Published

2018-01-01

Scaffolding the Learning-to-Teach Process: A Study in an EFL Teacher Education Programme in Argentina

El andamiaje del proceso de aprender a enseñar: un estudio en un programa de formación de profesores de inglés como lengua extranjera en Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v20n1.63032

Keywords:

Learning-to-teach, scaffolding, student-teachers, supervisor, teacher education (en)
andamiaje, aprender a enseñar, formación de profesores, profesores en formación, supervisora (es)

Downloads

Authors

  • Maria Gimena San Martin Universidad Nacional de Córdoba

This study seeks to examine how a supervisor scaffolds the student-teachers’ learning-to-teach process in the context of one-to-one tutoring sessions in an English as a foreign language teacher education programme in Argentina. The findings indicate that scaffolding implies two main phases: a diagnostic and an intervention phase. Moreover, the supervisor was found to provide contingent help, which suited the student-teachers’ perceived needs and/or difficulties. In conclusion, scaffolded help should be understood in relation to the function it serves and how it accommodates the students’ level of understanding.

Este estudio tiene el propósito de examinar como una supervisora orienta a los profesores en formación durante su proceso de aprender a enseñar en el contexto de tutorías uno-a-uno de un profesorado de lengua extranjera - inglés en Argentina. Los resultados muestran que el andamiaje consiste en dos fases principales: una de diagnóstico y otra de intervención. Además, se determinó que la supervisora proveía ayuda contingente, la cual se adaptaba a las necesidades y/o dificultades de los futuros profesores. En conclusión, el andamiaje debe ser entendido en relación con la función que cumple y cómo se adapta al nivel de comprensión de los profesores en formación.

References

Brandt, C. (2008). Integrating feedback and reflection in teacher preparation. ELT Journal, 62(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm076.

Cartaut, S., & Bertone, S. (2009). Co-analysis of work in the triadic supervision of preservice teachers based on neo Vygotskian activity theory: case study from French university institute of teacher training. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(8), 1086-1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.006.

Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev, & S. Mille (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory and practice in cultural context (pp. 39-64). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840975.004.

Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815-843. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20171.

Copland, F. (2010). Causes of tension in post-observation feedback in pre-service teacher training: An alternative view. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 466-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.001.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications.

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Engin, M. (2013). Trainer talk: Levels of intervention. ELT Journal, 67(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs048.

Freeman, D., & Johnson, K. E. (1998). Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base of language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 397-417.

Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in educational settings. Albany, US: State University of New York Press.

Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 201-224). Mahwah, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, US: Sage.

Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. L. (2005). Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 185-217. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20048.

Randall, M., & Thornton, B. (2001). Advising and supporting teachers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C. (2008). Second language teacher education today. RELC Journal, 39(2), 158-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688208092182.

Stone, C. A. (1998a). Should we salvage the scaffolding metaphor? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(4), 409-413. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949803100411.

Stone, C. A. (1998b). The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(4), 344-364. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949803100404.

Tabak, I. (2004). Synergy: A complement to emerging patterns of distributed scaffolding. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 305-335. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_3.

Tang, S. Y. F., & Chow, A. W. K. (2007). Communicating feedback in teaching practice supervision in a learning-oriented field experience assessment framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(7), 1066-1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.07.013.

Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1991). The instructional conversation: Teaching and learning in social activity (Research report 2). Santa Cruz, us: National Centre for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning, University of California.

van de Pol, J. (2012). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: Exploring, measuring, promoting and evaluating scaffolding. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Retrieved from http://dare.uva.nl/record/426432.

van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6.

van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2011). Patterns of contingent teaching in teacher-student interaction. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 46-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.10.004.

Van Zoest, L. R., & Stockero, S. L. (2008). Synergistic scaffolds as a means to support preservice teachers learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 2038-2048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.04.006.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, US: Harvard University Press.

Wells, G. (1999). Using L1 to master L2: A response to Anton and DiCamilla’s “Social-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom”. Modern Language Journal, 83(2), 248-254. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00019.

Wertsch, J. V. (1979). From social interaction to higher psychological processes: A clarification and application of Vygotsky’s theory. Human Development, 22, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1159/000272425.

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x.

Wright, T. (2010). Second language teacher education: Review of recent research on practice. Language Teaching, 43(3), 259-296. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000030.

Dimensions

PlumX

Article abstract page views

1880

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Scaffolding the Learning-to-Teach Process: A Study in an EFL Teacher Education Programme in Argentina. (2018). Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 20(1), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v20n1.63032