Published

2013-01-01

Identity-Forming Discourses: A Critical Discourse Analysis on Policy Making Processes Concerning English Language Teaching in Colombia

Discursos que forjan identidades: un análisis crítico de discursos en la formulación de políticas sobre la enseñanza del inglés en Colombia

Keywords:

Critical discourse analysis, dominance and control, language identity, power (en)
Análisis crítico del discurso, dominio y control, identidad lingüística, poder (es)

Downloads

Authors

  • Wilder Yesid Escobar Alméciga Universidad El Bosque

This article addresses a critical problem about asymmetrical power relationships and uneven conditions in English language education exerted via identity shaping discourses in the document Educación: Visión 2019 issued by the Colombian Ministry of National Education. The study follows the critical discourse analysis method. It characterizes discursive strategies which, in turn, unveil power structures, means of control, and subject positioning of submission and dominance inherent in three main categories: Being bilingual, being successful, and being Colombian. It concludes that discourses are being strategically employed by the Colombian Ministry of National Education to change or preserve ideologies and to widen gaps between socio-economic groups to protect the interests of only a small segment of the population.

Este reporte postula una problemática de relaciones desequilibradas de dominio, poder, control y de la desproporcionada distribución de recursos en la enseñanza del inglés en Colombia, lo cual es perpetrado por discursos que moldean la identidad, en el documento Educación: Visión 2019 publicado por el Ministerio de Educación Nacional de Colombia. El estudio sigue los principios del análisis crítico del discurso. Esta investigación caracteriza estrategias discursivas que a su vez develan estructuras de poder, medios de control, y posicionamiento de sumisión y dominio en tres categorías: ser bilingüe, ser exitoso y ser colombiano. El estudio sugiere que el Ministerio de Educación Nacional está empleando discursos para manipular ideologías y generar inequidad entre grupos sociales en tanto que protege los intereses de un segmento de la población exclusivamente.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ayala, J., & Álvarez, J. A. (2005). A perspective of the implications of the Common European Framework implementation in the Colombian socio-cultural context. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 7, 7-26.

Bernstein, B. (1998). Pedagogía, control simbólico e identidad. España: Ediciones Morata.

Block, D. (2007). Identity in social science today. London, UK: Biddles, Ltd.

Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2004). Language and identity. In A. Duranti (Ed.), The companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 369-388). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Cameron, D. (2001). Working with spoken discourse. Thousand Oaks, ca: Sage Publications.

Canagarajah, S. (2005). Reclaiming the local in language policy and planning: Reconstructing local knowledge. Reconfiguring Language Studies, 9(2), 3-23.

Castro J. G. (2010, March). Intensifican medidas para la Semana Santa. El universal. Retrieved from: http://www.eluniversal.com.co/cartagena/local/ intensifican-medidas-para-la-semana-santa

Cenoz, J., & Genesee, F. (1998). Beyond bilingualism: Multilingualism and multilingual education. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

Clark, J. B. (2010). Multilingualism, citizenship and identity: Voices of youth and symbolic investments in an urban, globalized world. London, UK: Continuum International Publishing.

Colombia. Ministerio de Educación Nacional [MEN]. (2004). Programa Nacional de Bilingüismo. Retrieved from: http://www.colombiaaprende.edu.co/html/productos/1685/article-158720.html and from http://www.colombiaaprende.edu.co/html/docentes/1596/article-82607.html#h2_4

Colombia. Ministerio de Educación Nacional [MEN]. (2006a). Educación: visión 2019: propuesta para discusión. Retrieved from http://www.mineducacion.gov.co/cvn

Colombia. Ministerio de Educación Nacional [MEN]. (2006b). Estándares básicos de competencias en lenguas extranjeras: inglés. Formar en lenguas extranjeras: ¡el reto! Lo que necesitamos saber y saber hacer. Bogotá, co: Imprenta Nacional.

Colombia. Ministerio de Educación Nacional [MEN]. (2007). Plan nacional de desarrollo educativo. Retrieved from: http://planeacion.univalle.edu.co/a_gestioninformacion/plandeaccion2008-2011/PND_2010_Educacin%20pdf1.pdf

Cuasialpud, R. E. (2010). Indigenous students’ attitudes towards learning English through a virtual program: A study in a Colombian public university. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 12(2), 133-152.

Escobar, W., & Gómez, J. (2010). Silenced fighters: Identity, language and thought of the Nasa people in bilingual contexts of Colombia. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 12(1), 125-140

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse. Textual analysis for social research. New York, NY: Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (2005). Critical discourse analysis in interdisciplinary discourse. In R. Wodak, & P. Chilton (Eds.), New agenda in (critical) discourse analysis (pp. 53-70). Philadelphia, pa: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the Self. Massachusetts, USA: University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst.

Gale, X. L. (1996). Teachers, discourses, and authority in the postmodern composition classroom. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London, uk: Taylor & Francis.

Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London, UK: Routledge.

Guerrero, C. H. (2008). Bilingual Colombia: What does it mean to be bilingual within the framework of the National Plan of Bilingualism? PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 10(1), 27-45.

Hawkins, M. R. (2004). Language learning and teacher education: A sociocultural approach. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters Limited.

Huerta, L. M., López-Reza, E., & García, F. (2007). El discurso de la educación bilingüe en la frontera México-Estados Unidos: formación de identidades, relaciones de poder y opresión. Nóesis. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 16(032), 72-95.

Lister, M. (2006). Globalization and its inequalities. In A. Carling (Ed.) Globalization and identity: Development and integration in a changing world (pp. 29-42). London, UK: I.B. Tauris.

McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

McKay, S., & Wong, S. (1996). Multiple discourses, multiple identities: Investment and agency in second-language learning among Chinese adolescent immigrant students. Harvard Educational Review, 66(3), 577-608.

Mejía, A. M. (2011). Bilingual education in Colombia: Towards a recognition of languages, cultures and identities. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 8, 152-168. Retrieved from http://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/ojs/index.php/calj/article/view/176

Norton, B. (1997). Language, identity, and the ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3), 409-429.

Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Researching identity and language learning. Hong Kong: Pearson Education.

Pardo, N. (2007). Diversidad lingüística y tolerancia en Colombia. Colombian Journal of Bilingual Education, 1, 11-23.

Sánchez, A. C., & Obando, G. V. (2008). Is Colombia ready for “bilingualism”? PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 9, 181-195.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 4(2), 249-283.

Vargas, M. R. (2010). Towards a discourse for criticism in language teaching: Analysis of sociocultural representations in mass media. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 12(2), 179-190.

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society (Vols. 1-2). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.