Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Published
Students’ Perceptions of the Impact of CLIL in a Mexican BA Program
Percepciones de los estudiantes sobre el impacto de la enseñanza de contenido-lengua integrados en un programa de pregrado en México
Keywords:
Content and language integrated learning, material development, Mexican context, students’ perceptions, tertiary bilingual education (en)Contexto mexicano, diseño de materiales, educación superior bilingüe, enseñanza de contenido-lengua integrados, percepciones de los estudiantes (es)
Content and language integrated learning is an innovative pedagogical approach used in educational institutions worldwide. This study considers information and experiences from various settings in order to explore content and language integrated learning within the Mexican context. This study reports the perceptions of students in a BA program. Through the study’s using qualitative research, the students’ voices students reveal their emotions, struggles, benefits, and opinions related to taking content and language integrated learning classes. The analysis of the participants’ information shows the potential for implementing content and language integrated learning programs in Mexico in that it suggests some areas of improvement for teachers, material design, administrators, and institutions in general.
El enfoque pedagógico de enseñanza de contenido-lengua integrados es una tendencia innovadora en los sistemas educativos del mundo. El estudio se basa en la información y experiencia de varios contextos donde se ha usado este enfoque para explorarlo en el contexto mexicano. El artículo reporta las percepciones de estudiantes de licenciatura para conocer más sobre la enseñanza de contenido-lengua integrados. A través de la investigación cualitativa, las voces de los estudiantes revelarán las emociones, dificultades, ventajas y opiniones al tomar clases con este enfoque. El análisis de datos muestra el potencial de la implementación de programas de enseñanza de contenido-lengua integrados en México, mientras sugiere áreas de oportunidad para docentes, diseño de materiales, administrativos e instituciones en general.
Downloads
References
Aguilar, M., & Rodríguez, R. (2012). Lecturer and student perceptions on CLIL at a Spanish university. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(2), 183-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.615906
Agustín Llach, M. (2009). The role of Spanish L1 in the vocabulary use of CLIL and non-CLIL EFL learners. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & R. M. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 112-129). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Coleman, J. (2006). English-medium teaching in European higher education. Language Teaching, 39(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480600320X
Costa, F. (2009). ICLHE/CLIL at the tertiary level of education: State-of the art. Studies About Languages (Kalbu Studijos), 15, 85-88.
Costa, F., & D’Angelo, L. (2011). CLIL: A suit for all seasons? Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 4(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2011.4.1.1
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content language integrated learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Crawford, T. (2010). ESL writing in the University of Guanajuato: The struggle to enter a discourse community. Guanajuato, MX: Universidad de Guanajuato.
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486999
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182-204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092
Davies, P. (2009). Strategic management of ELT in public educational systems: Trying to reduce failure, increase success. TESL-EJ, 13(3), 1-22.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Hillyard, S. (2011). First steps in CLIL: Training the teachers. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 4(2), 1-12.
Jenkins, J. (2009). World Englishes: A resource book for students. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Lippi-Green, R. (1997). English with an accent: Language, ideology and discrimination in the United States. London, UK: Routledge.
Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R. (2012). The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lorenzo, F. (2007). The sociolinguistics of CLIL: Language planning and language change in 21st century Europe. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 20, 27-38.
Lorenzo, F., Casal, S., & Moore, P. (2010). The effects of content and language integrated learning in European education: Key findings from the Andalusian bilingual sections evaluation project. Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 418-442. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp041
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. New Jersey, NJ: Routledge.
Maza, M. A. (2012). Content and language integrated learning: advantages and disadvantages. TLATEMOANI Revista Académica de Investigación, 9, 1-11.
McDonough, J., & McDonough, S. (1997). Research methods for English language teachers. London, UK: Hodder Education.
Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL: Content language integrated learning in bilingual and multilingual education. Oxford, UK: Macmillan Education.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Understanding English as a lingua franca. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Van de Craen, P., Mondt, K., Allain, L., & Gao, Y. (2007). Why and how CLIL works: An outline for a CLIL theory. Views, 16(3) 70-78.
Vency, H. J., & Ramganesh, E. (2013). Is language proficiency taken care of at higher education level? Need for self-efficacy of post graduate students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(6), 1176-1183. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.6.1176-1183
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are authorized to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format as long as you give appropriate credit to the authors of the articles and to Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development as original source of publication. The use of the material for commercial purposes is not allowed. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
Authors retain the intellectual property of their manuscripts with the following restriction: first publication is granted to Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development.
