Implications of technical-instrumental rationality in health education: pending challenges
Implicaciones de la racionalidad técnica-instrumental en la enseñanza en áreas de la salud: desafíos pendientes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v65n3.63950Descargas
letter to the editor
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v65n3.63950
Implications of technical-instrumental rationality
in health education: pending challenges
Implicaciones de la racionalidad técnica-instrumental en la enseñanza
en áreas de la salud: desafíos pendientes
Recibido: 07/04/2017. Aceptado: 31/05/2017.
Juan Carlos Beltrán-Véliz1 • Sergio Muñoz-Navarro2 • Sonia Osses-Bustingorry1 • Braulio Navarro-Aburto3 • Sebastián Peña-Troncoso4
1 Universidad de la Frontera - Faculty of Education, Social Sciences and Humanities - Temuco - Chile.
2 Universidad de la Frontera - Faculty of Medicine - Temuco - Chile.
3 Universidad Autónoma de Chile - Temuco Campus - Faculty of Education - Temuco - Chile.
4 Universidad de Los Lagos - Puerto Montt Campus - Department of Physical Activity Sciences - Puerto Montt - Chile.
Corresponding author: Juan Carlos Beltrán-Véliz. Faculty of Education, Social Sciences and Humanities, Universidad de la Frontera. Avenida Francisco Salazar 01145. Telephone number +56 977795983. Temuco. Chile. Email: beltranovic@hotmail.com.
Beltrán-Véliz JC, Muñoz-Navarro S, Osses-Bustingorry S, Navarro-Aburto B, Troncoso-Peña S. Implications of technical-instrumental rationality in health education: pending challenges. Rev. Fac. Med. 2017;65(3):541-2. English. doi: https://doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v65n3.63950.
Beltrán-Véliz JC, Muñoz-Navarro S, Osses-Bustingorry S, Navarro-Aburto B, Troncoso-Peña S. [Implicaciones de la racionalidad técnica-instrumental en la enseñanza en áreas de la salud: desafíos pendientes]. Rev. Fac. Med. 2017;65(3):541-2. English. doi: https://doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v65n3.63950.
Dear Editor,
The current era, characterized by postmodernism, puts a strain on the true meaning of higher education, specifically in relation to health, which has been guided by logics binding the technical, reflective and critical rationality of those who train professionals. One of the core concepts of this contemporary debate is the imposition of technical-instrumental rationality as the only paradigm of knowledge. This imposition eclipses the epistemological foundation of educational work and the teleological problems of every teaching act (1). Actually, in the words of Heidegger, insofar as man technically constructs the world as an object, the path to the open is voluntarily and completely obstructed. (2, p218). In this context, it is possible to observe the technical-instrumental rationality of knowledge, which constitutes one of the cognitive interests that underlies all human practices and, specifically, the teaching methods in health.
In this field, the problem is generated when the traditional model of education is legitimized as unique, because here non-participatory teaching methodologies with marked teacher-centered emphases are used. As a matter of fact, a study revealed that teachers have what could be considered more as a behavioral view, since students must memorize information and teaching takes place through repetition and constant review (3). Thus, we find ourselves in the presence of a teaching crisis that hinders the foundations of thought. In this regard, a research conducted in health programs (Nutrition, Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing) showed that teachers require pedagogical knowledge to improve the quality of teaching (4).
The technical-instrumental rationality limits the actions of teachers and students due to the lack of critical and reflective thinking. This happens, in part, because technology has expanded to such an extent that provides physicians with more means to rely on, while reflection has been left aside (5). It is evident that health programs, in relation to pedagogical practices, have been automated and instrumented (6), causing a crisis in higher education, specifically in the quality of the training provided to students.
It is pertinent, therefore, to transform the teaching processes to generate a true scientific revolution based on a crisis that challenges the dominant paradigm and fosters the emergence of a new paradigm with a theoretical nucleus that supports a reflective practice. In this way, teachers should develop their practice not only in a mechanized way, but in a reflective way. According to Cassís (7), Schön stated that reflective professional practice allows the teacher to build knowledge by solving the problems found in practice, which implies building knowledge from actions to take decisions through the use of strategies and methodologies and to innovate focused on critical reflection. In this sense, pedagogical strategies such as collaborative work, problem-based learning, debates, Socratic dialogue, case studies, reflection, feedback, discussion groups and structured controversy are proposed as valid tools.
Reflective practice would allow teachers to analyze, debate and question their own practices to improve and, thereby, optimize the teaching-learning processes of students. Additionally, it would favor the development of reflexive and critical thinking in students regarding diverse pedagogical issues and problems that emerge in the health area. In conclusion, without excluding technique and practice, teachers should articulate their practices with reflective rationality aiming at professionalizing the pedagogical processes of the health disciplines, all this with the purpose of improving the quality of student training.
References
1.Mansilla-Sepúlveda J, Beltrán-Véliz J. Racionalidad instrumental y prácticas de gestión en jefes técnicos de liceos de la Araucanía. RIE. 2016;34(1):151-65. http://doi.org/cd64.
2.Heidegger M. Caminos de bosque. Madrid: Alianza; 1995.
3.Ortega-Bastidas J, Nocetti-de la Barra A, Ortiz-Moreira L. Prácticas reflexivas del proceso de enseñanza en docentes universitarios de las ciencias de la salud. Rev. Educ Méd Super. 2015; 29(3):576-90.
4.Nome-Farbinger C, Nualart-Grollmus Z, Mansilla-Sepúlveda J, Beltrán-Véliz J. Representaciones que poseen los profesionales del área de la salud respecto de sus prácticas de enseñanza de las asignaturas disciplinarias en el aula. Rev. Fac. Med. 2013;61(1):17-23.
5.Mundt E. Reflexiones acerca de una Reforma a la Educación Médica. Rev. Méd Chile 2004;132(1):119-20. http://doi.org/c823p4.
6.Loaiza-Zuluaga YE, Rodríguez-Rengifo JC, Vargas-López HH. La práctica pedagógica de los docentes universitarios en el área de la salud y su relación con el desempeño académico. Latinoam Estud Educ. 2012;8(1):95-118.
7.Cassís-Larrain AJ. Donald Schön: una práctica profesional reflexiva en la universidad. Compás Empresarial. 2011; 3(5):54-8.
Recibido: 7 de abril de 2017; Aceptado: 31 de mayo de 2017
Dear Editor,
The current era, characterized by postmodernism, puts a strain on the true meaning of higher education, specifically in relation to health, which has been guided by logics binding the technical, reflective and critical rationality of those who train professionals. One of the core concepts of this contemporary debate is the imposition of technical-instrumental rationality as the only paradigm of knowledge. This imposition eclipses the epistemological foundation of educational work and the teleological problems of every teaching act 1. Actually, in the words of Heidegger, insofar as man technically constructs the world as an object, the path to the open is voluntarily and completely obstructed. (2, p218). In this context, it is possible to observe the technical-instrumental rationality of knowledge, which constitutes one of the cognitive interests that underlies all human practices and, specifically, the teaching methods in health.
In this field, the problem is generated when the traditional model of education is legitimized as unique, because here non-participatory teaching methodologies with marked teacher-centered emphases are used. As a matter of fact, a study revealed that teachers have what could be considered more as a behavioral view, since students must memorize information and teaching takes place through repetition and constant review 3. Thus, we find ourselves in the presence of a teaching crisis that hinders the foundations of thought. In this regard, a research conducted in health programs (Nutrition, Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing) showed that teachers require pedagogical knowledge to improve the quality of teaching 4.
The technical-instrumental rationality limits the actions of teachers and students due to the lack of critical and reflective thinking. This happens, in part, because technology has expanded to such an extent that provides physicians with more means to rely on, while reflection has been left aside 5. It is evident that health programs, in relation to pedagogical practices, have been automated and instrumented 6, causing a crisis in higher education, specifically in the quality of the training provided to students.
It is pertinent, therefore, to transform the teaching processes to generate a true scientific revolution based on a crisis that challenges the dominant paradigm and fosters the emergence of a new paradigm with a theoretical nucleus that supports a reflective practice. In this way, teachers should develop their practice not only in a mechanized way, but in a reflective way. According to Cassis 7, Schõn stated that reflective professional practice allows the teacher to build knowledge by solving the problems found in practice, which implies building knowledge from actions to take decisions through the use of strategies and methodologies and to innovate focused on critical reflection. In this sense, pedagogical strategies such as collaborative work, problem-based learning, debates, Socratic dialogue, case studies, reflection, feedback, discussion groups and structured controversy are proposed as valid tools.
Reflective practice would allow teachers to analyze, debate and question their own practices to improve and, thereby, optimize the teaching-learning processes of students. Additionally, it would favor the development of reflexive and critical thinking in students regarding diverse pedagogical issues and problems that emerge in the health area. In conclusion, without excluding technique and practice, teachers should articulate their practices with reflective rationality aiming at professionalizing the pedagogical processes of the health disciplines, all this with the purpose of improving the quality of student training.
References
Referencias
Mansilla-Sepúlveda J, Beltrán-Véliz J. Racionalidad instrumental y prácticas de gestión en jefes técnicos de liceos de la Araucanía. RIE. 2016;34(1):151-65. http://doi.org/cd64.
Heidegger M. Caminos de bosque. Madrid: Alianza; 1995.
Ortega-Bastidas J, Nocetti-de la Barra A, Ortiz-Moreira L. Prácticas reflexivas del proceso de enseñanza en docentes universitarios de las ciencias de la salud. Rev. Educ Méd Super. 2015; 29(3):576-90.
Nome-Farbinger C, Nualart-Grollmus Z, Mansilla-Sepúlveda J, Beltrán-Véliz J. Representaciones que poseen los profesionales del área de la salud respecto de sus prácticas de enseñanza de las asignaturas disciplinarias en el aula. Rev. Fac. Med. 2013;61(1):17-23.
Mundt E. Reflexiones acerca de una Reforma a la Educación Médica. Rev. Méd Chile 2004;132(1):119-20. http://doi.org/c823p4.
Loaiza-Zuluaga YE, Rodríguez-Rengifo JC, Vargas-López HH. La práctica pedagógica de los docentes universitarios en el área de la salud y su relación con el desempeño académico. Latinoam Estud Educ. 2012;8(1):95-118.
Cassís-Larrain AJ. Donald Schön: una práctica profesional reflexiva en la universidad. Compás Empresarial. 2011; 3(5):54-58.
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2017 Revista de la Facultad de Medicina

Esta obra está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento 3.0 Unported.
Derechos de autor
Los autores deben aceptar transferir a la Revista de la Facultad de Medicina los derechos de autor de los artículos publicados. La editorial tiene el derecho del uso, reproducción, transmisión, distribución y publicación en cualquier forma o medio. Los autores no podrán permitir o autorizar el uso de la contribución sin el consentimiento escrito de la revista. Estos archivos están disponibles en https://goo.gl/EfWPdX y https://goo.gl/6zztk4 y deben cargarse en el paso 4 del envío OJS (archivos complementarios).
La carta de cesión de derechos de autor y la de responsabilidad de autoría deben ser entregadas junto con el original.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).