Validación de la escala “Valoración de relaciones interpersonales enfermera-familia en UCI-VRIEF-UCI"
Validation of the scale “Assessment of nurse-family interpersonal relationships in ICU-VRIEF-UCI”
Validação da escala “Avaliação das relações interpessoais enfermeira-família na UTI-VRIEF-UCI”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/avenferm.v39n1.85692Keywords:
Psicometría, estudios de validación, relaciones interpersonales, enfermería, familia, cuidados críticos (es)Psicometria, estudos de validação, relações interpessoais, enfermagem, família, cuidados criticos (pt)
Psychometrics, validation studies, interpersonal relations, nursing, family, critical care (en)
Downloads
Objetivo: determinar las propiedades psicométricas del instrumento “Valoración de relaciones interpersonales enfermera-familia en Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos (VRIEF-UCI)”.
Materiales y método: estudio de tipo instrumental de cinco fases: i) validez de contenido a través de juicio de expertos,ii) validez de constructo Implementando análisis factorial exploratorio iii) validez de criterio analizando correlación con instrumento compatible teóricamente, iv) confiabilidad con el índice de correlación por mitades y v) análisis de dificultad/consistencia a través del modelo de Rasch. La muestra del pilotaje fue de 430 familiares de pacientes adultos internados en UCI de dos hospitales universitarios. La muestra para el juicio de expertos fue de 7 expertos.
Resultados: el VRIEF-UCI mostró un índice de concordancia global de 0,96; la validez de constructo determinó que el instrumento es unidimensional con una varianza explicada de 68,6 % para un factor; la validez de criterio evidenció un índice de correlación con el criterio externo de 0,876; la confiabilidad del instrumento es determinada con un índice de confiabilidad por mitades de 0,90. El modelo de Rasch evidenció adecuados niveles de dificultad, lo que se traduce en una alta probabilidad de que los participantes desarrollen adecuadamente el instrumento (residuales cuadráticos medios de 0,99 y de ajuste estadístico estandarizado de -0,1 para ajuste interno, y residuales cuadráticos medios de 1,01 y de ajuste estadístico estandarizado de 0,1 para ajuste externo).
Conclusiones: las propiedades psicométricas del instrumento VRIEF-UCI son adecuadas para la valoración de las relaciones interpersonales entre enfermera y familia en la unidad de cuidados intensivos.
Objective: To determine the psychometric properties of the instrument “Assessment of nurse-family interpersonal relationships in the Intensive Care Unit (VRIEF-ICU).”
Materiales and method: Five-phase instrumental study: i) content validity through expert judgment, ii) construct validity by implementing exploratory factor analysis, iii) criterion validity analyzing correlation with a theoretically compatible instrument, iv) reliability with the reliability index by halves, and v) analysis of difficulty/consistency through the Rasch model. The pilot sample consisted of 430 relatives of adult patients admitted to the ICU of two university hospitals. The sample for the expert judgment was 7 specialists.
Results: The VRIEF-UCI showed a global concordance index of 0.96; construct validity determined that the instrument is one-dimensional with an explained variance of 68.6% for one factor; criterion validity evidenced a correlation index with the external criterion of 0.876; the reliability of the instrument is
determined with a reliability index by halves of 0.90. The Rasch model showed adequate levels of difficulty, which translates into a high probability that participants adequately develop the instrument (mean square residuals of 0.99 and standardized statistical fit of -0.1 for internal fit, and mean square residuals of 1.01 and standardized statistical fit of 0.1 for external fit).
Conclusions: The psychometric properties of the VRIEF-UCI instrument are suitable for assessing the interpersonal relationships between nurse and family in the intensive care unit.
Objetivo: determinar as propriedades psicométricas do instrumento “Avaliação das relações interpessoais
enfermeira-família em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva (VRIEF-UTI)”.
Materiais e método: estudo instrumental em cinco fases: i) validade de conteúdo por meio de julgamento de especialistas; ii) validade de construto por meio da implementação de análise fatorial exploratória; iii) validade de critério a partir da análise da correlação com um instrumento teoricamente compatível; iv) confiabilidade com o índice de correlação pela metade e v) análise de dificuldade/consistência por meio do modelo Rasch. A amostra-piloto foi composta por 430 familiares de
pacientes adultos internados em UTI de dois hospitais universitários. A amostra para o julgamento do especialista foi de sete especialistas.
Resultados: o VRIEF-UCI apresentou índice de concordância global de 0,96; a validade de construto determinou que o instrumento é unidimensional com variância explicada de 68,6 % para um fator; a validade de critério evidenciou índice de correlação com o critério externo de 0,876; a confiabilidade do instrumento é determinada com um índice de confiabilidade pela metade de 0,90. O modelo Rasch
apresentou níveis de dificuldade adequados, o que se traduz em uma alta probabilidade de os participantes desenvolverem adequadamente o instrumento (resíduos quadrados médios de 0,99 e ajuste estatístico padronizado de -0,1 para ajuste interno e resíduos quadrados médios de 1,01 e ajuste estatístico padronizado de 0,1 para ajuste externo).
Conclusões: as propriedades psicométricas do instrumento VRIEF-UCI são adequadas para avaliar as relações interpessoais entre enfermeiro e família em unidade de terapia intensiva.
References
(1) Jo M; Song MK; Knafl GJ; Beeber L; Yoo YS; Van-Riper M. Family-clinician communication in the ICU and its relationship to psychological distress of family members: A cross-sectional study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019;95:34-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.03.020
(2) Peplau H. Relaciones interpersonales en enfermería. Un marco de referencia conceptual para la enfermería psicodinámica. Barcelona: Salvat Enfermería; 1990.
(3) Sánchez EJ; Leal CC; Díaz AJL; Carrillo IMD; Jiménez RD. Ensuring relational competency in critical care: Importance of nursing students’ communication skills. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2018;44:85-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2017.08.010
(4) Carlson EB; Spain DA; Muhtadie L; McDade Montez L; Macia KS. Care and caring in the intensive care unit: Family members’ distress and perceptions about staff skills, communication, and emotional support. J Crit Care. 2015;30(3):557-561. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.01.012
(5) Bolosi M; Peritogiannis V; Tzimas P; Margaritis A; Milios K; Rizos DV. Depressive and anxiety symptoms in relatives of intensive care unit patients and the perceived need for support. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2018;9(4):522-528. http://doi.org/10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_112_18
(6) Adams AMN; Mannix T; Harrington A. Nurses’ communication with families in the intensive care unit – A literature review. Nurs Crit Care. 2017;22(2):70-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12141
(7) Wendlandt B; Ceppe A; Choudhury S; Cox CE; Hanson LC; Danis M et al. Modifiableelements of ICU supportive care and communication are associated with surrogates’ PTSD symptoms. Intensive CareMed. 2019;45(5):619-626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05550-z
(8) Hollman FG; Wåhlin I; Orvelius L; Ågren S. Health-promoting conversations. A novel approach to families experiencing critical illness in the ICU environment. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(3-4):631-639. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13969
(9) Lana LD; Mittmann PS; Moszkowicz CI; Pereira CC. Los factores estresantes en pacientes adultos internados en una unidad de cuidados intensivos: una revisión integradora. Enferm Glob. 2018;17(52):580-611. https://bit.ly/39tOWq6
(10) Wetzig K; Mitchell M. The needs of families of ICU trauma patients: An integrative review. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2017;41:63-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2017.02.006
(11) Kynoch K; Chang A; Coyer F; McArdle A. Developing a model of factors that influence meeting the needs of family with a relative in ICU. Int J Nurs Pract. 2019;25(1):e12693. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12693
(12) Dinglas VD; Faraone LN; Needham DM. Understanding patient-important outcomes after critical illness: A synthesis of recent qualitative, empirical, and consensus-related studies. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2018;24(5):401-409. http://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000533
(13) Lee CTS; Doran DM. The role of interpersonal relations in healthcare team communication and patient safety: A proposed model of interpersonal process in teamwork. Can J Nurs Res. 2017;49(2):75-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0844562117699349
(14) Borges JWP; Moreira TMM; Andrade DF. Cuestionario de relación interpersonal en el cuidado de enfermería: elaboración y validación. Rev Latino Am Enfermagem. 2018;25:e2962. http://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2128.2962
(15) Methven D; Schlotfeldt RM. The social interaction inventory. Nurs Res. 1962;11(2):83-88. http://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196201120-00006
(16) Forchuk C; Brown B. Establishing a nurse-client relationship. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 1989;27(2):30-34. http://doi.org/10.3928/0279-3695-19890201-10
(17) Parrado LYM; Sáenz MX; Soto LVI; Guáqueta PSR; Amaya RP; Caro CCV et al. Validez de dos instrumentos para medir la relación interpersonal de la enfermera con el paciente y su familia en la unidad de cuidado intensivo. Investig Enferm Imagen Desarr. 2016;18(1):115-128. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.ie18-1.vimr
(18) Ramírez JA. Propiedades Psicométricas del Instrumento VRIEF-UCI “Valoración de la Relación Interpersonal entre Enfermera y Familiares de Pacientes en la UCI”. Bogotá. Universidad Nacional de Colombia-Facultad de Enfermería; 2019. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/69863
(19) Fawcett J; DeSanto-Madeya S. Contemporary nursing knowledge: Analysis and evaluation of nursing models and theories. 3.a ed. Philadelphia: Davis Company; 2013.
(20) Escobar-Pérez J; Cuervo-Martínez A. Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: una aproximación a su utilización. Rev Av Med. 2008;6:27-36. https://bit.ly/2V7B7p6
(21) Almanasreh E; Moles R; Chen TF. Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019;15(2):214-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066
(22) Baghestani AR; Ahmadi F; Tanha A; Meshkat M. Bayesian critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio. Meas Eval Couns Dev. 2019;52(1):69-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1308227
(23) Reio TG; Shuck B. Exploratory factor analysis: Implications for theory, research, and practice. Adv Dev Hum Resour. 2015;17(1):12-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422314559804
(24) Barendse MT; Oort FJ; Timmerman ME. Using exploratory factor analysis to determine the dimensionality of discrete responses. Struct Equ Model. 2015;22(1):87-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.934850
(25) Raykov T; Gabler S; Dimitrov DM. Maximal criterion validity and scale criterion validity: A latent variable modeling approach for examining their difference. Struct Equ Modeling. 2016;23(4):544-554. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1155414
(26) Ramírez PCA; Perdomo R AY; Galán GEF. Evaluación de la calidad del cuidado de enfermería en la unidad de cuidados intensivos. Av Enferm. 2013;31(1):42-51. https://bit.ly/3lcqmMH
(27) Streiner DL; Norman GR; Cairney J. Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. 5.a ed. Oxford University Press; 2015.
(28) Cervantes VH. Interpretaciones del coeficiente Alpha de Cronbach. Rev Av Med. 2005;3:9-28. https://bit.ly/3o3Hp5s
(29) Hagell P; Westergren A. Sample size and statistical conclusions from tests of fit to the Rasch Model according to the Rasch Unidimensional Measurement Model (RUMM) program in health outcome measurement. J Appl Meas. 2016;17(4):416-431. https://europepmc.org/article/med/28009589
(30) Muñiz J. Las teorías de los tests: teoría clásica y teoría de respuesta a los ítems. Pap Psicol. 2010;31(1):57-66. http://www.papelesdelpsicologo.es/pdf/1796.pdf
(31) Dias JS; Rocha LP; Carvalho DP; Tomaschewski-Barlem JG; Barlem ELD; Dalmolin GL. Construction and validation of a tool to assess nursing interpersonal relations. Rev Bras Enferm. 2019;72(2):408-413. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0229
(32) Hagerty TA; Samuels W; Norcini-Pala A; Gigliotti E. Peplau’s theory of interpersonal relations: An alternate factor structure for patient experience data? Nurs Sci Q. 2017;30(2):160-167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318417693286
(33) Seo M; Jungsoon P; Okkyoung K; Munhee H; Jeongok P; Mimi P. The influence of clinical nurses’ professional self-concept and interpersonal relations on nursing competence. Kor J Hosp Manag. 2017;22(2):28-43. https://bit.ly/2V7C2WA
How to Cite
VANCOUVER
ACM
ACS
APA
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Download Citation
CrossRef Cited-by
1. J.A. Ramírez-Niño, V.I. Soto-Lesmes. (2024). Necesidades comunicativas de enfermería para la relación con la familia del paciente en estado crítico. Enfermería Universitaria, 19(3), p.251. https://doi.org/10.22201/eneo.23958421e.2022.4.1312.
2. Candy Angles Vargas , María Angela Paredes Aguirre de Beltrán. (2024). Level of satisfaction with nurse-family communication of patients in intensive care: background on the topic. Multidisciplinar (Montevideo), 2, p.76. https://doi.org/10.62486/agmu202476.
Dimensions
PlumX
Article abstract page views
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Avances en Enfermería

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published by Avances en Enfermería are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Starting 2020, we added the CC-BY-NC recognition to the license, which means anyone is allowed to copy, redistribute, remix, transmit and transform our contents with non-commercial purposes, and although new works must adequately cite the original work and source and also pursue non-commercial purposes, users do not have to license derivative works under the same terms.


















