Resisting Hegemonic Discourses on the Relation Between Teaching Second Languages and Socioeconomic Development
Resistiendo discursos hegemónicos sobre la relación entre la enseñanza de segundas lenguas y el desarrollo socioeconómico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v25n2.103953Keywords:
English, modern languages, postdevelopment, socioeconomic development (en)desarrollo socioeconómico, inglés, lenguas modernas, posdesarrollo (es)
This study examines hegemonic discourses on English and socioeconomic development from teachers’ perspectives. Specifically, it scrutinizes the sorts of positions a group of 36 teachers of English, French, Italian, German, and Portuguese in an undergraduate program of modern languages take towards both the predominant narrative of English as the language of development and the role that the languages they teach may also play. Using postdevelopment as a theoretical framework, teachers’ social representations around the languages they teach are analyzed. Findings suggest that, although there is a strong tendency to uncritically accept and accommodate instrumental and Anglo normative views of development, “small hopes” for configuring plural, locally sensitive, less instrumental, and ecological understandings are also emerging.
Este estudio examina, desde la perspectiva de los profesores, los discursos hegemónicos del inglés en relación con el desarrollo socioeconómico. En particular, analizamos los tipos de posicionamientos que toma un grupo de 36 profesores de inglés, francés, italiano, alemán y portugués en un programa de pregrado frente a la narrativa predominante del inglés como lengua de desarrollo y el papel que las lenguas que enseñan pueden desempeñar frente a esta narrativa. Apoyados teóricamente en el posdesarrollo, analizamos las representaciones sociales de los docentes en torno a las lenguas que enseñan. Los resultados sugieren que, aunque existe una tendencia a aceptar acríticamente las visiones instrumentales y anglonormativas del desarrollo, también surgen “pequeñas esperanzas” de interpretaciones plurales, localmente sensibles, menos instrumentales y ecológicas.
References
Block, D. (2018). Some thoughts on education and the discourse of global neoliberalism. Language and Intercultural Communication, 18(5), 576–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2018.1501851
Bonilla-Carvajal, C. A., & Tejada-Sánchez, I. (2016). Unanswered questions in Colombia’s foreign language education policy. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 18(1), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v18n1.51996
Bourdieu, P. (2002). La distinción: criterios y bases sociales del gusto (M. Ruiz de Elvira, Trans.). Taurus. (Original work published 1979)
Bresser Pereira, L. C. (2019). Models of the developmental state. Revista Cepal, (128), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.18356/876f838e-en
British Council. (2015). English in Colombia: An examination of policy, perceptions and influencing factors. https://bit.ly/3W0p8YR
Brutt-Griffler, J. (2002). World English: A study of its development. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853595790
Calderón Paredes, E. (2014). Educación para el buen vivir: alcances y limitaciones [Master’s thesis, Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Sede Ecuador]. https://repositorio.flacsoandes.edu.ec/handle/10469/8575.
Campos Bandrés, I. O. (2021). Actitudes de los maestros en formación hacia las lenguas extranjeras y la educación multilingüe. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 24(2), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.428651
Canagarajah, A. S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford University Press.
Canagarajah, A. S. (2005). Reclaiming the local in language policy and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611840
Castañeda-Trujillo, J. (2018). Voices from the south: English language pre-service teachers’ contributions to ELTE. In Doctorado Interinstitucional en Educación (Ed.), ELT local research agendas I (pp. 159–179). Editorial Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas.
Coleman, H. (2010). The English language in development. British Council. https://bit.ly/3NdmN8W
Coleman, H. (2011). Developing countries and the English language: Rhetoric, risks, roles and recommendations. In H. Coleman (Ed.), Dreams and realities: Developing countries and the English language (pp. 9–21). British Council.
Cruz-Arcila, F. (2017). Interrogating the social impact of English language teaching policies in Colombia from the vantage point of rural areas. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 27(2), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.47381/aijre.v27i2.117
Cruz-Arcila, F., Solano-Cohen, V., Rincón, A., Lobato Junior, A., & Briceño-González, M. (2022). Second language learning and socioeconomic development: Interrogating anglonormativity from the perspective of pre-service modern language professionals. Current Issues in Language Planning, 23(5), 466–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2021.2006944
Cuestas-Caza, J. (2019). El discurso del desarrollo en las políticas públicas: del postdesarrollo a la crítica decolonial. Trayectorias Humanas Trascontinentales, (4). https://doi.org/10.25965/trahs.1561
Escobar, A. (2005). El “postdesarrollo” como concepto y práctica social. In D. Mato (Coord.), Políticas de economía, ambiente y sociedad en tiempos de globalización (pp. 17–31). Universidad Central de Venezuela.
Escobar, A. (2014). La invención del desarrollo (D. Ochoa, Trans.; 2nd ed.). Universidad del Cauca. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1pbwvtf (Original work published 1996)
Escobar, A. (2019). Transiciones civilizatorias. In A. Khotari, A. Salleh, A. Escobar, F. Demaria, & A. Acosta (Coords.), Pluriverso: un diccionario del postdesarrollo (pp. 458–461). Icaria.
German Foreign Office. (2020). Deutsch als Fremdsprache weltweit: Datenerhebung 2020. https://bit.ly/3SKinqV
González-Moncada, A. (2009). On alternative and additional certifications in English language teaching: The case of Colombian EFL teachers’ professional development. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 14(2), 183–209. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.2638
Guerrero, C. H. (2010). The portrayal of EFL teachers in official discourse: The perpetuation of disdain. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 12(2), 33–49.
Hurie, A. H. (2018). English for peace? Coloniality, neoliberal ideology, and discursive expansion in Colombia Bilingüe. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 23(2), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v23n02a09
Kachru, Y., & Smith, L. E. (2008). Cultures, contexts, and world Englishes. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891346
Le Gal, D. (2018). English language teaching in Colombia: A necessary paradigm shift. Matices en Lenguas Extranjeras, (12), 154–187. https://doi.org/10.15446/male.n12.73267
Mackenzie, L. (2022). Linguistic imperialism, English, and development: Implications for Colombia. Current Issues in Language Planning, 23(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2021.1939977
MAECI. (2014). L´Italiano nel mondo che cambia. https://bit.ly/3NbnNu7
McKinney, C. (2016). Language and power in post-colonial schooling: Ideologies in practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315730646
Mena, M., & García, O. (2021). “Converse racialization” and “un/marking” language: The making of a bilingual university in a neoliberal world. Language in Society, 50(3), 343–364. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404520000330
Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2005). Bases para una nación bilingüe y competitiva. Altablero, (37). http://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1621/article-97498.html
Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2014). Programa Nacional de Inglés 2015–2025: documento de socialización.
Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2022, February 17). Icfes presentó a la comunidad educativa el Informe de los Resultados agregado Saber 11 en 2021. https://bit.ly/3gINZA3
Mohanty, A. (2017). Multilingualism, education, English and development: Whose development? In H. Coleman (Ed.), Multilingualisms and development (pp. 261–280). British Council.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061200
Petracci, M., & Kornblit, A. L. (2007). Representaciones sociales: una teoría metodológicamente pluralista. In A. L. Kornblit (Ed.), Metodologías cualitativas en Ciencias Sociales: modelos y procedimientos de análisis (pp. 91–111). Biblos.
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press.
Rincón Restrepo, C. (2020). L’enseignement du français dans l’espace universitaire en Colombie : deux cents ans d’histoire, mais quel avenir? Synergies Chili, (16), 49–62.
Sachs, W. (2019). El diccionario del desarrollo reconsiderado. In A. Khotari, A. Salleh, A. Escobar, F. Demaria, & A. Acosta (Coords.), Pluriverso: un diccionario del postdesarrollo. Icaria.
Scano, S., Junique, C., & Vergès, P. (2002). Ensemble de programmes permettant l’analyse des évocations, EVOC2000: Manuel d’utilsateur.
Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Allen Lane. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674054578
Sen, A. (2015). Development as freedom (1999). In J. T. Roberts, A. B. Hite, & N. Chorev (Eds.), The globalization and development reader: Perspectives on development and global change (pp. 525–548, 2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishing.
Silva, H. (2011). Langues et territoires: le statut du français en Amérique Latine. Cahier Senghor de la Franchophonie.
Soto, C., & Pérez-Milans, M. (2018). Language, neoliberalism, and the commodification of pedagogy. Language and Intercultural Communication, 18(5), 490–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2018.1501844
Vergara Erices, L., & Rozas Poblete, M. (2014). Conceptualizaciones del desarrollo desde lo cultural: avances y desafíos en un mundo diverso. Revista Líder, 25, 9–34.
Wachelke, J., & Wolter, R. (2011). Criterios de construcción y elaboración de informes para el análisis prototípico de representaciones sociales. Psicología: Teoría e Investigación, 27(4), 521–526.
Walsh, C. (2010). Interculturalidad crítica y educación intercultural. In J. Viaña, L. Tapia, & C. Walsh (Eds.), Construyendo interculturalidad crítica (pp. 75–96). Instituto Internacional de Integración del Convenio Andrés Bello.
Walsh, C. (2017). Gritos, grietas y siembras de vida: entretejeres de lo pedagógico y lo decolonial. In C. Walsh (Ed.), Pedagogías decoloniales. Prácticas insurgentes de resistir,(re)existir y (re)vivir (tomo II, pp. 17–48). Abya Yala.
World Bank Group. (2021). Hacia la construcción de una sociedad equitativa en Colombia. https://bit.ly/3SGqHIv
Ziai, A. (2007). Development discourse and its critics: An introduction to post-development. In A. Ziai (Ed.), Exploring post-development: Theory and practice, problems and perspectives (pp. 3–17). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203962091
How to Cite
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Carmen Helena Guerrero‐Nieto, Jairo Enrique Castañeda‐Trujillo. (2024). Facing neoliberalism in education: How English language teachers enact their critical identities. TESOL Journal, 15(3) https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.785.
2. Serhat Başar, İrem Çomoğlu. (2024). A Review of Critical Pedagogy-Informed Collaborative Professional Development Practices in English Language Teaching. Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 26(2), p.163. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v26n2.110341.
3. Yimmy Alexander Hoyos-Pipicano. (2025). Rural teachers’ appropriation of national bilingual policies: voices from the Colombian periphery. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 28(2), p.135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2024.2410820.
4. Ferney Cruz-Arcila, Vanessa Solano-Cohen. (2023). Unauthorized Outlooks on Second Languages Education and Policies. , p.141. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45051-8_8.
Dimensions
PlumX
Article abstract page views
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ferney Cruz-Arcila, Vanessa Solano-Cohen, María Liliana Briceño-González, Ana Rincón, Antonio Lobato-Junior

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are authorized to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format as long as you give appropriate credit to the authors of the articles and to Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development as original source of publication. The use of the material for commercial purposes is not allowed. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
Authors retain the intellectual property of their manuscripts with the following restriction: first publication is granted to Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development.






























