Ethnography of Multimodal Communication: An English-Mediated University Classroom Interaction Analysis
Etnografía de la comunicación multimodal: un análisis de la interacción mediada por el inglés en una clase universitaria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v27n2.115294Keywords:
bilingual education, English as a medium of instruction, ethnography of communication, multimodal communication, multimodal interaction analysis (en)análisis de la interacción, comunicación multimodal, educación bilingüe, etnografía de la comunicación, inglés como medio de instrucción (es)
This study combines multimodal interaction analysis and ethnography of communication to examine the social dynamics of the English classroom. It investigates the ways in which norms of interaction are established and enacted, how such norms shape and transform the social roles that class members assume in interactions, and the extent to which these norms and social roles are conducive to communicative action in pursuit of learning. Rather than approaching multimodality as the mere use of videos and pictures in pedagogical pursuits, this study examines how human interaction is populated by numerous semiotic resources and communicative modes (i.e., proxemics, gaze, gestures), and how meaning is formed and transformed in their interplay.
Este estudio combina el análisis de la interacción y la etnografía de la comunicación para examinar una clase en la que se emplea el inglés como medio de instrucción en relación con las formas en que se establecen las normas de interacción, cómo dichas normas forman y transforman los roles sociales en la clase y la medida en que las normas de interacción y los roles sociales son conducentes a la acción comunicativa para lograr aprendizajes. Este estudio profundiza en la forma en que la interacción humana está poblada por numerosos recursos semióticos y modos comunicativos (es decir, proxémica, miradas y gestos), cómo estos forman y transforman el significado y, finalmente, cómo el aprendizaje es un efecto de la interacción en el aula.
References
Aukerman, M., Moore Johnson, E., & Chambers Schuldt, L. (2017). Reciprocity of student and teacher discourse practices in monologically and dialogically organized text discussion. Journal of Language & Literacy Education, 13(2), 1–52.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1994). The Bakhtin reader: Selected writings of Bakhtin, Medvedev, and Voloshinov (P. Morris, Ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Boyd, M. P., Jarmark, C. J., & Edmiston, B. (2018). Building bridges: Coauthoring a class handshake, building a classroom community. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 13(4), 330–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2018.1437731
Corrales, K. A., Rey Paba, L. A., & Escamilla, N. S. (2016). Is EMI enough? Perceptions from university professors and students. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 9(2), 318–344. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2016.9.2.4
Escobar-Alméciga W. Y. (2015). Language configurations in the spoken production of Colombian EFL university students. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 17(1), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2015.1.a08
Escobar-Alméciga, W. Y. (2020). Ethnography of multimodal communication in an English- medium university-level classroom: A social semiotic perspective on learning [Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
Escobar-Alméciga, W. Y. (2022). Framing English as a medium of instruction within the Iberian-American Spanish-speaking education contexts. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 24(1), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v24n1.93434
Escobar-Alméciga, W. Y., & Brutt-Griffler, J. (2022). Multimodal communication in an early childhood bilingual education setting: A social semiotic interactional analysis. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 27(1), 84–104. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v27n1a05
Escobar-Alméciga, W., Caviedes-Cadena, L., & Benavides-Jiménez, F. (2024). Navigating complexity: Fostering inclusive social environments in bilingual education through multimodal communication. In L. Cardozo-Gaibisso, R. Harman, M. Vazquez Dominguez, & C. Buxton (Eds.), Pedagogies for equitable access: Reimagining multilingual education for an uncertain world (pp. 77–94). Information Age Publishing.
Fairclough, N. (2011). Semiotic aspects of social transformation and learning. In R. Rogers (Ed.), An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (2nd ed., pp. 119–127). Routledge.
Franks, A., & Jewitt, C. (2001). The meaning of action in learning and teaching. British Educational Research Journal, 27(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120037144
García, O., & Bartlett, L. (2007). A speech community model of bilingual education: Educating Latino newcomers in the USA. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb364.0
Gibbons Pyles, D. (2017). A social semiotic mapping of voice in youth media: The pitch in youth video production. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(1), 8–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1095209
Goldin‐Meadow, S. (2000). Beyond words: The importance of gesture to researchers and learners. Child Development, 71(1), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00138
Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2008). Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(3), 495–514. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.3.495
Hymes, D. (1967). Models of the interaction of language and social setting. Journal of Social Issues, 23(2), 8–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1967.tb00572.x
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269–293). Penguin.
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic perspective. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hymes, D. (1979). On communicative competence. In C. J. Brumfit & K. Johnson (Eds.), The communicative approach to language teaching (pp. 5–26). Oxford University Press.
Hymes, D. (1994). Toward ethnographies of communication. In J. Maybin (Ed.), Language and literacy in social practice (pp. 11–22). Multilingual Matters.
Kress, G. (2011). Discourse analysis and education: A multimodal social semiotic approach. In R. Rogers (Ed.), An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (pp. 205–226). Routledge.
Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000350
Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203379493
Norris, S. (2014). The impact of literacy-based schooling on learning a creative practice: Modal configurations, practices and discourses. Multimodal Communication, 3(2), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1515/mc-2014-0011
Rojas, D., & Escobar-Alméciga, W. (2023). Student’s agency in English as foreign language learning in a virtual environment: An interaction analysis. Lengua y Sociedad, 22(2), 377–396. https://doi.org/10.15381/lengsoc.v22i2.25138
Roth, W.-M. (2001). Gestures: Their role in teaching and learning. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 365–392. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071003365
Wilmes, S. E. D., & Siry, C. (2021). Multimodal interaction analysis: A powerful tool for examining plurilingual students’ engagement in science practices. Research in Science Education, 51, 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09977-z
Zhyrun, I. (2016). Culture through comparison: Creating audio-visual listening materials for a CLIL course. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 9(2), 345–373. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2016.9.2.5
How to Cite
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Wilder Yesid Escobar-Alméciga

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are authorized to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format as long as you give appropriate credit to the authors of the articles and to Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development as original source of publication. The use of the material for commercial purposes is not allowed. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
Authors retain the intellectual property of their manuscripts with the following restriction: first publication is granted to Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development.






























