Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Publicado
Visibilidade dos dados nos portais de dados governamentais abertos da América Latina
Data Visibility in Latin American Open Government Data Portals
Visibilidad de los datos en los de datos abiertos gubernamentales de Latinoamérica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v32n85.101127Palabras clave:
América Latina, datos abiertos gubernamentales, portal de datos abiertos, visibilidad (pt)Latin America, open government data, visibility, open data portals (en)
América Latina, datos abiertos gubernamentales, portal de datos abiertos, visibilidad (es)
Descargas
em portais de dados governamentais abertos (dga), não basta reunir uma grande quantidade de dados para alcançar transparência, engajamento, inovação e crescimento econômico. É preciso oferecer mecanismos para que o usuário encontre e utilize os dados, o que é conhecido como “visibilidade” em dga. Com o objetivo de avaliar a visibilidade dos portais de dga dos governos federais dos países da América Latina, tomou-se visibilidade como uma variável composta por 14 critérios desenvolvidos com base em uma revisão bibliográfica. A análise constatou que os portais precisam, principalmente, desenvolver recursos para serem visualizados em outro idioma, disponibilizar um campo de busca interativo e relacionar diferentes dados com conjuntos específicos. O portal do governo federal da Colômbia e do Paraguai se mostraram os de melhor desempenho, pois cumpriram com 11 critérios analisados.
In open government data portals (ogdp) it is not enough just to gather a large amount of data to achieve transparency, engagement, innovation, and economic growth. It is also necessary to provide mechanisms so users can find and use the reported data, something known as “visibility.” With the aim of evaluating the visibility of ogdp of Latin American countries, visibility was considered as a variable composed of 14 criteria, which were developed based on a literature review. The analysis identified that the studied portals mainly require to develop resources to be read in another language, provide an interactive search field, and relate different data to specific sets. According to our findings, the portals of the governments of Colombia and Paraguay showed the best performance, as they met 11 of the observed criteria.
En portales de datos abiertos gubernamentales (dab), no es suficiente con reunir gran cantidad de datos para lograr transparencia, comprometimiento, innovación y crecimiento económico. Es necesario ofrecer mecanismos para que el usuario encuentre y utilice los datos, lo que es conocido como “visibilidad” en dab. Con el propósito de evaluar la visibilidad de los portales de dab de los países latinoamericanos, se tomó visibilidad como una variable compuesta de 14 criterios desarrollados con base en una revisión bibliográfica. El análisis encontró que los portales necesitan, principalmente, desarrollar recursos para que se visualicen en otro idioma, ofrecer un campo de búsqueda interactivo y relacionar diferentes datos conjuntos específicos. El portal del gobierno federal de Colombia y el de Paraguay se mostraron los de mejor desempeño, pues cumplieron con 11 criterios analizados.
Referencias
Abella, A., Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M., & De-Pablos-Heredero, C. (2018). Indicadores de calidad de datos abiertos: el caso del portal de datos abiertos de Barcelona. Profesional de la Información, 27(2), 375-382. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.mar.16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.mar.16
Albano, C. S., & Reinhard, N. (2015). Desafios para governos e sociedade no ecossistema brasileiro de dados governamentais abertos (DGA). Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, 20(67), 214-234. https://doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v20n67.41150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v20n67.41150
Alexopoulos, C., Loukis, E., Mouzakitis, S., Petychakis, M., & Charalabidis, Y. (2018). Analysing the characteristics of open government data sources in Greece. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9(3), 721-753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0298-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0298-8
AlRushaid, M. W., & Saudagar, A. K. J. (2016). Measuring the data openness for the open data in Saudi Arabia e-government: A case study. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 7(12), 113-122. http://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2016.071215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2016.071215
Arquero Avilés, R., & Marco Cuenca, G. (2014). El portal de datos abiertos de la Unión Europea: análisis y evaluación. Revista General de Información y Documentación, 24(1), 99-118. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RGID.2014.v24.n1.45384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RGID.2014.v24.n1.45384
Barni, G. de A. C. (2017). Valor e visibilidade em dados governamentais abertos: o cenário brasileiro a partir do desenvolvimento de um construto (dissertação de mestrado). Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina. https://sistemabu.udesc.br/pergamumweb/vinculos/00003d/00003d9f.pdf
Bauer, F., & Kaltenböck, M. (2012). Linked Open Data: The essentials. A quick start guide for decision makers. Edition mono/monochrom. https://www.reeep.org/LOD-the-Essentials.pdf
Bello, O., Akinwande, V., Jolayemi, O., & Ibrahim, A. (2016). Open data portals in Africa: An analysis of open government data initiatives. African Journal of Library, Archives & Information Science, 26(2), 97-106. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajlais/article/view/167427
Brito, K. dos S., Costa, M. A. da S., Garcia, V. C., & Meira, S. R. de L. (2015). Is Brazilian open government data actually open data? An analysis of the current scenario. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 4(2), 57-73. http://doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.2015040104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.2015040104
Chatfield, A. T., & Reddick, C. G. (2017). A longitudinal cross-sector analysis of open data portal service capability: The case of Australian local governments. Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.02.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.02.004
Dawes, S. S., Vidiasova, L., & Parkhimovich, O. (2016). Planning and designing open government data programs: An ecosystem approach. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2016.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.003
Germano, E. C., Souza, C. A. de, & Sun, V. (2016). Business models adopted by intermediaries in the use of open government data. REBRAE, 9(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.7213/rebrae.09.001.AO05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7213/rebrae.09.001.AO05
Gill, M., & Corbett, J. (2017). Downscaling: Understanding the influence of open data initiatives in smaller and mid-sized cities in British Columbia, Canada. Canadian Geographer, 61(3), 346-359. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12372 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12372
Graves, A., & Hendler, J. (2014). A study on the use of visualizations for open government data. Information Polity, 19(1-2), 73-91. http://doi.org/10.3233/IP-140333 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-140333
GSMA Mobile for Development Foundation. (2018). The mobile economy Latin America and the Caribbean. www.gsmaintelligence.com
Hasan, L., & Abuelrub, E. (2011). Assessing the quality of web sites. Applied Computing and Informatics, 9(1), 11-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACI.2009.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2009.03.001
Henriksson, A., Yi, O., Frost, B., & Middleton, M. (2007). Evaluation instrument for e-government websites. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 4(2), 204-226. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2007.013984 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2007.013984
Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
Jorge, S., Sá, P. M. e, & Lourenço, R. P. (2012). Transparência financeira nas entidades da administração local em portugal: análise da informação disponibilizada nos sítios web. Revista Portuguesa de Estudos Regionais, 31, 39-53. https://digitalis.uc.pt/pt-pt/artigo/transparência_financeira_nas_entidades_da_administração_local_em_portugal_análise_da
Kamesh, D. B. K., Sasi Bhanu, J., & Sastry, J. K. R. (2018). An architectural approach for assessing quality of web sites. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 13(15), 4503-4513. http://www.arpnjournals.org/jeas/research_papers/rp_2018/jeas_0818_7231.pdf
Kassen, M. (2014). Globalization of e-government: Open government as a global agenda; benefits, limitations and ways forward. Information Development, 30(1), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666912473620 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666912473620
Klein, R. H., Luciano, E. M., & Macadar, M. A. (2015). Grau de transparência de dados abertos governamentais do site dados.rs.gov.br. Economia e Gestão, 15(41), 256-285. https://doi.org/10.5752/P.1984-6606.2015v15n41p256 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5752/P.1984-6606.2015v15n41p256
Kucera, J., & Chlapek, D. (2014). Benefits and risks of open government data. Journal of Systems Integration, 5(1), 30-41. http://doi.org/10.20470/jsi.v5i1.185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20470/jsi.v5i1.185
Lin, C. S., & Yang, H.-C. (2014). Data quality assessment on Taiwan’s open data sites. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 473, 325-333. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45071-0_26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45071-0_26
Lourenço, R. P. (2013). Data disclosure and transparency for accountability: A strategy and case analysis. Information Polity, 18(3), 243-260. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-130310 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-130310
Lourenço, R. P. (2015). An analysis of open government portals: A perspective of transparency for accountability. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 323-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2015.05.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.006
Lourenço, R. P., Sá, P. M., Jorge, S., & Pattaro, A. F. (2013). Online transparency for accountability: One assessing model and two applications. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 11(1), 280-292. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejeg/article/view/587/550
Machova, R., & Lnenicka, M. (2017). Evaluating the quality of open data portals on the national level. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 12(1), 21-41. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762017000100003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762017000100003
Machova, R., Hub, M., & Lnenicka, M. (2018). Usability evaluation of open data portals: Evaluating data discoverability, accessibility, and reusability from a stakeholders’ perspective. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70(3), 252-268. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-02-2018-0026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-02-2018-0026
Market Share Report. (2019). 2019 Market Share Report. Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers of America. https://www.independentagent.com/research/SiteAssets/MarketShareReport/default/2019-MarketShareREport-BasedOn20162017Data.pdf
Martin, E. G., Law, J., Ran, W., Helbig, N., & Birkhead, G. S. (2016). Evaluating the quality and usability of open data for public health research: A systematic review of data offerings on 3 open data platforms. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 23(4), e5-e13. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000388 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000388
Matamoros, J. H. M., Rojas, L. A. R., & Bermúdez, G. M. T. (2018). Proposal to measure the quality of open data sets. Em: L. Uden, B. Hadzima, & I. H. Ting (eds.), Knowledge Management in Organizations (v. 877, pp. 701-709). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95204-8_58 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95204-8_58
Michener, G., & Bersch, K. (2013). Identifying transparency. Information Polity, 18(3), 233-242. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-130299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-130299
Nascimiento-Silva, P., & Kerr-Pinheiro, M. M. (2019). Métrica alternativa para dados governamentais abertos na América Latina. Transinformação, 31. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0889201931e190009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0889201931e190009
Open Data Impact Map. (2019). Open Data Impact Map. https://opendataimpactmap.org/map
Open Knowledge Foundation. (n. d.). Open Data Handbook. http://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/
Open Knowledge Network. (2017). Global Open Data Index. https://index.okfn.org/about/
Opquast. (2011). Open data good practices, version 1.1. https://res.cloudinary.com/opquast/image/upload/v1556788845/checklists/Opquast-Opendata_20120831_1.pdf
Peled, A. (2013). Re-designing open data 2.0. JeDEM — EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 5(2), 187-199. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v5i2.219 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v5i2.219
Petychakis, M., Vasileiou, O., Georgis, C., Mouzakitis, S., & Psarras, J. (2014). A state-of-the-art analysis of the current public data landscape from a functional, semantic and technical perspective. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 9(2), 34-47. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762014000200004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762014000200004
Sunlight Foundation. (2014). Open data policy guidelines. https://sunlightfoundation.com/opendataguidelines/
Rojas, L. A. R., Bermúdez, G. M. T., & Lovelle, J. M. C. (2014). Open data and big data: A perspective from Colombia. Em: L. Uden, D. Fuenzaliza Oshee, I. H. Ting, & D. Liberona (eds.), Knowledge Management in Organizations (v. 185, pp. 35-41). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08618-7_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08618-7_4
Said-Hung, E., Valencia, J., & Cancino, A. (2019). Conocimiento y uso del open data en Colombia. Andamios, 16(39), 329-351. https://doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v16i39.686 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v16i39.686
Sisto, R., García López, J., Paéz, J. M., & Múgica, E. M. (2018). Open data assessment in Italian and Spanish cities. Em: A. Bisello, D. Vettorato, P. Laconte, & S. Costa (eds.), International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions (pp. 121-131). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75774-2_9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75774-2_9
Tezza, R., Cezar Bornia, A., Francisco de Andrade, D., & Alberto Barbetta, P. (2018). Modelo multidimensional para mensurar qualidade em website de e-commerce utilizando a teoria da resposta ao item. Gestão e Produção, 25(4), 916-934. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X1875-18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530x1875-18
Thorsby, J., Stowers. G. N. L., Wolslegel, K., & Tumbuan, E. (2017). Understanding the content and features of open data portals in American cities. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 53-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.07.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.07.001
Vaz, J. C., Ribeiro, M. M., & Matheus, R. (2011). Dados governamentais abertos e seus impactos sobre os conceitos e práticas de transparência no Brasil. Cadernos PPG-AU/UFBA, 9(1), 45-62. https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/ppgau/article/view/5111
Veljković, N., Bogdanović-Dinić, S., & Stoimenov, L. (2014). Benchmarking open government: An open data perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 278-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.011
Vicente-Paños, A., & Jordan-Alfonso, A. (2017). Acceso a la información pública y su reutilización en las comunidades autónomas: evaluación de la reutilización de datos abiertos. Profesional de la Información, 26(3), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.may.04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.may.04
Wang, D., Chen, C., & Richards, D. (2018). A prioritization-based analysis of local open government data portals: A case study of Chinese province-level governments. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 644-656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.10.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.10.006
World Wide Web Foundation. (2017). The open data barometer. https://opendatabarometer.org/barometer/
Zhu, X., & Freeman, M. A. (2019). An evaluation of U.S. municipal open data portals: A user interaction framework. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,70(1), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24081 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24081
Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Choenni, S., Meijer, R., & Alibaks, R. S. (2012). Socio-technical impediments of open data. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 10(2), 156-172. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejeg/article/view/571
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
CrossRef Cited-by
Dimensions
PlumX
- Usage
- SciELO - Full Text Views: 24
- SciELO - Abstract Views: 13
- Captures
- Mendeley - Readers: 4
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Innovar
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Todos los artículos publicados por Innovar se encuentran disponibles globalmente con acceso abierto y licenciados bajo los términos de Creative Commons Atribución-No_Comercial-Sin_Derivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Una vez seleccionados los artículos para un número, y antes de iniciar la etapa de cuidado y producción editorial, los autores deben firmar una cesión de derechos patrimoniales de su obra. Innovar se ciñe a las normas colombianas en materia de derechos de autor.
El material de esta revista puede ser reproducido o citado con carácter académico, citando la fuente.
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons:
