Publicado

2022-12-21

Higher Education Student Complaint Behavior in a Complex Service Ecosystem: A Value Co-creation Perspective

Comportamiento de queja de los estudiantes de educación superior en un ecosistema de servicios complejo: una perspectiva de cocreación de valor

Comportamento de reclamação de estudantes de ensino superior em um ecossistema de serviços complexo: uma perspectiva de cocriação de valor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v33n87.105500

Palabras clave:

Customer complaint behavior, Service-dominant logic, service ecosystem complexity, value co-creation, student complaint behavior (en)
comportamento de reclamação do cliente, lógica dominante do serviço, complexidade do ecossistema de serviços, comportamento de reclamação do aluno, cocriação de valor (pt)
comportamiento de queja del cliente, lógica dominante del servicio, complejidad del ecosistema de servicios, comportamiento de queja de los estudiantes, cocreación de valor (es)

Descargas

Autores/as

During the global covid-19 pandemic, most of higher education institutions (heis) were forced to migrate to an e-learning methodology in order to continue their academic activities. At the same time, the student complaint behavior (scb) increased due to new experiences of dissatisfaction or non-satisfaction. In this context, and seeking to ensure student satisfaction, heis have managed this behavior in the same form that companies do with their customers. Therefore, we present a critical analysis on the generic and standardized approach in the literature and practice to understanding and managing scb in the same way as customer complaint behavior (ccb) is managed. A review of the literature on the theories and studies related to scb and ccb and the student/customer treatment debate are presented, highlighting the complexity of higher education (he) service, which is considered a pillar of development due to its social value. The authors argue the suitable application of the Service-Dominant Logic (sdl), specifically its value co-creation premise, as well as the principles of the Service Ecosystem theory to differentiate scb from ccb. This may allow heis to continue to ensure student satisfaction through the management of their complaints without compromising educational quality and service sustainability. The reflection hereby presented is limited to the Latin America region educational contexts and their structures.

durante la pandemia global de covid-19, la mayoría de las instituciones de educación superior (ies) se vieron obligadas a migrar hacia la metodología de e-learning con el fin de dar continuidad a sus actividades académicas. Al mismo tiempo, el comportamiento de queja de los estudiantes (cqe) reportó un incremento como resultado de nuevas experiencias de insatisfacción. En este contexto, y buscando garantizar la satisfacción de los estudiantes, las ies han gestionado el cqe de la misma forma que lo hacen las empresas con sus clientes. Por lo tanto, este trabajo presenta un análisis crítico frente al enfoque genérico y estandarizado —tanto en la literatura como en la práctica— que pretende la gestión del cqe bajo los mismos principios con los que se gestiona el comportamiento de queja del consumidor (cqc). Con tal fin, se presenta una revisión de la literatura sobre las teorías y estudios relacionados con el cqe y el cqc y el debate en torno a la gestión del estudiante/cliente, destacando la complejidad inherente a la prestación del servicio de educación superior (es), que es considerado un pilar del desarrollo debido a su valor social. Los autores defienden la adecuada aplicación de la lógica dominante del servicio (sdl, en inglés), específicamente su premisa de cocreación de valor, así como de los principios de la teoría del ecosistema de servicios para diferenciar un comportamiento de queja del otro. Esto puede propiciar que las ies continúen garantizando la satisfacción de sus estudiantes a través de la gestión de las quejas interpuestas por estos sin comprometer la calidad educativa y la sostenibilidad del servicio. La reflexión aquí abordada se circunscribe a los contextos educativos de la región latinoamericana.

Durante a pandemia global ocasionada pela covid-19, a maioria das instituições de ensino superior (IES) foi forçada a migrar para uma metodologia de e-learning, a fim de continuar suas atividades acadêmicas. Ao mesmo tempo, o comportamento de reclamação do aluno (CRA) aumentou devido a novas experiências de insatisfação ou não satisfação. Nesse contexto, e para garantir a satisfação dos alunos, as IES têm gerenciado esse comportamento da mesma forma que as empresas fazem com seus clientes. Por isso, apresentamos uma análise crítica sobre a abordagem genérica e padronizada na literatura e na prática de compreensão e gestão do CRA da mesma forma que o comportamento de reclamação do cliente (CRC) é gerenciado. Uma revisão da literatura sobre as teorias e estudos relacionados aos CRA e CRC e ao debate sobre tratamento aluno/cliente são apresentadas, com destaque para a complexidade do serviço de ensino superior, que é considerado um pilar de desenvolvimento devido ao seu valor social. Os autores argumentam a aplicação adequada da lógica dominante do serviço, especificamente sua premissa de cocriação de valor, bem como os princípios da teoria do ecossistema de serviços para diferenciar o CRA do CRC. Isso pode permitir que as IES continuem a garantir a satisfação dos alunos por meio da gestão de suas reclamações sem comprometer a qualidade educacional e a sustentabilidade dos serviços. A reflexão apresentada limita-se aos contextos educacionais da região da América Latina e suas estruturas.

Referencias

Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2019). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. Brill. https://brill.com/view/title/36570

Aristovnik, A., Keržič, D., Ravšelj, D., Tomaževič, N., & Umek, L. (2020). Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the life of higher education students: A global perspective. Sustainability, 12(20), 8438. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208438

Banwait, K. (2021). The student as customer: A study of the intensified marketisation of higher education in England. University of Derby (United Kingdom). https://derby.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10545/622828/Kuldeep%20Thesis%20%20Final%20submission%20for%20UDORA%20copyright%20proof.pdf?sequence=6&isAllowed=y

Barile, S., Pels, J., Polese, F., & Saviano, M. (2012). An introduction to the viable systems approach and its contribution to marketing. Journal of Business Market Management, 5(2), 54-78. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2239812

Blau, I., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2018). Digital technologies for promoting “student voice” and co-creating learning experience in an academic course. Instructional Science, 46(2), 315-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9436-y

Blodgett, J. G., Hill, D. J., & Tax, S. S. (1997). The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on post complaint behavior. Journal of Retailing, 73(2), 185-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(97)90003-8

Bovill, C., & Bulley, C. J. (2011). A model of active student participation in curriculum design: Exploring desirability and possibility. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving Student Learning (ISL) 18: Global theories and local practices: Institutional, disciplinary and cultural variations (pp. 176-188). Oxford Brookes University

Bunce, L., Baird, A., & Jones, S. E. (2017). The student-as-consumer approach in higher education and its effects on academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 1958-1978. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1127908

Calma, A., & Dickson-Deane, C. (2020). The student as customer and quality in higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(8), 1221-1235. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2019-0093

Chahal, H., & Devi, P. (2015). Consumer attitude towards service failure and recovery in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 23(1), 67-85. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-07-2013-0029

Crie, D. (2003). Consumers' complaint behaviour. Taxonomy, typology and determinants: Towards a unified ontology. Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 11(1), 60-79. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.dbm.3240206

Díaz-Méndez, M., & Gummesson, E. (2012). Value co-creation and university teaching quality: Consequences for the European Higher Education Area (EHEA). Journal of Service Management, 23(4), 571-592. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-03-2017-0031

Díaz-Méndez, M., Paredes, M. R., & Saren, M. (2019). Improving society by improving education through Service-Dominant Logic: Reframing the role of students in higher education. Sustainability, 11(19), 5292. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195292

Díaz-Méndez, M., Saren, M., & Gummesson, E. (2017). Considering pollution in the higher education (HE) service ecosystem: The role of students’ evaluation surveys. The TQM Journal, 29(6), 767-782. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-03-2017-0031

Driscoll, C., & Wicks, D. (1998). The customer-driven approach in business education: A possible danger? Journal of Education for Business, 74(1), 58-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832329809601663

Dolinsky, A. L. (1994). A consumer complaint framework with resulting strategies: An application to higher education. Journal of Services Marketing, 8(3), 27-39. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876049410065598

Dollinger, M., Lodge, J., & Coates, H. (2018). Co-creation in higher education: Towards a conceptual model. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 28(2), 210-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2018.1466756

Douglas, J., McClelland, R., & Davies, J. (2008). The development of a conceptual model of student satisfaction with their experience in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 16(1), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880810848396

Dubey, P., & Pandey, D. (2020). Distance learning in higher education during pandemic: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 8(2), 43-46. https://doi.org/10.25215/0802.204

Ferguson, G., & Phau, I. (2012). A cross-national investigation of university students' complaining behaviour and attitudes to complaining. Journal of International Education in Business, 5(1), 50-70. https://doi.org/10.1108/18363261211261755

Fitz-Patrick, M., Davey, J., & Dai, L. (2012). Chinese students' complaining behavior: Hearing the silence. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 24(5), 738-754. https://doi.org/10.1108/13555851211278349

Ford, R. C., & Bowen, D. E. (2008). A service-dominant logic for management education: It's time. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(2), 224-243. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2008.32712620

Gaebel, M., Zhang, T., Bunescu, L., & Stoeber, H. (2018). Learning and teaching in the European higher education area. European University Association. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED593591

Gillespie-Finney, T., & Zachary-Finney, R. (2010). Are students their universities' customers? An exploratory study. Education + Training, 52(4), 276-291. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911011050954

Gilly, M. C., & Gelb, B. D. (1982). Post-purchase consumer processes and the complaining consumer. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 323-328. https://doi.org/10.1086/208927

Golooba, M., & Ahlan, A. R. (2013). Service value co-creation in research and innovation practices in higher education institutions in Malaysia. Procedia Technology, 11, 342-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.200

Goodman, J., & Newman, S. (2003). Understand customer behavior and complaints. Quality Progress, 36(1),51-55. https://www.proquest.com/magazines/understand-customer-behavior-complaints/docview/214764337/se-2

Guilbault, M. (2016). Students as customers in higher education: Reframing the debate. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 26(2), 132-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2016.1245234

Gummesson, E. (2006). Many-to-many marketing as grand theory. In R. F. Lusch, S. L. Vargo (Eds.), The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, debate, and directions (pp. 339-353). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315699035

Gummesson, E. (2014). Many-to-many marketing as grand theory: A Nordic school contribution. In R. F. Lusch, S. L. Vargo (Eds.), The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, debate, and directions (pp. 357-371). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315699035-40/many-many-marketing-grand-theory-nordic-school-contribution-evert-gummesson

Gummesson, E., Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2010). Transitioning from service management to Service-Dominant Logic: Observations and recommendations. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 2(1), 8-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/17566691011026577

Gupta, T. (2018). The marketization of higher education. International Journal of Recent Research Aspects, 5(3), 1-8. http://www.ijrra.net/Vol5issue3/IJRRA-05-03-01.pdf

Haraldseid-Driftland, C., Aase, I., & Aase, K. (2019). Developing curriculum: Nursing students’ involvement in skills training design. In K. Trimmer, T. Newman, & F. Padró (Eds.), Ensuring Quality in Professional Education (Vol. I) (pp. 189-207). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01096-6_9

Hart, D. J., & Coates, N. F. (2010). International student complaint behaviour: How do East Asian students complain to their university? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 34(3), 303-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2010.484051

Hemsley-Brown, J., & Oplatka, I. (2006). Universities in a competitive global marketplace: A systematic review of the literature on higher education marketing. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(4), 316-338. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550610669176

Hill, F. M. (1995). Managing service quality in higher education: The role of the student as primary consumer. Quality Assurance in Education, 3(3), 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684889510093497

Hurt, E. (2012). The marketization of higher education. College Literature, 39(2), 121-132. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23266076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lit.2012.0013

Iyer, R., & Muncy, J. A. (2008). Service recovery in marketing education: It's what we do that counts. Journal of Marketing Education, 30(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475307312195

Judson, K. M., & Taylor, S. A. (2014). Moving from marketization to marketing of higher education: The co-creation of value in higher education. Higher Education Studies, 4(1), 51-67. http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v4n1p51

Karunathilake, R. L. P., & Galdolage, B. S. (2021). Value co-creation and co-destruction in online education during the Covid19 pandemic: Special reference to Sri Lankan State Sector Universities. Journal of Business and Technology, 5(2), 14-28. http://doi.org/10.4038/jbt.v5i2.30

Koris, R., & Nokelainen, P. (2015). The student-customer orientation questionnaire (SCOQ) Application of customer metaphor to higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(1), 115-138. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2013-0152

Lala, V., & Priluck, R. (2011). When students complain: An antecedent model of students’ intention to complain. Journal of Marketing Education, 33(3), 236-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475311420229

Leem, B. H. (2021). An effect of value co-creation on student benefits in COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 13. https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790211058320

Lei, S. I., & So, A. S. I. (2021). Online teaching and learning experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic–A comparison of teacher and student perceptions. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 33(3), 148-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2021.1907196

Marinoni, G., Van’t Land, H., & Jensen, T. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 on higher education around the world. IAU Global Survey Report. The International Association of Universities [IAU]. https://www.uniss.it/sites/default/files/news/iau_covid19_and_he_survey_report_final_may_2020.pdf

McCabe, A., & O'Connor, U. (2014). Student-centred learning: The role and responsibility of the lecturer. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(4), 350-359. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.860111

Meyer, M. W., & Norman, D. (2020). Changing design education for the 21st century. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 6(1), 13-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.12.002

Mousavi, M., & Esfidani, M. R. (2013). A comprehensive model of customers’ complaint behavior. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3(5), 548-569. https://hrmars.com/papers_submitted/9552/a-comprehensive-model-of-customers-complaint-behavior.pdf

Mukherjee, A., Pinto, M. B., & Malhotra, N. (2009). Power perceptions and modes of complaining in higher education. The Service Industries Journal, 29(11), 1615-1633. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060902793383

Musselin, C. (2018). New forms of competition in higher education. Socio-Economic Review, 16(3), 657-683. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy033

Msosa, S. K. (2021). Service failure and complaints management in higher education institutions. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 10(3), 514-521. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i3.1098

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. 21st century learning: Research, innovation and policy. OECD. https://www.haiti-now.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/21st-Century-Learning.pdf

Perla, L., Agrati, L. S., & Vinci, V. (2019). The ‘sophisticated’ knowledge of e-teacher. Re-shape digital resources for online courses. In D. Burgos, M. Cimitile, P, Ducange, R. Pecori, P. Picerno, P. Raviolo, & C. M. Stracke (Eds.), International Workshop on Higher Education Learning Methodologies and Technologies Online (pp. 3-17). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31284-8_1

Petruzzellis, L., d'Uggento, A. M., & Romanazzi, S. (2006). Student satisfaction and quality of service in Italian universities. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 16(4), 349-364. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520610675694

Pucciarelli, F., & Kaplan, A. (2016). Competition and strategy in higher education: Managing complexity and uncertainty. Business Horizons, 59(3), 311-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.01.003

Scott, T. (2021). Higher education's marketization impact on EFL instructor moral stress, identity, and agency. English Language Teaching, 14(1), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n1p99

Seeman, E. D., & O’Hara, M. (2006). Customer relationship management in higher education: Using information systems to improve the student-school relationship. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 23(1), 24-34. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650740610639714

Senior, C., Moores, E., & Burgess, A. (2017). “I can't get no satisfaction”: Measuring student satisfaction in the age of a consumerist higher education. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 980. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00980

Shupe, D. A. (1999). Productivity, quality, and accountability in higher education. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 47(1), 2-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377366.1999.10400360

Singh, J. (1988). Consumer complaint intentions and behavior: Definitional and taxonomical issues. Journal of Marketing, 52(1), 93-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200108

Singh, J. (1990). Identifying consumer dissatisfaction response styles: An agenda for future research. European Journal of Marketing, 24(6), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569010140516

Singh, J., & Pandya, S. (1991). Exploring the effects of consumers′ dissatisfaction level on complaint behaviours. European Journal of Marketing, 25(9), 7-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000000621

Smørvik, K. K., & Vespestad, M. K. (2020). Bridging marketing and higher education: Resource integration, co-creation and student learning. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 30(2), 256-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2020.1728465

Spohrer, J., & Maglio, P. P. (2008). The emergence of service science: Toward systematic service innovations to accelerate co-creation of value. Production and Operations Management, 17(3), 238-246. https://doi.org/10.3401/poms.1080.0027

Štimac, H., & Šimić, M. L. (2012). Competitiveness in higher education: A need for marketing orientation and service quality. Economics & Sociology, 5(2), 23-34. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1268704687?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2012/5-2/2

Su, C., & Bao, Y. (2001). Student complaint behavior based on power perception: A taxonomy. Services Marketing Quarterly, 22(3), 45-65. https://doi.org/10.1300/J396v22n03_03

Svensson, G., & Wood, G. (2007). Are university students really customers? When illusion may lead to delusion for all! International Journal of Educational Management, 21(1), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540710716795

Tax, S. S., Brown, S. W., & Chandrashekaran, M. (1998). Customer evaluations of service complaint experiences: Implications for relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 60-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299806200205

Tømte, C. E., Fossland, T., Aamodt, P. O., & Degn, L. (2019). Digitalisation in higher education: Mapping institutional approaches for teaching and learning. Quality in Higher Education, 25(1), 98-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2019.1603611

Tomlinson, M. (2018). Conceptions of the value of higher education in a measured market. Higher Education, 75(4), 711-727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0165-6

Tronvoll, B. (2007). Customer complaint behaviour from the perspective of the service-dominant logic of marketing. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 17(6), 601-620. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520710834966

Tronvoll, B. (2008). Customer complaint behaviour in service (Doctoral dissertation, Karlstad Universitet). Diva Portal. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:5576/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Tronvoll, B. (2012). A dynamic model of customer complaining behaviour from the perspective of service-dominant logic. European Journal of Marketing, 46(1/2), 284-305. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561211189338

University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing [IfM] & International Business Machines Corporation [IBM]. (2008). Succeeding through service innovation: A service perspective for education, research, business, and government. University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing. https://www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/uploads/Resources/080428cambridge_ssme_whitepaper.pdf

Vargo, S. L., Akaka, M. A., & Vaughan, C. M. (2017). Conceptualizing value: A service-ecosystem view. Journal of Creating Value, 3(2), 117-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/2394964317732861

Vargo, S. L., Koskela-Huotari, K., & Vink, J. (2020). Service-dominant logic: Foundations and applications. In E. Bridges & K. Fowler (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of service research insights and ideas (pp. 3-23). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351245234-1

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: An extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0456-3

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2017). Service-dominant logic 2025. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(1), 46-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.001

Wueste, D. E., & Fishman, T. (2010). The customer isn't always right: Limitations of 'customer service' approaches to education or why Higher Ed is not Burger King. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 6(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.21913/IJEI.v6i1.672

Yoke, L. B. (2018). Interrelationship between perceived instructor power, student dissatisfaction, and complaint behaviors in the context of higher education. International Education Studies, 11(7), 12-25. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1184010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n7p12

Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299606000203

Cómo citar

APA

Zamora-Ramos, M. R., Díaz-Méndez, M. & Chamorro-Mera, A. (2023). Higher Education Student Complaint Behavior in a Complex Service Ecosystem: A Value Co-creation Perspective. Innovar, 33(87), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v33n87.105500

ACM

[1]
Zamora-Ramos, M.R., Díaz-Méndez, M. y Chamorro-Mera, A. 2023. Higher Education Student Complaint Behavior in a Complex Service Ecosystem: A Value Co-creation Perspective. Innovar. 33, 87 (ene. 2023), 27–41. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v33n87.105500.

ACS

(1)
Zamora-Ramos, M. R.; Díaz-Méndez, M.; Chamorro-Mera, A. Higher Education Student Complaint Behavior in a Complex Service Ecosystem: A Value Co-creation Perspective. Innovar 2023, 33, 27-41.

ABNT

ZAMORA-RAMOS, M. R.; DÍAZ-MÉNDEZ, M.; CHAMORRO-MERA, A. Higher Education Student Complaint Behavior in a Complex Service Ecosystem: A Value Co-creation Perspective. Innovar, [S. l.], v. 33, n. 87, p. 27–41, 2023. DOI: 10.15446/innovar.v33n87.105500. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/105500. Acesso em: 24 dic. 2025.

Chicago

Zamora-Ramos, Moisés Rubén, Montserrat Díaz-Méndez, y Antonio Chamorro-Mera. 2023. «Higher Education Student Complaint Behavior in a Complex Service Ecosystem: A Value Co-creation Perspective». Innovar 33 (87):27-41. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v33n87.105500.

Harvard

Zamora-Ramos, M. R., Díaz-Méndez, M. y Chamorro-Mera, A. (2023) «Higher Education Student Complaint Behavior in a Complex Service Ecosystem: A Value Co-creation Perspective», Innovar, 33(87), pp. 27–41. doi: 10.15446/innovar.v33n87.105500.

IEEE

[1]
M. R. Zamora-Ramos, M. Díaz-Méndez, y A. Chamorro-Mera, «Higher Education Student Complaint Behavior in a Complex Service Ecosystem: A Value Co-creation Perspective», Innovar, vol. 33, n.º 87, pp. 27–41, ene. 2023.

MLA

Zamora-Ramos, M. R., M. Díaz-Méndez, y A. Chamorro-Mera. «Higher Education Student Complaint Behavior in a Complex Service Ecosystem: A Value Co-creation Perspective». Innovar, vol. 33, n.º 87, enero de 2023, pp. 27-41, doi:10.15446/innovar.v33n87.105500.

Turabian

Zamora-Ramos, Moisés Rubén, Montserrat Díaz-Méndez, y Antonio Chamorro-Mera. «Higher Education Student Complaint Behavior in a Complex Service Ecosystem: A Value Co-creation Perspective». Innovar 33, no. 87 (enero 1, 2023): 27–41. Accedido diciembre 24, 2025. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/105500.

Vancouver

1.
Zamora-Ramos MR, Díaz-Méndez M, Chamorro-Mera A. Higher Education Student Complaint Behavior in a Complex Service Ecosystem: A Value Co-creation Perspective. Innovar [Internet]. 1 de enero de 2023 [citado 24 de diciembre de 2025];33(87):27-41. Disponible en: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/105500

Descargar cita

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations2

1. Sandra Rojas-Berrio, Javier A. Sánchez-Torres, Francisco-Javier Arroyo-Cañada, Flor Madrigal-Moreno. (2022). Retos del marketing desde la pandemia por COVID-19. Innovar, 33(87), p.3. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v33n87.106350.

2. Jingwei Fan, Mei Tian. (2024). Satisfaction with Online Chinese Learning among International Students in China: A Study Based on the fsQCA Method. Sustainability, 16(3), p.1086. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031086.

Dimensions

PlumX

Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo

866

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.