Publicado

2017-01-01

Análisis bibliométrico sobre la implementación de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación en las administraciones públicas: aportaciones y oportunidades de investigación

BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF ICT IMPLEMENTATION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONS: CONTRIBUTIONS AND RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES

ANÁLISE BIBLIOMÉTRICA SOBRE A IMPLEMENTAÇÃO DAS TIC NAS ADMINISTRAÇÕES PÚBLICAS: CONTRIBUIÇÕES E OPORTUNIDADES DE PESQUISA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v26n63.60674

Palabras clave:

e-Gobierno, estudio bibliométrico, métodos de investigación, administración pública y ciencias de la información (es)
E-Government, bibliometric study, research methods, Public Administration and Information Science (en)
e-Governo, estudo bibliométrico, métodos de pesquisa, administração pública e ciências da informação (pt)

Descargas

Autores/as

En la actualidad el e-Gobierno es considerado uno de los principales temas incluidos en las agendas gubernamentales, parte central de la transformación de las administraciones públicas, e innovación en la gestión y rendición de cuentas. Aunque muchas han sido las investigaciones llevadas a cabo sobre esta temática desde diferentes perspectivas, no existe aún una clara justificación percibida por los expertos de su necesidad en procesos de reformas administrativas. Esta investigación plantea como objetivo ofrecer una base sólida para futuras investigaciones mediante el análisis de las publicaciones sobre la evolución de la implementación de las tecnologías asociadas a la información y la comunicación en las administraciones públicas (e-Gobierno) como instrumento esencial para las reformas administrativas realizadas en las revistas incluidas en el índice del Instituto para la Información Científica. El análisis bibliométrico llevado a cabo destaca el bajo grado de madurez de este tema y, como principal oportunidad de investigación, la necesidad de dotar al e-Gobierno de teorías sólidas y de investigaciones de carácter cuantitativo.
Currently, e-Government is considered one of the main issues in government agendas, a central part of changes in public administrations, and an innovative feature in management and accountability. Although many research studies have underpinned this topic from different perspectives, there is no a perceived consensus among experts about its relevance for administrative change processes. Thus, the aim of this research is to enable a solid baseline for future research studies on the topic, by carrying out an analysis of the publications about the evolution of technologies for information and communication (ICT) in public administrations (e-Government), as an essential instrument for administrative changes in the journals included in the Institute for scientific Information (ISI) citation index. The bibliometric analysis highlights the degree of maturity of this topic and the need to provide e-Government with robust theories and quantitative research studies.
Na atualidade, o e-Governo é considerado um dos principais temas incluídos nas agendas governamentais, parte central da transformação das administrações públicas, e inovação no gerenciamento e prestação de contas. Ainda que tenham sido muitas as pesquisas realizadas sobre essa temática a partir de diferentes perspectivas, não existe ainda uma clara justificativa percebida pelos especialistas de sua necessidade em processos de reformas administrativas. Esta pesquisa propõe, como objetivo, oferecer uma base sólida para futuras pesquisas mediante a análise das publicações sobre a evolução da implementação das tecnologias associadas à informação e à comunicação (TIC) nas administrações públicas (e-Governo) como instrumento essencial para as reformas administrativas realizadas nas revistas incluídas no índice do Instituto para a Informação Científica (ISI). A análise bibliométrica realizada destaca o baixo grau de maturidade desse tema e, como principal oportunidade de pesquisas, a necessidade de dotar o e-Governo de teorias sólidas e de pesquisas de caráter quantitativo.

Referencias

Arnal, J., Del Rincón, D., & La Torre, A. (1994). Investigación educativa. Fundamentos y metodología. Barcelona: Labor.

Atkins, S. E. (1988). Subject trends in library and information science research 1975-1984. Library Trends, 36(4), 633-658.

Babbie, E. (2000). Fundamentos de la investigación social. Madrid: Paraninfo.

Bailey, M. T. (1992). Do Physicists Use Case Studies? Thoughts on Public Administration Research. Public Administration Review, 52(1),47-55.

Barki, H., Rivard, S., & Talbot, J. (1988). An Information Systems Keyword Classification Scheme. MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 299-322.

Berelson, B. (1952). Content Analysis in Communication Research. New York: Free Press.

Bonsón, E., Escobar, T., & Flores, F. (2006). Online transparency of the banking sector. Online Information Review, 30(6), 714-730.

Borins, S. (2001). Public Management Innovation: Toward a Global Perspective. American Review of Public Administration, 31(1), 5-21.

Borins, S. (2002). On the frontiers of electronic governance: a report on the United States and Canada. International Review of Administrative Science, 68(2), 199-211.

Brookes, B. C. (1990). Biblio-, sciento-, informetrics? What are we talking about?. Informetrics, 89/90, 31-43.

Brower, R. S., Abolafia, M. Y., & Carr, J. B. (2000). On Improving Qualitative Methods in Public Administration Research. Administration and Society, 32(4), 363-397.

Busha, C., & Harter, S. P. (1980). Research Methods in Librarianship: techniques and interpretations. New York: Academic Press.

Byrne, M. (2001). Hermeneutics as a methodology for textual analysis. AORN Journal, 73(5), 968-970.

Cameron, B. D. (2005). Trends in the Usage of isi Bibliometric Data: Uses, Abuses, and Implications. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 5(1), 105-125.

Cejudo, G. M. (2008). Explaining change in the Mexican public sector: the limits of New Pubic Management. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74(1), 111-127.

Chan, H. S., & Chow, K. W. (2007). Public Management Policy and Practice in Western China: Metapolicy, Tacit Knowledge, and implications for Management Innovation Transfer. American Review of Public Administration, 37(4), 479-497.

Charih, M., & Robert, J. (2004). Government On-line in the federal government of Canada: the organizational issue. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 70(2), 373-384.

Cleary, R. E. (2000). The Public Administration Doctoral Dissertation Reexamined: An Evaluation of the Dissertations of 1998. Public Administration Review, 60(5), 446-455.

Colson, H. (1990). Citation Rankings of Public Administration. Administration and Society, 21 (4), 452-471.

Cook, I., & Horobin, G. (2006). Implementing eGovernment without promoting dependence: Open Source software in developing countries in Southeast Asia. Public Administration and Development, 26(4), 279-289.

Cooper, H. M. (1988). Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews. Knowledge in Society, 1(1), 104-126.

Coursey, D., & Norris, D. F. (2008). Model of E-Government: Are they correct? An Empirical Assessment. Public Administration Review, 58(3), 523-536.

Cozzetto, D. A. (1994). Quantitative Research in Public Administration: A Need to Address Some Serious Methodological Problems. Administration and Society, 26(3), 337-343.

Evans, D., & Yen, D. C. (2006). E-Government: Evolving relationship of citizens and government, domestic, and international development. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), 207-235.

Federowicz, J., & Dias, M. A. (2010). A decade of design in digital government research. Government Information Quarterly, 27(1), 1-8.

Flanagan, J. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51 (4), 327-358.

Forrester, J. P., & Watson, S. S. (1994). An Assessment of Public Administration Journals: The Perspective of Editors and Editorial Boards Members. Public Administration Review, 54(5), 474-482.

Fountain, J. E. (2002). Information, institutions and governance. Cambridge: Harvard University.

Frasser, D. (2000). QSR Nvivo. NUDIST Vivo. [Computer software]. Reference Guide. Malaysia. QSR International Pty. Ltda. Melbourne Australia.

Galton, F. (1886). Regression towards mediocrity in hereditary stature. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 15, 246-263.

Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178(60), 471-479.

Georgakellos, D. A., & Marcis, A. M. (2009). Application of the semantic learning approach in the feasibility studies preparation training process. Information Systems Management, 26(3), 231-240.

Grönlund, A. (2005). What's in a field: Exploring the e-Government domain. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.

Grosser, A. (1973): Politik erkláren (Explicar la Política). Munich: Hanser.

Hartmann, J. (Ed.). (1980). Vergleichende politische Systemforschung: Konzepte und Analysen. Colonia/Viena: Böhlau.

Heeks, R., & Bailur, S. (2007). Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly, 24(1), 243-265.

Holden, S. H. (2003). The evolution of information technology management at the federal level: Implications for public administration. En G. D. Garson (ed.), Public information technology: Policy and management issues (pp. 53-73). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.

Holden, S. H.; Norris, D. F., & Fletcher, P. D. (2003). Electronic government at the local level: Progress to date and future issues. Public Performance and Management Review, 26(3), 1-20.

Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3-19.

Hood, C. (1995). Contemporary Public Management: A New Global Paradigm? Public Policy and Administration, 10, 104-117.

Houston, D. J., & Delevan, S. M. (1990). Public Administration Research: An Assessment of Journal Publications. Public Administration Review, 50(6), 674-681.

Hui, G., & Hayllar, M. R. (2010). Creating Public Value in E-Government: A Public-Private-Citizen Collaboration Framework in Web 2.0. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69(S1), S120-S131.

Jaeger, P. T. (2003). The endless wire: E-government as global phenomenon. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 323-331.

Jong, M., & Lentz, L. (2006). Scenario evaluation of municipal Web sites: Development and use of an expert-focused evaluation tool. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), 191-206.

Joseph, R. C., & Jeffers, P. I. (2009). E-Government in the Caribbean Nations. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 12(1), 52-70.

Juliani, F., & José de Oliveira, O. (2016). State of research on public service management: Identifying scientific gaps from a bibliometric study. International Journal of Information Management, 36(6), 1033-1041.

Justis, R. T., & Kreighmann, B. (1979). The feasibility study as a tool for venture analysis. Business Journal of Small Business Management, 17(1), 35-42.

Kaylor, C. H., Deshazo, R., & Van Eck, D. (2001). Gauging e-government: A report on implementing services among American cities. Government Information Quarterly, 18(4), 293-307.

Kraemer, K., & King, J. L. (2008). Information Technology and Administrative Reform: Will E-Government be Different? En Donald Norris (ed.), E-Government Research: Policy and Management (pp. 1-20). Hershey, New York: IGI.

Krebs, T. B., y Pelissero, J. P. (2010). What influences City Council adoption and support for Reinventing Government? Environmental or Institutional Factors? Public Administration Review, 70(2), 258-267.

Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. USA: SAGE.

Kurt, L. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34-46.

Lan, Z., & Anders, K. K. (2000). A Paradigmatic View of Contemporary Public Administration Research: An Empirical Test. Administration and Society, 32(2), 138-165.

Lee, J. (2010). 10 year retrospect on stage models of e-Government: Qualitative meta-synthesis. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 220-230.

Legge, J. S. Jr., & Devore, J. (1987). Measuring Productivity in Public Administration and Public Affairs Programs 1981-1985. Administration and Society, 19(2), 147-156.

Löfstedt, U. (2005). E-Government: Assessment of current research and some proposals for future direction. International Journal of Public Information Systems, 1 (1), 39-52.

Lowery, D., & Evans, K. G. (2004). The Iron Cage and Methodology: The Vicious Circle of Means Limiting Ends Limiting Means. Administration and Society, 36(3), 306-327.

McCurdy, H. E., & Cleary, R. E. (1984). A Call for Appropriate Methods. Public Administration Review, 44(6), 49-55.

Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424-433.

Nielsen, J. (1994). Heuristic evaluation. En J. Nielsen & R. L. Mack (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods (pp. 25-62). New York: Wiley.

Nord, J. H., & Nord, G. D. (1995). MIS research: Journal status and analysis. Information and Management, 29(1), 29-42.

Norris, D. F. (2005). Electronic democracy at the American grassroots. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 1 (3), 1-14.

OECD [Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development] (2003). Engaging Citizens Online for Better Policy-making. OECD Observer, Policy Brief. Recuperado el 17 de febrero del 2010 de http://www.oecd.org/publications/Pol_brief.

Palmer, R. E. (1969). Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Scleiermacher, Deilthey, Heidegger and Gadamer. Evanston-Illinoir: Northwestern University Press.

Paris, M. (2005). Local E-Government and Devolution: Electronic Service Delivery in Northern Ireland. Local Government Studies, 31 (3), 307-319.

Perry, J, L., & Kraemer, K. L. (1986). Research Methodology in the Public Administration Review, 1975-1984. Public Administration Review, 6(3), 215-226.

Piotrowski, S. J., & Van Ryzing, G. G. (2007). Citizen Attitudes Toward Transparency in Local Government. American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 306-323.

Plümber, T., & Radaelli, C. M. (2004). Publish or perish? Publications and citations of Italian political scientists in international political science journals, 1990-2002. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(6), 1112-1127.

Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348-349.

Ragin, C. C., & Zaret. D. (1983). Theory and Method in Comparative Research: Two Strategies. Social Forces, 61(3), 731-754.

Ramos-Rodríguez, A. R., & Ruíz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intelectual structure of strategic management research: a bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980-2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10), 981-1004.

Rocheleau, B., & Wu, L. (2002). Public Versus Private Information Systems. Do they differ in important ways? A review and empirical test. American Review of Public Administration, 32(4), 349-397.

Rodríguez, E. A. I., & Gutiérrez, C. J. (1999). Ciencia y método científico. En F. J. Saravia (ed.) (1999), Metodología para la investigación en marketing y dirección de empresas (pp. 21-50). Madrid: Pirámide.

Rodríguez-Bolívar, M. P., Alcaide-Muñoz, L., & López-Hernández, A. M. (2010). Trends of e-Government research: Contextualization and research opportunities. International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 10, 87-111.

Ronan, W., & Latham, G. (1974). The reliability and validity of the critical incident technique: A closer took. Studies in Personnel Psychology, 6(1), 53-64.

Sánchez-Meca, J., & Ato-García, M. (1989). Metaanálisis: Una alternativa metodológica a las revisiones tradicionales de la investigación. En J. Arnau y H. Carpintero (Eds.), Tratado de psicologia general 1: Historia, teoría y método (pp. 617-669). Madrid: Alhambra.

Scholl, H. J. (2006). Electronic government: Information management capacity, organizational capabilities, and the sourcing mix. Government Information Quarterly, 23(1), 73-96.

Sharifi, M., & Manian, A. (2010). The study of the success indicators for pre-implementation activities of Iran's E-Government development projects". Government Information Quarterly, 27(1), 63-69.

Stallings, R. A., & Ferris, J. A. (1988). Public Administration Research: Work in par, 1940-1984. Public Administration Review, 48(1), 580-585.

Suchman, E. (1967). Evaluative Research. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Thatcher, J. B., Brower, R. S., & Mason, R. M. (2006). Organizational fields and the diffusion of information technologies within and across the Nonprofit and Public Sectors: A Preliminary Theory. American Review of Public Administration, 36(4), 437-454.

Visser, R. A. (1985). Analysis of longitudinal data in behavioural and social research. Leiden: DSWO Press.

Vocino, T., & Elliott, R. H. (1982). Journal Prestige in Public Administration: A Research Note. Administration and Society, 14(1), 5-14.

Welch, E. W., & Hinnant, C. C. (2002). Internet Use, Transparency, and Interactivity Effects on Trust in Government. Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences-2003, Hawaii, USA.

Wright, B. E., Manigault, L. J., & Black, T. R. (2004). Quantitative Research Measurement in Public Administration: An Assessment of Journals Publications. Administration and Society, 35(6), 747-764.

Yildiz, M. (2007). E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 646-665.

Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research. Design and Methods. London: SAGE.

Zeger, S. L., & Liang, K. Y. (1992). An overview of methods for the analysis of longitudinal data. Statistics in Medicine, 11, 1825-1839.

Dimensions

PlumX

Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo

1370

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Cómo citar

Alcaide Muñoz, L., Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P., & López Hernández, A. M. (2017). Análisis bibliométrico sobre la implementación de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación en las administraciones públicas: aportaciones y oportunidades de investigación. Innovar, 27(63), 141-160. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v26n63.60674

Licencia

Derechos de autor 2017 Innovar

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0.

Todos los artículos publicados por Innovar se encuentran disponibles globalmente con acceso abierto y licenciados bajo los términos de Creative Commons Atribución-No_Comercial-Sin_Derivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

Una vez seleccionados los artículos para un número, y antes de iniciar la etapa de cuidado y producción editorial, los autores deben firmar una cesión de derechos patrimoniales de su obra. Innovar se ciñe a las normas colombianas en materia de derechos de autor.

El material de esta revista puede ser reproducido o citado con carácter académico, citando la fuente.

Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons: