NGOs EFFICIENCY AND TRANSPARENCY POLICY: THE COLOMBIAN CASE
POLÍTICA DE EFICIENCIA Y TRANSPARENCIA EN LAS ONG: EL CASO COLOMBIANO
POLÍTICA DE EFICIÊNCIA E TRANSPARÊNCIA NAS ONG: O CASO COLOMBIANO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v26n60.55534Palabras clave:
Transparency, efficiency, NCOs, Internet (en)Transparencia, eficiencia, ONG, Internet (es)
Transparência, eficiência, ONG, internet (pt)
Descargas
In recent years the influence of Colombian non-governmental organizations (NCOs) in diverse social sectors of the country has increased. However, the legitimacy of this sector has been undermined by corruption. This distrust has questioned the efficiency of NCOs as social tools. Transparency as a mechanism against corruption and one of the tools that improves the functioning of an organization is considered. There is no doubt that Internet is an essential element in disseminating information to the different stakeholders of the organization.
This paper sets out three main objectives: i) the analysis of information disclosure through the Internet of Colombian NCOs, ii) the analysis of the efficiency of these entities in reaching their social goals and, iii) the analysis of the online transparency effect in a greater efficiency of the Colombian NCOs.
En los últimos años se ha evidenciado un incremento de la influencia de las Organizaciones No Gubernamentales (ONG) colombianas en diversos sectores de la sociedad. No obstante, la legitimidad de este tipo de organizaciones se ha visto desdibujada por la corrupción, originando cierta desconfianza en su labor y cuestionamientos sobre su eficiencia como herramienta social. Por su parte, la transparencia es considerada como un mecanismo anti-corrupción y una de las herramientas para el mejoramiento en la gestión de estas organizaciones; no cabe duda de que el Internet es un elemento clave para la diseminación de información a las diferentes partes interesadas. Por tal razón, este artículo se plantea tres objetivos: i) analizar la divulgación de información a través del Internet por parte de las ONG colombianas, ii) analizar la eficiencia de estas entidades en la consecución de sus objetivos sociales y iii) analizar el efecto de la transparencia en línea sobre una mayor eficiencia de las ONG en Colombia.
Referencias
Alexander, W. R. J., Haug, A. A., & Jaforullah, M. (2010). A two-stage double-bootstrap data envelopment analysis of efficiency differences of New Zealand secondary schools. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 34(2), 99-110.
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
Berggren, E., & Bernshteyn, R. (2007). Organizational transparency drives company performance. The Journal of Management Development, 26(5), 411-417.
Biener, C., & Martin, E. (2011). The performance of microinsurance programs: a data envelopment. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 78(1), 83-115.
Boot, A. W. A., & Thakor, A. V. (2001). The many faces of information disclosure. The Review of Financial Studies, 14(4), 1021-1057.
Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2002). Government-nonprofit partnership: A defining framework. Public Administration and Development, 22(1), 19-30.
Burger, R., & Owens, T. (2010). Promoting transparency in the NGO sector: Examining the availability and reliability of self-reported data. World Development, 38(9), 1263-1277.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444.
Chen, Y, & Hasan, I. (2006). The transparency of the banking system and the efficiency of information-based bank runs. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 15, 307-331.
Ciborra, C. (2005). Interpreting e-government and development: Efficiency, transparency or governance at a distance? Information Technology & People, 18(3), 260-279.
De Castro Sanz, M. (2005). La Responsabilidad Social de las Empresas, o un nuevo concepto de empresa. CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 53, 29-51.
De França, J. M. F., De Figueiredo, J. N., & Lapa, J. S. (2010). A DEA methodology to evaluate the impact of information asymmetry on the efficiency of not-for-profit organizations with an application to higher education in Brazil. Annals of Operations Research, 173(1), 39-56.
Ebrahim, A. (2003). Accountability in Practice: Mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31(5), 813-829.
Epstein, M. J., & McFarlan, F. W. (2011). Measuring the efficiency and effectiveness of a nonprofit's performance. Strategic Finance, 93(4), 27-34.
Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 120(3), 253-290.
Florez, M. (1997). Non-governmental organisations and philanthropy: the Colombian case. Voluntas, 8(4), 386-400.
Friedman, E. J. (2000). Unfinished Transitions, Women and the Gendered Development of Democracy in Venezuela, 1936-1996. University Park: Penn State University Press.
Friedman, E. J., Hochstetler, K., & Clark, A. M. (2001). Sovereign limits and regional opportunities for global civil society in Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 36(3), 7-35.
Gandía, J. L. (2011). Internet disclosure by nonprofit organizations: Empirical evidence of nongovernmental organizations for development in Spain. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(1), 57-58.
García, L. I., & Marcuello, C. (2002). Eficiencia y captación de fondos en las organizaciones no gubernamentales para el desarrollo. Ciriec-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 58, 221-249.
García-Sánchez, I. M. (2010). The effectiveness of corporate governance: Board structure and business technical efficiency in Spain. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 18(3), 311-339.
García-Sánchez, I. M., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., & Frías-Aceituno, J. (2012). Determinants of E-Government Development: Some Methodological Issues. Journal of Management and Strategy, 3(3), 11-20.
Goatman, A. K., & Lewis, B. R. (2007). Charity E-volution? An evaluation of the attitudes of UK charities towards website adoption and use. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 12(1), 33-46.
Golden, L. L., Brockett, P. L., Betak, J. F., Smith, K. H., & Cooper, W. (2012). Efficiency metrics for nonprofit marketing/fundraising and service provision a DEA analysis. Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 9(1), 1-25.
Greenberg, J., & MacAulay, M. (2009). NPO 2.0? Exploring the web presence of environmental nonprofit organizations in Canada. Global Media Journal, 2(1), 63-88.
Gutiérrez-Nieto, B., Serrano-Cinca, C., & Mar-Molinero, C. (2007). Micro-finance institutions and efficiency. Omega, 35(2), 131-142.
Gutiérrez-Nieto, B., Serrano-Cinca, C., & Mar-Molinero, C. (2009). Social efficiency in microfinance institutions. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60(1), 104-119.
Halter, M. V., Coutinho-Arruda, M. C., & Halter, R. B. (2009). Transparency to Reduce Corruption? Journal of Business Ethics, 84(3), 373-385.
Harrison, J. P., & Sexton, C. (2006). The improving efficiency frontier of religious not-for profit hospitals. Hospital Topics, 84(1), 2-10.
Ingenhoff, D., & Koelling, A. M. (2009). The potential of web sites as a relationship building tool for charitable fundraising NPOs. Public Relations Review, 35(1), 66-77.
Jacobs, R., Smith, P. C., & Street, A. (2006). Measuring efficiency in health care: analytic techniques and health policy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Kang, S., & Norton, H. E. (2004). Nonprofit organizations' use of the World Wide Web: Are they sufficiently fulfilling organizational goals? Public Relations Review, 30(3), 279-284.
Korzeniewicz, R. P., & Smith, W. C. (2000). Poverty, inequality, and growth in Latin America: Searching for the high road to globalization. Latin American Research Review, 35(3), 7-54.
Landim L., & Thompson A. (1997). Non-governmental organisations and philanthropy in Latin America: an overview. Voluntas, 8(4),337-350.
Lee, T. D., Chen, J. Q., & Zhang, R. (2001). Utilizing the Internet as a competitive tool for non-profit organizations. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 41(3), 26-31.
Lennerfors, T. T. (2007). The transformation of transparency on the act on public procurement and the right to appeal in the context of the war on corruption. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(4), 381-390.
Levine, D. P. (2005). The corrupt organization. Human Relations, 58(6), 723-739.
Lindstedt, C., & Naurin, D. (2010). Transparency is not enough: Making transparency effective in reducing corruption. International Political Science Review, 37(3), 301-322.
Marcuello, C. (1999). Análisis de la conducta de la eficiencia de las organizaciones no gubernamentales españolas. Economía y Cooperación al Desarrollo, 778, 181-196.
Marudas, N. P., & Jacobs, F. A. (2007). The extent of excessive or insufficient fundraising among US arts organizations and the effect of organizational efficiency on donations to US arts organizations. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 72(3), 267-273.
Nelson, J. (2007). The Operation of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) in a World of Corporate and Other Codes of Conduct. Corporate Social Responsability Iniciative. Working Paper No. 34, Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, University of Harvard. Retrieved on January 2012 from: http://www. hks.harvard.edu/mrcbg/CSRI/publications/workingpaper_34_ nelson.pdf.
Nunnally. J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill: Nueva York, USA.
Ozcelik, Y. (2008). Globalization and the Internet: Digitizing the nonprofit sector. Journal of Global Business Issues, 2(1), 149-152.
Pasiouras, F. (2008). International evidence on the impact of regulations and supervision on banks' technical efficiency: An application of two-stage data envelopment analysis. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 30(2), 187-223.
Refait-Alexandre, C., Farvaque, E., & Weill, L. (2011). Are Transparent Banks More Efficient? Evidence from Russia. Retrieved on January 2012 from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1792605 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1792605.
Saxton, G. D., & Guo, C. (2011). Accountability online: Understanding the web-based accountability practices of nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(2), 270-295.
Schepers, D. H. (2006). The impact of NGO network conflict on the corporate social responsibility strategies of multinational corporations. Business and Society, 45(3), 282-299.
Shea, C., & Sitar, S. (2004). NGO Accreditation and Certification: The Way Forward? An Evaluation of the Development Community's Experience. Institutional Center for Not for profit Law. Washington. Retrieved on January 2012 from: http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/crosscutting_programs/private_voluntary_coopera-tion/conf_icnl.pdf.
Simar, L., & Wilson, P. (1998). Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: how to bootstrap in non-parametric frontier models. Management Science, 44, 49-61.
Simar, L., & Wilson P. (2000a). Statistical inference in nonparame-tric frontier models: the state of the art. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 73(1), 49-78.
Simar, L., & Wilson, P. (2000b). A general methodology for bootstrapping in nonparametric frontier models. Journal of applied statistics, 27(6), 779-802.
Simar, L., & Wilson, P. (2007). Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics, 736(1), 31-64.
Taylor M., Kent, M. L., & White, W. J. (2001). How activist organizations are using the Internet to build relationships. Public Relations Review, 27(3), 263-284.
Treviño, J. (2004). Las ONG de derechos humanos y la redención de la soberanía del estado mexicano. Foro Internacional, 777(3), 509-539.
Turilli, M., & Floridi, L. (2009). The ethics of information transparency. Ethics and Information Technology, 77(2), 105-112.
Vaccaro, A., & Madsen, P. (2009a). Corporate dynamic transparency: The new ICT-driven ethics? Ethics and Information Technology, 77 (2), 113-122.
Vaccaro, A., & Madsen, P. (2009b). ICT and an NGO: Difficulties in attempting to be extremely transparent. Ethics and Information Technology 77 (3), 221-23.
Valladares, A. M., & Neira, I. (2003). Impacto de la ayuda oficial al desarrollo en Centroamérica. Estudios Económicos de Desarrollo Internacional, 3(1), 1-19.
Vázquez, J. J. (2011). Attitudes toward nongovernmental organizations in Central America. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(1), 166-184.
Verbruggen, S., Christiaens, J., & Milis, K. (2011). Can resource dependence and coercive isomorphism explain nonprofit organizations' compliance with reporting standards? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(1), 5-32.
Warren, S., & Lloyd, R. (2009). Civil Society Self-Regulation: The Global Picture. (Briefing Paper No. 119). One World Trust, London. Retrieved on January 2012 from: http://www.oneworldtrust.org/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=377&tmpl=component&format=raw&Itemid=55.
Waters, R. D. (2007). Nonprofit organizations' use of the Internet: A content analysis of communication trends on the Internet sites of the philanthropy 400. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 78(1), 59-76.
Wu, I. X., & Zang, J. S. (2009). The Voluntary Adoption of Internationally Recognized Accounting Standards and Firm Internal Performance Evaluation. The Accounting Review, 84(4), 1281-1310.
Xuegang, C. (2004). The Effects of Corporate Governance on Corporate Transparency Experience from China Listed Companies. Accounting Research, 8, 72-80.
Zhongsheng, Z., & Hanwen, C. (2008). Accounting Information Transparency and Resources Allocation Efficiency: Theory and Empirical Evidence. Accounting Research, 12, 56-62.
Dimensions
PlumX
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo
Descargas
Cómo citar
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2016 Innovar

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0.
Todos los artículos publicados por Innovar se encuentran disponibles globalmente con acceso abierto y licenciados bajo los términos de Creative Commons Atribución-No_Comercial-Sin_Derivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Una vez seleccionados los artículos para un número, y antes de iniciar la etapa de cuidado y producción editorial, los autores deben firmar una cesión de derechos patrimoniales de su obra. Innovar se ciñe a las normas colombianas en materia de derechos de autor.
El material de esta revista puede ser reproducido o citado con carácter académico, citando la fuente.
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons:








