Published

1962-10-01

Comparación de la eficacia de dos toxinas diftéricas

Keywords:

prueba de Schick, toxina diftérica, difteria (es)

Downloads

Authors

  • Luis Eduardo Giraldo Correa Universidad Nacional de Colombia
  • Inés Mora Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Se efectuaron pruebas de Schick con el propósito de comparar la eficacia de la toxina diftérica producida por el Instituto Nacional de Salud Sarnper-Martínez, en relación con la producida por el Laboratorio Parke-Davis. Se pudo concluir que los productos tenían una eficacia análoga y que la inmunidad era alta (74,4%) en el grupo de escolares estudiado.


How to Cite

APA

Giraldo Correa, L. E. and Mora, I. (1962). Comparación de la eficacia de dos toxinas diftéricas. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina, 30(4), 87–90. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/revfacmed/article/view/22565

ACM

[1]
Giraldo Correa, L.E. and Mora, I. 1962. Comparación de la eficacia de dos toxinas diftéricas. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina. 30, 4 (Oct. 1962), 87–90.

ACS

(1)
Giraldo Correa, L. E.; Mora, I. Comparación de la eficacia de dos toxinas diftéricas. Rev. Fac. Med. 1962, 30, 87-90.

ABNT

GIRALDO CORREA, L. E.; MORA, I. Comparación de la eficacia de dos toxinas diftéricas. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina, [S. l.], v. 30, n. 4, p. 87–90, 1962. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/revfacmed/article/view/22565. Acesso em: 30 jul. 2024.

Chicago

Giraldo Correa, Luis Eduardo, and Inés Mora. 1962. “Comparación de la eficacia de dos toxinas diftéricas”. Revista De La Facultad De Medicina 30 (4):87-90. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/revfacmed/article/view/22565.

Harvard

Giraldo Correa, L. E. and Mora, I. (1962) “Comparación de la eficacia de dos toxinas diftéricas”, Revista de la Facultad de Medicina, 30(4), pp. 87–90. Available at: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/revfacmed/article/view/22565 (Accessed: 30 July 2024).

IEEE

[1]
L. E. Giraldo Correa and I. Mora, “Comparación de la eficacia de dos toxinas diftéricas”, Rev. Fac. Med., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 87–90, Oct. 1962.

MLA

Giraldo Correa, L. E., and I. Mora. “Comparación de la eficacia de dos toxinas diftéricas”. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina, vol. 30, no. 4, Oct. 1962, pp. 87-90, https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/revfacmed/article/view/22565.

Turabian

Giraldo Correa, Luis Eduardo, and Inés Mora. “Comparación de la eficacia de dos toxinas diftéricas”. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina 30, no. 4 (October 1, 1962): 87–90. Accessed July 30, 2024. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/revfacmed/article/view/22565.

Vancouver

1.
Giraldo Correa LE, Mora I. Comparación de la eficacia de dos toxinas diftéricas. Rev. Fac. Med. [Internet]. 1962 Oct. 1 [cited 2024 Jul. 30];30(4):87-90. Available from: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/revfacmed/article/view/22565

Download Citation

Article abstract page views

192

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

License

Copyright

Authors must agree to transfer to the Revista de la Facultad de Medicina the copyright of the articles published in the Journal. The publisher has the right to use, reproduce, transmit, distribute and publish the articles in any form. Authors will not be able to permit or authorize the use of their published paper without the written consent of the Journal.

The letter of copyright transfer and the letter of authorship responsibility must be submitted along with the original paper through the Journal OJS platform. These files are available in https://goo.gl/EfWPdX y https://goo.gl/6zztk4 and must be uploaded in step 4 (supplementary files).

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).