English for Academic Purposes Related to Dentistry: Analyzing the Reading Comprehension Process
Inglés con fines académicos vinculado a la odontología: análisis del proceso de comprensión lectora
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v23n2.86965Keywords:
Dentistry, English for academic purposes, lexical acquisition, reading comprehension (en)adquisición de léxico, comprensión lectora, inglés con fines académicos, odontología (es)
The Universidad de la República, in Uruguay, offers reading comprehension in English courses within the career of dentistry for students to access information in this language. The study sought to analyze the fulfilment of the course’s aims and to test the hypothesis that the greater the vocabulary that dentistry students possess, the better they will be able to understand written dentistry texts. A mixed approach, based on interviews and a class survey, was used. Data showed that the course’s objectives were achieved. Participants stated that the course is highly meaningful, and they believed that the previously mentioned correlation exists. However, this could not be statistically verified, which indicates that multiple reading comprehension skills are involved when trying to understand academic texts.
La Universidad de la República, en Uruguay, brinda cursos de comprensión lectora en inglés durante la carrera de Odontología para que sus estudiantes accedan a información en esta lengua. En la investigación se analizó el cumplimiento de los objetivos del curso y la hipótesis de que entre más vocabulario poseen los estudiantes de odontología, mejor comprenden los textos académicos sobre odontología. Se utilizó una metodología mixta basada en entrevistas y una encuesta. Con la información recabada se verificó el cumplimiento de los objetivos del curso. Los participantes manifestaron que el curso es muy significativo y que existe la correlación analizada. Sin embargo, esto no pudo ser verificado estadísticamente, lo que indica que para comprender textos académicos son necesarias múltiples habilidades.
References
Basturkmen, H. (2012). A genre-based investigation of discussion section of research articles in Dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.10.004
Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes: Theory, politics, and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410601803
Bhatia, V. (2002). A generic view of academic discourse. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 21–39). Longman.
Brown, J. D., & Rodgers, T. S. (2002). Doing second language research. Oxford University Press.
Carabelli, P. (2018). Lexical growth in English among undergraduate dentistry students [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Southampton University, United Kingdom.
Caro, K., & Rosado-Mendinueta, N. (2017). Lexis, lexical competence and lexical knowledge: A review. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(2), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0802.01
Carter, R. (2006). Exploring grammar in context: Grammar reference and practice. Cambridge University Press.
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge grammar of English: A comprehensive guide. Spoken and written English grammar and usage. Cambridge University Press.
Cruz, A., & D’Alessandro, A. (2015). Esquemas de conocimiento previo en la comprensión lectora en lengua extranjera: su aplicación en materiales para el desarrollo de la comprensión lectora en el nivel superior [Schemes of previous knowledge in reading comprehension in a foreign language: Its application in materials for the development of reading comprehension at the higher level]. In C. Muse (Ed.), Lectura y escritura 7: segundas lenguas y lenguas extranjeras (pp. 52–62). Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.
Cullen, R. (2008). Teaching grammar as a liberating force. ELT Journal, 62(3), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm042
de Chazal, E. (2014). English for academic purposes. Oxford University Press.
de la Garza, B., & Harris, R. J. (2017). Acquiring foreign language vocabulary through meaningful linguistic context: Where is the limit of vocabulary learning? Journal of Psycholinguist Research, 46(2), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9444-0
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
Dudley-Evans, T., & St. John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge University Press.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2014). Teaching reading for academic purposes. In M. Celce-Murcia, D. M. Brinton, & M. A. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (4th ed., pp. 189–205). National Geographic Learning & Heinle Cengage Learning.
Harkio, N., & Pietilä, P. (2016). The role of vocabulary breadth and depth in reading comprehension: A quantitative study of Finnish EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(6), 1079–1088. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0706.03
Harwood, N. (2002). Taking a lexical approach to teaching: Principles and problems. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00028
Horst, M. (2005). Learning L2 vocabulary through extensive reading: A measurement study. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(3), 355–382. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.61.3.355
Hudson, T. (2007). Teaching second language reading. Oxford University Press.
Hyland, K. (2011). Specific purpose programs. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 201–217). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315783.ch12
Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, role and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524650
Kang, E. Y. (2015). Promoting L2 vocabulary learning through narrow reading. RELC Journal, 46(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688215586236
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.
Krashen, S. D. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 73(4), 440–464. https://doi.org/10.2307/326879
Küçükoğlu, H. (2013). Improving reading skills through effective reading strategies. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 709–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.113
Laufer, B. (1992). Reading in a foreign language: How does L2 lexical knowledge interact with the reader’s general academic ability? Journal of Research in Reading, 15(2), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1992.tb00025.x
Lewis, M. (Ed.). (2000). Teaching collocation: Further developments in the lexical approach. Language Teaching Publications.
Lewis, M. (2002a). Implementing the lexical approach: Putting theory into practice. Thomson Heinle.
Lewis, M. (2002b). The lexical approach: The state of ELT and a way forward. Thomson Heinle.
Marshall, S., & Gilmour, M. (1993). Lexical knowledge and reading comprehension in Papua New Guinea. English for Specific Purposes, 12(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(93)90028-M
Mason, J. (1996). Qualitative researching. Sage Publications.
McCarter, S., & Jakes, P. (2009). Uncovering EAP: How to teach academic writing and reading. Macmillan.
McCarthy, M. (2011). Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
McKay, S. L. (2006). Researching second language classrooms. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McNamara, T. F. (1996). Measuring second language performance. Longman.
Meara, P. (1996). The dimensions of lexical competence. In G. Brown, K. Malmkjær, & J. Williams (Eds.), Performance and competence in second language acquisition (pp. 35–53). Cambridge University Press.
Meara, P. (1997). Towards a new approach to modelling vocabulary acquisition. In N. Schmitt, & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 109–121). Cambridge University Press.
Meara, P. (2002). The rediscovery of vocabulary. Second Language Research, 18(4), 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658302sr211xx
Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Newbury House.
Nation, P., & Waring, R. (1997). Vocabulary size, text coverage and word lists. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 6–19). Cambridge University Press.
Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52(3), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00193
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732942
Read, J., & Chapelle, C. A. (2001). A framework for second language vocabulary assessment. Language Testing, 18(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220101800101
Reynolds, B. L. (2014). A mixed-methods approach to investigating first- and second-language incidental vocabulary acquisition through the reading of fiction. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.88
Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01146.x
Schmitt, N., & McCarthy, M. (Eds.) (1997). Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy. Cambridge University Press.
Thornbury, S. (2001). Uncovering grammar. Prentice Hall.
Uccelli, P., Galloway, E. P., Barr, C. D., Meneses, A., & Dobbs, C. L. (2015). Beyond vocabulary: Exploring cross-disciplinary academic-language proficiency and its association with reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(3), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.104
Wallace, C. (2007). Vocabulary: The key to teaching English language learners to read. Reading Improvement, 44(4), 189–193.
Williams, R. (1985). Teaching vocabulary recognition strategies in ESP reading. The ESP Journal, 4(2), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-2380(85)90015-0
How to Cite
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Doris Correa, Juan Carlos Montoya. (2025). Academic English Needs and Practices of Faculty and Students at a Public University in Medellín, Colombia. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.358410.
Dimensions
PlumX
Article abstract page views
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Patricia Carabelli

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are authorized to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format as long as you give appropriate credit to the authors of the articles and to Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development as original source of publication. The use of the material for commercial purposes is not allowed. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
Authors retain the intellectual property of their manuscripts with the following restriction: first publication is granted to Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development.






























