Published

2016-09-01

Railway and road discrete choice model for foreign trade freight between Antioquia and the Port of Cartagena

Keywords:

Discrete choice model, foreign trade freight, stated preferences, freight transportation (en)

Downloads

Authors

  • J. D. Pineda-Jaramillo Universitat Politècnica de València, Spain.
  • I. Sarmiento Universidad Nacional de Colombia
  • J. E. Córdoba Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Most Colombian freight is transported on roads with barely acceptable conditions, and although there is a speculation about the need for a railway for freight transportation, there is not a study in Colombia showing the variables that influence the modal choice by the companies that generate freight transportation. This article presents the calculation of demand for a hypothetical railway through a discrete choice model. It begins with a qualitative research through focus group techniques to identify the variables that influence the choice of persons responsible for the transportation of large commercial companies in Antioquia (Colombia). The influential variables in the election were the cost and service frequency, and these variables were used to apply a Stated Preference (SP) and Revealed Preference (RP) survey, then to calibrate a Multinomial Logit Model (MNL), and to estimate the influence of each of them. We show that the probability of railway choice by the studied companies varies between 67% and 93%, depending on differences in these variables.

References

Breen, R. L. (2006). A practical guide to focus-group research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education , 30(3), 463-475.

Bustamante, L. (2009). Informe sobre comercio exterior Antioquia primer semestre 2009.

EPFL. (2013, 11 7). BIOGEME. Retrieved from http://biogeme.epfl.ch

Estrada, A. (2008). Modelación de la distribución del transporte de carga por carretera de productos colombianos. Masters dissertation, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellín.

Forkenbrock, D. J. (2001). Comparison of external costs of rail and truck freight transportation. Journal Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 35, 321-337.

García, L., Martínez, I., & Piñero, D. (2004, September). Determinants of mode choice between road and shipping for freight transport. Evidence of four spanish exporting sectors. Journal of transport economics and policy, 38, 447-466.

ICF International. (2009). Comparative evaluation of rail and truck fuel efficiency on competitive corridors. U.U. Department of Transportation.

Jiang, F., Johnson, P., & Calzada, C. (1999, December). Freight demand characteristics and mode choice: An analysis of results of modeling with disaggregate revealed preference data. Journal of transportation and statistics, 2(2), 149-158.

Kocur, G., Adler, T., Hyman, W., & Aunet, B. (1982). Guide to forecasting travel demand with direct utility assessment. Report N0. UMTA-NH-11-0001-82, Urban Mass

Transportation Administration U.S., Department of Transportation.Krueger, R. A. (1991). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage, California: Beverly Hills.

Márquez, L. (2009). Modelación de una red de transporte de carga en Colombia utilizando costos de externalidades. Masters dissertation, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Tunja. Ministerio de Transporte de Colombia. (2012). Transporte en cifras. Versión 2012. Bogotá.

Pineda Jaramillo, J. D., & Sarmiento Ordosgoitia, I. (2014). Variables influyentes en la elección entre carretera y ferrocarril para carga general de comercio exterior. Ingeniería Solidaria, 10(17), 29-37.

Pons, E. (2011). Influencia futura del ferrocarril en el comercio exterior. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Departamento de infraestructura, transporte y territorio, Barcelona.

Rich, J., Holmblad, P. M., & Hansen, C. O. (2009). A weighted logit freight mode-choice model. Journal Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45, 1006-1019.

Train, K., & Wilson, W. W. (2008). Estimation on Stated-Preference experiments constructed from Revealed-Preference choices. Transportation Research Part B, 42, 191-203. DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2007.04.012