Published

2012-07-01

Identity of the Teacher-Researcher in Collaborative Action Research: Concerns Reflected in a Research Journal

La identidad del docente investigador en la investigación acción colaborativa: preocupaciones reflejadas en un diario de investigación

Keywords:

Collaborative action research, journal writing, teacher-researcher identity (en)
Escritura de diarios, identidad del docentes investigador, investigación acción colaborativa (es)

Downloads

Authors

  • Darío Luis Banegas University of Warwick, UK & Ministry of Education of Chubut, Argentina

In this paper I report the insights of my personal research journal as part of a collaborative action research project I facilitated in a secondary school where I teach English as a foreign language. I kept a journal so as to offer the natural history of my research towards my doctoral degree. In this project I worked together with four participating teachers but I assumed a complex identity as I was a teacher-researcher i.e. doctoral researcher and a teacher. This entailed different roles and interests which generated opportunities and tensions. Qualitative analysis of my journal reveals complex concerns at different levels which signal the individual struggles of a teacher-researcher involved in collaboration.

En este artículo presento un reporte de mis reflexiones sobre mi diario de investigación, que usé como parte de un proyecto de investigación-acción colaborativo que propicié en una escuela secundaria donde enseño inglés como lengua extranjera. Llevé un diario con miras a ofrecer la historia natural de mi proyecto de doctorado. En este proyecto trabajé junto a otros cuatro docentes participantes y asumí una identidad compleja ya que fui docente investigador y docente participante. Esto implicó diferentes roles e intereses que generaron tanto experiencias positivas como tensiones con mis colegas. El análisis cualitativo de mi diario revela preocupaciones complejas en diferentes niveles y señala las luchas individuales del docente investigador involucrado en colaboración.

References

Allwright, D. (2005). Developing principles for practitioner research: The case of exploratory practice. The Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 353-366.

Altrichter, H., & Posch, P. (2009). Action research, professional development and systemic reform. In S. Noffke, & B. Somekh (Eds.), The Sage handbook of educational action research (pp. 213-225). London: Sage.

Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385-405.

Avgitidou, S. (2010). Participation, roles and processes in a collaborative action research project: A reflexive account of the facilitator. Educational Action Research, 17(4), 585-600.

Banegas, D. (2011). Teachers as “reform-doers”: Developing a participatory curriculum to teach English as a foreign language. Educational Action Research, 19(4), 417-432.

Benson, P. (2007). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 40(1), 21-40.

Benson, P. (2010). Teacher education and teacher autonomy: Creating spaces for experimentation in secondary school English language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 14(3), 259-275.

Borg, S. (2010). Language teacher research engagement. Language Teaching, 43(4), 391-429.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Brooks-Lewis, K. (2010). Learning about history in the foreign language classroom. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 137-150.

Bruce, C. D., Flynn, T., & Stagg-Peterson, S. (2011). Examining what we mean by collaboration in collaborative action research: A cross-case analysis. Educational Action Research, 19(4), 433-452.

Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Burns, A. (2005a). Action research: An evolving paradigm? Language Teaching, 38(1), 57-74.

Burns, A. (2005b). Action research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 241-256). Mahwah, NJ/London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching. A guide for practitioners. Abingdon: Routledge.

Clarke, M. (2009). The ethico-politics of teacher identity. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(2), 185-200.

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content and language integrated learning: From practice to principle? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31(1), 182-204.

Ding, A. (2009). Tensions and struggles in fostering collaborative teacher autonomy online. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 3(1), 65-81.

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Elliot, J. (2009). Building educational theory through action research. In S. Noffke, & B. Somekh (Eds.), The Sage handbook of educational action research (pp. 28-38). London: Sage.

Ellis, R. (2010). Second language acquisition, teacher education and language pedagogy. Language Teaching, 43(2), 181-201.

Feldman, A., & Weiss, T. (2010). Understanding change in teachers’ ways of being through collaborative action research: A cultural-historical activity theory analysis. Educational Action Research, 18(1), 29-55.

Frederiksen, L. F., & Beck, S. (2010). Caught in the crossfire: Educational research in context. International Journal of Research & Methods in Education, 33(2), 135-149.

Freeman, D., & Johnson, K. (1998). Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base of language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 397-417.

Gewirtz, S., Shapiro, J., Maguire, M., Mahony, P., & Cribb, A. (2009). Doing teacher research: A qualitative analysis of purposes, processes and experiences. Educational Action Research, 17(4), 567-583.

Glenn, M. (2011). Developing holistic practice through reflection, action, and theorising. Educational Action Research, 19(4), 489-502.

Goodnough, K. (2010). The role of action research in transforming teacher identity: Modes of belonging and ecological perspectives. Educational Action Research, 18(2), 167-182.

Johnson, K., & Golombek, P. (2011). The transformative power of narrative in second language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 45(3), 486-509.

Jones, M., & Stanley, G. (2010). Collaborative action research: A democratic undertaking or a web of collusion and compliance? International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 33(2), 151-163.

Jove, G. (2011). How do I improve what I am doing as a teacher, teacher educator and action-researcher through reflection? A learning walk from Lleida to Winchester and back again. Educational Action Research, 19(3), 261-278.

Kiely, R. (2011). Understanding CLIL as an innovation. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 153-171.

Kiely, R., & Davis, M. (2010). From transmission to transformation: Teacher learning in English for speakers of other languages. Language Teaching Research, 14(3), 277-295.

Koshy, V. (2010). Action research for improving educational practice. A step-by-step guide (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

Li, N. (2006). Researching and experiencing motivation: A plea for ‘balanced research.’ Language Teaching Research, 10(4), 437-456.

Locke, T., & Riley, D. (2009). What happened to educational criticism? Engaging with a paradigm for observation. Educational Action Research, 17(4), 489-504.

López-Pastor, V. M., Monjas, R., & Manrique, J. C. (2011). Fifteen years of action research as professional development: Seeking more collaborative, useful and democratic systems for teachers. Educational Action Research, 19(2), 153-170.

Mann, S. (2005). The language teacher’s development. Language Teaching, 38(3), 103-118.

Moloney, J. (2009). Engaging in action research: A personal and professional journey towards an inquiry into teacher morale in a senior secondary college. Educational Action Research, 17(2), 181-195.

Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2011). Identity, language learning, and social change. Language Teaching, 44(4), 412-446.

Nunan, D., & Bailey, K. M. (2009). Exploring second language classroom research. A comprehensive guide. Boston: Heinle.

Pérez, A., Soto, E., & Serván, M. (2010). Participatory action research and the construction of teachers’ practical thinking: lesson studies and core reflection. An experience in Spain. Educational Action Research, 18(1), 73-87.

Pica, T. (2005). Classroom learning, teaching, and research: A task-based perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 339-352.

Rainey, I. (2011). Grassroots action research and the greater good. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 13(1), 31-54.

Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). Introduction. In P. Reason, & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The Sage handbook of action research. Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 1-14). London: Sage.

Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. London: Sage.

Silverman, D. (2010). Doing qualitative research (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

Somekh, B. (2006). Action research: A methodology for change and development. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Somekh, B. (2010). The collaborative research network: 30 years of agency in developing educational action research. Educational Action Research, 18(1), 103-121.

Somekh, B., & Zeichner, K. (2009). Action research for educational reform: Remodelling action research theories and practices in local contexts. Educational Action Research, 17(1), 5-21.

Stenhouse, L. (1981). What counts as research? British Journal of Educational Studies, 29(2), 103-114.

Stewart, T. (2006). Teacher-researcher collaboration or teachers’ research? TESOL Quarterly, 40(2), 421-430.

Swantz, M. L. (2008). Participatory action research as practice. In P. Reason, & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The Sage handbook of action research. Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed., pp. 31-48). London: Sage.

Taylor, S. S., Rudolph, J. W., & Foldy, E. G. (2008). Teaching reflective practice in the action science/action inquiry tradition: Key stages, concepts and practices. In P. Reason, & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The Sage handbook of action research. Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed., pp. 656-668). London: Sage.

Van Lier, L. (1994). Action research. Sintagma, 6, 31-37.

Vergara Luján, O., Hernández Gaviria, F., & Cárdenas Ramos, R. (2009). Classroom research and professional development. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 11(2), 169-191.

Waters, A. (2009). Managing innovation in English language education. Language Teaching, 42(4), 421-458.

Wedell, M. (2009). Planning for educational change. Putting people and their contexts first. London/New York, NY: Continuum.

Wells, G. (2009). Dialogic inquiry as collaborative action research. In S. Noffke, & B. Somekh (Eds.), The Sage handbook of educational action research (pp. 50-61). London: Sage.

Wiesemes, R. (2002). Developing my theory of practice as a teacher-researcher through a case-study of CLIL classroom interaction (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Nottingham.

Wyatt, M. (2011a). Teachers researching their own practice. ELT Journal, 65(4), 417-425.

Wyatt, M. (2011b) Becoming a do-it-yourself designer of English language teaching materials. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), Art. 33. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1101334

Article abstract page views

3325

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Identity of the Teacher-Researcher in Collaborative Action Research: Concerns Reflected in a Research Journal. (2012). Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 14(2), 29-43. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/profile/article/view/34051