Publicado

2016-01-01

Neurología de la anticipación y sus implicaciones en el deporte

Anticipation neurology and its implications in sports

Palabras clave:

Rendimiento atlético, Tiempo de reacción, Desempeño psicomotor, Percepción de movimiento, Anticipación psicológica, Neuronas espejo. (es)
Mirror Neurons, Athletic Performance, Reaction Time, Psychomotor Performance, Perceptual Motor Performance, Anticipation Psychological (en)

Descargas

Autores/as

  • Juan Felipe Correa-Mesa Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Facultad de Medicina - Departamento del Movimiento Corporal Humano – Bogotá, D.C. - Colombia.
  • Paula Andrea Álvarez-Peña Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Facultad de Medicina - Departamento de Fisioterapia – Bogotá, D.C. - Colombia.

El movimiento es una acción que involucra interconexiones complejas, por lo cual se requiere profundizar en los procesos de adaptación, predicción y anticipación que permiten entender la importancia de estos aspectos desde sus bases filogenéticas y ontogenéticas hasta su implicación en movimientos complejos.

Parte de la optimización de los procesos descritos se haya en la calidad de información aferente, la cual permite la relación con el entorno —especialmente la entrada visual— que reconoce un flujo de imágenes y una proyección al contexto en el que se está inmerso. Las estructuras e interconexiones implicadas en la anticipación y predicción de movimientos son descritas de modo que se evidencia la congruencia y continuidad del flujo de información que caracteriza esta especialidad neuromecánica de movimiento.

Por otro lado, se aborda la integración de centros puntuales del sistema nervioso central y redes neuronales que permiten el entramado de procesos de aprendizaje por observación, además de proveer equilibrio y eficiencia al sistema en la recepción de estímulos y su relación con la generación de eferencias motoras que cumplan con objetivos específicos. En el ámbito deportivo estos procesos favorecen la eficiencia del gesto optimizando el movimiento.

Movement involves complex interconnections. It is required to deeply examine the adaptation, prediction and anticipation processes to understand their importance from the phylogenetic and ontogenetic bases, until its involvement in complex movements.

Part of the optimization of these processes is found in the quality of afferent input, which allows the connection with the environment, in particular, the visual input, which recognizes an image stream and a projection to the context in which it is immersed. Those structures and interconnections involved in the anticipation and prediction of movements are described so that the consistency and the constant transfer of information that characterizes this field of neuromechanical movement speciality are evidenced.

In addition, this article addresses the integration of specific centers from the Central Nervous System and the neural networks that allow the network of learning processes by observation, and that also provide balance and efficiency to the system in receiving stimuli and their relationship with the generation of motor efferents that accomplish specific objectives. In sports, these processes favor the gesture efficience optimizing the movement.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Nishikawa K, Biewener AA, Aerts P, Ahn AN, Chiel HJ, Daley MM, et al. Neuromechanics: an integrative approach for understanding motor control. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2007;47(1):16-54. http://doi.org/cnvptf.

Hernández H, Oña A, Bilbao A, Ureña A, Bolaños J. Efecto de la aplicación de un sistema automatizado de proyección de preíndices para la mejora de la capacidad de anticipación en jugadoras de voleibol. Revista de Psicología del Deporte. 2011;20(2):551-72.

Abernethy B, Schorer J, Jackson RC, Hagemann N. Perceptual training methods compared: the relative efficacy of different approaches to enhancing sport-specific anticipation. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 2012;18(2):143-53. http://doi.org/bb57.

Díaz GJ, Fajen BR, Phyllips F. Anticipation from biological motion: the goalkeeper problem. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2012;38(4):848-64. http://doi.org/bb58.

Stanley J, Gowen E, Miall C. How instructions modify perception: An fMRI study investigating brain areas involved in attributing human agency. Neuroimage. 2010;52(1):389-400. http://doi.org/fkbrhg.

Farrow D, Abernethy B. Can anticipatory skills be learned through implicit video-based perceptual training? J. Sports Sci. 2002;20(6):471-85. http://doi.org/cgkn3f.

Nijhawan R, Wu S. Compensating time delays with neural predictions: are predictions sensory or motor? Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2009;367:1063-78. http://doi.org/fk7jmp.

Krämer UM, Solbakk AK, Funderud I, Lovstad M, Endestad T, Knight RT. The role of the lateral prefrontal cortex in inhibitory motor control. Cortex. 2013;49(3):837-49. http://doi.org/bb59.

Llinás RR. El cerebro y el mito del yo: el papel de las neuronas en el pensamiento y el comportamiento humanos. Bogotá, D.C.: Grupo Editorial Norma; 2003.

Bassett JP, Zugaro MB, Muir GM, Golob EJ, Muller RU, Taube JS. Passive movements of the head do not abolish anticipatory firing properties of head direction cells. J. Neurophysiol. 2005;93(3):1304-16. http://doi.org/ck44p2.

Tan H, Zavala B, Pogosyan A, Ashkan K, Zrinzo L, Foltynie T, et al. Human subthalamic nucleus in movement error detection and its evaluation during visuomotor adaptation. J. Neurosci. 2014;34(50):16744-54. http://doi.org/bb6n.

Nijhawan R. The flash-lag phenomenon: objecto motion and eye movements. Perception. 2001;30(3):263-82. http://doi.org/b49x6s.

Desantis A, Roussel C, Waszak F. The temporal dynamics of the perceptual consequences of action-effect prediction. Cognition. 2014;132(3):243-50. http://doi.org/bb6p.

Ros T, Munneke MA, Parkinson LA, Gruzelier JH. Neurofeedback facilitation of implicit motor learning. Biol. Psychology. 2014;95:54-8. http://doi.org/bb6q.

Shi Z, Church RM, Meck WH. Bayesian optimization of time perception. Trends. Cogn. Sci. 2013;17(11):556-64. http://doi.org/bb6r.

Jiang J, Heller K, Egner T. Bayesian modeling of flexible cognitive control. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2014;46(Pt 1):30-43. http://doi.org/bb6s.

Kording KP. Bayesian statistics: relevant for the brain? Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2014;25:130-33. http://doi.org/bb6t.

Montagnini A, Mamassian P, Perrinet L, Castet E, Masson GS. Bayesian modeling of dynamic motion integration. J. Physiol. Paris. 2007; 101: 64-77.

Gandolla M, Ferrante S, Molteni F, Guanziroli E, Frattini T, Martegani A, et al. Re-thinking the role of motor cortex: context-sensitive motor outputs? Neuroimage. 2014;1(91):366-74. http://doi.org/bb6v.

Herzfeld D, Pastor D, Haith A, Rossetti Y, Shadmehr R, O'Shea J. Contributions of the cerebellum and the motro cortez to acquisition and retention of motor memories. Neuroimage. 2014;98:147-58. http://doi.org/bb6w.

Roach NW, McGraw PV, Johnston A. Visual Motion Induces a Forward Prediction of Spatial Pattern. Curr. Biol. 2011;21(9):740-45. http://doi.org/cv9v4w.

Wu Y, Zeng Y, Zhang L, Wang S, Wang D, Tan X, et al. The role of visual perception in action anticipation in basketball athletes. Neuroscience. 2013;237:29-41. http://doi.org/bb6x.

Page WK, Duffy CJ. Cortical Neuronal Responses to Optic Flow Are Shaped by Visual Strategies for Steering. Cereb. Cortex. 2008;18(4):727-39. http://doi.org/csbtqb.

Pan JS, Bingham N, Bingham GP. Embodied Memory: Effective and Stable Perception By Combining Optic Flow and Image Structure. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2013;39(6):1638-51. http://doi.org/bb6z.

Durant S, Zanker JM. Variation in the local motion statistics of Real-life optic flow scenes. Neural. Comput. 2012;24(7):1781-805. http://doi.org/bb62.

Cullen KE. The vestibular system: multimodal integration and encoding of self-motion for motor control. Trends Neusoci. 2012;35(3):185-96. http://doi.org/fzkp4f.

Galán-Terraza A, Visa-Nasarre J. Diplopía: manual práctico con vídeos demostrativos. Barcelona: Glosa; 2005.

Nakahara K, Miyashita Y. Neuroscience. Understaning intentions: through the looking glass. Science. 2005;308(5722):644-45. http://doi.org/dts8v9.

Maeda F, Kleiner-Fisman G, Pascual-Leone A. Motor facilitation while observing hand actions: specificity of the effect and role of observer's orientation. J. Neurophysiol. 2002;87(3):1329-335.

Lacoboni M, Dapretto M. The mirror neuron system and the consequences of its dysfunction. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2006;7(12):942-51. http://doi.org/fm3nrn.

Michielsen ME, Smits M, Ribbers GM, Stam HJ, Van Der Geest JN, Bussmann JB, et al. The neuronal correlates of mirror therapy: an fMRI study on mirror induced visual illusions in patients with stroke. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2011;82(4):393-8. http://doi.org/dn3t9z.

Martineau J, Andersson F, Barhélémy C, Cotier JP, Destrieux C. Atypical activation of the mirror neuron system during perception of hand motion in autism. Brain Res. 2010;1320:168-75. http://doi.org/dsdt7h.

Carvalho D, Teixeira S, Lucas M, Yuan TF, Chaves F, Peressutti C, et al. The mirror neuron system in post-stroke rehabilitation. Int. Arch. Med. 2013;6(1):41. http://doi.org/bb63.

Uithol S, van Rooij I, Bekkering H, Haselager P. What do mirror neurons mirror? Philos. Psychol. 2011;24(5):607-23. http://doi.org/dncvx5.

Lago-Rodriguez A, López-Alonso V, Fernández-del-Olmo M. Mirror neuron system and observational learning: behavioral and neurophysiological evidence. Behav. Brain Res. 2013;248:104-13. http://doi.org/bb64.

Kang H, Tsuda I. Dynamical analysis on duplicating-and-assimilating process: toward the understanding of mirror-neuron systems. J. Integr. Neurosci. 2012;11(4):363-84. http://doi.org/bb65.

Danion F, Latash M. Motor Control: Theories, Experiments, and Applications. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010.

Gross B, Schlager W. Table tennis tips from a world champion. Aachen: Meyer & Meyer Sport; 2011.

Correa J, Muñoz D. Vías de la emoción y la inhibición de la neocorteza cerebral. CES Movimiento y Salud. 2013;1(1):52:60.

Llinás RR. Cerebellar motor learning versus cerebellar motor timing: the climbing fibre story. J. Physiol. 2011; 589(Pt 14):3423-32. http://doi.org/fh7s6b.

Snell R. Neuroanatomía clínica. 7th ed. Buenos Aires: Editorial Médica Panamericana; 2007.

Bustamante B. Neuroanatomía funcional y clínica: atlas del sistema nervioso central. 4th ed. Bogotá, D.C.: Editorial Médica Celsus; 2007.

Yarom Y, Cohen D. The olivocerebellar system as a generator of temporal patterns. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 2002;978:122-34. http://doi.org/crch62.

Raab M, Johnson J, Heekeren H. Mind and motion: the bidirectional link between thought and action. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2009.

Latash ML. Synergy. New York: Oxfort University Press; 2008.

Wakeling J, Horn T. Neuromechanics of muscle synergies during cycling. J. Neurophysiol. 2009;101(2):843-54. http://doi.org/cjnckm.

Tokuda IT, Hoang H, Scheweighofer N, Kawato M. Adaptive coupling of inferior olive neurons in cerebellar learning. Neural Netw. 2013;47:42-50. http://doi.org/bb66.

De Gruijl JR, Hoogland TM, De Zeeuw CI. Behavioral correlates of complex spike synchrony in cerebellar microzones. J. Neurosci. 2014;34(27): 8937-47. http://doi.org/bb67.

Van Der Giessen RS, Koekkoek SK, van Dorp S, De gruijl JR, Cupido A, Khosrovani S, et al. Role of olivary electrical coupling in cerebellar motor learning. Neuron. 2008;58(4):599-612. http://doi.org/fd9dd7.

Scheweighofer N, Lang EJ, Kawato M. Role of the olivo-cerebellar complex in motor learning and control. Front. Neural circuits. 2013;7:94. http://doi.org/bb68.

Halliday DM, Conway BA, Farmer SF, Roserberg JR. Load-independent contributions from motor-unit synchronization to human physiological tremor. J. Neurophysiol. 1999;82(2):664-75.

Mehta AR, Brittain JS, Brown P. The Selective Influence of Rhythmic Cortical versus Cerebellar Transcranial Stimulation on Human Physiological Tremor. J. Neurosci. 2014;34(22):7501-8. http://doi.org/bb69.

Knapen T, Kanai R, Branscamp J, van Boxtel J, van Ee R. Distance in feature space determines exclusivity in visual rivalry. Vision Res. 2007;47(26):3269-75. http://doi.org/ds84qr.

Alvis Gómez K, Pulzara Tiara A. Discriminación auditiva, exploración visual y desarrollo del esquema corporal y espacial en tenistas y no practicantes de deporte. Rev. Fac. Med. 2013;61(4):395-403.