Published

2025-01-13

Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions of C1 English Proficiency in a Chilean Teacher Education Program

Percepciones de docentes en formación sobre el nivel de dominio de inglés C1 en un programa chileno de formación docente

Keywords:

C1 level, Common European Framework of Reference for Languages, English language proficiency, English language teaching standards, teacher education (en)
estándares para la enseñanza del inglés, formación docente, nivel C1, nivel de dominio del inglés, Marco común europeo de referencia para las lenguas (es)

Downloads

Authors

This mixed-methods study examined preservice teachers’ perceptions of C1 English proficiency, focusing on their linguistic competence, understanding, attitudes, and challenges. Conducted at a university in Ñuble, Chile, with 13 participants, data were gathered through a closed-ended questionnaire and a semi-structured interview. Findings suggest that perceived linguistic competence improves as students advance academically. Although participants’ understanding of the C1 level was often fragmented, they acknowledged the difficulty of achieving it and the importance of mastering grammar by graduation. Despite challenges, participants held positive attitudes toward the C1 standard. These findings aim to help teacher education programs better support preservice teachers’ progress toward C1 proficiency.

Este estudio mixto examinó las percepciones de docentes en formación sobre el dominio del inglés C1, centrándose en su competencia lingüística, comprensión, actitudes y desafíos. Realizado en una universidad en Ñuble, Chile, con 13 participantes, los datos se recopilaron mediante un cuestionario cerrado y una entrevista semiestructurada. Los resultados sugieren que la percepción de competencia lingüística mejora con el avance académico. Aunque su comprensión del nivel C1 era fragmentada, los participantes reconocieron la dificultad e importancia de dominar la gramática al graduarse. Pese a los desafíos, mostraron actitudes positivas hacia este estándar. Estos hallazgos buscan ayudar a los programas de formación docente a apoyar mejor el progreso de los futuros docentes hacia la competencia C1.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cárdenas, R., & Chaves, O. (2013). English teaching in Cali. Teachers’ proficiency level described. Lenguaje, 41(2), 325–352. https://doi.org/10.25100/lenguaje.v41i2.4971

Charttrakul, K., & Damnet, A. (2021). Role of the CEFR and English teaching in Thailand: A case study of Rajabhat universities. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 12(2), 82–89. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1297093

Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press. https://bit.ly/409aToM

Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment (Companion volume). Council of Europe Publishing. www.coe.int/lang-cefr

Figueras, N. (2012). The impact of the CEFR. ELT Journal, 66(4), 477–485. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs037

Hishamudin, N. A. Z., & Li, K. L. (2023). TESL pre-service teachers’ perceptions toward the implementation of CEFR: Awareness, challenges, and solutions. Anatolian Journal of Education, 8(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2023.8210a

Kaur, P., & Jian, M. Z. (2022). The CEFR-aligned curriculum: Perspectives of Malaysian teachers. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, 4(1), 138–145. https://bit.ly/3AcTOzJ

Kostina, I. (2012). El nivel de dominio de inglés de los futuros profesores de lenguas: examen de competencias en inglés. Lenguaje, 40(2), 383–413. https://doi.org/10.25100/lenguaje.v40i2.4955

Little, D. (2007). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Perspectives on the making of supranational language education policy. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 645–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00627_2.x

Little, D. (2011). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 44(3), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000097

Ministerio de Educación de Chile. (2021). Estándares de la profesión docente. Carreras de pedagogía en inglés. Educación básica y media. https://bit.ly/3A0tTLN

Naser, M. S., & Ali, N. L. (2023). Using the CEFR for improving pre-service teachers’ communicative competence. Asian Social Science, 19(3), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v19n3p15

Nii, A. T., & Yunus, M. M. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions on the implementation of Common European Framework Reference (CEFR) in an ESL classroom: The Malaysian context. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 10(6), 226–240. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2022.106018

Phoolaikao, W., & Sukying, A. (2021). Insights into CEFR and its implementation through the lens of preservice English teachers in Thailand. English Language Teaching, 14(6), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n6p25

Ramírez-Draughn, R., & Cárdenas-Tamburini, N. (2023). English pedagogy students’ motivations towards the C1 advanced test as a tool to measure English language proficiency. RLA: Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada, 61(1), 169–190.

Ramos-García, A. M., & Fernández-Viciana, A. (2019). Pre-service teachers’ perception on their EFL competence and professional requirements. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 13, 44–53. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1270212

Shukor, E. A., & Sulaiman, N. A. (2022). ESL teachers’ attitude and motivation towards CEFR implementation. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(6), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i6/13951

Van Loi, N., & Hang, C. T. T. (2021). Integrating project work into English proficiency courses for pre-service teachers’ training. TESL-EJ, 25(3). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1332289

Yee, B. C., & Periasamy, V. (2019). English language teachers’ perceptions towards Malaysian University English Test (MUET) as a measure to test teachers’ language proficiency. Malaysian International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 2, 94–103.