New Labels for Old Problems: Grammar in Communicative Language Teaching
Nuevos rótulos para viejos problemas: La gramática en la enseñanza del lenguaje
Keywords:
English grammar, second language acquisition, grammar instruction (en)Gramática inglesa, adquisición de una segunda lengua, enseñanza de la gramática (es)
Downloads
Communicative language teaching has long been controversial due to its lack of explicit grammar instruction. Focus on form instruction, however, puts communication as the centerpiece of instruction, but addresses form on a need-to- know-basis; thus, focus on form instruction claims to balance communication and grammar. Moreover, the concept of uptake, or the process by which learners respond to correction initiated by teachers and/or other learners, has been used to demonstrate that focus on form instruction, and thus by extension, CLT, gives sufficient attention to grammar. In this article, I will show that the concept of uptake is problematic, and demonstrate that focus on form instruction does not offer a feasible way of addressing grammar in EFL classrooms. I will highlight selected aspects of focus on form instruction and uptake research.
El enfoque en la enseñanza de la forma y, por extensión el enfoque en la enseñanza comunicativa del lenguaje, facilitan la atención a la gramática. Sin embargo, el concepto de ‘uptake’ es teórica y prácticamente problemático y demuestra que el enfoque de la enseñanza en la forma no es un camino viable para enseñar gramática en salones donde el inglés se enseña como idioma extranjero. Mi propósito en este artículo es: (1) resumir las investigaciones concernientes a la enseñanza de la forma y ‘uptake’; (2) debatir que ‘uptake’ y la enseñanza en la forma no son elementos suficientes para aprender inglés como idioma extranjero ya que es muy difícil prestar atención a la gramática.
References
Allwright, B. (1984). Why don’t learners learn what teachers teach? The Interaction hypothesis. In D. Singleton & D. Little (Eds.), Language learning in formal and informal contexts (pp. 3-18). Dublin: IRAAL.
Brown, H.D. (1994). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
Brown, H.D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. White Plains, NY: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical basis of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics 1, 1-47.
Celce-Murcia, M., Britton, D., & Goodwin, J. (1996). Teaching pronunciation: A reference for teachers of English of speakers of other languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51 (2), 281-318.
Li, D. (1998). It’s always more difficult than you plan and imagine: teacher’s perceived difficulties in introducing the communicative approach in South Korea. TESOL Quarterly, 26 (1), 27-56.
Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de bot, R. Ginsberg, C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Long, M. & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15- 63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19 (1), 37-66.
Lyster, R. (1998). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183-218.
Mitchell, R. & Myles, F. (1998). Second language learning theories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shamim, F. (1996). In or out of the action zone: Location as a feature of interaction in large ESL classes in Pakistan. In, Bailey, K., and Nunan, D. (Eds.), Voices from the language classroom: Qualitative research in second language education (pp. 200-236). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sheorey, R., & Nayar, P. B. (2002). Learning and teaching English in India: Looking in from outside. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28 (2), 13-24.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of Comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Terrell, T. & Krashen, S. (1983). Natural approach: Language in the classroom. Oxford: Alemany Press.
How to Cite
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
Article abstract page views
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2003 Alexander Poole

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are authorized to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format as long as you give appropriate credit to the authors of the articles and to Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development as original source of publication. The use of the material for commercial purposes is not allowed. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
Authors retain the intellectual property of their manuscripts with the following restriction: first publication is granted to Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development.






























