Sensibilidad del coeficiente de Manning en la estimación de los niveles de crecida para el mapeo de inundaciones en un río de la región interandina de Ecuador
The Sensitivity of Manning’s Coefficient in Estimating Water Levels in an Ecuadorian River in The Inter-Andean Region for Flood Mapping
Sensibilidade do coeficiente de Manning na estimativa de níveis de água para o mapeamento de inundações em um rio da região interandina do Equador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/rcdg.v32n1.94764Palabras clave:
análisis de sensibilidad, coeficiente de rugosidad, mapas de inundación, modelización hidráulica, modelo 1-D (es)sensitivity analysis, roughness coefficient, flood maps, hydraulic modeling, 1-D model (en)
análise de sensibilidade, coeficiente de rugosidade, mapas de inundação, modelagem hidráulica, modelo 1-D (pt)
Los datos de entrada, parámetros y la estructura de los modelos matemáticos introducen incertidumbre en los resultados; siendo aconsejable realizar un análisis de sensibilidad cuando se implementan o antes de su uso. Este estudio evaluó la sensibilidad del coeficiente de Manning debido al tipo de cobertura de las planicies y el cauce del río, en el cómputo de los niveles de agua y en la delimitación de las áreas inundadas. El estudio usó el modelo unidimensional [1-D] MIKE 11 para la implementación de un tramo de cinco kilómetros del río Santa Bárbara en el sur de Ecuador. Para el análisis de sensibilidad se realizaron seiscientas simulaciones de Monte Carlo para cada evento de crecida, y los resultados sirvieron para evaluar la robustez del modelo 1-D. Este análisis reveló sensibilidad a los cambios en el coeficiente de Manning; hubo una diferencia de hasta 1,02 m. entre niveles máximos y mínimos de agua. Sin embargo, los resultados de los mapas de inundación revelaron diferencias casi imperceptibles en la extensión del área inundada. Los hallazgos indican que el valor medio de Manning recomendado en la literatura es confiable para estimar mapas de peligro de inundación en ríos de montaña de la región interandina.
Input data, parameters, and the structure of mathematical models introduce uncertainty in the results; thus, sensitivity analysis is required when implementing a model or as a preliminary step. This study evaluated the sensitivity of Manning’s coefficient based on landcover types in the floodplains and the main channel, for calculating water levels and defining flood extent. The MIKE 11 one-dimensional [1-D] model was used in this study on a five-kilometer stretch of the Santa Barbara River in southern Ecuador. Six hundred Monte Carlo simulations were run for each flood event, and the results were used to assess the robustness of the 1-D model. This analysis revealed that Manning’s coefficient was sensitive to changes: there was a difference of up to 1.02 m between maximum and minimum water levels. The resulting flood maps, however, revealed almost imperceptible differences in flood extent. These findings demonstrate that the recommended Manning’s mean value is reliable for flood hazard mapping of Mountain Rivers in the inter-Andean region.
Os dados de entrada, parâmetros e a estrutura dos modelos matemáticos introduzem incerteza nos resultados; sendo aconselhável realizar uma análise de sensibilidade quando forem implementadas ou antes de sua utilização. Este estudo avaliou a sensibilidade do coeficiente de Manning devido ao tipo de cobertura das planícies e do canal do rio, no cálculo dos níveis de água e na delimitação das áreas inundadas. O estudo utilizou o modelo unidimensional [1-D] MIKE 11 para a implementação de um trecho de cinco quilômetros do rio Santa Bárbara no sul do Equador. Para a análise de sensibilidade, 600 simulações de Monte Carlo foram realizadas para cada evento de inundação, e os resultados foram usados para avaliar a robustez do modelo 1-D. Esta análise revelou sensibilidade a mudanças no coeficiente de Manning; houve uma diferença de até 1,02 m. entre os níveis máximos e mínimos de água. No entanto, os resultados dos mapas de inundação revelaram diferenças quase imperceptíveis na extensão da área inundada. Os resultados indicam que o valor médio de Manning recomendado na literatura é confiável para estimar mapas de risco de inundação em rios de montanha da região interandina.
Referencias
Alam, Shahabul, Patrick Willems, y Masud Alam. 2014. “Comparative Assessment of Urban Flood Risks Due to Urbanization and Climate Change in the Turnhout Valley of Belgium.” ABC Journal of Advanced Research 3 (1): 14-17. https://doi.org/10.18034/abcjar.v3i1.27
Anderson, B. G., I. D. Rutherfurd, y A. W. Western. 2006. “An Analysis of the Influence of Riparian Vegetation on the Propagation of Flood Waves.” Environmental Modelling & Software 21 (9): 1290-1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.04.027
Aronica, G., P. D. Bates, y M. S. Horritt. 2014. “Assessing the Uncertainty in Distributed Model Predictions Using Observed Binary Pattern Information within Glue.” Hydrological Processes 16 (10): 2001-2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.398
Bladé Castellet, Ernest, Luis Cea, y Georgina Corestein. 2014. “Numerical Modelling of River Inundations.” Ingeniería del agua 18 (1): 71-82. https://doi.org/10.4995/ia.2014.3144
Burnham, Michael W., y Darryl W. Davis. 1990. “Effects of Data Errors on Computed Steady‐Flow Profiles.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 116 (7): 914-929. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1990)116:7(914)
Campozano, L., D. Tenelanda, E. Sanchez, E. Samaniego, y J. Feyen. 2016. “Comparison of Statistical Downscaling Methods for Monthly Total Precipitation: Case Study for the Paute River Basin in Southern Ecuador.” Advances in Meteorology 2016: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6526341
Carpenter, James, y John Bithel. 2000 “Bootstrap Confidence Intervals: When, Which, What? A Practical Guide for Medical Statisticians.” Statistics in Medicine 19 (9): 1141-1164. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000515)19:9%3C1141::AID-SIM479%3E3.0.CO;2-F
Chow, Ven Te. 1959. Open-Channel Hydraulics. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill Civil Engineering series.
DHI. 2001. MIKE GIS: Floodplain Mapping and Analysis, User Guide. Horsholm, Denmark: Water & Environment.
DHI. 2002. MIKE-11 A modeling system for rivers and channels reference manual. Horsholm, Denmark: Water & Environment.
Di Baldassarre, Giuliano.2012. Floods in a changing climate: inundation modelling. Vol. 3. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139088411
Dimitriadis, Panayiotis, Aristoteles Tegos, Athanasios Oikonomou, Vassiliki Pagana, Antonios Koukouvinos, Nikos Mamassis, Demetris Koutsoyiannis, y Andreas Efstratiadis. 2016. “Comparative Evaluation of 1D and Quasi-2d Hydraulic Models Based on Benchmark and Real-World Applications for Uncertainty Assessment in Flood Mapping.” Journal of Hydrology 534: 478-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.020
Falter, D., N. V. Dung, S. Vorogushyn, K. Schröter, Y. Hundecha, H. Kreibich, H. Apel, F. Theisselmann, y B. Merz. 2014. “Continuous, Large-Scale Simulation Model for Flood Risk Assessments: Proof-of-Concept.” Journal of Flood Risk Management 9 (1): 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12105
Ferguson, Rob. 2010. “Time to Abandon the Manning Equation?” Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 35 (15): 1873-1876. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.2091
Fread, Danny L. 1989. Flood routing models and the Manning n. Maryland: B.C. Yen, ed. Proceedings of the International Conference on Channel Flow and Catchment Runoff.
Gichamo, T. Z., I. Popescu, A. Jonoski, y D. Solomatine. 2012. “River Cross-Section Extraction from the Aster Global Dem for Flood Modeling.” Environmental Modelling & Software 31: 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.12.003
Hall, J. W., S. Tarantola, P. D. Bates, y M. S. Horritt. 2005. “Distributed Sensitivity Analysis of Flood Inundation Model Calibration.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 131(2): 117-126. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2005)131:2(117)
Hardy, R. J., P. D. Bates, y M. G. Anderson. 1999. “The Importance of Spatial Resolution in Hydraulic Models for Floodplain Environments.” Journal of Hydrology 216 (1-2): 124-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00002-5
Horritt, M. S., y P. D. Bates. 2002. “Evaluation of 1D and 2D Numerical Models for Predicting River Flood Inundation.” Journal of Hydrology 268 (1-4): 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00121-X
Hunter, Neil M., Paul D. Bates, Matthew S. Horritt, y Matthew D. Wilson. 2007. “Simple Spatially-Distributed Models for Predicting Flood Inundation: A Review.” Geomorphology 90 (3-4): 208-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.021
Iooss, Bertrand, y Paul Lemaître. 2015. “A Review on Global Sensitivity Analysis Methods.” Uncertainty Management in Simulation-Optimization of Complex Systems 59: 101-22. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1404.2405
Jung, Younghun, Venkatesh Merwade, Kyudong Yeo, Yongchul Shin, y Seung Lee. 2013. “An Approach Using a 1D Hydraulic Model, Landsat Imaging and Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation for an Approximation of Flood Discharge.” Water 5 (4): 1598-1621. https://doi.org/10.3390/w5041598
Lenhart, T., K. Eckhardt, N. Fohrer, y H.-G. Frede. 2002. “Comparison of Two Different Approaches of Sensitivity Analysis.” Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 27 (9-10): 645-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-7065(02)00049-9
Montero, Rodolfo Alvarado, Dirk Schwanenberg, Marcus Hatz, y Martin Brinkmann. 2013. “Simplified Hydraulic Modelling in Model Predictive Control of Flood Mitigation Measures along Rivers.” Journal of Applied Water Engineering and Research 1 (1): 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249676.2013.827897
Mora, Diego Estebán y Patrick Willems. 2011. “Decadal Oscillations in Rainfall and Air Temperature in the Paute River Basin-Southern Andes of Ecuador.” Theoretical and Applied Climatology 108 (1-2): 267-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-011-0527-4
Moussa, Roger. 1996. “Analytical Hayami Solution for the Diffusive Wave Flood Routing Problem with Lateral Inflow.” Hydrological Processes 10 (9): 1209-1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199609)10:9<1209::AID-HYP380>3.0.CO;2-2
Ochoa, A., L. Campozano, E. Sánchez, R. Gualán, y E. Samaniego. 2015. “Evaluation of Downscaled Estimates of Monthly Temperature and Precipitation for a Southern Ecuador Case Study.” International Journal of Climatology 36 (3): 1244-1255. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4418
Papaioannou, G., A. Loukas, L. Vasiliades, y G. T. Aronica. 2016. “Flood Inundation Mapping Sensitivity to Riverine Spatial Resolution and Modelling Approach.” Natural Hazards 83 (S1): 117-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2382-1
Pappenberger, Florian, Keith J. Beven, Marco Ratto, y Patrick Matgen. 2008. “Multi-Method Global Sensitivity Analysis of Flood Inundation Models.” Advances in Water Resources 31 (1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2007.04.009
Pinos, Juan, Daniel Orellana, y Luis Timbe. 2020. “Assessment of Microscale Economic Flood Losses in Urban and Agricultural Areas: Case Study of the Santa Bárbara River, Ecuador.” Natural Hazards 103: 2323-2337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04084-8
Pinos, Juan, y Luis Timbe. 2020. “Mountain Riverine Floods in Ecuador: Issues, Challenges, and Opportunities.” Front. Water 2:545880. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2020.545880
SENAGUA (Secretaria Nacional del Agua). 2014. “Análisis de la vulnerabilidad a eventos de crecida y diseño de obras físicas para la protección de márgenes e infraestructura del río santa bárbara.” 2014. Vol. 2. Cuenca: Estudio Hidráulico, Demarcación Hidrográfica del Santiago.
Tayefi, V., S. N. Lane, R. J. Hardy, y D. Yu. 2007. “A Comparison of One- and Two-Dimensional Approaches to Modelling Flood Inundation over Complex Upland Floodplains.” Hydrological Processes 21 (23): 3190-3202. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6523
Timbe, Luis M. 2007. River Flooding Analysis Using Quasi-2D Hydraulic Modelling and Geospatial Data. Heverlee: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Weichel, T., F. Pappenberger, y Karsten Schulz. 2007. “Sensitivity and Uncertainty in Flood Inundation Modelling - Concept of an Analysis Framework.” Advances in Geosciences 11: 31-36. https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-11-31-2007
Willems, P. 2012. “Model Uncertainty Analysis by Variance Decomposition.” Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 42-44: 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2011.07.003
Wohl, Ellen E. 1998. “Uncertainty in Flood Estimates Associated with Roughness Coefficient.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 124 (2): 219-223. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1998)124:2(219)
Wong, Jefferson S., Jim E. Freer, Paul D. Bates, David A. Sear, y Elisabeth M. Stephens. 2014. “Sensitivity of a Hydraulic Model to Channel Erosion Uncertainty during Extreme Flooding.” Hydrological Processes 29 (2): 261-79. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10148
Yadaicela, Julio A. 2012. “Estudio técnico sobre la implementación de generación distribuida en el sistema eléctrico ecuatoriano.” Tesis de Ingeniería Eléctrica, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Quito.
Yang, Fan, Jingxiu Wu, Yu Zhang, Senlin Zhu, Guoqing Liu, Guangyu Chen, Shiqiang Wu, y Ziwu Fan. 2020. “Improved Method for Identifying Manning’s Roughness Coefficients in Plain Looped River Network Area.” Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics 15 (1): 94-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2020.1858967
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Juan Carlos Mora-Chaparro, Nelly Lucero Ramírez-Serrato, Mario Ángel Morales-Valencia, Jesús Jacob Nieto-Butrón, María del Carmen Oviedo-Parra, Raúl Guerrero-Bustamante, Mario Alberto Hernández-Hernández. (2025). Mapa hidrográfico urbano y zonas en peligro de inundación en Pachuca de Soto, Hidalgo, México. Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana, 77(3) https://doi.org/10.18268/BSGM2025v77n3a180625.
Dimensions
PlumX
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Autor - Revista

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

Cuadernos de Geografía: Revista Colombiana de Geografía es publicada por la Universidad Nacional de Colombia y está licenciada bajo los términos de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional License.











