Published

2023-07-28

Resisting Hegemonic Discourses on the Relation Between Teaching Second Languages and Socioeconomic Development

Resistiendo discursos hegemónicos sobre la relación entre la enseñanza de segundas lenguas y el desarrollo socioeconómico

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v25n2.103953

Keywords:

English, modern languages, postdevelopment, socioeconomic development (en)
desarrollo socioeconómico, inglés, lenguas modernas, posdesarrollo (es)

Downloads

Authors

This study examines hegemonic discourses on English and socioeconomic development from teachers’ perspectives. Specifically, it scrutinizes the sorts of positions a group of 36 teachers of English, French, Italian, German, and Portuguese in an undergraduate program of modern languages take towards both the predominant narrative of English as the language of development and the role that the languages they teach may also play. Using postdevelopment as a theoretical framework, teachers’ social representations around the languages they teach are analyzed. Findings suggest that, although there is a strong tendency to uncritically accept and accommodate instrumental and Anglo normative views of development, “small hopes” for configuring plural, locally sensitive, less instrumental, and ecological understandings are also emerging.

Este estudio examina, desde la perspectiva de los profesores, los discursos hegemónicos del inglés en relación con el desarrollo socioeconómico. En particular, analizamos los tipos de posicionamientos que toma un grupo de 36 profesores de inglés, francés, italiano, alemán y portugués en un programa de pregrado frente a la narrativa predominante del inglés como lengua de desarrollo y el papel que las lenguas que enseñan pueden desempeñar frente a esta narrativa. Apoyados teóricamente en el posdesarrollo, analizamos las representaciones sociales de los docentes en torno a las lenguas que enseñan. Los resultados sugieren que, aunque existe una tendencia a aceptar acríticamente las visiones instrumentales y anglonormativas del desarrollo, también surgen “pequeñas esperanzas” de interpretaciones plurales, localmente sensibles, menos instrumentales y ecológicas.

References

Block, D. (2018). Some thoughts on education and the discourse of global neoliberalism. Language and Intercultural Communication, 18(5), 576–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2018.1501851

Bonilla-Carvajal, C. A., & Tejada-Sánchez, I. (2016). Unanswered questions in Colombia’s foreign language education policy. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 18(1), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v18n1.51996

Bourdieu, P. (2002). La distinción: criterios y bases sociales del gusto (M. Ruiz de Elvira, Trans.). Taurus. (Original work published 1979)

Bresser Pereira, L. C. (2019). Models of the developmental state. Revista Cepal, (128), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.18356/876f838e-en

British Council. (2015). English in Colombia: An examination of policy, perceptions and influencing factors. https://bit.ly/3W0p8YR

Brutt-Griffler, J. (2002). World English: A study of its development. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853595790

Calderón Paredes, E. (2014). Educación para el buen vivir: alcances y limitaciones [Master’s thesis, Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Sede Ecuador]. https://repositorio.flacsoandes.edu.ec/handle/10469/8575.

Campos Bandrés, I. O. (2021). Actitudes de los maestros en formación hacia las lenguas extranjeras y la educación multilingüe. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 24(2), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.428651

Canagarajah, A. S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford University Press.

Canagarajah, A. S. (2005). Reclaiming the local in language policy and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611840

Castañeda-Trujillo, J. (2018). Voices from the south: English language pre-service teachers’ contributions to ELTE. In Doctorado Interinstitucional en Educación (Ed.), ELT local research agendas I (pp. 159–179). Editorial Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas.

Coleman, H. (2010). The English language in development. British Council. https://bit.ly/3NdmN8W

Coleman, H. (2011). Developing countries and the English language: Rhetoric, risks, roles and recommendations. In H. Coleman (Ed.), Dreams and realities: Developing countries and the English language (pp. 9–21). British Council.

Cruz-Arcila, F. (2017). Interrogating the social impact of English language teaching policies in Colombia from the vantage point of rural areas. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 27(2), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.47381/aijre.v27i2.117

Cruz-Arcila, F., Solano-Cohen, V., Rincón, A., Lobato Junior, A., & Briceño-González, M. (2022). Second language learning and socioeconomic development: Interrogating anglonormativity from the perspective of pre-service modern language professionals. Current Issues in Language Planning, 23(5), 466–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2021.2006944

Cuestas-Caza, J. (2019). El discurso del desarrollo en las políticas públicas: del postdesarrollo a la crítica decolonial. Trayectorias Humanas Trascontinentales, (4). https://doi.org/10.25965/trahs.1561

Escobar, A. (2005). El “postdesarrollo” como concepto y práctica social. In D. Mato (Coord.), Políticas de economía, ambiente y sociedad en tiempos de globalización (pp. 17–31). Universidad Central de Venezuela.

Escobar, A. (2014). La invención del desarrollo (D. Ochoa, Trans.; 2nd ed.). Universidad del Cauca. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1pbwvtf (Original work published 1996)

Escobar, A. (2019). Transiciones civilizatorias. In A. Khotari, A. Salleh, A. Escobar, F. Demaria, & A. Acosta (Coords.), Pluriverso: un diccionario del postdesarrollo (pp. 458–461). Icaria.

German Foreign Office. (2020). Deutsch als Fremdsprache weltweit: Datenerhebung 2020. https://bit.ly/3SKinqV

González-Moncada, A. (2009). On alternative and additional certifications in English language teaching: The case of Colombian EFL teachers’ professional development. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 14(2), 183–209. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.2638

Guerrero, C. H. (2010). The portrayal of EFL teachers in official discourse: The perpetuation of disdain. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 12(2), 33–49.

Hurie, A. H. (2018). English for peace? Coloniality, neoliberal ideology, and discursive expansion in Colombia Bilingüe. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 23(2), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v23n02a09

Kachru, Y., & Smith, L. E. (2008). Cultures, contexts, and world Englishes. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891346

Le Gal, D. (2018). English language teaching in Colombia: A necessary paradigm shift. Matices en Lenguas Extranjeras, (12), 154–187. https://doi.org/10.15446/male.n12.73267

Mackenzie, L. (2022). Linguistic imperialism, English, and development: Implications for Colombia. Current Issues in Language Planning, 23(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2021.1939977

MAECI. (2014). L´Italiano nel mondo che cambia. https://bit.ly/3NbnNu7

McKinney, C. (2016). Language and power in post-colonial schooling: Ideologies in practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315730646

Mena, M., & García, O. (2021). “Converse racialization” and “un/marking” language: The making of a bilingual university in a neoliberal world. Language in Society, 50(3), 343–364. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404520000330

Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2005). Bases para una nación bilingüe y competitiva. Altablero, (37). http://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1621/article-97498.html

Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2014). Programa Nacional de Inglés 2015–2025: documento de socialización.

Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2022, February 17). Icfes presentó a la comunidad educativa el Informe de los Resultados agregado Saber 11 en 2021. https://bit.ly/3gINZA3

Mohanty, A. (2017). Multilingualism, education, English and development: Whose development? In H. Coleman (Ed.), Multilingualisms and development (pp. 261–280). British Council.

Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061200

Petracci, M., & Kornblit, A. L. (2007). Representaciones sociales: una teoría metodológicamente pluralista. In A. L. Kornblit (Ed.), Metodologías cualitativas en Ciencias Sociales: modelos y procedimientos de análisis (pp. 91–111). Biblos.

Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press.

Rincón Restrepo, C. (2020). L’enseignement du français dans l’espace universitaire en Colombie : deux cents ans d’histoire, mais quel avenir? Synergies Chili, (16), 49–62.

Sachs, W. (2019). El diccionario del desarrollo reconsiderado. In A. Khotari, A. Salleh, A. Escobar, F. Demaria, & A. Acosta (Coords.), Pluriverso: un diccionario del postdesarrollo. Icaria.

Scano, S., Junique, C., & Vergès, P. (2002). Ensemble de programmes permettant l’analyse des évocations, EVOC2000: Manuel d’utilsateur.

Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Allen Lane. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674054578

Sen, A. (2015). Development as freedom (1999). In J. T. Roberts, A. B. Hite, & N. Chorev (Eds.), The globalization and development reader: Perspectives on development and global change (pp. 525–548, 2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishing.

Silva, H. (2011). Langues et territoires: le statut du français en Amérique Latine. Cahier Senghor de la Franchophonie.

Soto, C., & Pérez-Milans, M. (2018). Language, neoliberalism, and the commodification of pedagogy. Language and Intercultural Communication, 18(5), 490–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2018.1501844

Vergara Erices, L., & Rozas Poblete, M. (2014). Conceptualizaciones del desarrollo desde lo cultural: avances y desafíos en un mundo diverso. Revista Líder, 25, 9–34.

Wachelke, J., & Wolter, R. (2011). Criterios de construcción y elaboración de informes para el análisis prototípico de representaciones sociales. Psicología: Teoría e Investigación, 27(4), 521–526.

Walsh, C. (2010). Interculturalidad crítica y educación intercultural. In J. Viaña, L. Tapia, & C. Walsh (Eds.), Construyendo interculturalidad crítica (pp. 75–96). Instituto Internacional de Integración del Convenio Andrés Bello.

Walsh, C. (2017). Gritos, grietas y siembras de vida: entretejeres de lo pedagógico y lo decolonial. In C. Walsh (Ed.), Pedagogías decoloniales. Prácticas insurgentes de resistir,(re)existir y (re)vivir (tomo II, pp. 17–48). Abya Yala.

World Bank Group. (2021). Hacia la construcción de una sociedad equitativa en Colombia. https://bit.ly/3SGqHIv

Ziai, A. (2007). Development discourse and its critics: An introduction to post-development. In A. Ziai (Ed.), Exploring post-development: Theory and practice, problems and perspectives (pp. 3–17). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203962091

How to Cite

APA

Cruz-Arcila, F., Solano-Cohen, V., Briceño-González, M. L., Rincón, A. & Lobato-Junior, A. (2023). Resisting Hegemonic Discourses on the Relation Between Teaching Second Languages and Socioeconomic Development. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 25(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v25n2.103953

ACM

[1]
Cruz-Arcila, F., Solano-Cohen, V., Briceño-González, M.L., Rincón, A. and Lobato-Junior, A. 2023. Resisting Hegemonic Discourses on the Relation Between Teaching Second Languages and Socioeconomic Development. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development. 25, 2 (Jul. 2023), 111–127. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v25n2.103953.

ACS

(1)
Cruz-Arcila, F.; Solano-Cohen, V.; Briceño-González, M. L.; Rincón, A.; Lobato-Junior, A. Resisting Hegemonic Discourses on the Relation Between Teaching Second Languages and Socioeconomic Development. Profile: Issues Teach. Prof. Dev. 2023, 25, 111-127.

ABNT

CRUZ-ARCILA, F.; SOLANO-COHEN, V.; BRICEÑO-GONZÁLEZ, M. L.; RINCÓN, A.; LOBATO-JUNIOR, A. Resisting Hegemonic Discourses on the Relation Between Teaching Second Languages and Socioeconomic Development. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, [S. l.], v. 25, n. 2, p. 111–127, 2023. DOI: 10.15446/profile.v25n2.103953. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/profile/article/view/103953. Acesso em: 16 mar. 2026.

Chicago

Cruz-Arcila, Ferney, Vanessa Solano-Cohen, María Liliana Briceño-González, Ana Rincón, and Antonio Lobato-Junior. 2023. “Resisting Hegemonic Discourses on the Relation Between Teaching Second Languages and Socioeconomic Development”. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development 25 (2):111-27. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v25n2.103953.

Harvard

Cruz-Arcila, F., Solano-Cohen, V., Briceño-González, M. L., Rincón, A. and Lobato-Junior, A. (2023) “Resisting Hegemonic Discourses on the Relation Between Teaching Second Languages and Socioeconomic Development”, Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 25(2), pp. 111–127. doi: 10.15446/profile.v25n2.103953.

IEEE

[1]
F. Cruz-Arcila, V. Solano-Cohen, M. L. Briceño-González, A. Rincón, and A. Lobato-Junior, “Resisting Hegemonic Discourses on the Relation Between Teaching Second Languages and Socioeconomic Development”, Profile: Issues Teach. Prof. Dev., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 111–127, Jul. 2023.

MLA

Cruz-Arcila, F., V. Solano-Cohen, M. L. Briceño-González, A. Rincón, and A. Lobato-Junior. “Resisting Hegemonic Discourses on the Relation Between Teaching Second Languages and Socioeconomic Development”. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, vol. 25, no. 2, July 2023, pp. 111-27, doi:10.15446/profile.v25n2.103953.

Turabian

Cruz-Arcila, Ferney, Vanessa Solano-Cohen, María Liliana Briceño-González, Ana Rincón, and Antonio Lobato-Junior. “Resisting Hegemonic Discourses on the Relation Between Teaching Second Languages and Socioeconomic Development”. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development 25, no. 2 (July 28, 2023): 111–127. Accessed March 16, 2026. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/profile/article/view/103953.

Vancouver

1.
Cruz-Arcila F, Solano-Cohen V, Briceño-González ML, Rincón A, Lobato-Junior A. Resisting Hegemonic Discourses on the Relation Between Teaching Second Languages and Socioeconomic Development. Profile: Issues Teach. Prof. Dev. [Internet]. 2023 Jul. 28 [cited 2026 Mar. 16];25(2):111-27. Available from: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/profile/article/view/103953

Download Citation

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations4

1. Carmen Helena Guerrero‐Nieto, Jairo Enrique Castañeda‐Trujillo. (2024). Facing neoliberalism in education: How English language teachers enact their critical identities. TESOL Journal, 15(3) https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.785.

2. Serhat Başar, İrem Çomoğlu. (2024). A Review of Critical Pedagogy-Informed Collaborative Professional Development Practices in English Language Teaching. Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 26(2), p.163. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v26n2.110341.

3. Yimmy Alexander Hoyos-Pipicano. (2025). Rural teachers’ appropriation of national bilingual policies: voices from the Colombian periphery. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 28(2), p.135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2024.2410820.

4. Ferney Cruz-Arcila, Vanessa Solano-Cohen. (2023). Unauthorized Outlooks on Second Languages Education and Policies. , p.141. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45051-8_8.

Dimensions

PlumX

Article abstract page views

2452

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.