Article Evaluation Form

ANUARIO COLOMBIANO DE HISTORIA SOCIAL Y DE LA CULTURA

 

ARTICLE EVALUATION FORM

 

Date received by peer reviewer

dd

mm

aaaa

Submission Date

dd

mm

aaaa

 

Title

 

Reviewer information

Name

 

Institution

 

Education level

 

 

 

Instructions

 

  • Please mark with an X the score for each evaluation criteria.
  • Commentaries are vital to our authors. We suggest doing them as clear, extensive, precise and constructive as possible.
  • Once you submit the ARTICLE EVALUATION FORM, the journal will provide an Evaluation Certificate. 

 

 

Title and Abstract

(Article and abstract’s pertinence; capacity of giving a clear and synthetic idea of the article’s contents)

1

2

3

4

5

Explanation:

 

 

 

 

Importance and relevance of the topic

1

2

3

4

5

Explanation:

 

 

 

 

 

Originality

1

2

3

4

5

Explanation:

 

 

 

 

 

Contribution to historical or historiographical knowledge

1

2

3

4

5

Explanation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Usage of primary sources

(Pertinence of the usage and selection of sources)

1

2

3

4

5

Explanation:

 

 

 

 

Bibliography

(Topicality, sufficiency and relevance of the referred bibliography)

1

2

3

4

5

Explanation:

 

 

 

 

Quality of wording

(Grammar, phrasing, clarity in argumentation and structure)

1

2

3

4

5

Explanation:

 

 

 

 

Quality and academic level

(Rigor; articulation between title, abstract, arguments and conclusions; academic quality of the article)

1

2

3

4

5

Explanation:

 

 

 

 

 

After reviewing the previous criteria the reviewer considers that:

 

___ The article can be accepted without modifications

___ The article can be accepted with minor modifications

___ The article can be accepted with major modifications

___ The article should NOT be accepted.

 

Reviewer suggestions:

 

 

 

Observations by the Editorial Committee:

 

 

 

THIS FORM IS ONLY FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES. IF YOU WANT THE DIGITAL VERSION, PLEASE CONTACT US.