Published

2014-07-01

Hybrid Identity in Academic Writing: “Are There Two of Me?”

Identidad híbrida: “¿hay dos yo?”

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v16n2.40192

Keywords:

Academic writing, attachment, detachment, hybrid, identity (en)
Conexión, desconexión, escritura académica, híbrido, identidad (es)

Downloads

Authors

  • Troy Crawford University of Guanajuato
  • Martha Lengeling University of Guanajuato
  • Irasema Mora Pablo University of Guanajuato
  • Rocío Heredia Ocampo University of Guanajuato

This paper explores the construction of identity in an academic learning environment in Central Mexico, and shows how identity may be linked to non-language factors such as emotions or family. These issues are associated with elements of hybrid identity. To analyze this we draw on language choice as a tool used for the construction of identity and for showcasing and defending identity through exploratory interviews with the bilingual students and teachers. The results draw our attention towards the role of non-linguistic variables and their relationship to emotional and contextual issues that influence how academic writing occurs within the school confines, where hybrid identities may be constructed for academic purposes.

Este artículo explora la construcción de identidad en un medio de aprendizaje en el centro de México y muestra cómo la identidad puede estar relacionada con factores no lingüísticos, como las emociones o la familia. Estos factores están asociados con aspectos de identidad híbrida. Para analizar esto, nos basamos en la elección de lengua del usuario como una herramienta para la construcción de la identidad y para ilustrar y defender la identidad en entrevistas a fondo con alumnos y maestros bilingües. Los resultados atraen nuestra atención hacia el papel de variables no lingüísticas y su relación con factores emocionales y contextuales que influyen en la manera como ocurre la redacción en segunda lengua en la escuela, en donde las identidades híbridas pueden ser construidas para propósitos académicos.

References

Bretherton, I. (1992). The origins of attachment theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth. Developmental Psychology, 28(5), 759-775.

Busayo, I. (2010). Identity and language choice: ‘We equals I’. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(11), 3047-3054.

Cameron, D. (1997). Performing gender identity: Young men’s talk and the construction of heterosexual masculinity. In S. Johnson & U. H. Meinhof (Eds.), Language and masculinity (pp. 47-64). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Cheng, W. (2003). Intercultural conversation. Amsterdam, NL: Benjamins.

Clark, R., & Ivanič, R. (1997). The politics of writing. London, UK: Routledge.

Condon, J. C. (1997). Good neighbors: Communicating with the Mexicans (2nd ed.). Yarmouth, MA: Intercultural Press.

Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second language writing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Connor, U. (2002). New directions in contrastive rhetoric. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 493-510.

Crawford, T. (2007). Some historical and academic considerations for the teaching of second language writing in English in Mexico. MEXTESOL Journal, 31(1), 75-90.

Crawford, T. (2010). ESL writing in the University of Guanajuato: The struggle to enter a discourse community. Guanajuato: University of Guanajuato.

Crawford, T., Mora Pablo, I., Goodwin, D., & Lengeling, M. (2013). From contrastive rhetoric towards perceptions of identity: Written academic English in Central Mexico. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 15(1), 9-24.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). (Eds.). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications.

Haugen, E. (1956). Bilingualism in the Americas: A bibliography and research guide. Alabama, US: University of Alabama Press.

Holliday, A. (2005). The struggle to teach English as an international language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

Kachru, B. B., & Smith, L. E. (1985). Editorial. World Englishes, 4(2), 209-212.

Kubota, R. (2002). The impact of globalization on language teaching in Japan. In Block, D. & Cameron, D. (Eds.) Globalization and language teaching (pp. 13-28). New York, NY: Routledge.

Madriz, E. (2000). Focus groups in feminist research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research, (pp. 835-858). London, UK: Sage Publications.

Matsuda, P., Canagarajah, S., Harklau, L., Hyland, K., & Warschauer, M. (2003). Changing currents in second language writing research: A colloquium. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(2), 151-179.

Maycut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophical and practical guide. London, UK: Routledge.

Miller, J. (1997). Second language acquisition and social identity. Queensland Journal of Educational Research, 13(2). Retrieved from http://iier.org.au/qjer/qjer13/miller2.html

Mills, S. (2002). Rethinking politeness, impoliteness and gender identity. In J. Sunderland & L. Litoselliti, (Eds.), Gender identity and discourse analysis (pp. 69-90). Amsterdam, NL: Benjamins.

Mok, A., & Morris, M. (2010). An upside to bicultural identity conflict: Resisting groupthink in cultural ingroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1114-1117.

Mokhtarnia, S. (2011). Language education in Iran: A dialogue between cultures or a clash of identities. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1998-2002.

Mora Pablo, I. (2011). The native speaker spin: The construction of the English teacher at a language department at a university in Central Mexico (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury.

Olinger, A. R. (2011) Constructing identities through “discourse”: Stance and interaction in collaborative college writing. Linguistics and Education, 22(3), 273-286.

Spolsky, B. (1998). Sociolinguistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Stewart, D. W., & Shamsadani, P. N. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice. London, UK: Sage.

Vassileva, I. (2001). Commitment and detachment in English and Bulgarian academic writing. English for Specific Purposes, 20(1), 83-102.

Wagner, W., Kronberger, N., Nagata, M., Sen, R., Holtz, P., & Flores Palacios, F. (2010). Essentialist theory of ‘hybrids’: From animal kinds to ethnic categories and race. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13(4), 232-246.

Waseem, F., & Asadullah, S. (2013). Linguistic domination and critical language awareness. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 799-820.

Dimensions

PlumX

Article abstract page views

1660

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Crawford, T., Lengeling, M., Mora Pablo, I., & Heredia Ocampo, R. (2014). Hybrid Identity in Academic Writing: “Are There Two of Me?”. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 16(2), 87-100. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v16n2.40192