La satisfacción laboral: tercera variable en las relaciones entre pasión por el trabajo y arraigo laboral
Job Satisfaction as a Third Variable in the Relationship Between Work Passion and Job Embeddedness
Satisfação no trabalho: terceira variável nas relações entre paixão pelo trabalho e comprometimento organizacional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v35n96.104822Palabras clave:
mediación, moderación, satisfacción laboral, supresión, terceras variables (es)Mediation, moderation, job satisfaction, suppression, third variables (en)
mediação, moderação, satisfação no trabalho, supressão, terceiras variáveis (pt)
Descargas
El análisis de terceras variables cuenta con cierta trayectoria en la investigación organizacional. No obstante, aún subsisten errores conceptuales que impiden la correcta comprensión de procesos estadísticos tales como mediación, supresión y moderación. Frente a esto, el objetivo del presente trabajo fue clarificar mediante un ejemplo empírico tales procesos. Para ello, se analizó el rol de la satisfacción laboral como tercera variable en las relaciones entre pasión por el trabajo y arraigo laboral. Se diseñó un estudio transversal de alcance correlacional-explicativo y se estudió una muestra no probabilística de 381 trabajadores argentinos. Los datos se analizaron mediante el enfoque de regresión jerárquica, cuyos resultados indican que la satisfacción se desenvuelve como mediador parcial en las relaciones entre pasión armoniosa y arraigo laboral, y como variable supresora en las vinculaciones entre pasión obsesiva y el arraigo laboral. No se hallaron evidencias a favor de su rol como variable moderadora en tales relaciones. El estudio realizado contribuye a la literatura al demostrar la relevancia de la satisfacción para la retención de personal, dando luces sobre la aplicación e interpretación de terceras variables en la investigación organizacional. Las principales limitaciones atañen al diseño transversal, que impide cualquier inferencia de causalidad, y el uso de medidas de autoinforme como único instrumento de recolección.
The analysis of third variables has a well-established tradition in organizational research. However, conceptual misunderstandings that hinder the correct interpretation of statistical processes such as mediation, suppression, and moderation persist. In response, the aim of this study was to clarify these processes through an empirical example. Specifically, the role of job satisfaction as a third variable in the relationship between work passion and job embeddedness was examined. A cross-sectional, correlational-explanatory study was conducted using a non-probabilistic sample of 381 Argentinian workers. Data were analyzed using a hierarchical regression approach. Results indicate that job satisfaction acts as a partial mediator in the relationship between harmonious passion and job embeddedness, and as a suppressor variable in the relationship between obsessive passion and job embeddedness. No evidence was found to support the role of job satisfaction as a moderator in these relationships. This study contributes to the organizational literature by demonstrating the relevance of job satisfaction in employee retention and offering insights into the application and interpretation of third-variable effects in organizational research. The main limitations relate to the cross-sectional design, which prevents causal inference, and the exclusive use of self-report measures for data collection.
A análise de terceiras variáveis já possui uma trajetória consolidada na pesquisa organizacional. No entanto, ainda existem erros conceituais que dificultam a compreensão correta de processos estatísticos como mediação, supressão e moderação. Nesse contexto, o objetivo deste artigo é esclarecer esses processos por meio de um exemplo empírico. Para isso, foi analisado o papel da satisfação no trabalho como uma terceira variável nas relações entre paixão pelo trabalho e comprometimento organizacional. Foi realizado um estudo transversal de natureza correlacional-exploratória, com uma amostra não probabilística de 381 trabalhadores argentinos. Os dados foram analisados usando a abordagem de regressão hierárquica, cujos resultados indicam que a satisfação atua como mediadora parcial das relações entre a paixão harmoniosa e o comprometimento organizacional, e como variável supressora nas relações entre a paixão obsessiva e comprometimento organizacional. Não foram encontradas evidências a favor de seu papel como variável moderadora em tais relações. O estudo contribui para a literatura ao demonstrar a relevância da satisfação no trabalho para a retenção de pessoal, além de esclarecer a aplicação e interpretação de terceiras variáveis na pesquisa organizacional. As principais limitações referem-se ao delineamento transversal, que impede inferências de causalidade, e ao uso exclusivo de medidas de autorrelato como instrumento de coleta.
Referencias
Allan, B., Dexter, C., Kinsey, R., & Parker,S. (2018). Meaningful work and mental health: job satisfaction as a moderator. Journal of Mental Health, 27(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2016.1244718
Asgari, A., Mezginejad, S. & Taherpour, F. (2020). The role of leadership styles in organizational citizenship behavior through mediation of perceived organizational support and job satisfaction. Innovar, 30(75), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v30n75.83259
Ato, M., & Vallejo, G. (2011). Los efectos de terceras variables en la investigación psicológica. Anales de Psicología, 27(2), 550–561. https://revistas.um.es/analesps/article/view/123201
Azmi, M., Hanafi A., & Adam, A. (2021). Mediating Role of job satisfaction in the effect of work-life balance and work passion on turnover intention. Junior Scientific Researcher, SC Research, 7(1), 33-48. https://ideas.repec.org/a/jsr/journl/v7y2021i1p33-48.html
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1), 8-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0278-x
Bakker, A., & de Vries, J. (2021). Job Demands–Resources theory and self-regulation: new explanations and remedies for job burnout. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 34(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2020.1797695
Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Çelik, M. (2018). The effect of psychological capital level of employees on workplace stress and employee turnover intention. Innovar, 28(68), 67-75. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v28n68.70472
Cheung, G., & Lau, R. (2008). Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables: Bootstrapping with structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 296-325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107300343
Clinton, M., Knight, T., & Guest, D. (2012). Job embeddedness: A new attitudinal measure. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20(1), 111-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2012.00584.x
Collins, J., & Schmidt, F. (1997). Can suppressor variables enhance criterion-related validity in the personality domain? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57(6), 924-936. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164497057006003
Comello, M., & Farman, L. (2016). Identity as a moderator and mediator of communication effects: Evidence and implications for message design. Journal of Psychology, 150(7), 822-836. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2016.1196160
Conger, A. J. (1974). A revised definition of suppressor variables: A guide to their identification and interpretation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447403400105
Contreras-Espinoza, S., & Novoa-Muñoz, F. (2018). Ventajas del alfa ordinal respecto al alfa de Cronbach ilustradas con la encuesta audit-oms. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 42, e65. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2018.65
Galindo-Domínguez, H., Pegalajar, M., & Uriarte, J. (2020). Efecto mediador y moderador de la resiliencia entre la autoeficacia y el burnout entre el profesorado universitario de ciencias sociales y legales. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 25(2), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2020.04.002
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06031-2_16
Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd Ed.). Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/books/Introduction-to-Mediation-Moderation-and-Conditional-Process-Analysis/Andrew-Hayes/9781462549030
Hayes, A. F., & Montoya, A. K. (2017). A tutorial on testing, visualizing, and probing interaction involving a multicategorical variable in linear regression analysis. Communication Methods and Measures, 11, 1-30. http://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2016.1271116
Holbert, R., & Park, E. (2020). Conceptualizing, organizing, and positing moderation in communication research. Communication Theory, 30(3), 227-246. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz006
Holmbeck, G. (2019). Commentary: Mediation and Moderation: An Historical Progress Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 44(7), 816-818. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsz034
Hopwood, C., Bleidorn, W., & Wright, A. (2022). Connecting theory to methods in longitudinal research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(2), 884-894. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211008407
Hunsley, J. & Meyer, G. (2003). The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: Conceptual, methodological and statistical issues. Psychologica Assessment, 15(4), 446-455. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.446
Judge, T., Shuxia, Z., & Glerum, D. (2021). Job Satisfaction. In V. Sessa, & Nathan Bowling (Eds.), Essentials of Job Attitudes and Other Workplace Psychological Constructs (pp. 210-235). Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429325755-11
Karazsia, B., & Berlin, K. (2017). Can a mediator moderate? Considering the role of time and change in the mediator-moderator. Behavior Therapy, 49(1), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2017.10.001
Maassen, G., & Bakker, A. (2001). Suppressor variables in path models: Definitions and interpretations. Sociological Methods & Research, 30(2), 241-70 https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124101030002004
Macdonald, S., & MacIntyre, P. (1997). The generic job satisfaction scale: Scale development and its correlates. Employee Assistance Quarterly, 13(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1300/j022v13n02_01
MacKinnon, D., & Lamp, S. (2021). Unification of mediator, confounder, and collider Effects. Prevention Science, 22(8), 1185-1193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-021-01268-x
Madero-Gómez, S. (2020). La satisfacción laboral como efecto moderador entre las prácticas organizacionales de recursos humanos y las líneas estratégicas de responsabilidad social corporativa en México. Estudios Gerenciales, 36(157), 391-401. https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2020.157.3790.
Murgui, S., & Jiménez, T. (2013). Efecto de supresión y mediación en el contexto de la intervención psicosocial: Diferencias, similitudes y ejemplos. Psychosocial Intervention, 22(1), 55-910. https://dx.doi.org/10.5093/in2013a7
Paulhus, D., Robins, R., Trzesniewski, K., & Tracy, J. (2004). Two replicable suppressor situations in personality research, Multivariate Behavioural Research, 39(2), 303-328. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_7
Pollack, J., Ho, V., O'Boyle, E., & Kirkman, B. (2020). Passion at work: A meta‐analysis of individual work outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 41(4), 311-331. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2434
Purba, S., & Ananta, A. (2018). The effects of work passion, work engagement and job satisfaction on turn over intention of the millennial. Jurnal Manajemen dan Pemasaran Jasa, 11(2), 263-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.25105/jmpj.v11i2.2954
Ramaite, S., Rothmann, M., & Van der Vaart, L. (2022). Job embeddedness profiles: Associations with supervisor relations, job satisfaction, and work engagement. Cogent Psychology, 9, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2022.2080322
Reyes-Reyes, F., Reyes-Reyes, A., & Díaz-Narváez, V. (2019). Acerca de los sistemas de clasificación de diseños de investigación en psicología: importancia y alcance. Interciencia: Revista de Ciencia y Tecnología de América, 44(5), 303-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2021.1920360
Salanova, M. (2021). Work engagement: a key to hero –healthy and resilient organizations. En J. Meyer & B. Schneider (Eds.), A Research Agenda for Employee Engagement in a Changing World of Work (pp. 53-65). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789907858.00011
Salessi, S. (2022). Escala de arraigo laboral: Evidencias de validez y normas de referencia para docentes argentinos. Revista de Psicología y Educación, 17(2), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.23923/rpye2022.02.223
Salessi, S., de Andrade, A., & Omar, A. (2020). Factorial invariance of the generic job satisfaction scale in Argentina and Brazil. Actualidades en Psicología Latinoamericana, 38(2), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.7477
Salessi, S. & Omar, A. (2018). Pasión por el trabajo: evidencias de validez discriminante, predictiva e incremental. Psicologia: Ciência e Profissão, 38(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-37030004752017
Salessi, S., & Omar, A. (2020). Pasión por el trabajo: un estudio instrumental con trabajadores argentinos. Psycké, 29(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.7764/psykhe.29.1.1262
Tabachnick, B., Fidell, L., & Ullman, J. (2019). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson. https://www.pearson.com/en-us/subject-catalog/p/using-multivariate-statistics/P200000003097/9780137526543
Tarkar, P., Dhamija, S., & Singh, P. (2022). A mediation effect of job satisfaction and affective commitment in relationship between passion and work intentions after retirement. Frontiers in Psychology, 23(2), 197-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262919840228
Teng, H., Cheng, L., & Chen, C. (2021). Does job passion enhance job embeddedness? A moderated mediation model of work engagement and abusive supervision. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 95(3), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102913
Tolentino, J., Lajom, J., Sibunruang, H., & Garcia, P. (2022). The bright side of loving your work: Optimism as a mediating mechanism between work passion and employee outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 194, 111664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111664
Vallerand, R. J. (2015). The Dualistic Model of Passion. In R.J. Vallerand (Ed), The psychology of passion: A dualistic model (pp. 43-68). New Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.7202/1041845ar
Van Landingham, C., Fuller, W., & Schoof, R. (2020). The effect of confounding variables in studies of lead exposure and IQ. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 50(9), 815-825. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2020.1842851
Yu, Q., & Li, B. (2020). Third-variable effect analysis with multilevel additive models PLoS ONE, 15(10), 1-17. https://doi.org/17. 10.1371/journal.pone.0241072
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Innovar

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Todos los artículos publicados por Innovar se encuentran disponibles globalmente con acceso abierto y licenciados bajo los términos de Creative Commons Atribución-No_Comercial-Sin_Derivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Una vez seleccionados los artículos para un número, y antes de iniciar la etapa de cuidado y producción editorial, los autores deben firmar una cesión de derechos patrimoniales de su obra. Innovar se ciñe a las normas colombianas en materia de derechos de autor.
El material de esta revista puede ser reproducido o citado con carácter académico, citando la fuente.
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons:








