Mexican Secondary School Students’ Perception of Learning the History of Mexico in English
La percepción de alumnos mexicanos de secundaria cuando aprenden la historia de México en inglés
Keywords:
Attitudes, belief, content-based instruction, emotions, learning strategies, perceptions (en)Actitudes, creencias, emociones, enseñanza basada en contenidos, estrategias de aprendizaje, percepciones. (es)
This article focuses on Mexican students’ perceptions of learning the history of Mexico in English through content-based instruction, which is one of many types of bilingual pedagogical approaches that are now considered established approaches in Mexico and around the globe. A phenomenological approach was chosen in order to understand and examine participants’ lived experiences through semi-structured interviews; this in turn led to the discovery of their acceptance or rejection towards learning the history of Mexico in English. The data suggest that despite students’ initial rejection to learning a sensitive subject as is the history of Mexico in English, most students found the content-based method as being meaningful, thus, they had a sense of pride in the end.
Downloads
References
Alderson, P., & Morrow, V. (2011). The ethics of research with children and young people: A practical handbook. London, UK: Sage.
Arriaga, P. W. (1978). Bilingual education in private elementary schools in Mexico. In C. Holcomb (Ed.), English teaching in Mexico (pp. 96-103). Mexico City, MX: Instituto Mexicano-Norteamericano de relaciones culturales.
Barbezat, S. (n.d.). Where to celebrate “El Grito”. Retrieved from http://gomexico.about.com/od/festivalsholidays/p/el_grito.htm
Braithwaite, J. J. (2007). Occam’s razor: The principle of parsimony. Academia.edu. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/1742741/Occams_Razor_The_principle_of_Parsimony
Brinton, D. M., Snow, M. A., & Wesche, M. (2011). Content-based second language instruction. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Carlo, M. S., August, D., McLaughlin, B., Snow, C. E., Dressler, C., Lippman, D. N., Lively, T. J., & White, C. E. (2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English-language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 188-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.39.2.3
Cloud, N., Genesee, F., & Hamayan, E. (2000). Dual language instruction: A handbook for enriched education. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Corbetta, P. (2003). Social research theory, methods and techniques. London, UK: Sage.
Corrales, K., & Maloof, C. (2009). Evaluating the effects of CBI on an English for medical students program. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 2(1), 15-23.
Cothran, D. J., & Hodges, P. K. (2006). Students’ perspectives on direct, peer, and inquiry teaching strategies. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25, 166-181.
Cullingford, C. (1991). The inner world of the school: Children’s ideas about schools. London, UK: Cassell Educational Limited.
Da Silva, M. (2005). Constructing the teaching process from inside out: How pre-service teachers make sense of their perceptions of the teaching of the four skills. TESL-EJ, 9(2), 1-19.
Deckert, G. (2004). Guidelines for the selection of topical content in ESL programs. TESL Canada Journal, Special Issue 4. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ847924.pdf
Despagne, C. (2010). The difficulties of learning English: Perceptions and attitude in Mexico. Canadian and International Education, 39(2), 55-74.
Dickey, J. R. (2010, February). Content and language in Asia: Beyond the North American and European models. On the Inside: KATE Forum, pp. 13-15.
Evans, S., & Green, C. (2007). Why EAP is necessary: A survey of Hong Kong tertiary students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(1), 3-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.11.005
Field, J. (2003). Psycholinguistics: A resource book for students. New York, NY: Routledge.
Foster, L. V. (2007). A brief history of Mexico. New York, NY: Checkmark Books.
Groenewald, T. (2004). A phenomenological research design illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1). Retrieved from http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/3_1/pdf/groenewald.pdf
Hernández, A. (2003). Making content instruction accessible for English language learners. In G. Garcia (Ed.), English learners: Reaching the highest level of English literacy (pp. 125-149). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Holloway, I. (1997). Basic concepts for qualitative research. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.
Hycner, R. H. (1999). Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Qualitative research, (Vol. 3, pp. 143-164). London, UK: Sage.
Jiang, W. (2000). The relationship between culture and language. ELT Journal, 54(4), 328-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.4.328
King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Labuschangne, A. (2003). Qualitative research: Airy fairy or fundamental. The Qualitative Report, 8(1). Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR8-1/labuschagne.html
Lafayette, R. C., & Buscaglia, M. (1985). Students learn language via a civilization course: A comparison of second language classroom environments. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 323-342.
Mack, N., Woodsong, C., MacQueen, K. M., Guest, G., & Namey, E. (2005). Qualitative research methods: A data collector’s field guide. Durham, NC: Family Health International.
Met, M. (1991). Learning language through content: Learning content through language. Foreign Language Annals, 24(4), 281-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1991.tb00472.x
Moore, D. (2007). Les représentations des langues et de leur apprentissage: itinéraires théoriques et trajets méthodologiques [Representations of language and learning: Theoretical and methodological route paths]. In D. Moore (Ed.), Les représentations des langues et de leur apprentissage (pp. 9-22). Le Mesnil-sur-l’Estrée, FR: Didier.
Mugler, F., & Landbeck, R. (2000). Learning, memorisation and understanding among distance learners in the South Pacific. Learning and Instruction, 10(2), 179-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00026-2
Nunan, D. (2001). Syllabus design. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 55-65). New York, NY: Heinle & Heinle Thomson Learning.
Occam’s razor. (n.d.). In Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Retrieved from http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/424706/Ockhams-razor
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York, NY: Newbury House Publishers.
Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. London, UK: Sage.
Schenk, K., & Williamson, J. (2005). Ethical approaches to gathering information from children and adolescents in international settings: Guidelines and resource. Washington DC: Population Council.
Secretaría de Educación Pública. (n.d.). Programas de estudio: primaria [primary school curricula]. Retrieved from http://www.curriculobasica.sep.gob.mx/index.php/prog-primaria
Short, D. J. (2002). Language learning in sheltered social studies classes. TESOL Journal, 11(1), 18-24.
Silva, T. (1997). On the ethical treatment of ESL writers. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 359-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3588052
Smyth, J. (2006). Educational leadership that fosters “student voice”. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 9(4), 279-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603120600894216
Stewart, T. (2007). Teachers and learners evaluating course tasks together. ELT Journal, 61(3), 256-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm033
Stoller, F. L. (2002). Promoting the acquisition of knowledge in a content-based course. In J. A. Crandall & D. Kaufman (Eds.), Content-based instruction in higher education settings (pp.109-123). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Stoller, F. L. (2004). Content-based instruction: Perspectives on curriculum planning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 261-283.
Ulrich, G. (2003). Charges and counter-charges of ethical imperialism: Towards a situated approach to development ethics. In P. Quarles, V. Ufford, & A. Kumar Giri (Eds.), A moral critique of development: In search of global responsibilities (pp. 153-168). London, UK: Routledge.
Valette, R. M. (1969). The Pennsylvania project, its conclusions and its implications. The Modern Language Journal, 53(6), 396-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1969.tb04973.x
Vandenberg, D. (1997). Phenomenological research in the study of education. In D. Vandenberg (Ed.), Phenomenology and education discourse (pp. 3-37). Johannesburg, ZA: Heinemann.
Violand-Sanchez, E. (1995). Cognitive and learning styles of high school students: Implications for ESL curriculum development. In J. M. Reid (Ed.), Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom (pp. 158-168). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Welman, J. C., & Kruger, S. J. (1999). Research methodology for the business and administrative sciences. Johannesburg, ZA: International Thompson.
Wesche, M. B., & Skehan, P. (2002). Communicative, task-based, and content-based language instruction. In R. B. Kaplan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 207-228). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Wiersma, W. (1995). Research methods in education: An introduction (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Profile: Issues in Teachers´ Professional Development

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are authorized to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format as long as you give appropriate credit to the authors of the articles and to Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development as original source of publication. The use of the material for commercial purposes is not allowed. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
Authors retain the intellectual property of their manuscripts with the following restriction: first publication is granted to Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development.