Torque estimation based on surface electromyography: potential tool for knee rehabilitation
Estimación de par basada en electromiografía de superficie: potencial herramienta para la rehabilitación de rodilla
Palabras clave:
Knee Joint, Electromyography, Torque, Muscle Contraction (en)Articulación de la rodilla, Electromiografía, Contracción muscular (es)
Descargas
Introduction: Multiple signal processing studies have reported the application of surface electromyography (sEMG) signals in robotics and motor rehabilitation processes.
Objective: To conduct a literature review on the use of sEMG signals as an alternative method for knee torque estimation in order to objectively measure the progress of patients at different stages of knee injury rehabilitation.
Materials and methods: A literature review of studies published between 1986 and 2018, without geographical limits, was carried out in the Engineering Village, IEEE Xplore, Science- Direct, Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases by combining 8 search terms.
Results: After completing the initial search, 355 records were retrieved. Duplicated publications were eliminated, and 308 articles were analyzed to determine if they met the inclusion criteria. Finally, 18 studies describing, in a comparative way, how to estimate torque based on sEMG signals were included.
Conclusion: The use of sEMG signals to calculate joint torque is an alternative method that allows therapists to obtain quantitative parameters and assess the progress of patients undergoing knee rehabilitation processes.
Introducción. Múltiples estudios de procesamiento de señales han reportado la aplicación de las señales de electromiografía de superficie (sEMG) en robótica y en procesos de rehabilitación motora.
Objetivo. Realizar una revisión de la literatura sobre el uso de señales de sEMG como alternativa para la estimación del par de rodilla con el fin de medir objetivamente el progreso de los pacientes en las diferentes etapas de rehabilitación de lesiones de rodilla.
Materiales y métodos. Se realizó una revisión de la literatura publicada entre 1986 y 2018, sin límites geográficos, en las bases de datos Engineering Village, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Scopus y PubMed mediante la combinación de 8 términos de búsqueda.
Resultados. Al finalizar la búsqueda inicial se obtuvieron 355 registros. Luego de realizar la remoción de duplicados esta cifra descendió a 308, los cuales fueron analizados para determinar si cumplían con los criterios de inclusión. Finalmente se incluyeron 18 estudios que describen de forma comparativa cómo estimar el par a partir de señales de sEMG.
Conclusión. El uso de señales de sEMG para calcular el par en una articulación es una herramienta alternativa que permite al terapeuta acceder a parámetros cuantitativos y, de esta forma, valorar el progreso de los pacientes durante el proceso de rehabilitación de rodilla.
Descargas
Citas
Nakagawa TH, Maciel CD, Serrão FV. Trunk biomechanics and its association with hip and knee kinematics in patients with and without patellofemoral pain. Man Ther. 2015;20(1):189-93. http://doi.org/d4hj.
Panesso MC, Trillos MC, Tolosa-Guzmán I. Biomecánica clínica de la rodilla.Bogotá D.C.: Editorial Universidad del Rosario; 2008.
Goldblatt JP, Richmond JC. Anatomy and biomechanics of the knee. Oper Tech Sports Med. 2003;11(3):172-86. http://doi.org/cr498q.
McLean SG, Lucey SM, Rohrer S, Brandon C. Knee joint anatomy predicts high-risk in vivo dynamic landing knee biomechanics. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2010;25(8):781-8. http://doi.org/bnvpg4.
Haider-Khan HMM, Masood T. Knee Biomechanics and Physical Performance; an Acl-Reconstructed Athlete Before and After Isokinetic Strength Training. Professional Med J. 2017;24(12):1921-26. http://doi.org/d4hk
Schein A, Matcuk G, Patel D, Gottsegen CJ, Hartshorn T, Forrester D, et al. Structure and function, injury, pathology, and treatment of the medial collateral ligament of the knee. Emerg Radiol. 2012;19(6):489-98. http://doi.org/f4htqd.
Schoenfeld BJ. Squatting kinematics and kinetics and their application to exercise performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(12):3497-506. http://doi.org/fkngtz.
Trâmbiţaş D, Baier I. Clinical and Imaging Study of Knee Biomechanics. Buletinul UPG. 2010;62(4).
Lasmar RCP, de Almeida AM, Serbino JW, Albuquerque RF da M, Hernandez AJ. Importance of the different posterolateral knee static stabilizers: biomechanical study. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2010;65(4):433-40. http://doi.org/dcgbhp.
Hollman JH, Deusinger RH, Van Dillen LR, Matava MJ. Knee Joint Movements in Subjects Without Knee Pathology and Subjects With Injured Anterior Cruciate Ligaments. Physical Therapy. 2002;82(10):960-72. http://doi.org/d4hm.
Knežević OM, Mirkov DM. Strength assessment in athletes following an anterior cruciate ligament injury. Kinesiology. 2013;45(1):3-15.
Škarabot J, Ansdell P, Brownstein C, Howatson G, Goodall S, Durbaba R. Differences in force normalising procedures during submaximal anisometric contractions. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2018;41:82-8. http://doi.org/gdxqbg.
Kasprisin JE, Grabiner MD. EMG variability during maximum voluntary isometric and anisometric contractions is reduced using spatial averaging. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1998;8(1):45-50. http://doi.org/bkvsdg.
Wiczkowski E, Skiba K. Kinetic analysis of the human knee joint. BiolSport. 2008;25:77-91.
Hickey PF. Isokinetic strength testing in monitoring progress in a multidisciplinary work reentry program: A case study. J Occup Rehabil. 1991;1(1):83-90. http://doi.org/ckmxgh.
Stam HJ, Binkhorst RA, Kühlmann P, Van Nieuwenhuyzen JF. Clinical progress and quadriceps torque ratios during training of meniscectomy patients. Int J Sports Med. 1992;13(02):183-8. http://doi.org/fqt8p9.
Czaplicki A, Jarocka M, Walawski J. Isokinetic identification of knee joint torques before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0144283. http://doi.org/gdg62b.
Farina D, Merletti R, Enoka RM. The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004;96(4):1486-95. http://doi.org/ds9h5p.
Villarroya-Aparicio MA. Electromiografía cinesiológica. Rehabilitación. 2005;39(6):255-255-64. http://doi.org/cqdg85.
Van Roie E, Verschueren SM, Boonen S, Bogaerts A, Kennis E, Coudyzer W, et al. Force-Velocity Characteristics of the Knee Extensors: An Indication of the Risk for Physical Frailty in Elderly Women. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(11):1827-32. http://doi.org/fxdmtx.
Ibarra-Lúzar JI, Pérez-Zorrilla E, Fernández-García C. Electromiografía clínica. Rehabilitación. 2005;39(6):265-76. http://doi.org/c9p7zs.
Onuoha ARA. Comparison of Quadriceps and Hamstring Functions in College-age Students. Physiotherapy. 1990;76(3):172-6. http://doi.org/frjgsr.
Welsch MA, Williams PA, Pollock ML, Graves JE, Foster DN, Fulton MN. Quantification of full-range-of-motion unilateral and bilateral knee flexion and extension torque ratios. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(8):971-8. http://doi.org/ckwf4d.
Koutras G, Bernard M, Terzidis IP, Papadopoulos P, Georgoulis A, Pappas E. Comparison of knee flexion isokinetic deficits between seated and prone positions after ACL reconstruction with hamstrings graft: Implications for rehabilitation and return to sports decisions. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19(7):559-62. http://doi.org/d4hq.
Valtonen AM, Pöyhönen T, Manninen M, Heinonen A, Sipilä S. Knee Extensor and Flexor Muscle Power Explains Stair Ascension Time in Patients With Unilateral Late-Stage Knee Osteoarthritis: A Cross-Sectional Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(2):253-9. http://doi.org/f6x63m.
Gabriel DA, Basford JR, An K. Training-related changes in the maximal rate of torque development and EMG activity. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2001;11(2):123-9. http://doi.org/fprkg6.
Singh SC, Chengappa R, Banerjee A. Evaluation of Muscle Strength Among Different Sports Disciplines: Relevance for Improving Sports Performance. Med J Armed Forces India. 2002;58(4):310-4. http://doi.org/fs89zq.
Konrad P. The ABC of emg. A Pract Introd to Kinesiol Electromyogr. Scottsdale: Noraxon U.S.A, Inc.; 2005.
Menegaldo LL, Oliveira LF. An EMG-driven model to evaluate quadriceps strengthening after an isokinetic training. Procedia IUTAM. 2011;2:131-41. http://doi.org/cfwdzs.
Nguyen-Tuong D, Peters J. Learning robot dynamics for computed torque control using local Gaussian processes regression. En: Learning and Adaptive Behaviors for Robotic Systems, ECSIS Symposium on. Null; 2008. http://doi.org/cswfr8.
Lucas MF, Gaufriau A, Pascual S, Doncarli C, Farina D. Multi-channel surface EMG classification using support vector machines and signal-based wavelet optimization. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2008;3(2):169-74. http://doi.org/d4dbhv.
Fleischer C. Controlling exoskeletons with EMG signals and a biomechanical body model [disseertation]. Berlin: Technische Universität Berlin; 2007.
Wei G, Tian F, Tang G, Wang C. A wavelet-based method to predict muscle forces from surface electromyography signals in weightlifting. J Bionic Eng. 2012;9(1):48-58. http://doi.org/fzsqv9.
Law LF, Krishnan C, Avin K. Modeling nonlinear errors in surface electromyography due to baseline noise: a new methodology. J Biomech. 2011;44(1):202-5. http://doi.org/dmqsn2.
Van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, Bouter L, Editorial Board of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(12):1290-9. http://doi.org/btfw84.
Hahn ME. Feasibility of estimating isokinetic knee torque using a neural network model. J Biomech. 2007;40(5):1107-14. http://doi.org/cvph5m.
Anwar T, Al-Jumaily A, Watsford M. Estimation of Torque Based on EMG using ANFIS. Procedia Comput Sci. 2017;105:197-202. http://doi.org/d33r.
Anwar T, Al-Jumaily A. EMG signal based knee joint torque estimation. 2016 International Conference on Systems in Medicine and Biology (ICSMB). Kharagpur; 2016. http://doi.org/d33s.
Nurhanim K, Elamvazuthi I, Izhar LI, Ganesan T, Su SW. Development of a model for sEMG based joint-torque estimation using Swarm techniques. 2016 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Robotics and Manufacturing Automation (ROMA). Ipoh; 2016. http://doi.org/d36x.
Peng L, Hou Z, Kasabov N, Hu J, Peng L, Wang W. sEMG-based torque estimation for robot-assisted lower limb rehabilitation. 2015 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). Killarney; 2015. http://doi.org/d36z.
Menegaldo LL, de Oliveira LF, Minato KK. EMGD-FE: an open source graphical user interface for estimating isometric muscle forces in the lower limb using an EMG-driven model. Biomed Eng Online. 2014;13:37. http://doi.org/f55bx5.
Tsutsui Y, Tanaka T, Kaneko S, Feng MQ. Joint torque and angle estimation by using ultrasonic muscle activity sensor. Optomechatronic Sensors and Instrumentation. 2005;6049. http://doi.org/fjgpgb.
Simon BN, Verstraete MC, Mulavara AP, Zehner L, Reisberg S. Prediction of knee joint torque from muscle activity during knee flexion/extension. Proceedings of 17th International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Montreal; 1995. http://doi.org/bc6hvc.
Heine CB, Menegaldo LL. Numerical validation of a subject-specific parameter identification approach of a quadriceps femoris EMG-driven model. Med Eng Phys. 2018;53:66-74. http://doi.org/gddztt.
Ardestani MM, Zhang X, Wang L, Lian Q, Liu Y, He J, et al. Human lower extremity joint moment prediction: A wavelet neural network approach. Expert Syst Appl. 2014;41(9):4422-33. http://doi.org/d362.
Anwar T, Anam K. Estimation of torque for knee joint using frequency domain features for rehabilitation robot biomechanics. 2016 6th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob). Singapore; 2016. http://doi.org/d363.
Peng L, Hou Z, Peng L, Wang W. A practical EMG-driven musculoskeletal model for dynamic torque estimation of knee joint. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO). Zhuhai; 2015. http://doi.org/d364.
Bai F, Chew C, Li J, Shen B, Lubecki TM. Muscle force estimation method with surface EMG for a lower extremities rehabilitation device. 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR). Seattle; 2013. http://doi.org/d365.
Simon BN, Verstraete MC, Reisbert S, Mulavara AP. Torque production vs. muscle activity during knee flexion/extension. Proceedings of 16th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Baltimore; 1994. http://doi.org/chzmrm.
Amarantini D, Martin L. A method to combine numerical optimization and EMG data for the estimation of joint moments under dynamic conditions. J Biomech. 2004;37(9):1393-404. http://doi.org/fkzfmr.
Anwar T, Al-Dmour H. RBF based adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system to torque estimation from EMG signal. 2017 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI). Honolulu; 2017. http://doi.org/d366.
Liu L, Lüken M, Leonhardt S, Misgeld BJE. EMG-driven model-based knee torque estimation on a variable impedance actuator orthosis. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Cyborg and Bionic Systems (CBS). Beijin; 2017. http://doi.org/d368.
Shabani A, Mahjoob MJ. Bio-signal interface for knee rehabilitation robot utilizing EMG signals of thigh muscles. 2016 4th International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (ICROM). Tehran; 2016. http://doi.org/d37d.
Fernández JM, Acevedo R, Tabernig CB. Influencia de la fatiga muscular en la señal electromiográfica de músculos estimulados eléctricamente. Revista EIA. 2007.
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 Revista de la Facultad de Medicina

Esta obra está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento 3.0 Unported.
-