Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Publicado
Mecanismos de acción de Bacillus spp. (Bacillaceae) contra microorganismos fitopatógenos durante su interacción con plantas
Mechanisms of action of Bacillus spp. (Bacillaceae) against phytopathogenic microorganisms during their interaction with plants
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/abc.v25n1.75045Palabras clave:
Biocontrol, enfermedad vegetal, pérdida de cultivos, seguridad alimentaria (es)Biocontrol, crop losses, food security, plant disease (en)
Descargas
Algunos Bacillus spp. promotores de crecimiento vegetal son microorganismos reconocidos como agentes de control biológico que forman una estructura de resistencia denominada endospora, que les permite sobrevivir en ambientes hostiles y estar en casi todos los agroecosistemas. Estos microorganismos han sido reportados como alternativa al uso de agroquímicos. Sus mecanismos de acción se pueden dividir en: producción de compuestos antimicrobianos, como son péptidos de síntesis no ribosomal (NRPs) y policétidos (PKs); producción de hormonas, capacidad de colonización, formación de biopelículas y competencia por espacio y nutrientes; síntesis de enzimas líticas como quitinasas, glucanasas, protesasas y acil homoserin lactonasas (AHSL); producción de compuestos orgánicos volátiles (VOCs); e inducción de resistencia sistémica (ISR). Estos mecanismos han sido reportados en la literatura en diversos estudios, principalmente llevados a cabo a nivel in vitro. Sin embargo, son pocos los estudios que contemplan la interacción dentro del sistema tritrófico: planta – microorganismos patógenos – Bacillus sp. (agente biocontrolador), a nivel in vivo. Es importante destacar que la actividad biocontroladora de los Bacillus es diferente cuando se estudia bajo condiciones de laboratorio, las cuales están sesgadas para lograr la máxima expresión de los mecanismos de acción. Por otra parte, a nivel in vivo, la interacción con la planta y el patógeno juegan un papel fundamental en la expresión de dichos mecanismos de acción, siendo esta más cercana a la situación real de campo. Esta revisión se centra en los mecanismos de acción de los Bacillus promotores de crecimiento vegetal, expresados bajo la interacción con la planta y el patógeno.
Some Bacillus spp. plant growth promoters are microorganisms recognized as biological control agents, which form a resistance structure called endospore, which allows them to survive in hostile environments and be in almost all agroecosystems. These microorganisms have been reported as an alternative to the use of agrochemicals. Its mechanisms of action can be divided into: production of antimicrobial compounds, such as non-ribosomal peptides (NRPs) and polyketides (PKs); hormone production, colonization capacity, biofilm formation and competition for space and nutrients; synthesis of lytic enzymes such as chitinases, glucanases, protesases and acyl homoserin lactonases (AHSL); production of volatile organic compounds (VOCs); and induction of systemic resistance (SRI). These mechanisms have been reported in the literature in several studies, mainly carried out in vitro. However, there are few studies that contemplate the interaction within the tritrophic system: plant - pathogenic microorganisms - Bacillus sp. (biocontrol agent), in vivo level. It is important to note that the Bacillus biocontrol activity is different when studied under laboratory conditions, which are biased to achieve maximum expression of the mechanisms of action. On the other hand, at the in vivo level, the interaction with the plant and the pathogen play a fundamental role in the expression of said mechanisms of action, being this closer to the real field situation. This review focuses on the mechanisms of action of the Bacillus promoters of plant growth, expressed under the interaction with the plant and the pathogen.
Referencias
Ahmed E, Holmstron S. Siderophores in environmental research: roles and applications. Microb Bioetchnol. 2014;7(3):196-208. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12117
Aleti G, Sessitsch A, Brader G. Genome minding: Prediction of lipopeptides and polyketides from Bacillus and related Firmicutes. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2015;13:192-203. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2015.03.003
Aleti G, Lehner S, Bacher M, Compant S, Nikolic B, Plesko M et al. Surfactin variants mediate species‐specific biofilm formation and root colonization in Bacillus. Environ Microbiol. 2016; 18: 2634-2645. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13405
Allard-Massicotte R, Tessier L, Lécuyer F, Lakshmanan V, Lucier J, Garneau D et al. Bacillus subtilis early colonization of Arabidopsis thaliana roots involves multiple chemotaxis receptors. mBio. 2016; 7(6):e01664-16. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01664-16
Badri DV, Chaparro JM, Zhan R, Shen Q, Vivanco J.M. Application of natural blends of phytochemicals derived from the root exudates of Arabidopsis to the soil reveal that phenolic-related compounds predominantly modulate the soil microbiome. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(7):4502–4512. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.433300
Bitas V, Kim HS, Bennett JW, Kang S. Sniffing on microbes: diverse roles of microbial volatile organic compounds in plant health. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2013; 26(8):835-843. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-10-12-0249-CR
Bloudoff K, Fage C, Marahiel M, Schmeing M. Structural and mutational analysis of the nonribosomal peptide synthetase heterocyclization domain provides insight into catalysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;114(1):95-100. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1614191114
Brunelle T, Dumas P, Souty F, Dorin B, Nadaud F. Evaluating the impact of rising fertilizer prices on crop yields. Agric Econ. 2015;46(5): 653-666. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12161
Bulgarelli D, Rott M, Schlaeppi K, Ver Loren van Themaat E, Ahmadinejad N, Assenza F, Rauf P, et al. Revealing structure and assembly cues for Arabidopsis root-inhabiting bacterial microbiota. Nature. 2012;488(7409):91–95. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature11336. PMID:22859207
Burketova L, Trda L, Ott P, Valentova O. Bio-based resistance inducers for sustainable plant protection against pathogens. Biotechnol adv. 2015;33(6 Pt2):994-1004. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.01.004
Cawoy H, Mariutto M, Henry G, Fisher C, Vasilyeva N, Thonart P et al. Plant defense stimulation by natural isolates of Bacillus depends on efficient surfactin production. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2014;27(2):87-100. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-09-13-0262-R
Ceballos I, Mosquera S, Angulo M, Mira J J, Argel L E, Uribe-Vélez D, Romero-Tabares M, Orduz-Peralta S, Villegas V. Cultivable Bacteria Populations Associated with Leaves of Banana and Plantain Plants and Their Antagonistic Activity Against Mycosphaerella fijiensis. Microb Ecol. 2012;64(3):641-653. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-012-0052-8
Chakraborty S, Newton A. Climate change, plant diseases and food security: an overview. Plant Pathol. 2011;60(1):2-14. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02411.x
Chandler S, Van Hese N, Coutte F, Jacques P, Hofte M, De Veesschauwer D. Role of cyclic lipopeptides produced by Bacillus subtilis in mounting induced immunity in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2015;91:20-30. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2015.05.010
Chen F, Gao Y, Chen X, Yu Z, Li X. Quorum Quenching Enzymes and Their Application in Degrading Signal Molecules to Block Quorum Sensing-Dependent Infection. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(9):17477-17500. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140917477
Chen Y, Gozzi K, Yan F, Chai, Y. Acetic acid acts as a volatile signal to stimulate bacterial biofilm formation. MBio. 2015;6(3):e00392. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00392-15
Cheng J, Sagar K, Yang S, Suh J. Endophytic Bacillus subtilis MJMP2 from Kimchi inhibits Xanthomonas oryzae pv oryzae, the pathogen of rice bacterial blight diease.J Appl Biol Chem. 2016;59(2):149-154. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3839/jabc.2016.027
Choudhary DK, Prakash A, Johri BN. Induced systemic resistance (ISR) in plants: Mechanism of action. Indian J Microbiol. 2007;47(4):289. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-007-0054-2
Chowdhury SP, Hartmann A, Gao X, Borriss R. Biocontrol mechanism by root-associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 – a review. Front. Microbiol. 2015a;6:780. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00780
Chowdhury SP, Uhl J, Grosch R, Alquéres S, Pittroff S, Dietel K et al. Cycliclipopeptides of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 subsp. plantarum colonizing the lettuce rhizosphere enhance plant defense responses towards the bottom rot pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2015b;28(9):984-995. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-03-15-0066-R
Compant S, Duffy B, Nowak J, et al. Use of plant growth promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71(9):4951–4959.
Dadaby K, Tulk P. Agrochemicals and their impact on human health: An analysis of pesticide use and incidences of diseases in the region of Rincon de Santa Marta. Report Final [on line]. Quebec, Canada: McGill Universite. MontReal. 2015. Disponible en: https://www.mcgill.ca/pfss/files/pfss/agrochemicals_and_their_impact_on_human_health.pdf. Consulta: 13 de marzo de 2017.
Dae B, Dutta S, Ryu H, Yoo S, Suh D, Park K. Induction of systemic resistance in Panax ginseng against Phytophthora cactorum by native Bacillus amyloliquefaciens HK34. J Ginseng Res. 2015;39:213-220. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgr.2014.12.002
Debois D, Jourdan E, Smargiasso N, Thonart P, De pauw E, Ongena M. Spatio temporal monitoring of the antibiome secreted by Bacillus biofilms on plant roots using MALDI Mass spectrometry imaging. Anal Chem. 2014;86(9):4431-4438. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/ac500290s
Dweck H, Ebrahim S, Thoma M, Mohamed A, Keesey I, Trona F et al. Pheromones medianting copulation and attraction in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(21):E2829-2835. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1504527112
Dong YH, Gusti A, Zhang Q, Xu J, Zhang L. Identification of Quorum-Quenching N-Acyl homoserine lactonases from Bacillus species. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68(4):1754-1759. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.4.1754-1759.2002
Effmert U, Kalderás J, Warnke R, Piechulla B. Volatile mediated interactions between bacteria and fungi in the soil. J. Chem. Ecol. 2012;38(6):665-703. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-012-0135-5
Fan H, Ru J, Zhang Y, Wang Q, Li Y. Fengycin produced by Bacillus subtilis 9407 plays a major role in the biocontrol of apple ring rot disease. Microbiological Res. 2017;199:89-97. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2017.03.004
FAO. El estado mundial de la agricultura y la alimentación: La innovación en la agricultura familiar. Roma: Organización de las naciones unidas para la alimentación y la agricultura; 2015. p.1-175.
Fickers P. Antibiotic compounds from Bacillus: Why are they so Amazing? Am J Biochem Bioechnol. 2012;8(1):38-43. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3844/ajbbsp.2012.38.43
Fones H, Gurr S. Noxious gases and the unpredictability of emerging plant pathogens under climate change. BMC Biol. 2017;15(1):36. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-017-0376-4
Frikha-Gargouri, O, Ben, D, Ghorbel I, Charfeddine I, Jlaiel L, Triki M. Lipopeptides from a novel Bacillus methylotrophicus 39b strain suppress Agrobacterium crown gall tumours on tomato plants. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2017;73(3):568–574. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4331
Gao Z, Zhangf B, Liu H, Han J, Zhang Y. Identification of endophytic Bacillus velenzensis ZSY-1 strain and antifungal activity its volatile compounds against Alternaria solani and Botrytis cinerea. Bio con. 2017;105(C):27-39. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.11.007
Garge S, Naerurkar S. Evaluation of quorum quenching Bacillus spp. For their biocontrol traits against Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum causing soft rot.Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2017;9:48-57. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2016.11.004
Gollin D, Worm C, Wingender A. Two Blades of Grass: The Impact of the Green revolution. Centre for this study of african economies. Oxford, United States: University of OxfordCSAE Working Paper WPS/2016-30. 2016; 45p.
Gotor-Vila A, Franceso D, Usall. J, Ugolini L, Torres R, Mari M. Antifungal effect of volatile organic compounds produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CPA-8 against fruit pathogen decays of cherry. Food Microbiol. 2016;64:219–225. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2017.01.006
Guo Q, Dong W, Li S, Lu X, Wang P, Zhang X et al. Fengycin produced by Bacillus subtilis NCD-2 plays a major role in biocontrol of cotton seedlig damping-off disease. Microbiol Res. 2013;169(7-8):533-540. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2013.12.001
Hao Z, Van D, Wipf D, Fayolle L, Chataignier O, Li X et al. Biocontrol of grapevine aerial and root pathogens by PaeniBacillus sp. strain B2 and paenimyxin in vitro and in planta. Bio Con. 2017;109:42-50. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.03.004
Huang X, Chaparro J, Reardon K, Zhang R, Shen Q, Vivanco J. Rhizosphere interactions: root exudates, microbes and microbial communities. Botany. 2014;92(4):267-275. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2013-0225
Jha S, Kumar C, Modi H. Microbial chitinases: Manifestation and prospective. In: Garg N, Aeron A, editor(s). Microbes in Process. Portland, ME, USA.: Nova Science Publisher. 2014. p. 151-162.
Jones JD, Dangl JL. The plant immune system. Nature. 2006;444:323–329. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05286
Jones S, Ho L, Rees C, Hill J, Nodwell J, Elliot M. Streptomyces exploration is triggered by fungal interactions and volatile signals. eLIFE. 2017;21738:1-21. Doi: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21738
Kamilova F, Okon Y, De Weert S, Hora K. Commercialization of microbes: manufacturing, inoculation, best practice for objective field testing, and registration. In: Lugtenberg B editors. Principles of Plant Microbe Interactions. Berlin: Springer; 2015.p. 319–327.
Kayalvizhi N, Rameshkumar N, Gunasekaran P. Cloning and characterization of mersacidin like bacteriocin from Bacillus licheniformis MKU3 in Escherichia coli. J. Food Sci Technol. 2014;53(5):2298-2306. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-016-2195
Kejela T, Thakkar V, Thakor P. Bacillus species (BT42) isolated from Coffea Arabica L. rhizosphere antagonizes Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Fusarium oxysporum and also exhibits multiple plant growth promoting activity. BMC microbiology. 2016;16(1):277. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0897-y
Lalloo R, Moonsamy G, Ramchuran S, Gorgens J, Gardiner N. Competitive exclusion as a mode of action of a novel Bacillus cereus aquaculture biologicao agent. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2010;50(6):563-570. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2010.02829.x
Lamichhane J, Dachbrodt-Saaydeh, Kudsk P. Toward a reduced a reliance on conventional pesticides in European agriculture. Plant dis. 2016;100(1):10-24. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-05-15-0574-FE
Li B, Li Q, Xu Z, Zhang N, Sheen Q, Zhang R. Responses of benefical Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9 to different soilborne fungal pathogens through the alteration of antifungal compounds production. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:636. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00636
Li Y, Gu Y, Li J, Xu M, Wei Q, Wang Y. Biocontrol agent Bacillus amyloliquefasciens LJ02 induces systemic resistance against cucurbits powdery mildew. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:883. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/facmib.2015.00883
Li S, Xu S, Zhang R, Liu Y, Zhou R. The antibiosis action and rice-induced resistance, mediated by a lipopeptide from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B014, in controlling rice disease caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;26(4):748-756. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1510.10072
Liao J, Chen P, Yang Y, Kan S, Hsieh F, Liu Y. Clarification of the antagonistic effect of the lipopeptides produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BPD1 against Pyricularia oryzae via in Situ MALDI-TOF IMS analysis. Molecules. 2016;21(12):E1670. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21121670
Liu Z, Budiharjo A, Wang P, Shi H, Fang J, Borriss R, Zhang K, Huang X. The highly modified microcin peptide plantazocilin is associated with nematicidal activity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. Appl Microbiol Biotechnolo. 2013;97(23):10081-10090. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-5247-5
Liu Y, Zhang N, Qiu M, Feng H, Vivanco J, Shen Q et al. Enhanced rhizosphere colonization of beneficial Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9 by pathogen infection. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2014;353(1):49-56. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6968.1240
Lu X, Zhou D, Chen X, Zhang J, Huang H, Wei L. Isolation and characterization of Bacillus altitudinis JSCX-1 as a new potential biocontrol agent against Phytophtora sojae in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr). Plant soil. 2016;416(1-2):53-66. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3195-z
Mahmood I, Imadi SR, Shazadi K, Gul A, Rehman KR. Effect of Pesticides on Environment. In: Hakeem K, Akhtar M and Abdulan S, editor(s) Plant, soil and microbes. New York: Springer; 2016. p: 253-269 Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27455-3
Martínez‑Núñez MA, López VE. Nonribosomal peptides synthetases and their applications in industry. Sustain Chem Process. 2016;4:13 Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40508-016-0057-6
Mardanova A, Fanisovna G, Tafkilevisch M, Rashidovna M. Bacillus subtilis strains with antifungal activity against the phytopathogenic fungi. J Agric Sci.2017;8(1):1-20. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2017.81001
Monteiro F, Vasconcelos F, Ongena M, Franzil L, Souza P, Souza J. Effect of temperature, pH and substrate composition on production of lipopeptides by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens 629. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2016;19(36):1506-1512. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR2016.8222
Mootz HD, Finking R, Marahiel MA. 4’-Phosphopantetheinyl transferase in primary and secondary metabolism of Bacillus subtilis. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276(40):37289-37298. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M103556200
Mora I, Cabrefiga J, Montesinos E. Cyclic lipopeptide biosynthetic genes and products, and inhibitory activity of plant-associated Bacillus against phytopathogenic bacteria. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(5):e0127738. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127738
Mosquera S, González-Jaramillo LM, Orduz S, Villegas-Escobar V. Multiple response optimization of Bacillus subtilis EA-CB0015 culture and identification of antifungal metabolites. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2014;3(4):378-385. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2014.09.004
Motta AS, Flores FS, Souto AA, Brandelli, A. Antibacterial activity of bacteriocin-like substance produced by Bacillus sp. P34 that targets the bacterial cell envelope. Antonie Van Leuuwenhoek. 2008;93(3): 275-284. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-007-9202-2
Mota M, Gomes C, Souza I, Moura A. Bacterial selection for biological control of plant disease: criterion determination and validation. Braz J Microbiol. 2017;48(1):62-70. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2016.09.003
Muller S, Strack DN, Hoefler BC, Straight PD, Kearns DB, Kirby J. Bacillaene and sporulation protect Bacillus subtillis from predation by Myxococcus xanthus. Environ Microbiol. 2014;80(18):5603-5610. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01621-14
Nie P, Li X, Wang S, Guo J, Zhao H, Niu D. Induced systemic resistance against Botrytis cinerea by Bacillus cereus AR156 through a JA/ET and NPR1 dependent signaling pathway and activates PAMP-triggered immunity in Arabidopsis. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:238. Doi. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00238
Niu D, Wang X, Wang Y, Song X, Wang J, Guo J et al. Bacillus cereus AR156 activates PAMP-triggered inmunity and induces a systemic acquired resistance through a NPR1 and SA- dependent signaling pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;469(1):120-125. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.11.081
Oerke E-C, Dehne D-W, Schonbeck F, Weber A. Crop Production and Crop Prot.: Estimated losses in major food and cash crops. 1st Edition, Amsterdam: Elsevier. 1994. p.72-741
Oerke E-C. Crop losses to pest. J Agricul Sci. 2006;144(1):31-43. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859605005708
Olmos J, Paniagua-Michel J. Bacillus subtilis A potential probiotic bacterium to formulated functional feeds for aquaculture. J Microb Biochem Technol. 2014;6:361-365. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4172/1948-5948.1000169
Ongena M, Jacques P. Bacillus lipopeptides: versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol. Trends Microbiol. 2008;16(3): 115-125. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2007.12.009
Pandin C, Le Coq D, Canette A, Aymerich S, Briandet R. Should the biofilm mode of life be taken into consideration for microbial biocontrol agents? Microb Biotechnol. 2017;10(4):719-734. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1751.12693
Park K, Park Y, Ahamed J, Moon S. Elicitation of induced systemic resistance of chili pepper by iturin A analogs derived from Bacillus vallismortis EXTN-1. Can J Plant Sci. 2016;96(4):564-570. Doi: https://doi.org/101139/CJPS-2015-0199
Pieterse C.M, Zamioudis C, Berendsen R.L, Weller D.M, Van Wees S.C, Bakker PA. Induced systemic resistance by benefical microbes. Annu Rev Phytopatholog. 2014;52:347-375. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102340
Posada LF, Álvarez JC, Romero-Tabarez M, De Bashan L, Villegas-Escobar V. Enhanced molecular visualization of root colonization and growth promotion by Bacillus subtilis EA-CBOS75 in different growth systems. Microbiol Res. 2018;217:69-80. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2018.08.017
Raaijmakers JM, de Bruijn I, Nybroe O, Ongena M. Natural functions of lipopeptides from Bacillus and Pseudomonas: more than surfactants and antibiotics. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2010;34(6):1037–1062. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00221.x
Rafique M, Hayat K, Mukhtar T, Anna, Khan AA, Afridi MS et al. Bacterial biofilm formation and its role against agricultural pathogens. In: Mendez A, editor. The battle against microbial pathogens: Basic Science, Technological advances and educational programs. Spain: Formatex research Center; 2015.p. 373-382.
Rajer FU, Wu H, Xie Y, Xie S, Raza W, Samad H et al. Volatile organic compounds produced by soil-isolate, Bacillus subtilis FA26 induce adverse ultra-structural changes to the cells of Clavibacter michiganensis ssp. sepedonicus, the causal agent of bacterial ring rot of potato. Microbiology. 2017;163(4):523-530. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.000451
Rea MC, Ross RP, Cotter PD, Hill C. Classification of bacteriocins from Gram-positive bacteria. In: Drider D, Rebuffat S, editor(s) Prokayotic antimicrobial peptides; from genes to application. New York: Springer. 2011. p. 29-47. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7692-5_3
Rudrappa T, Czymmek KJ, Paré PW, Bais HP. Root-secreted malic acid recruits beneficial soil bacteria. Plant Physiol. 2008;148(3):1547–1556. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.127613. PMID:18820082
Ryu C. Bacterial volatiles as airborne signals for plants and bacteria. In: Lugtenberg B, editor(s). Principles of plant-microbe interactions. Switzerland: Springer, Cham. 2015.p. 53-61. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08575-3_8
Sajitha K, Arun S. Quantification of antifungal lipopeptide gene expression levels in Bacillus subtilis B1 during antagonism against sapstain fungus on rubberwood. Biol control. 2016;96:78-85. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.02.007
Samad H, Gu Q, Wu H, Niu Y, Huo R, Gao X. Bacillus volatiles adversely affect the physiology and ultra-structure of Ralstonia solanacearum and induce systemic resistance in tobacco against bacterial wilt. Sci Rep. 2016;7:40481. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40481
Savary S, Ficke A, Aubertot JN, Hollier C. Crop losses due to diseases and their implications for global food production losses and food security. Food Sec. 2012;4(4):519-537. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-012-0200-5
Shafi J, Tian H, Ji M. Bacillus species as versatile weapons for plant pathogens: a review. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2017;31(3):446-459. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2017.1286950
Schisler DA, Slininger PJ, Behle RW, Jackson MA. Formulation of Bacillus spp. for biological control of plant diseases. Phytopathology. 2004;94(11):1267-1271. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.11.1267
Scholz R, Vater J, Budiharjo A, Wang Z, He Y, Dietel K, et al. Amylocyclicin, a novel circular bacteriocin produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. J Bacteriol. 2014;196(10):1842-1852. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01474-14
Singh R, Srivastava P, Singh P, Upadhyay S, Singh A. Human overpopulation and food security: Challenges for the agriculture sustainaibility. In: Singh R, Srivastava V, SinghA, Editor(s). Enviromental issues surroding human overpopulation. Edition: 1. India: IGI Global. 2016. p. 12-39. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225.1683-5.ch002
Song GC, Ryu CM. Two volatile organic compounds trigger plant self-defense against a bacterial pathogen and a sucking insect in cucumber under open field conditions. Intern J Mol Sci. 2013;14(5):9803–9819. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms14059803
Souza C, Li S, Lin AZ, Boutrot F, Grossmann G, Zipfel C et al. Cellulose-derived oligomers act as damage-asociated molecular patterns and trigger defense-like responses. Plant Physio. 2017;173(4):2383-2398. Doi: https://doi.org/1104/pp.01680.2016
Summi CD, Yang BW, Yeo IC, Hahm YT. Antimicrobial peptides of the genus Bacillus: a new era for antibiotics. Can J Microbiol. 2015;61(2):693-103. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2014-0613
Van Loon LC. Plant responses to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2007;119(3):243-254. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-007-9165-1
Villas-Boas S, Roessner U, Hansen M, Smedsgaard J, Nielsen J. Metabolome analysis: An introduction. Volume 24 of Wiley Series on Mass Spectometry. Canadá: Jhon Wiley & Sons; 2007. 320.p.
Villegas-Escobar V, González-Jaramillo LM, Ramírez M, Moncada RN, Sierra-Zapata L, Romero-Tabarez M. Lipopeptides from Bacillus sp . EA-CB0959: active metabolites responsible for in vitro and in vivo control of Ralstonia solanacearum. Bio control. 2018;125:20-28. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.06.005
Walsh CT. Polyketides and nonribosomal peptide antibiotics: modularity and versatility. Science. 2004; 303(5665):1805–1810. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1094318
Wu L, Wu H, Chen L, Yu X, Borris R, Gao X. Difficin and bacilysin from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 have antibacterial activity against Xanthomonas oryzae rice pathogens. Sci Rep. 2015a;13(5):12975. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12975
Wu L, Wu HJ, Qiao J, Gao X, Borriss R. Novel Routes for Improving Biocontrol Activity of Bacillus Based Bioinoculants. Front Microbiol. 2015b;10(6):6:1395. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01395
Wu, K, Fang Z, Guo R, Pan B, Shi W, Yuan S, et al. Pectin enhances bio-control efficacy by inducing colonization and secretion of secondary metabolites by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQY 162 in the rhizosphere of tobacco. PLoS ONE. 2015c;10(5):e0127418. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127418
Xie S, Zang H, Wu H, Uddin Rajer F, Gao X. Antibacterial effects of volatiles produced by Bacillus strain D13 against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Mol Plant Pathol. 2018;19(1):49-58 Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12494
Yu X, Ai C, Xin L, Zhou G. The siderophore-producing bacterium, Bacillus subtilis CAS15, has a biocontrol effect on Fusarium wilt and promotes the growth of pepper. Eur J Soil Biol. 2011;47(2):138–145. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2010.11.001
Yuan J, Zhang F, Wu Y, Zhang J, Raza W, Shen Q, et al. Recovery of several cell pellet-associated antibiotics produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens NJN-6. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2014;59(2):169–176. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.12260
Yuan J, Zhang N, Huang Q, Raza W, Li R, Vivanco JM, et al. Organic acids from root exudates of banana help root colonization of PGPR strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens NJN-6. Sci Rep.2015;5:13438. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13438
Zeriouh H, De Vicente A, Pérez-García A, Romero D. Surfactin triggers biofilm formation of Bacillus subtilis in melon phylloplane and contributes to the biocontrol activity. Environ Microbiol. 2014;16(7):2196–2211. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12271
Zhan S, Fu Y, Mersha Z, Pernezny K. Assesment of copper resistance in Pseudomonas syringae pv phaseolicola, the pathogen of halo blight on snap bean. Crop Prot. 2017;98:8-15. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2017.03.009
Zhou H, Luo C, Fang X, Xiang Y, Wang X, Zhang R, et al. Loss of GltB inhibits biofilm formation and biocontrol efficiency of Bacillus subtilis Bs916 by altering the production of γ-polyglutamate and three lipopeptides. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(5):e0156247. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156247
Zipfel C, Robatzek S. Pathogen–associated molecular pattern – triggered immunity: veni, vidi…? Plant physiol. 2010;154(2):551-554. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.161547
Zohora U, Ano T, Rahman. Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani K1 by iturin A producer Bacillus subtilis RB14 seed treatment in tomato plants. Advc Microbiol. 2016;6(6):424-431. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2016.66042
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Luz Adriana Pedraza-Herrera, Jessica Paola Bautista, Carlos Alberto Cruz-Ramírez, Daniel Uribe-Vélez. (2021). IBUN2755 Bacillus strain controls seedling root and bacterial panicle blight caused by Burkholderia glumae. Biological Control, 153, p.104494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104494.
2. Maria Magdalena Rivera-Salas, José Basilio Heredia, Juan Manuel Tovar-Pedraza, José Benigno Valdez-Torres, Cesar San Martín-Hernández, Isabel Cruz-Lachica, Raymundo Saúl García-Estrada. (2026). Inhibitory effect of the lipopeptide extract from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B17 on the mycelial growth and spore germination of Gilbertella persicaria. Revista Argentina de Microbiología, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2025.11.006.
3. Tamara Alvear, Macarena Gerding, Richard M. Bastías, Carolina Contreras, Silvia Antileo-Mellado, Andrés Olivos, Mauricio Calderón-Orellana, Arturo Calderón-Orellana. (2025). Physiological, Productive, and Soil Rhizospheric Microbiota Responses of ‘Santina’ Cherry Trees to Regulated Deficit Irrigation Applied After Harvest. Plants, 14(23), p.3611. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14233611.
4. Martha Patricia Aparicio, Cristian Giovanny Palencia, Héctor Julio Paz , Mónica María Pacheco Valderrama , Cesar Aguirre Duran . (2024). Tendencias en la investigación universitaria. Una visión desde Latinoamérica. Volumen XXIII. , p.177. https://doi.org/10.47212/tendencias2024vol.xxiii.13.
5. Elena Ostroukhova, Irina Peskova, Svetlana Levchenko, Mariya Vyugina, Dmitriy Belash, Nadezhda Shadura, S. Eliseeva, E.A. Vatskel. (2022). The use of a microbiological preparation based on Bacillus subtilis in organic viticulture. BIO Web of Conferences, 48, p.02006. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20224802006.
6. Mirian Villavicencio-Vásquez, Fernando Espinoza-Lozano, Ivan Chóez-Guaranda, Valeria Cos-Farias, Jonathan Coronel-León. (2026). Fengycin–essential oil emulsions as sustainable biocontrol formulations against Moniliophthora roreri, the cacao frosty pod rot pathogen. Frontiers in Plant Science, 16 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1731535.
7. Mirian Villavicencio-Vásquez, Fernando Espinoza-Lozano, Lisbeth Espinoza-Lozano, Jonathan Coronel-León. (2025). Biological control agents: mechanisms of action, selection, formulation and challenges in agriculture. Frontiers in Agronomy, 7 https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2025.1578915.
8. Pedro Ulises Bautista-Rosales, Verónica Alhelí Ochoa-Jiménez, Paloma Patricia Casas-Junco, Rosendo Balois-Morales, Alejandro Rubio-Melgarejo, Ángel Elpidio Díaz-Jasso, Guillermo Berumen-Varela. (2022). Bacillus mojavensis enhances the antioxidant defense mechanism of soursop (Annona muricata L.) fruits during postharvest storage. Archives of Microbiology, 204(9) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-022-03199-9.
9. Jared Hernández-Huerta, Patricia Tamez-Guerra, Ricardo Gomez-Flores, Ma. Carmen E. Delgado-Gardea, Loreto Robles-Hernández, Ana Cecilia Gonzalez-Franco, Rocio Infante-Ramirez. (2023). Pepper growth promotion and biocontrol againstXanthomonas euvesicatoriabyBacillus cereusandBacillus thuringiensisformulations. PeerJ, 11, p.e14633. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14633.
10. Favián Bayas-Morejón. (2024). Antimicrobial effectiveness of wild-type Bacillus spp compared to Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6051 against Escherichia coli isolated from bovine mastitis. BioNatura Journal: Ibero-American Journal of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, 1(4), p.12. https://doi.org/10.70099/BJ/2024.01.04.16.
11. Edison Ramiro Edison Ramiro, Arístides Stavrinouidis-Xenon. (2026). AgroBacillus: Lixiviado de Raquis de Banano para el Manejo Agroecológico de Ralstonia solanacearum con Reducción Significativa de la Carga Bacteriana. Bosques Latitud Cero, 16(1), p.90. https://doi.org/10.54753/blc.v16i1.2532.
12. Ximena Blanco Crivelli, Cecilia Cundon, María Paz Bonino, Mariana Soledad Sanin, Adriana Bentancor. (2024). The Complex and Changing Genus Bacillus: A Diverse Bacterial Powerhouse for Many Applications. Bacteria, 3(3), p.256. https://doi.org/10.3390/bacteria3030017.
13. Claudia Gabriela Magallón-Andalón, Montserrat Calderón-Santoyo, Rosendo Balois-Morales, Verónica Alhelí Ochoa-Jiménez, Paloma Patricia Casas-Junco, Graciela Guadalupe López-Guzmán, Iza Fernanda Pérez-Ramírez, Yolotzin Apatzingan Palomino-Hermosillo, Pedro Ulises Bautista-Rosales. (2024). Antagonistic potential of Bacillus spp. for the control of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides on avocado (Persea americana Mill.) 'Hass'. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 131(5), p.1695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-024-00959-1.
14. Claudia Gabriela Magallón-Andalón, Montserrat Calderón-Santoyo, Rosendo Balois-Morales, Verónica Alhelí Ochoa-Jiménez, Paloma Patricia Casas-Junco, Graciela Guadalupe López-Guzmán, Iza Fernanda Pérez-Ramírez, Carla Fabiola Arias-Navarro, Pedro Ulises Bautista‐Rosales. (2025). Exploring the biocontrol potential of Bacillus thuringiensis against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in 'Hass' avocado fruits. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 138, p.102724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2025.102724.
15. Ali Fakhar, Bushra Gul, Ali Raza Gurmani, Shah Masaud Khan, Shafaqat Ali, Tariq Sultan, Hassan Javed Chaudhary, Mazhar Rafique, Muhammad Rizwan. (2022). Heavy metal remediation and resistance mechanism ofAeromonas,Bacillus, andPseudomonas: A review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 52(11), p.1868. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2020.1863112.
16. Blanca Rojas-Sánchez, Sergio de los Santos-Villalobos, Juan J. Valdez Alarcón, Ana T. Chávez-Bárcenas, Ma. del Carmen Orozco-Mosqueda, Gustavo Santoyo. (2025). Optimizing milpa agrosystems with beneficial microbes and their ecological interactions: a review. Discover Applied Sciences, 7(2) https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-06503-6.
17. Etna Mendoza‐Buenrostro, Esmeralda Rangel‐Vargas, Carlos A. Gómez‐Aldapa, René Velázquez‐Jiménez, Ma R. Torres‐Vitela, Javier Castro‐Rosas. (2025). Effective Use of Microbial and Plant‐Based Alternatives in Tomato Pathogen Control: A Comprehensive Review. Plant Pathology, 74(5), p.1171. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.14085.
18. D. Vega, S. Ibarra, R. A. Varela Pardo, S. L. Poggio. (2023). Agroecological management of crop diseases: a review. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 47(7), p.919. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2023.2216149.
19. Braulio Edgar Herrera-Cabrera, Adriana Delgado-Alvarado, Rafael Salgado-Garciglia, Luis Germán López-Valdez, Leticia Mónica Sánchez-Herrera, Jorge Montiel-Montoya, Marcos Soto-Hernández, Luz María BasurtoGonzález, Hebert Jair Barrales Cureño. (2024). Bacterial Secondary Metabolites. , p.177. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95251-4.00011-9.
Dimensions
PlumX
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 Acta Biológica Colombiana
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
1. La aceptación de manuscritos por parte de la revista implicará, además de su edición electrónica de acceso abierto bajo licencia Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY NC SA), la inclusión y difusión del texto completo a través del repositorio institucional de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia y en todas aquellas bases de datos especializadas que el editor considere adecuadas para su indización con miras a incrementar la visibilidad de la revista.
2. Acta Biológica Colombiana permite a los autores archivar, descargar y compartir, la versión final publicada, así como las versiones pre-print y post-print incluyendo un encabezado con la referencia bibliográfica del articulo publicado.
3. Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
4. Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos institucionales, en su página web o en redes sociales cientificas como Academia, Researchgate; Mendelay) lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
