrían no haber sido obtenidas en el experimento de diseño robusto y se necesitan en el proceso de búsqueda, el AGP usa metodología de superficie de respuesta (MSR) para estimarlas. El AGP no solo entregó soluciones que ajustan adecuadamente la media de las respuestas a sus valores meta y con poca variabilidad, sino que también encontró más soluciones Pareto eficientes que una versión previa del AGP. Esta mejora facilita encontrar soluciones que alcancen el balance entre reducción de variabilidad, ajuste de media y consideraciones económicas. Además, la MSR permite estimar las medias y varianzas de las respuestas de sistemas altamente no lineales, haciendo apropiado el uso del AGP en dichos sistemas.

References

Allende, H., Bravo, D., Canessa, E., (2010). Robust Design in Multivariate Systems using Genetic Algorithms. Quality & Quantity Journal, Vol. 44, 315-332.

Canessa E., Droop, C., Allende, H., (2011). An improved genetic algorithm for robust design in multivariate systems. Quality & Quantity Journal, Vol. 42, 665-678.

Canessa E., Bielenberg, G., Allende, H., Robust (2014). Design in Multiobjective Systems using Taguchi’s Parameter Design Approach and a Pareto Genetic Algorithm. Revista Facultad Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia, Vol. 72, 73-86.

Del Castillo, E., Montgomery, D.C., McCarville, D.R., (1996). Modified desirability functions for multiple response optimization. Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 28, 337– 345.

Laumans, M., SPEA2-The Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm 2. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, 2008. Retrieved from: http://www.tik.ee.ethz.ch/~sop/pisa/ selectors/spea2/?page=spea2.php. Accessed 10 October 2015.

Lin, C.D., Anderson-Cook, C.M., Hamada, M.S., Moore, L.M., Sitter, R.R., (2014). Using Genetic Algorithms to Design Experiments: A Review. Quality Reliability Engineering International, doi: 10.1002/qre.1591.

Maghsoodloo, S., Ozdemir, G., Jordan, G., Huang, CH., (2004). Strengths and limitations of Taguchi’s contributions to quality, manufacturing, and process engineering. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 23, Nr. 2, 73-126.

Myers R., & Montgomery, D., (2002). Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. New York: J. Wiley & Sons.

Nair V.N., Taam, W., & Ye K.Q., (2002). Analysis of functional responses from robust design studies. Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 34, Nr. 4, 355-370.

Ortiz, F., Simpson, J., Pigniatello J. Jr., Heredia – Langner, A., (2004). A Genetic Algorithm Approach to Multiple – Response Optimization. Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 36, Nr. 4 432– 449.

Roy, R.K., (2001). Design of Experiments Using the Taguchi Approach. New York: J. Wiley & Sons.

Robinson, T.J., Borror, C.M., & Myers, R.H., (2004). Robust Parameter Design: A Review. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, Vol. 20, 81-101.

Taguchi, G., (1991) System of experimental design. Dearborn: American Supplier Institute.

Vandenbrande, W., (2000). Make love, not war: Combining DOE and Taguchi. In ASQ´s 54th Annual Quality Congress Proceedings, 450– 456.

Vandenbrande, W., (1998). SPC in paint application: Mission Impossible? In ASQ´s 52nd Annual Quality Congress Proceedings, 708-715.

Vining, G.G., & Myers, R.H., (1990). Combining Taguchi and response surface philosophies: a dual response approach. Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 22, 38–45.

Wan, W., & Birch, J.B., (2011). Using a modified genetic algorithm to find feasible regions of a desirability function. Quality Reliability Engineering International, Vol. 27, 1173–1182.

Wu, C.F.J., & Hamada, M.S., (2009). Experiments: Planning, Analysis, and Optimization, 2nd ed. New York: J. Wiley & Sons.

Dimensions

PlumX

Article abstract page views

948

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Canessa, E., & Chaigneau, S. (2017). Response surface methodology for estimating missing values in a pareto genetic algorithm used in parameter design. Ingeniería E Investigación, 37(2), 89-98. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v37n2.57152