Using Students’ Analysis in Teaching Public Speaking for Business
Uso del análisis de los estudiantes en la enseñanza del discurso oral en negocios
Keywords:
Students’ analysis, English for Academic Purposes, needs assessment, students’ peer evaluation (en)Análisis de los estudiantes, inglés con propósitos académicos, evaluación de necesidades, evaluación de pares (es)
Downloads
This paper investigates a particular aspect of learner participation – students’ analysis (SA) in an oral communication program of an undergraduate business and commerce curriculum in Sultan Qaboos University, Sultanate of Oman - and examines its role in improving and promoting learning effectiveness in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) classroom discourse. Drawing on the results of a set of surveys into needs analysis, students’ peer response and student feedback, it is suggested that SA can play a significant role by providing wider input into the content, design and implementation of an EAP course by creating opportunities to engage students in interesting and meaningful classroom experiences and providing essential data for reviewing and evaluating the course to improve and promote its effectiveness.
Este artículo investiga un aspecto particular de la participación del estudiante y examina su papel en el mejoramiento y promoción de la efectividad del aprendizaje en el discurso del aula de inglés con propósitos académicos. Basado en los resultados de una serie de encuestas sobre análisis de necesidades, respuesta a pares y retroalimentación del estudiante, se puede sugerir que el análisis de los estudiantes tiene un papel significativo en cuanto proporciona un insumo más amplio en el contenido, diseño e implementación de un curso de inglés con propósitos académicos, ofreciendo así mayores oportunidades para involucrar a los estudiantes en experiencias interesantes y significativas en el aula y brindando información esencial para la revisión y evaluación del curso, para así mejorar y promover su efectividad.
References
Allwright, R. (1982). Perceiving and pursuing learners’ needs. In M. Geddes and G. Sturtridge (Eds.), Individualisation (pp.24-31). Oxford: Modern English Publications.
Bartels, N. (2003). Written peer response in L2 writing. English Teaching Forum, 41 (1), 34-37.
Berg, E.C. (1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing 8 (3), 215-241.
Bhatia, V. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.
Braunstein, B., C. et al. (2000). The U.S.- SiberLink Internet project. TESL-EJ, 4 (3), 1-23. Dudley-Evans, T. & St. John, M. (1998).
Development in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, M. & Johnson, C. (1994). Teaching business English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hedderich, N., (1997). Peer tutoring via electronic mail. Unterrichtspraxis, 30 (2), 141-147.
Holliday, A. & T.Cooke. (1982). An ecological approach to ESP. Lancaster Practical Papers in English Language Education, 5 (Issues in ESP). University of Lancaster.
Jackson, J., (2005). An inter-university, cross- disciplinary analysis of business education: Perceptions of business faculty in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes, 24 (3), 293-306.
James, K., (1984). Speak to learn: Oral English for academic purposes. London: Collins.
Johns, A. & Price-Machado, D. (2001). English for specific purposes: Tailoring courses to students needs- and to the outside world. In M. Celce- Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp.43- 54). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
Jordan, R.R., (1997). English for academic purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Liu, J. & Hansen, J.G. (2005). Guiding principles for effective peer response, ELT Journal, 59(1), 31-38.
Liu, J. & Hansen, J.G. (2002). Peer response in second language writing classroom. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Lynch, T. & Anderson, K. (1992). Study speaking: A course in spoken English for academic purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Madden, C.G. & Rohlck, T.N., (1997). Discussion and interaction in the academic community. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Mendonca, C.O. & Johnson, K.E. (1994). Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly 28 (4), 74-769.
Mezirow, J. (Ed.). (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mittan, R., (1989). The peer response process: Harnessing students’ communicative power. In D. Johnson and D. Roen. (Eds.), Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students (pp. 207-219). New York: Longman.
Munby, J., (1978). Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J.C., et al. (1992). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. London: Longman.
Richterich, R. & J.L. Chancerel. (1980). Identifying the needs of adults learning a foreign language. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Rignall, R. & Furneaux, C. (1997). Speaking. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.
Rollinson, Paul. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59 (1), 23-30.
Rizvi, M.A. (2004). Teaching oral communication skills to business English learners. Journal of Communication Practices, 1 (1), 13-24.
Schon, D.A., (1991). The reflexive turn: Case studies in and on educational practice. New York: Teachers’ College.
Vaughan, D.K. (2004). The impact of the new global economy on business communication skills. Journal of Communication Practices, 1 (1), 3-11.
Villamil, O.S. & De Guerrero, M.C. (1996). Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social, cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behaviour. Journal of Second Language Writing 5 (1), 51-75.
West, R. (1994). Needs analysis in teaching: State of the art. Language Teaching, 27, 1-19.
West, R. (1997). Needs analysis: State of the art. In Howard, R., & Brown, G. (Eds.), Teacher education for LSP (pp. 68-79). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual matters.
How to Cite
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
Article abstract page views
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2005 M. Ashraf Rizvi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are authorized to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format as long as you give appropriate credit to the authors of the articles and to Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development as original source of publication. The use of the material for commercial purposes is not allowed. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
Authors retain the intellectual property of their manuscripts with the following restriction: first publication is granted to Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development.






























