The Feasibility of Assessing Teenagers’ Oral English Language Performance with a Rubric
La viabilidad de evaluar el desempeño oral de los adolescentes en inglés con una rúbrica
Keywords:
Alternative assessment, oral performance, practicality, rubrics, teaching English to teenagers (en)Desempeño oral, enseñanza de inglés a adolescentes, evaluación alternativa, rúbricas, viabilidad (es)
This article reports the experience of a study group in a public university in Colombia, formed mostly by academic coordinators who worked in the design of assessment rubrics. Its focus is on the experience of the academic coordinator of the English program for teenagers, who concentrated on implementing the rubric to assess the students’ oral performance. The data collection instruments used were the rubric and interviews with the teachers and students. The results are related to the impact of the assessment rubrics on the program’s teachers regarding practicality.
En este artículo se presenta la experiencia de un grupo de estudio en una universidad pública colombiana, conformado principalmente por coordinadores académicos que trabajaron en el diseño de rúbricas para la evaluación. El presente trabajo se centra en la experiencia de la coordinadora del programa de inglés para jóvenes, quien usa las rúbricas para evaluar el desempeño oral de los estudiantes. Los instrumentos de recolección de datos fueron la rúbrica y entrevistas a los profesores y estudiantes. Los resultados están relacionados con la viabilidad y utilidad de la rúbrica.
Downloads
References
Arias, C., & Maturana, L. (2005). Evaluación en lenguas extranjeras: discursos y prácticas [Assessment in foreign languages: Discourses and practices]. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 10(16), 63-91.
Arias, C., Estrada, L., Areiza, H., & Restrepo, E. (2009). Sistema de evaluación en lenguas extranjeras [Assessment system in foreign languages]. Medellín, CO: Universidad de Antioquia.
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Brown, D. H. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. New York, NY: Longman.
Brown, J. & Hudson, T. (1998). The alternatives in language assessment. TESOL Quaterly, 32(4), 653-675.
Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Retrieved from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdf
Mertler, C. A. (2001). Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=25
Moskal, B. M. (2000). Scoring rubrics: What, when and how? Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation. Retrieved from http://Pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=3
Muñoz-Marín, J. (2007). Recognizing institutional guidelines and teachers’ practices and beliefs for assessing foreign language reading comprehension performance (Unpublished master’s thesis). Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia.
O’Malley, J. M., & Valdez-Pierce, L. (1996). Authentic assessment for English language learners: Practical approaches for teachers. White Plains, NY: Addison-Wesley.
Stevens, D. D., & Levi, A. J. (2005). Introduction to rubrics: An assessment tool to save grading time, convey effective feedback, and promote student learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
Taggart, G., Phifer, S., Nixon, J., & Wood, M. (Eds.). (1998). Rubrics: A handbook for construction and use. Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing Company.
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Diana Pineda

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are authorized to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format as long as you give appropriate credit to the authors of the articles and to Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development as original source of publication. The use of the material for commercial purposes is not allowed. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
Authors retain the intellectual property of their manuscripts with the following restriction: first publication is granted to Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development.