Published
Language Learning Shifts and Attitudes Towards Language Learning in an Online Tandem Program for Beginner Writers
Cambios lingüísticos y actitudes hacia el aprendizaje de lenguas en un programa virtual tándem para escritores principiantes
Keywords:
Computer mediated communication, foreign language writing, language learning shifts, tandem language learning (en)aprendizaje de lenguas en tándem, cambios lingüísticos, comunicación mediada por computador, escritura en lengua extranjera (es)
We present findings of a project that investigated the potential of an online tandem program to enhance the foreign language learning of two groups of school-aged beginner learners, one learning English in Colombia and the other learning Spanish in New Zealand. We assessed the impact of the project on students’ learning with a free writing activity done as pretest and posttest and used a semi-structured interview to explore their attitudes towards language learning and their perceived development of their native language. Data analysis indicated statistically significant gains in foreign language writing and positive attitudinal changes toward foreign and native language learning.
Downloads
References
Andrews, R., & Haythornthwaite, C. (2007). Introduction to e-learning research. In R. Andrews & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The sage handbook of e-learning research (pp. 1-57). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607859.n1.
Brammerts, H. (1996). Language learning in tandem using the Internet. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning: Proceedings of the Hawai’i symposium (pp. 121-130). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
Canga Alonso, A. (2012). La pareja tándem como modelo para el aprendizaje de una lengua extranjera [The tandem partner as a model for learning a foreign language]. Escuela Abierta, 15, 119-142.
Crompton, H. (2013). A historical overview of mobile learning: Toward learner-centered education. In Z. L. Berge & L. Y. Muilenburg (Eds.), Handbook of mobile learning (pp. 3-14). Florence, KY: Routledge.
Dooly, M., & O’Dowd, R. (2012). Researching online interaction and exchange in foreign language education: Introduction to the volume. In M. Dooly & R. O’Dowd (Eds.), Researching online foreign language interaction and exchange: Theories, methods and challenges (pp. 11-44). Frankfurt, DE: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0414-1.
Fantuzzo, J., & Ginsburg-Block, M. (1998). Reciprocal peer tutoring: Developing and testing effective peer collaborations for elementary school students. In K. Topping & S. Ehly (Eds.), Peer assisted learning (pp. 123-144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
González-Lloret, M. (2003). Designing task-based call to promote interaction: En busca de esmeraldas. Language Learning & Technology, 7(1), 86-104.
Greenfield, R. (2003). Collaborative e-mail exchange for teaching secondary ESL: A case study in Hong Kong. Language Learning & Technology, 7(1), 46 -70.
Guth, S., & Helm, F. (Eds.). (2010). Telecollaboration 2.0: Language, literacy and intercultural learning in the 21st century. Bern, DE: Peter Lang.
Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667251.
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83-101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399.
Kern, R. G. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics on language production. Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 457-476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05445.x.
Kitade, K. (2008). The role of offline metalanguage talk in asynchronous computer-mediated communication. Language Learning and Technology, 12(1), 64-84.
Lafford, P. A., & Lafford, B. A. (2005). CMC technologies for teaching foreign languages: What’s on the horizon? CALICO Journal, 22(3), 679-709.
Lantolf, J. P. (2012). Sociocultural theory: A dialectical approach to L2 research. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 57-72). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1084.
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Lapadat, J. C. (2002). Written interaction: A key component in online learning. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2002.tb00158.x.
Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Manchón, R. M. (Ed.). (2011). Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.31.
Mendonça C. O., & Johnson, K. E., (1994). Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), 745-769. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587558.
O’Dowd, R., & Ware, P. (2009). Critical issues in telecollaborative task design. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(2), 173-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220902778369.
Philp, J., Adams, R., & Iwashita, N. (2014). Peer interaction and second language learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
Salaberry, R. (1996). A theoretical foundation for the development of pedagogical tasks in computer mediated communication. CALICO Journal, 14(1), 5-34.
Thurston, A., Duran, D., Cunningham, E., Blanch, S., & Topping, K. (2009). International online reciprocal peer tutoring to promote modern language development in primary schools. Computers & Education, 53(2), 462-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.03.005.
Tolosa, C., Ordóñez C. L., & Alfonso, T. (2015). Online peer feedback between Colombian and New Zealand FL beginners: A comparison and lessons learned. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 17(1), 73-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/profile.v17n1.41858.
Van den Branden, K. (2006). Introduction: Task-based language teaching in a nutshell. In K. Van den Branden (Ed.), Task-based language education: From theory to practice (pp. 1-16). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667282.002.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ware, P., & Hellmich, E. (2014). CALL in the K-12 context: Language learning outcomes and opportunies. CALICO Journal, 31(2), 140-157. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.31.2.140-157.
Ware, P., & Kessler, G. (2013). CALL and digital feedback. In M. Thomas, H. Reinders, & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary studies in linguistics: Contemporary computer-assisted language learning (pp. 323-340). London, UK: Continuum.
Ware, P., & O’Dowd, R. (2008). Peer feedback on language form in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 12(1), 43-63.
Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 470-481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05514.x.
Warschauer, M. (2005). Sociocultural perspectives on CALL. In J. Egbert & G. M. Petrie (Eds.), CALL Research Perspectives (pp. 41-51). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H.-Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
License
Copyright (c) 2017 PROFILE Issues in Teachers' Professional Development

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are authorized to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format as long as you give appropriate credit to the authors of the articles and to Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development as original source of publication. The use of the material for commercial purposes is not allowed. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
Authors retain the intellectual property of their manuscripts with the following restriction: first publication is granted to Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development.