Publicado

2023-07-01

Interacción intergeneracional y gestión del cambio en empresas familiares agrícolas: un análisis desde las dimensiones racional, emocional y contextual

Intergenerational Interaction and Change Management in Agricultural Family Businesses: An Analysis from the Rational, Emotional, and Contextual Dimensions

Interação intergeracional e gestão de mudanças em empresas familiares agrícolas: uma análise das dimensões racional, emocional e contextual

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v34n91.101682

Palabras clave:

Agricultura, Conflicto, Empresa familiar, Granja familiar, Innovación, Sucesión (es)
Agriculture, Conflict, Family business, Family farm, Innovation, Succession (en)
agricultura, conflito, empresa familiar, fazenda familiar, inovação, sucessão (pt)

Autores/as

El cambio y la transición generacional reflejados en la innovación son cruciales para la continuidad de las empresas familiares. La mayor parte de los cambios en este tipo de empresas se dan a medida que avanza la transición generacional, con al menos dos generaciones interactuando. Este estudio analiza la gestión del cambio en el contexto de la interacción intergeneracional con el objetivo de responder a la siguiente pregunta: ¿Cómo promover la ocurrencia del cambio y la generación de resultados positivos en las empresas familiares? Para ello, se adoptó un diseño de estudio de caso múltiple orientado a analizar tres situaciones de cambio en igual número de empresas del sector agrícola, las cuales presentan un marcado contraste en términos de resultados derivados de sus procesos de cambio. Para explicar los resultados obtenidos, se utilizó un marco de análisis que examina las dimensiones racional, emocional y contextual de los procesos de cambio estudiados. Así, se identificó que el cambio se logra más fácilmente cuando: i) un sentido de pertenencia psicológica anima a las nuevas generaciones a contribuir con nuevas ideas; ii) el cambio implementado genera resultados inmediatos y fácilmente visibles; iii) el número de miembros de la familia involucrados es bajo; y iv) el contexto brinda oportunidades de financiamiento. A su vez, el cambio produce resultados positivos al estar precedido por conflictos abiertos y cognitivos, y cuando el contexto permite acceder a redes de conocimiento. Este trabajo es una propuesta novedosa que analiza la gestión del cambio durante una etapa de interacción intergeneracional, una realidad permanente que es poco abordada en los procesos de innovación en el contexto de las empresas familiares.

Generational transition and change reflected in innovation are crucial for the continuity of family businesses. Most of the changes are made as the generational transition progresses, having at least two generations interacting. This study analyses change management in the context of intergenerational interaction to answer the question: How to drive change so that it takes place and generates positive results for family businesses? A multiple case study design was adopted to analyse three situations of change with a sharp contrast in their results in three agricultural enterprises. A framework that examines the rational, emotional, and contextual dimensions of change processes was used to explain the results. Change was found to be more easily accomplished when: i) a sense of psychological ownership encourages new generations to contribute new ideas; ii) change generates immediate and easily visible results; iii) the number of family members involved is low; and iv) the context provides funding opportunities. In turn, change produces positive results when it is preceded by open and cognitive conflict, and when the context offers opportunities to access knowledge networks. This work is a unique piece in the sense that it analyses the management of change during intergenerational interaction, an almost permanent situation that is little studied in innovation processes in the context of family businesses.

a mudança e a transição geracional refletidas na inovação são cruciais para a continuidade das empresas familiares. A maioria das mudanças nesse tipo de empresa ocorre à medida que a transição geracional avança, com a interação de pelo menos duas gerações. Este estudo analisa a gestão de mudanças no contexto da interação intergeracional com o objetivo de responder à seguinte pergunta: como promover a ocorrência de mudanças e a geração de resultados positivos em empresas familiares? Para isso, foi adotado um projeto de estudo de casos múltiplos para analisar três situações de mudança em um número igual de empresas do setor agrícola, que apresentam um contraste marcante em termos dos resultados derivados de seus processos de mudança. Para explicar os resultados obtidos, foi utilizada uma estrutura de análise que examina as dimensões racional, emocional e contextual dos processos de mudança estudados. Assim, identificou-se que a mudança é mais facilmente alcançada quando 1) um senso de propriedade psicológica incentiva as novas gerações a contribuir com novas ideias; 2) a mudança implementada gera resultados imediatos e facilmente visíveis; 3) o número de membros da família envolvidos é baixo; e 4) o contexto oferece oportunidades de financiamento. Por sua vez, a mudança produz resultados positivos quando é precedida por conflitos abertos e cognitivos, e quando o contexto oferece acesso a redes de conhecimento. Este artigo é uma proposta inovadora que analisa a gestão da mudança durante um estágio de interação intergeracional, uma realidade permanente que é pouco abordada nos processos de inovação no contexto de empresas familiares.

Referencias

Aguilera, R. V, & Crespi-Cladera, R. (2012). Firm family firms: Current debates of corporate governance in family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3(2), 66-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2012.03.006

Arzubiaga, U. (2018). Corporate governance and entrepreneurial orientation of family SMEs: An analysis of the influence of family involvement at different levels. Cuadernos de Gestión, 19(1), 119-146. https://doi.org/10.5295/CDG.170757UA

Basco, R., Calabrò, A., & Campopiano, G. (2019). Transgenerational entrepreneurship around the world: Implications for family business research and practice. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.03.004

Basly, S., & Saunier, P. (2020). Family members’ commitment to the firm and family business continuity: Investigating the mediating role of family-to-firm identity fit and emotional attachment. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 32(1), 9-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2018.1551458

Beer, M., & Nohria, N. (2000). Cracking the code of change. Harvard Business Review, 78(3), 133-141. https://hbr.org/2000/05/cracking-the-code-of-change

Bertolozzi-Caredio, D., Bardaji, I., Coopmans, I., Soriano, B., & Garrido, A. (2020). Key steps and dynamics of family farm succession in marginal extensive livestock farming. Journal of Rural Studies, 76, 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.030

Bloemen, M., Van Gils, A., Lambrechts, F., & Sharma, P. (2019). Nurturing offspring’s affective commitment through informal family governance mechanisms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 12(2), 100309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2019.100309

Bruce, A. B. (2019). Farm entry and persistence: Three pathways into alternative agriculture in southern Ohio. Journal of Rural Studies, 69, 30-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.04.007

Claßen, C. A. E., & Schulte, R. (2017). How do conflicts impact change in family businesses? The family system and familiness as a catalytic converter of change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 30(7), 1198-1212. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-04-2016-0071

Dana, L. E., & Smyrnios, K. X. (2010). Family business best practices: Where from and where to? Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(1), 40-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2009.12.002

Davis, P. S., & Harveston, P. D. (1999). In the founder’s shadow: Conflict in the family firm. Family Business Review, XII(4), 311-323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00311.x

De Massis, A., & Kotlar, J. (2014). The case study method in family business research: Guidelines for qualitative scholarship. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.007

Dieleman, M. (2019). Reaping what you sow: The family firm innovation trajectory. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.03.003

Distelberg, B., & Blow, A. (2010). The role of values and unity in family businesses. Journal of Family and Economic, 31(4), 427-441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-010-9221-4

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888

Elsbach, K. D., & Pieper, T. M. (2019). How psychological needs motivate family firm identifications and identifiers: A framework and future research agenda. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2019.100289

European Commission [EC]. (2013). Structure and dynamics of EU farms: Changes, trends and policy relevance. EU Agricultural Economics Briefs.

Fernandez-Araoz, C., Iqbal, S., & Ritter, J. (2015). Leadership lessons from great family businesses. Harvard Business Review, April, 82-88. https://hbr.org/2015/04/leadership-lessons-from-great-family-businesses

Flynn, J., & Duesing, R. J. (2018). Toward developing an applied framework to help foster success in generational transition of family businesses. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 32(3), 287-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2018.1510695

Gibbert, M., Ruigrok, W., & Wicki, B. (2008). What passes as a rigorous case study? Strategic Management Journal, 29(13), 1465-1474. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.722

Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of ground theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction.

Goel, S., He, X., & Karri, R. (2011). Family involvement in a hierarchical culture: Effect of dispersion of family ownership control and family member tenure on firm performance in Chinese family owned firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2(4), 199-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2011.10.003

Golden, B. R. (1992). The past is the past--or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. The Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 848-860. https://doi.org/10.2307/256318

Graamans, E., Aij, K., Vonk, A., & ten Have, W. (2020). Case study: Examining failure in change management. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(2), 319-330. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-06-2019-0204

Haidt, J. (2015). The Happiness Hypothesis: Putting Ancient Wisdom to the Test of Modern Science. Random House.

Hauck, J., & Prügl, R. (2015). Innovation activities during intra-family leadership succession in family firms: An empirical study from a socioemotional wealth perspective. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6(2), 104-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.11.002

Heath, C., & Heath, D. (2018). Cambia el chip. Cómo afrontar cambios que parecen imposibles. Ediciones Culturales Paidós.

Herriau, C., & Touchais, L. (2014). The role of control systems in the process of change: Application to a family business succession. Journal of Change Management, 15(1), 19-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2014.922603

Hillen, C., & Facin, C. E. (2020). Sucessão intergeracional e inovação em empresas familiares: revisão de literatura. Innovar, 30(77), 11-24. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v30n77.87426

Huber, G. P., & Power, D. J. (1985). Retrospective reports of strategic-level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management Journal, 6(2), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250060206

Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura [IICA]. (2016). La agricultura familiar en las Américas: principios y conceptos que guían la cooperación técnica del IICA. IICA. https://repositorio.iica.int/bitstream/handle/11324/2609/BVE17038696e.pdf;jsessionid=BCCAE5F900B66DA52C684F4F5A8C5BE8?sequence=1

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía de México [INEGI]. (2020). Banco de información económica [Data set]. INEGI. https://www.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/bie/

Inwood, S. M., & Sharp, J. S. (2012). Farm persistence and adaptation at the rural-urban interface: Succession and farm adjustment. Journal of Rural Studies, 28(1), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.07.005

Islas-Moreno, A., Muñoz-Rodríguez, M., Santoyo-Cortés, V. H., Martínez González, E. G., Aguilar-Gallegos, N., & Morris, W. (2021). The role of conflict in the adoption of governance practices in family businesses. Journal of Family Business Management, 12(4), 959-980. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-03-2021-0019

Joosse, S., & Grubbström, A. (2017). Continuity in farming – Not just family business. Journal of Rural Studies, 50, 198-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.11.018

Kaur, R., & Singh, H. (2018). Corporate Governance in family businesses – A review. Pacific Business Review International, 11(5), 233-253. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119207061.ch11

Keating, N. C., & Little, H. M. (1997). Choosing the successor in New Zealand family farms. Family Business Review, 10(2), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1997.00157.x

Khoury, G., Eid, N., & Khoury, E. N. (In press). Family business trans-generational succession in extreme contexts: A socio- emotional wealth perspective. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, In press.

Kubíček, A., & Machek, O. (2020). Intrafamily conflicts in family businesses: A systematic review of the literature and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 33(2), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486519899573

Lambrecht, J., & Lievens, J. (2008). Pruning the family tree: An unexplored path to family business continuity and family harmony. Family Business Review, XXI(4), 295-313. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865080210040103

Leonard, B., Farrell, M., Mahon, M., Kinsella, A., & Donoghue, C. O. (2020). Risky (farm) business: Perceptions of economic risk in farm succession and inheritance. Journal of Rural Studies, 75, 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.12.007

Mc Fadden, T., & Gorman, M. (2016). Exploring the concept of farm household innovation capacity in relation to farm diversification in policy context. Journal of Rural Studies, 46, 60-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.05.006

Melin, L., & Nordqvist, M. (2007). The reflexive dynamics of institutionalization: The case of the family business. Strategic Organization, 5(3), 321-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127007079959

Milone, P., & Ventura, F. (2019). New generation farmers: Rediscovering the peasantry. Journal of Rural Studies, 65, 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.12.009

Muñoz-Rodríguez, M., Santoyo-Cortés, V. H., Gómez-Pérez, D., & Altamirano-Cárdenas, J. R. (2018). ¡Otro campo es posible! Agenda pública y política con relación al campo mexicano. UACh-CIESTAAM. https://ciestaam.edu.mx/publicaciones2018/libros/otro-campo-es-posible.pdf

Osornio-Macías, M. (2016). Conflictos más comunes en empresarios familiares del ramo de la industria lechera en Lagos de Moreno, Jalisco, México. Revista Observatorio de La Economía Latinoamericana, enero. http://www.eumed.net/cursecon/ecolat/mx/2016/industria-lechera.html

Qiu, H., & Freel, M. (2020). Managing family-related conflicts in family businesses: A review and research agenda. Family Business Review, 33(1), 90-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486519893223

Rau, S. B., Werner, A., & Schell, S. (2019). Psychological ownership as a driving factor of innovation in older family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.03.001

Reinholz, D. L., & Andrews, T. C. (2020). Change theory and theory of change: What’s the difference anyway? International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-0202-3

Richards, M., Kammerlander, N., & Zellweger, T. (2019). Listening to the heart or the head? Exploring the “willingness versus ability” succession dilemma. Family Business Review, 32(4), 330-353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486519833511

Rondi, E., De Massis, A., & Kotlar, J. (2019). Unlocking innovation potential: A typology of family business innovation postures and the critical role of the family system. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.12.001

San Martin-Reyna, J. M., & Duran-Encalada, J. A. (2012). The relationship among family business, corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from the Mexican stock exchange. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3(2), 106-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2012.03.001

Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(2), 99-116. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.99.10114

Stake, R. E. (1999). Investigación con estudio de casos (2nd ed.). Morata. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2005.00891.x

Steier, L. P., & Miller, D. (2010). Pre- and post-succession governance philosophies in entrepreneurial family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(3), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2010.07.001

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE publications.

United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service [USDA-ERS]. (2015). Agricultural Resource Management Survey. USDA-ERS. https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/DataFiles/52816/59564_W_2015_All_Phase2_Interviewers_Manual_M_COP_CPP.pdf?v=8936

Villarreal-Larrinaga, O. (2017). Is it desirable, necessary and possible to perform research using case studies? Cuadernos de Gestión, 17(1), 147-172. https://doi.org/10.5295/cdg.140516ov

Wairegi, L. W. I., Bennett, M., Nziguheba, G., Mawanda, A., De Los Rios, C., Ampaire, E., Jassogne, L., Pali, P., Mukasa, D., & van Asten, P. J. A. (2018). Sustainably improving Kenya’s coffee production needs more participation of younger farmers with diversified income. Journal of Rural Studies, 63, 190-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.07.009

Ward, J. L. (2004). Perpetuating the family business: 50 lessons from long-lasting successful families in business. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230505995

Watkins-Fassler, K., & Briano-Turrent, G. D. C. (2019). Succession and performance of family firms listed on the Mexican stock exchange. Contaduría y Administración, 64(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.22201/fca.24488410e.2020.2235

Woodfield, P., & Husted, K. (2017). Intergenerational knowledge sharing in family firms: Case-based evidence from the New Zealand wine industry. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 8(1), 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.01.001

Yin, R. (1994). Case study research. Design and methods: Applied Social Research and Methods Series. SAGE publications.

Cómo citar

APA

Islas-Moreno, A., Muñoz-Rodríguez, M. & Morris, W. (2023). Interacción intergeneracional y gestión del cambio en empresas familiares agrícolas: un análisis desde las dimensiones racional, emocional y contextual. Innovar, 34(91), e101682. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v34n91.101682

ACM

[1]
Islas-Moreno, A., Muñoz-Rodríguez, M. y Morris, W. 2023. Interacción intergeneracional y gestión del cambio en empresas familiares agrícolas: un análisis desde las dimensiones racional, emocional y contextual. Innovar. 34, 91 (jul. 2023), e101682. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v34n91.101682.

ACS

(1)
Islas-Moreno, A.; Muñoz-Rodríguez, M.; Morris, W. Interacción intergeneracional y gestión del cambio en empresas familiares agrícolas: un análisis desde las dimensiones racional, emocional y contextual. Innovar 2023, 34, e101682.

ABNT

ISLAS-MORENO, A.; MUÑOZ-RODRÍGUEZ, M.; MORRIS, W. Interacción intergeneracional y gestión del cambio en empresas familiares agrícolas: un análisis desde las dimensiones racional, emocional y contextual. Innovar, [S. l.], v. 34, n. 91, p. e101682, 2023. DOI: 10.15446/innovar.v34n91.101682. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/101682. Acesso em: 27 dic. 2025.

Chicago

Islas-Moreno, Asael, Manrrubio Muñoz-Rodríguez, y Wyn Morris. 2023. «Interacción intergeneracional y gestión del cambio en empresas familiares agrícolas: un análisis desde las dimensiones racional, emocional y contextual». Innovar 34 (91):e101682. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v34n91.101682.

Harvard

Islas-Moreno, A., Muñoz-Rodríguez, M. y Morris, W. (2023) «Interacción intergeneracional y gestión del cambio en empresas familiares agrícolas: un análisis desde las dimensiones racional, emocional y contextual», Innovar, 34(91), p. e101682. doi: 10.15446/innovar.v34n91.101682.

IEEE

[1]
A. Islas-Moreno, M. Muñoz-Rodríguez, y W. Morris, «Interacción intergeneracional y gestión del cambio en empresas familiares agrícolas: un análisis desde las dimensiones racional, emocional y contextual», Innovar, vol. 34, n.º 91, p. e101682, jul. 2023.

MLA

Islas-Moreno, A., M. Muñoz-Rodríguez, y W. Morris. «Interacción intergeneracional y gestión del cambio en empresas familiares agrícolas: un análisis desde las dimensiones racional, emocional y contextual». Innovar, vol. 34, n.º 91, julio de 2023, p. e101682, doi:10.15446/innovar.v34n91.101682.

Turabian

Islas-Moreno, Asael, Manrrubio Muñoz-Rodríguez, y Wyn Morris. «Interacción intergeneracional y gestión del cambio en empresas familiares agrícolas: un análisis desde las dimensiones racional, emocional y contextual». Innovar 34, no. 91 (julio 1, 2023): e101682. Accedido diciembre 27, 2025. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/101682.

Vancouver

1.
Islas-Moreno A, Muñoz-Rodríguez M, Morris W. Interacción intergeneracional y gestión del cambio en empresas familiares agrícolas: un análisis desde las dimensiones racional, emocional y contextual. Innovar [Internet]. 1 de julio de 2023 [citado 27 de diciembre de 2025];34(91):e101682. Disponible en: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/101682

Descargar cita

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations1

1. Marlen López-Pérez, Asael Islas-Moreno, Oscar Arce-Cervantes, Benito Flores-Chávez. (2025). Succession intentions and expectations: compatibility and determinants in agricultural family businesses. Journal of Family Business Management, 15(4), p.949. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-01-2025-0019.

Dimensions

PlumX

Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo

516

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.