Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Publicado
Los procesos de corporatización y privatización parcial de las empresas de propiedad del Estado: una revisión de la literatura
Processes of Corporatization and Partial Privatization of State-Owned companies: A Literature Review
Os processos de corporatização e privatização parcial das empresas de propriedade do Estado: uma revisão da literatura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v32n85.101193Palabras clave:
corporatización, desempeño financiero, empresas propiedad del Estado, enfoques teóricos y metodológicos, privatización parcial (es)corporatização, desempenho financeiro, empresas propriedade do Estado, abordagens teóricas e metodológicas, privatização parcial (pt)
Corporatization, financial performance, state-owned enterprises, theoretical and methodological approaches, partial privatization (en)
El propósito de este estudio es identificar y analizar los trabajos empíricos de corte cuantitativo que estudian los efectos de los procesos de corporatización y privatización parcial en el desempeño financiero de las empresas de propiedad del Estado (epe). Se analizan las perspectivas teóricas, las metodologías y las variables empleadas para la medición de desempeño, y se sintetizan los hallazgos relacionados con los procesos de corporatización y privatización parcial. Asimismo, se realiza una revisión sistemática de la literatura a partir de 31 investigaciones, seleccionadas de un total de 101 artículos identificados de las bases de datos Scopus y Web of Science (WoS). Como resultado del análisis, se identifica que las investigaciones sobre los procesos de corporatización presentan mayor diversidad teórica que las investigaciones sobre los procesos de privatización parcial. El análisis de los hallazgos evidencia que existe consenso sobre los beneficios de los procesos de corporatización, pero no existe un acuerdo sobre las causas que explican dichos beneficios en el desempeño de las epe. Por el contrario, no existe un consenso sobre los efectos de la privatización parcial en el desempeño de las empresas.
This work seeks to identify and analyze quantitative empirical studies addressing the effects of corporatization and partial privatization processes on the financial performance of state-owned enterprises. Theoretical perspectives, methodological approaches, and the variables used for measuring business performance were examined. Besides, the findings of studied works related to the processes of corporatization and partial privatization of this type of companies were synthesized. Additionally, we performed a systematic review of the literature of 31 research works, selected from a sample of 101 articles identified from the Scopus and Web of Science (wos) databases. As a result, it was identified that research on corporatization processes shows greater theoretical diversity than studies on partial privatization processes. Our findings also show a consensus on the benefits of corporatization processes, although there is no agreement on the causes that explain said benefits in the performance of state-owned enterprises. In contrast, there is no consensus on the effects of partial privatization processes over business performance.
O objetivo deste estudo é identificar e analisar os trabalhos empíricos de corte quantitativo que estudam os efeitos dos processos de corporatização e privatização parcial no desempenho financeiro das empresas de propriedade do Estado (epe). São analisadas as perspectivas teóricas, as metodologias e variáveis utilizadas para medir desempenho e são sintetizados os achados relacionados com os processos de corporatização e privatização parcial. Além disso, é feita uma revisão sistemática da literatura a partir de 31 pesquisas, selecionadas de um total de 101 artigos identificados das bases de dados Scopus e Web of Science. Como resultado da análise, é identificado que as pesquisas sobre os processos de privatização parcial. A análise dos achados evidencia que há consenso sobre os benefícios dos processos de corporatização, mas não existe um acordo sobre as causas que explicam esses benefícios no desempenho das epe. Ao contrário, não há um consenso sobre os efeitos da privatização parcial no desempenho das empresas.
Referencias
Aghion, P., & Tirole, J. (1997). Formal and real authority in organizations. Journal of Political Economy, 105(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1086/262063
Aivazian, V. A., Ge, Y., & Qiu, J. (2005). Can corporatization improve the performance of state-owned enterprises even without privatization? Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(5), 791-808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2004.11.001
Alchian, A. (1959). Private property and the relative cost of tenure. En D. Bradley (Ed.), The public stake in union power (pp. 177-202). University of Virginia Press.
Alchian, A., & Demsetz, H. (1973). The property right paradigm. The Journal of Economic History, 33(1), 16-27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2117138 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700076403
Alesina, A. (1987). Macroeconomic policy in a two-party system as a repeated game. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102(3), 651-678. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884222
Anuatti-Neto, F., Barossi-Filho, M., Gledson de Carvalho, A., & Macedo, R. (2005). Os efeitos da privatização sobre o desempenho econômico e financeiro das empresas privatizadas. Revista Brasileira de Economía, 59(2), 151-175. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-71402005000200001
Astami, E. W., Tower, G., Rusmin, R., & Neilson, J. (2010). The effect of privatisation on performance of state-owned enterprises in Indonesia. Asian Review of Accounting, 18(1), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1108/13217341011045971
Barney, J. B. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27(6), 643-650. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700602
Bhattacharyya, A., Parker, E., & Raffiee, K. (1994). An examination of the effect of ownership on the relative efficiency of public and private water utilities. Land Economics, 70(2), 197-209. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146322
Bozec, R. (2005). Boards of directors, market discipline and firm performance. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 32(9-10), 1921-1960. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0306-686X.2005.00652.x
Bozec, R., & Breton, G. (2003). The impact of the corporatization process on the financial performance of Canadian state-owned enterprises. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 16(1), 27-47. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550310456409
Bilodeau, N., Laurin, C., & Vining, A. (2007). “Choice of organizational form makes a real difference”: The impact of corporatization on government agencies in Canada. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(1), 119-147. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mul014
Brown, J. D., Earle, J. S., Shpak, S., & Vakhitov, V. (2019). Is privatization working in Ukraine?: New estimates from comprehensive manufacturing firm data, 1989-2013. Comparative Economic Studies, 61(6), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41294-018-0070-8
Buchanan, J. M. (1954). Social choice, democracy, and free markets. Journal of Political Economy, 62(2), 114-123. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1825570 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/257496
Buchanan, J. M. (1986). Liberty, market and state. Political economy in the 1980s. Oxford University Press.
Cai, D., Wang, L. F., & Wu, X. (2018). Governance, privatization and foreign direct investment. Nankai Business Review International, 9(4), 569-586. https://doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-01-2018-0002
Cambini, C., Filippini, M., Piacenza, M., & Vannoni, D. (2011). Corporatization and firm performance: Evidence from publicly-provided local utilities. Review of Law and Economics, 7(1), 195-217. https://doi.org/10.2202/1555-5879.1428
Carney, M., Gedajlovic, E., & Sur, S. (2011). Corporate governance and stakeholder conflict. Journal of Management & Governance, 15, 483-507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-010-9135-4
Cavaliere, A., Maggi, M., & Stroffolini, F. (2017). Investment-driven mixed firms: Partial privatization by local governments. International Tax and Public Finance, 24, 459-483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-016-9426-z
Chakrabarti, A. B., & Mondal, A. (2017). Can commercialization through partial disinvestment improve the performance of state-owned enterprises? The case of Indian SOEs under reforms. Journal of General Management, 43(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306307017719700
Chavez, D., & Torres, S. (Eds.). (2013). La reinvención del Estado. Empresas públicas y desarrollo en Uruguay, América Latina y el mundo. Transnational Institute. https://www.tni.org/files/download/montevideobook.pdf
Child, J. (1974). Managerial and organizational factors associated with company performance part I. Journal of Management Studies, 11(3), 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1974.tb00693.x
Chong, A., & Lopez-de-Sindales, F. (2005). The truth about privatization in America Latina. En A. Chong, & F. López-de-Silanes (Eds.), Privatization in America Latina Mysth and Reality (pp. 1-66). Inter-American Development Bank; Stanford University Press. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Privatization-in-Latin-America-Myths-and-Reality.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-5882-5
Devlin, R. (1993). Las privatizaciones y el bienestar social. Revista de la CEPAL, 49, 155-181. http://hdl.handle.net/11362/11886 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18356/9e9716be-es
Donaldson, L. R., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289629101600103
Du, J., & Liu, X. (2015). Selection, staging, and sequencing in the recent Chinese privatization. The Journal of Law & Economics, 58(3), 657-682. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26456923 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/684230
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003
Estrin, S., & Pelletier, A. (2018). Privatization in developing countries: What are the lessons of recent experience? The World Bank Research Observer, 33(1), 65-102. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkx007
Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288-307. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1837292 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260866
Fiedler, F. E. (1978). The contingency model and the dynamics of the leadership process. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 59-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60005-2
Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409-421. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857340
Gakhar, D., & Phukon, A. (2018). From welfare to wealth creation: A review of the literature on privatization of state-owned enterprises. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 31(2), 265-286. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-03-2017-0096
Grossi, G., & Reichard, C. (2008). Municipal corporatization in Germany and Italy. Public Management Review, 10(5), 597-617. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030802264275
Gunasekar, S., & Sarkar, J. (2019). Does autonomy matter in state owned enterprises? Evidence from performance contracts in India. Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, 27(3), 763-800. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12220
Gupta, N. (2005). Partial privatization and firm performance. The Journal of Finance, 60(2), 987-1015. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00753.x
Heath, J., & Norman, W. (2004). Stakeholder theory, corporate governance and public management: What can the history of state-run enterprises teach us in the post-Enron era?. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(3), 247-265. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039418.75103.ed
Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1969). Life cycle theory of leadership. Training & Development Journal, 23(5), 26-34. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1970-19661-001
Holmstrom, B., & Tirole, J. (1993). Market liquidity and performance monitoring. Journal of Political Economy, 101(4), 678-709. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2138744 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261893
Hung, M., Wong, T. J., & Zhang. T. (2012). Political considerations in the decision of Chinese SOEs to list in Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1-2), 435-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.10.001
Huyghebaert N., & Quan Q. (2011). Ownership dynamics after partial privatization: Evidence from China. The Journal of Law & Economics, 54(2), 389-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.966679
Huyghebaert, N., Quan, Q., & Sun, L. (2014). Financing decisions after partial privatization in China: Can a stock market quotation really provide discipline? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 23(1), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2013.08.005
Inoue, C. F., Lazzarini, S. G., & Musacchio, A. (2013). Leviathan as a minority shareholder: Firm-level implications of state equity purchases. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1775-1801. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0406
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Kang, Y., & Kim, B. (2012). Ownership structure and firm performance: Evidence from the Chinese corporate reform. China Economic Review, 23(2), 471-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2012.03.006
Kirkpatrick, I., Altanlar, A., & Veronesi, G. (2017). Corporatisation and the emergence of (under-managered) managed organisations: The case of English public hospitals. Organization Studies, 38(12), 1687-1708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617693273
Khongmalai, O., & Distanont, A. (2017). Corporate governance model in Thai state-owned enterprises: Structural equation modelling approach. Corporate Governance, 17(4), 613-628. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2016-0021
Klien, M. (2014). Corporatization and the behavior of public firms: How shifting control rights affects political interference in water prices. Review of Industrial Organization, 44(4), 393-422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-013-9401-0
Kole, S. R., & Mulherin, J. H. (1997). The government as a shareholder: A case from the United States. The Journal of Law & Economics, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1086/467364
Lavie, D. (2006). The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 638-658. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.21318922
Lazzarini, S. G., & Musacchio, A. (2018). State ownership reinvented? Explaining performance differences between state‐owned and private firms. Corporate Governance, 26(4), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12239
Li, L., McMurray, A., Sy, M., & Xue, J. (2018). Corporate ownership, efficiency and performance under state capitalism: Evidence from China. Journal of Policy Modeling, 40(4), 747-766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2018.03.002
Li, S., & Xia, J. (2008). The roles and performance of state firms and non-state firms in China's economic transition. World Development, 36(1), 39-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.01.008
Li, X. M., & Yueh, L. (2011). Does incorporation improve firm performance? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 73(6), 753-770. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2011.00674.x
Lora, E., & Panizza, U. (2002). Un escrutinio a las reformas estructurales en América Latina. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/spanish/document/Un-Escrutinio-a-las-Reformas-Estructurales-en-Am%C3%A9rica-Latina.pdf
Luthans, F., & Stewart, T. (1977). A general contingency theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 181-195. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1977.4409038
Mazzucato, M. (2016). From market fixing to market-creating: a new framework for innovation policy. Industry and Innovation, 23(2), 140-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1146124
Mbo, M., & Adjasi, C. (2017). Drivers of organizational performance in state owned enterprises. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 66(3), 405-423. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-11-2015-0177
McDonald, D. (2015). La ambigüedad de lo público y los numerosos significados de la corporatización. En D. McDonald (Ed.), Servicios públicos en el Sur Global: mirada crítica a nuevas formas de gestión (pp. 9-46). Clave intelectual. https://www.tni.org/my/node/1754
Milhaupt, C. J., & Pargendler, M. (2017). Governance challenges of listed state-owned enterprises around the world: National experiences and a framework for reform. Corporate Practice Commentator, 60(3), 473-542. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1907&context=cilj
Nordhaus, W. D. (1975). The political business cycle. The Review of Economic Studies, 42(2), 169-190. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296528
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos. (2018). Ownership and governance of state-owned enterprises: A compendium of national practices. https://www.oecd.org/corporate/ca/Ownership-and-Governance-of-State-Owned-Enterprises-A-Compendium-of-National-Practices.pdf
Prahalad, C.K., & Hamel, G. (1994). Strategy as a field of study: Why search for a new paradigm? Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250151002
Penfold, M., Oneto, A., & Rodríguez-Guzmán. G. (2015). La transparencia del gobierno corporativo en las empresas de propiedad del Estado en América Latina. CAF. http://scioteca.caf.com/handle/123456789/767
Qi, D., Wu, W., & Zhang, H. (2000). Shareholding structure and corporate performance of partially privatized firms: Evidence from listed Chinese companies. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 8(5), 587-610. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-538X(00)00013-5
Rakhman, F. (2018). Can partially privatized SOEs outperform fully private firms? Evidence from Indonesia. Research in International Business and Finance, 45, 285-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.160
Rogoff, K., & Sibert, A. (1988). Elections and macroeconomic policy cycles. The Review of Economic Studies, 55(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297526
Richter, P., Edeling, T., & Reichard, C. (2006). Kommunale betriebe in größeren städten. En W. Kilian, P. Richter, & J. Trapp (Eds.), Ausgliederung und privatisierung in kommunen (pp. 56-84). Empirische Befunde zur Struktur kommunaler Aufgabenwahrnehmung. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845267197-55
Sam, C. Y. (2010). Globalizing partially privatized firms in Singapore: The role of government as a regulator and a shareholder. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 45(3), 258-273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909610364778
Shan, Y. G., & McIver, R. P. (2011). Corporate governance mechanisms and financial performance in China: Panel data evidence on listed non-financial companies. Asia Pacific Business Review, 17(3), 301-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602380903522325
Shawtari, F. A., Har Sani Mohamad, M., Abdul Rashid, H. M., & Ayedh, A. M. (2017). Board characteristics and real performance in Malaysian state-owned enterprises (SOEs). International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 66(8), 1064-1086. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2015-0188
Shi, X. (2010). Restructuring in China’s state-owned enterprises: Evidence from the coal industry. China and World Economy, 18(3), 90-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-124X.2010.01198.x
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1994). Politicians and firms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(4), 995-1025. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118354
Song, Z., Nahm, A. Y., & Zhang, Z. (2017). Partial state ownership, political connection, and financing: Evidence from Chinese publicly listed private sector enterprises. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 53(3), 611-628. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2015.1097920
Su, D. & He, X. (2012). Ownership structure, corporate governance and productive efficiency in China. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 38(3), 303-318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-011-0257-8
Teo, S. (2000). Evidence of strategic HRM linkages in eleven Australian corporatized public sector organizations. Public Personnel Management, 29(4), 557-574. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102600002900412
Tian, L., & Estrin, S. (2007). Debt financing, soft budget constraints, and government ownership: Evidence from China. Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, 15(3), 461-481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.2007.00292.x
Tihanyi, L., Aguilera, R. V., Heugens, P., Van Essen, M., Sauerwald, S., Duran, P., & Turturea, R. (2019). State ownership and political connections. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2293-2321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318822113
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
Triebs, T., & Pollitt, M. G. (2019). Objectives and incentives: Evidence from the privatization of Great Britain’s power plants. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 65, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2018.12.003
Tullock, G., & Wagner, R. E. (1976). Rational models, politics, and policy analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 4(4), 408-416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1976.tb01668.x
Voorn, B., Van Genugten, M. L., & Van Thiel, S. (2017). The efficiency and effectiveness of municipally owned corporations: A systematic review. Local Government Studies, 43(5), 820-841. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1319360
Wang, L. F. S., & Han, T. D. (2015). Better governance matters optimal privatization policy. Eurasian Economic Review, 5(2), 189-206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-015-0025-6
Wernerfelt B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2486175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
Wong, S. C. Y. (2018). The state of governance at state-owned enterprises. Private Sector Opinion, 40,. 3-19. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/564891520946563480/pdf/NWP-State-of-Governance-PSO-40-PUBLIC.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/29533
Xu, L. C., Zhu, T., & Lin, Y. (2005). Politician control, agency problems and ownership reform: Evidence from China. Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, 13(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.2005.00205.x
Zhang, L. Y. (2004). The roles of corporatization and stock market listing in reforming China's state industry. World Development, 32(12), 2031-2047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.08.003
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Lorena Vásquez Arango, Daniel Daniel Ceballos García. (2024). RIESGO FINANCIERO EN LOS BANCOS Y ASEGURADORAS EN TIEMPOS DE PANDEMIA: UNA REVISIÓN BIBLIOGRÁFICA. Semestre Económico, 27(62), p.1. https://doi.org/10.22395/seec.v27n62a4537.
Dimensions
PlumX
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Innovar
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Todos los artículos publicados por Innovar se encuentran disponibles globalmente con acceso abierto y licenciados bajo los términos de Creative Commons Atribución-No_Comercial-Sin_Derivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Una vez seleccionados los artículos para un número, y antes de iniciar la etapa de cuidado y producción editorial, los autores deben firmar una cesión de derechos patrimoniales de su obra. Innovar se ciñe a las normas colombianas en materia de derechos de autor.
El material de esta revista puede ser reproducido o citado con carácter académico, citando la fuente.
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons:
