Metodologías ágiles para la innovación en Latinoamérica
Agile Methodologies for Innovation in Latin America
Metodologias ágeis para a inovação na América Latina
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v35n96.102267Palabras clave:
aprendizajes, Capital relacional, gestión del conocimiento, innovación, metodologías ágiles, trabajo en equipo (es)Learning, relational capital, knowledge management, innovation, agile methodologies, teamwork (en)
aprendizagem organizacional, capital relacional, gestão do conhecimento, inovação, metodologias ágeis, trabalho em equipe (pt)
Descargas
Las metodologías ágiles proponen una nueva dinámica de trabajo y requieren integrar el modelo de negocio, adaptando todos los procesos organizacionales para mejorar los procesos de innovación. El objetivo fue estudiar los beneficios de la aplicación de las metodologías ágiles a través de una investigación descriptiva y explicativa con un enfoque mixto, estudiando empresas de diferentes sectores y tamaños, de Argentina, Colombia y Ecuador. Los resultados al potenciar la agilidad se vieron asociados a las mejoras en el capital relacional entre la empresa y sus clientes, a la aceleración de los aprendizajes, y a las mejoras en los procesos de innovación. A su vez, las mejoras en los procesos de innovación se vieron explicadas por la presencia de individuos que cuentan con habilidades para desarrollar trabajo en equipo y metodologías ágiles, y por la práctica de trabajo en equipos interdisciplinarios. Las estructuras demasiado verticales, las implementaciones incompletas y la falta de experiencia fueron las principales barreras a la incorporación de metodologías ágiles, y la documentación del conocimiento se asocia en forma negativa a dichos procesos. Dada la escasez de documentación en la agilidad, se deben propiciar los espacios de socialización para compartir el conocimiento y acelerar el aprendizaje.
Agile methodologies propose a new dynamic for organizational work and require the integration of the business model by adapting all organizational processes to enhance innovation outcomes. This study aimed to examine the benefits of applying agile methodologies through a descriptive and explanatory investigation with a mixed-methods approach. Companies of various sizes and sectors from Argentina, Colombia, and Ecuador were analyzed. Our findings indicate that increased agility is associated with improvements in relational capital between firms and their clients, accelerated organizational learning processes, and enhanced innovation capabilities. Advancements in innovation processes were further attributed to the presence of individuals proficient in teamwork and agile methodologies, as well as to the practice of interdisciplinary collaboration. The primary barriers to the adoption of agile methodologies included rigid hierarchical organizational structures, partial or inconsistent implementation efforts, and a general lack of experience. Furthermore, knowledge documentation was found to be negatively associated with agile processes. Given the limited emphasis on formal documentation within agile environments, the study recommends the promotion of knowledge-sharing spaces to facilitate socialization and accelerate organizational learning.
As metodologias ágeis propõem uma nova dinâmica de trabalho e exigem a integração do modelo de negócios, com a adaptação dos processos organizacionais para potencializar a inovação. Este estudo teve como objetivo analisar os benefícios da aplicação de metodologias ágeis por meio de uma pesquisa descritiva e explicativa, com uma abordagem mista, realizada em empresas de diferentes setores e tamanhos na Argentina, na Colômbia e no Equador. Os resultados indicam que o aumento da agilidade está associado a melhorias no capital relacional entre a empresa e seus clientes, à aceleração do aprendizagem e ao aprimoramento dos processos de inovação. Essas melhorias, por sua vez, foram explicadas pela presença de indivíduos com competências para trabalhar em equipe e domínio das metodologias ágeis, além da prática de trabalhar em equipes interdisciplinares. Estruturas muito verticais, implementações parciais e falta de experiência foram apontadas como as principais barreiras à adoção de metodologias ágeis, sendo que a documentação do conhecimento se mostrou negativamente associada a esses processos. Diante da escassez de documentação em ambientes ágeis, recomenda-se a criação de espaços de socialização para compartilhar conhecimento e acelerar o aprendizado coletivo.
Referencias
Arce Hernández, M. (2022). Agilidad organizacional dinamizador de la innovación: un estudio de caso de la Rama Judicial [Trabajo de grado, Universidad de los Andes]. Repositorio Uniandes. http://hdl.handle.net/1992/59494
Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323-1339. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910984578
Bazigos, M., Gagnon, C., & Schaninger, S. (enero 1 de 2016). Leadership in Context. McKinsey Quarterly. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Business%20Functions/Organization/Our%20Insights/Leadership%20in%20context/Leadership%20in%20context.pdf
Cooper, R. G., & Sommer, A. F. (2016). Agile-Stage-Gate: New idea-to-launch method for manufactured new products is faster, more responsive. Industrial Marketing Management, 59, 167-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.10.006
Cooper, R. G., & Sommer, A. F. (2018). Agile–Stage-Gate for Manufacturers: Changing the Way New Products Are Developed Integrating Agile project management methods into a Stage-Gate system. Research-Technology Management, 61(2), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2018.1421380
Cortina, J. M. (1993). What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98-104. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
Demigha, S., & Kharabsheh, R. (2016). The Influence of National Culture on Knowledge Sharing. ECKM, European Conference on Knowledge Management. http://toc.proceedings.com/31938webtoc.pdf
Demigha, S., & Kharabsheh, R. (2019). Knowledge Sharing in an Agile Organization. En E. Tomé, F. Cesário & R. Reis Soares (Dirs.), Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management (pp. 267-277). Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited. http://doi.org/10.34190/KM.19.102
Denning, S. (2015), Agile: It’s Time to Put It to Use to Manage Business Complexity. Strategy & Leadership, 43(5), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/SL-07-2015-0057
Denning, S. (2018). How major corporations are making sense of Agile. Strategy & Leadership, 46(1), 3-9. 7p. http://doi.org/10.1108/SL-11-2017-0104
Denning, S. (2019) Understanding Fake Agile. Leadership Strategy. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2019/05/23/understanding-fake-agile/?sh=fa850c54bbe5
De Smet, A., Lackey G., & Weiss L. (junio 21 de 2017) Untangling your organization’s decision making. McKinsey Quarterly. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/untangling-your-organizations-decision-making
Devedžić, V., & Milenkovic, S. (2011). Teaching agile software development: A case study, Education, IEEE Transactions, 54(2), 273-278. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2010.2052104
Donadon, F. A. B., & Santos, D. F. L. (2020). Modelo de negocio y estrategia de innovación de una empresa brasileña de alimentos. Estudios Gerenciales, 36(156), 337-350. https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2020.156.3634
Edwards, K., Cooper, R. G., Vedsmand, T., & Nardelli, G. (2019). Evaluating the Agile Stage-Gate Hybrid Model: Experiences From Three SME Manufacturing Firms. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 16(8), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877019500482
Ersoy, I. B., & Mahdy, A. M. (2015). Agile knowledge sharing. International Journal of Software Engineering (IJSE), 6(1), 1–15. https://www.cscjournals.org/manuscript/Journals/IJSE/Volume6/Issue1/IJSE-152.pdf
Fernández, F. G., & Borjas, A. E. C. (2007). Equipos de trabajo: forma organizativa de la economía basada en el conocimiento. Economía y Sociedad, 12(20), 17-33. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/510/51002002.pdf
Hadida, S., & Troilo, F. (2020). La agilidad en las organizaciones: Trabajo comparativo entre metodologías ágiles y de cascada en un contexto de ambigüedad y transformación digital, Serie Documentos de Trabajo N.º 756. Universidad del Centro de Estudios Macroeconómicos de Argentina (ucema). https://hdl.handle.net/10419/238381
Hajjar, S. T. (2018). Statistical analysis: Internal-consistency reliability and construct validity. International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, 6(1), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.37745/ijqqrm.13
Hesselberg, J. (2018). Unlocking agility: An insider's guide to agile enterprise transformation. Addison-Wesley Professional.
Knapp, J., Zeratsky, J., & Kowitz, B. (2016). Sprint: How to solve big problems and test new ideas in just five days. Simon and Schuster.
Lewrick, M., Link, P., & Leifer, L. (2018). The design thinking playbook: Mindful digital transformation of teams, products, services, businesses and ecosystems. John Wiley & Sons.
Lin, C. T., Chiu, H., & Chu, P. Y. (2006). Agility index in the supply chain. International Journal of production economics, 100(2), 285-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.11.013
Lingard, R., & Barkataki, S. (2011). Teaching teamwork in engineering and computer science. En Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. F1C-1-F1C-5). ieee. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2011.6143000
Marrington, A., Hogan, J., & Thomas, R. (2005). Quality assurance in a student-based agile software engineering process. En Software Engineering Conference, Proceedings (pp. 324-331). ieee. https://doi.org/10.1109/ASWEC.2005.38
Micheli, P., Wilner, S. J., Bhatti, S. H., Mura, M., & Beverland, M. B. (2019). Doing design thinking: Conceptual review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(2), 124-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12466
Mueller, E. F., & Jungwirth, C. (2022). Are cooperative firms more agile? A contingency perspective on small and medium-sized enterprises in agglomerations and peripheral areas. Small Business Economics, 58(1), 281-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00410-3
Muñoz, M., Mejia, J., & Corona, B. (2016). Hacia la evaluación de la implementación y uso de metodologías ágiles en las pymes: Un análisis de herramientas de evaluación de metodologías ágiles. International Journal of Information Systems and Software Engineering for Big Companies, 3(2), 75-82. http://uajournals.com/ojs/index.php/ijisebc/article/download/176/156
Naranjo-Valencia, J. C., & Calderón-Hernández, G. (2015). Construyendo una cultura de innovación. Una propuesta de transformación cultural. Estudios Gerenciales, 31(135), 223-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2014.12.005
Neves, F., Correia, A., Rosa, V., & De Castro Neto, M. (2011). Knowledge creation and sharing in software development teams using agile methodologies: Key insights affecting their adoption. Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 6th Iberian Conference (pp. 307-312). ieee. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5974178
Niewöhner, N., Asmar, L., Wortmann, F., Röltgen, D., Kühn, A., & Dumitrescu, R. (2019). Design fields of agile innovation management in small and medium sized enterprises. Procedia CIRP, 84, 826-831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.295
Ocaña-Fernández, Y., Valenzuela-Fernández, A., Gálvez-Suárez, E., Aguinaga-Villegas, D., Gamboa, J. N., & Echevarria, T. I. L. (2020). Gestión del conocimiento y tecnologías de la información y comunicación (tics) en estudiantes de ingeniería mecánica. Apuntes Universitarios, Revista de Investigación, 10(1), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v10i1.419
Oppenheim, A. N. (1992). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. Pinter Publishers Ltd, London. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=435162
Petermann, M., & Zacher, H. (2020). Agility in the workplace: Conceptual analysis, contributing factors, and practical examples. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 13(4), 599-609 http://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2020.106
Rising, L., & Janoff, N.S. (2000). The Scrum Software Development Process for Small Teams. IEEE Software, 17(4), 26-32. http://doi.org/10.1109/52.854065
Salvato, J. J., & Laplume, A. O. (2020). Agile Stage‐Gate Management (asgm) for physical products. R&D Management, 50(5), 631-647. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12426
Santos, R. F., & Oliveira, M. (2019). The Effects of Social Capital’s Relational Dimension on Tacit and Explicit Knowledge Sharing. En E. Tomé, F. Cesário & R. Reis Soares (Dirs.), Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management (p. 352). Academic Conferences and Publishing Limited. https://www.proceedings.com/50635.html
Sauer, S., & Nicklich, M. (2021). Empowerment and Beyond: Paradoxes of Self-Organised Work. Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation, 15(2), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.15.2.0073
Selic, B. (2009). Agile Documentation, Anyone? IEEE Software, 26(6), 11-12. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2009.167
Tessarini, G., & Saltorato, P. (2021). Workforce agility: A Systematic Literature Review and a Research Agenda Proposal. Innovar, 31(81), 155-168. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v31n81.95582
Venkatagiri, S. (2011). Teach Project Management, Pack an Agile Punch, En Software Engineering Education Conference, Proceedings. ieee. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEET.2011.5876106
Zasa, F. P., Patrucco, A., & Pellizzoni, E. (2020). Managing the hybrid organization: How can agile and traditional project management coexist? Research-Technology Management, 64(1), 54-63. http://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2021.1843331
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Innovar

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Todos los artículos publicados por Innovar se encuentran disponibles globalmente con acceso abierto y licenciados bajo los términos de Creative Commons Atribución-No_Comercial-Sin_Derivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Una vez seleccionados los artículos para un número, y antes de iniciar la etapa de cuidado y producción editorial, los autores deben firmar una cesión de derechos patrimoniales de su obra. Innovar se ciñe a las normas colombianas en materia de derechos de autor.
El material de esta revista puede ser reproducido o citado con carácter académico, citando la fuente.
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons:








