Published

2022-01-19

The Relationship Between Demographic Features and Iranian EFL Teachers’ Attachment Style

La relación entre las características demográficas y el estilo de apego de profesores iraníes de inglés como lengua extranjera

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v24n1.91098

Keywords:

attachment style, demographic features, English language teachers (en)
características demográficas, estilo de apego, docentes de inglés (es)

Downloads

Authors

This study investigated Iranian English as a foreign language teachers’ attachment styles and possible influential factors such as age, teaching experience, gender, and educational degree. The participants were 108 female and 79 male Iranian English teachers, chosen through convenience and snowball sampling. Using Google forms, a researcher-made questionnaire was sent to the participants. There was a positive relationship between age and a secure style, and a negative relationship between fearful and preoccupied styles and age. Further, there was a positive correlation between a secure style and teaching experience, and a negative relationship between fearful and preoccupied styles and teaching experience. Male teachers were more secure, and educational degree made no difference in secure and preoccupied styles.

Este estudio investigó los estilos de apego de profesores de inglés como lengua extranjera iraníes y los posibles factores influyentes como edad, experiencia docente, género y nivel educativo. Los participantes fueron 108 mujeres y 79 hombres, seleccionados por el muestreo de conveniencia y en cadena. Se elaboró un cuestionario en línea que se envió a los participantes. Las respuestas revelaron que, en cuanto a la edad, existía una relación positiva con el estilo seguro y una negativa con los estilos temerosos y preocupados. Además, en cuanto a la experiencia docente, hubo una correlación positiva con el estilo seguro y una negativa con los estilos de miedo y preocupación. Los hombres indicaron sentirse más seguros y el nivel educativo no mostró diferencia para los estilos seguro y preocupado.

References

Ackerman, C. E. (n.d.). What is attachment theory? Bowlby’s 4 stages explained. PositivePsychology.com. https://positivepsychology.com/attachment-theory/

Ainsworth, M. D., & Bell, S. M. (1970). Attachment, exploration, and separation: Illustrated by the behavior of one-year-olds in a strange situation. Child Development, 41(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127388

Ainsworth, M. D., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Akbağ, M., & İmamoğlu, S. E. (2010). The prediction of gender and attachment styles on shame, guilt, and loneliness. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 10, 669–682.

Allen, J. P., & Land, D. (1999). Attachment in adolescence. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (1st ed., pp. 319–335). Guilford Press.

Barker, E. S. (2015). Promoting positive teacher–child interactions through implementation of a social emotional learning curriculum with performance feedback [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA.

Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226

Bergin, C., & Bergin, D. (2009). Attachment in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 141–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9104-0

Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Separation, anxiety and anger (Vol. 2). Basic Books.

Bretherton, I. (2010). Fathers in attachment theory and research: A review. Early Child Development and Care, 180(1–2), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430903414661

Cassidy, J., Jones, J. D., & Shaver, P. R. (2013). Contributions of attachment theory and research: A Framework for future research, translation, and policy. Development and Psychopathology, 25(4), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579413000692

Choi, J. Y., & Dobbs-Oates, J. (2016). Teacher-child relationships: Contribution of teacher and child characteristics. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 30(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2015.1105331

Davis, K. (2018, September 25). How does cognitive behavioral therapy work? Medical News Today. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/296579

de Castro, R. M., & Pereira, D. I. F. (2019). Education and attachment: Guidelines to prevent school failure. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 3(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti3010010

Del Giudice, M. (2011). Sex differences in romantic attachment: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210392789

Gervai, J. (2009). Environmental and genetic influences on early attachment. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 3, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-2000-3-25

Granot, D., & Mayseless, O. (2001). Attachment security and adjustment to school in middle childhood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25(6), 530–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250042000366

Hancock, N., Scanlan, J. N., Honey, A., Bundy, A., & O’Shea, K. (2015). Recovery assessment scale—domains and stages (RASDS): Its feasibility and outcome measurement capacity. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 49(7), 624–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867414564084

Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.52.3.511

Hoffman, S. G., Sawyer, A. T., Witt, A. A., & Oh, D. (2010). The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018555

Krstić, K. (2015). Attachment in the student–teacher relationship as a factor of school achievement. Teaching Innovations, 28(3), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.5937/inovacije1503167K

Moss, E., & St-Laurent, D. (2001). Attachment at school age and academic performance. Developmental Psychology, 37(6), 863–874. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.6.863

O’Connor, E., & McCartney, K. (2007). Examining teacher–child relationships and achievement as part of an ecological model of development. American Educational Research Journal, 44(2), 340–369. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207302172

Ogelman, H. G., & Seven, S. (2012). Investigating preschool children’s attachment styles and peer relationships. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 765–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.731

Polek, E. (2008). Evaluating the replicability of the Bartholomew and Horowitz Model of attachment in one native Dutch and four immigrant samples. In E. Polek (Ed.), Attachment in cultural context: Differences in attachment between Eastern and Western Europeans (pp. 16–33). University of Groningen/UMCG research.

Poole Heller, D. (2014). Attachment style quiz. Retrieved July 2020, from https://dianepooleheller.com/attachment-test/

Pourmohseni-Koluri, F. (2016). Gender differences in attachment style and personality traits in prediction of love styles in university students. Research in Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences, 6(1), 17–32.

Riley, P. (2009). An adult attachment perspective on the student–teacher relationship and classroom management difficulties. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 626–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.11.018

Riley, P. (2012). Attachment perspectives on classroom relationships: Helping ourselves through helping others? (ED542248). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED542248.pdf

Rozvadský-Gugová, G., & Heretik, A. (2011). Gender differences in attachment styles using Slovak version of the experiences in close relationships – Revised (ECR-R). Acta Technologica Dubnicae, 1(2), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1515/atd-2015-0043

Scharfe, E. (2017). Sex differences in attachment. In T. K. Shackelford, & V. A. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3592-1

Segal, D. L., Needham, T. N., & Coolidge, F. L. (2009). Age differences in attachment orientations among younger and older adults: Evidence from two self-report measures of attachment. Aging and Human Development, 69(2), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.2190/AG.69.2.c

Shumaker, D. M., Deutsch, R. M., & Brenninkmeyer, L. (2009). How do I connect? Attachment issues in adolescence. Journal of Child Custody, 6(1–2), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/15379410902894866

Simpson, J. A., & Rholes, W. S. (2017). Adult attachment, stress, and romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.006

Stevenson-Hinde, J., & Verschueren, K. (2002). Attachment in childhood. In P. K. Smith & C. H. Hart (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of childhood social development (pp. 182–204). Blackwell.

Tagay, Ö., & Karataş, Z. (2012). An investigation of attachment styles of college students. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 745–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.728

Toffoli, D. (2015). Attachment theory: Insights into student postures in autonomous language learning. In C. Gkonou, D. Tatzl, & S. Mercer (Eds.), New directions in language learning psychology (pp 55–70). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23491-5_5

Van Oudenhoven, J. P., Hofstra, J., & Bakker, W. (2003). Ontwikkeling en evaluatie van de Hechtingstijllijst [Development and evaluation of the Attachment Styles Questionnaire]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 58, 95–102.

Veríssimo, M., Torres, N., Silva, F., Fernandes, C., Vaughn, B. E., & Santos, A. J. (2017). Children’s representations of attachment and positive teacher–child relationships. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02270

How to Cite

APA

Ganji, M. & Samani, F. S. (2022). The Relationship Between Demographic Features and Iranian EFL Teachers’ Attachment Style. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 24(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v24n1.91098

ACM

[1]
Ganji, M. and Samani, F.S. 2022. The Relationship Between Demographic Features and Iranian EFL Teachers’ Attachment Style. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development. 24, 1 (Jan. 2022), 45–61. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v24n1.91098.

ACS

(1)
Ganji, M.; Samani, F. S. The Relationship Between Demographic Features and Iranian EFL Teachers’ Attachment Style. Profile: Issues Teach. Prof. Dev. 2022, 24, 45-61.

ABNT

GANJI, M.; SAMANI, F. S. The Relationship Between Demographic Features and Iranian EFL Teachers’ Attachment Style. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, [S. l.], v. 24, n. 1, p. 45–61, 2022. DOI: 10.15446/profile.v24n1.91098. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/profile/article/view/91098. Acesso em: 16 mar. 2026.

Chicago

Ganji, Mansoor, and Farzane Safarzade Samani. 2022. “The Relationship Between Demographic Features and Iranian EFL Teachers’ Attachment Style”. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development 24 (1):45-61. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v24n1.91098.

Harvard

Ganji, M. and Samani, F. S. (2022) “The Relationship Between Demographic Features and Iranian EFL Teachers’ Attachment Style”, Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 24(1), pp. 45–61. doi: 10.15446/profile.v24n1.91098.

IEEE

[1]
M. Ganji and F. S. Samani, “The Relationship Between Demographic Features and Iranian EFL Teachers’ Attachment Style”, Profile: Issues Teach. Prof. Dev., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 45–61, Jan. 2022.

MLA

Ganji, M., and F. S. Samani. “The Relationship Between Demographic Features and Iranian EFL Teachers’ Attachment Style”. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, vol. 24, no. 1, Jan. 2022, pp. 45-61, doi:10.15446/profile.v24n1.91098.

Turabian

Ganji, Mansoor, and Farzane Safarzade Samani. “The Relationship Between Demographic Features and Iranian EFL Teachers’ Attachment Style”. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development 24, no. 1 (January 19, 2022): 45–61. Accessed March 16, 2026. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/profile/article/view/91098.

Vancouver

1.
Ganji M, Samani FS. The Relationship Between Demographic Features and Iranian EFL Teachers’ Attachment Style. Profile: Issues Teach. Prof. Dev. [Internet]. 2022 Jan. 19 [cited 2026 Mar. 16];24(1):45-61. Available from: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/profile/article/view/91098

Download Citation

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations0

Dimensions

PlumX

Article abstract page views

1022

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.