Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Publicado
Atualizando e situando o conceito de ecossistema de inovação: uma revisão sistemática da literatura (2018-2022)
Updating and contextualizing the concept of innovation ecosystems: a systematic review of the literature (2018–2022)
Actualización y contextualización del concepto de ecosistema de innovación: una revisión sistemática de la literatura (2018-2022)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v36n99.105713Palabras clave:
ecossistemas de inovação, gestão da inovação, construção do conhecimento, revisão sistemática da literatura, design science research (pt)innovation ecosystems, innovation management, knowledge construction, systematic literature review, design science research (en)
ecosistemas de innovación, gestión de la innovación, construcción del conocimiento, revisión sistemática de la literatura, investigación en ciencias del diseño (es)
Descargas
Os Ecossistemas de Inovação são espaços que agregam infraestrutura e arranjos institucionais e culturais, que atraem empreendedores e recursos financeiros, e que potencializam o desenvolvimento da sociedade do conhecimento. Assim, este artigo teve como objetivo atualizar e situar o conceito de Ecossistemas de Inovação a partir de seus principais elementos constitutivos, por meio de Revisão Sistemática da Literatura na forma de meta-síntese e apoiada no paradigma da Design Science Research, delimitado aos últimos 5 anos, resultando na análise de 422 artigos. Os principais resultados evidenciaram que: (a) verificou-se que há caminhos diversos para a conceituação de EI em virtude da sua própria natureza dinâmica, multidimensional e possibilidades distintas de configuração e implementação; (b) recomenda-se compreender o conceito de EI em uma perspectiva de uma dualidade dialética interdependente e aberta, podendo-se assumir diversas nomenclaturas, conforme o ambiente concreto da sua aplicação; (c) pode-se conceituar e situar EI como um conjunto de casos, aplicações, interações e interpretações que por sua vez compõem a própria construção do conhecimento, dentro de uma espécie de EI global. Com esta pesquisa, pode-se constatar uma tendência contínua de crescimento dos estudos a respeito de EI, bem como a ampliação da sua diversidade, indo além do escopo das empresas e agregando elementos estruturantes do desenvolvimento, como a questão geográfica, energética e social-distributiva, fortalecendo os seus elementos abióticos.
EIs are spaces that bring together infrastructure and institutional and cultural arrangements that attract entrepreneurs and financial resources, boosting the development of the knowledge society. The research offers an innovative meta-synthesis, integrating a critical analysis of recent economic and technological transformations with a new dialectical and multidimensional approach to the concept of EIs. The systematic literature review, conducted between 2018 and 2022, analyzed 422 articles and resulted in significant insights. In contrast to previous reviews, which treat EIs statically, this study suggests an evolutionary and adaptable model, essential for understanding and applying the concept in diverse contexts. The main results indicate that the conceptualization of IEs follows different paths, reflecting their dynamic and multidimensional nature. In addition, a dialectical understanding of the concept is suggested, which adapts to the application environment, and a new approach to IEs is proposed as a set of innovation management practices that contribute to the construction of knowledge in a global ecosystem. The practical contribution of this study is to offer a conceptual basis that can guide the development of innovative policies and practices adapted to different global environments. The work also sheds light on the current scenario of IEs and points to new demands for empirical studies and the development of constructivist methodologies focused on sustainability.
Los EI (ecosistemas de innovación) son espacios que reúnen infraestructura y disposiciones institucionales y culturales que atraen a emprendedores y recursos financieros, potenciando el desarrollo de la sociedad del conocimiento. La investigación ofrece una metasíntesis innovadora, integrando un análisis crítico de las recientes transformaciones económicas y tecnológicas con un nuevo enfoque dialéctico y multidimensional del concepto de EI. La revisión sistemática de la literatura, realizada entre 2018 y 2022, analizó 422 artículos y dio lugar a importantes conclusiones. A diferencia de revisiones anteriores, que tratan los EI de forma estática, este estudio sugiere un modelo evolutivo y adaptable, esencial para comprender y aplicar el concepto en diversos contextos. Los principales resultados indican que la conceptualización de las EI sigue caminos diversos, lo que refleja su naturaleza dinámica y multidimensional. Además, se sugiere una comprensión dialéctica del concepto, que se adapta al entorno de aplicación, y se propone un nuevo enfoque de las EI como un conjunto de prácticas de gestión de la innovación que contribuyen a la construcción del conocimiento en un ecosistema global. La contribución práctica de este estudio consiste en ofrecer una base conceptual que pueda guiar el desarrollo de políticas y prácticas innovadoras adaptadas a diferentes entornos globales. El trabajo también ilumina el panorama actual de los EI y señala nuevas demandas para estudios empíricos y para el desarrollo de metodologías constructivistas centradas en la sostenibilidad.
Referencias
Abi Younes, G., Ayoubi, C., Ballester, O., Cristelli, G., de Rassenfosse, G., Foray, D., Gaulé, P., Pellegrino, G., van den Heuvel, M., Webster, E., & Zhou, L. (2021). COVID-19: Insights from innovation economists. Science and Public Policy, 47(5), 733–745. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa028
Adner, R. (2006). Match Your Innovation Strategy to Your Innovation Ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84(4), 98–107. https://hbr.org/2006/04/match-your-innovation-strategy-to-your-innovation-ecosystem
Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451
Agbali, M., Trillo, C., Ibrahim, I. A., Arayici, Y., & Fernando, T. (2019). Are smart innovation ecosystems really seeking to meet citizens’ needs? Insights from the stakeholders’ vision on smart city strategy implementation. Smart Cities, 2(2), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities2020019
Amitrano, C. C., Tregua, M., Spena, T. R., & Bifulco, F. (2018). On technology in innovation systems and innovation-ecosystem perspectives: A cross-linking analysis. Sustainability, 10(10), Article 3744. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103744
Amann, M., Granström, G., Frishammar, J., & Elfsberg, J. (2022). Mitigating not-invented-here and not-sold-here problems: The role of corporate innovation hubs. Technovation, 111, Article 102377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102377
Appio, F. P., Lima, M., & Paroutis, S. (2019). Understanding smart cities: Innovation ecosystems, technological advancements, and societal challenges. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.018
Arribas-Ibar, M., Nylund, P., & Brem, A. (2021). The risk of dissolution of sustainable innovation ecosystems in times of crisis: The electric vehicle during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(3), Article 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031319
Audretsch, D. B., Eichler, G. M., & Schwarz, E. J. (2022). Emerging needs of social innovators and social innovation ecosystems. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 18(1), 217–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-021-00789-9
Bacon, E., Williams, M. D., & Davies, G. (2020). Coopetition in innovation ecosystems: A comparative analysis of knowledge transfer configurations. Journal of Business Research, 115, 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.005
Beltagui, A., Rosli, A., & Candi, M. (2020). Exaptation in a digital innovation ecosystem: The disruptive impacts of 3D printing. Research Policy, 49(1), Article 103833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103833
Bevilacqua, C., & Ou, Y. (2018). Place, relationships, and community-controlled capital: On ecosystem-based innovation towards an equitable competitive advantages distribution. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 13(8), 1072–1089. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V13-N8-1072-1089
Boyer, J. (2020). Toward an evolutionary and sustainability perspective of the innovation ecosystem: Revisiting the panarchy model. Sustainability, 12(8), Article 3232. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083232
Brasil. (2019). Portaria nº 6.762, de 17 de dezembro de 2019: Institui o Programa Nacional de Apoio aos Ambientes Inovadores. Diário Oficial da União. https://www.in.gov.br/en/web/dou/-/portaria-n-6.762-de-17-de-dezembro-de-2019-234748537
Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Checkland, P. (1999). Systems thinking, systems practice: Includes a 30-year retrospective. John Wiley & Sons.
Cobben, D., Ooms, W., Roijakkers, N., & Radziwon, A. (2022). Ecosystem types: A systematic review on boundaries and goals. Journal of Business Research, 142, 138–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.046
Corrêa, C. M., Silva, A. P., Rocha, H. M., & Pereira, L. R. (2025). Product development process in the fashion industry: A case study in a Brazilian footwear company. Innovar, 35(96), Article e104970. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v35n96.104970
Costa, J., & Matias, J. C. O. (2020). Open innovation 4.0 as an enhancer of sustainable innovation ecosystems. Sustainability, 12(19), Article 8112. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198112
Dattée, B., Alexy, O., & Autio, E. (2018). Maneuvering in poor visibility: How firms play the ecosystem game when uncertainty is high. Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 466–498. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0869
Davis, C., Safran, B., Schaff, R., & Yayboke, L. (2023). Building innovation ecosystems: Accelerating tech hub growth. McKinsey Global Publishing. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-sector/our-insights/building-innovation-ecosystems-accelerating-tech-hub-growth
dos Santos, M. L. B., & Zattar, I. C. (2019). The importance of knowledge management for the functioning of innovation ecosystems. Informacijos Mokslai, 10(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.24212/2179-3565.2019v10i1p48-56
Dresch, A., Lacerda, D. P., & Antunes Júnior, J. A. V. (2015). Design science research. In A. Dresch, D. P. Lacerda, & J. A. V. Antunes Júnior (Eds.), Design science research: A method for science and technology advancement (pp. 67–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07374-3
Ermel, A. P. C. (2020). Literature grounded theory: Método de pesquisa para investigação sobre o conhecimento científico e tecnológico (Dissertação de mestrado, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos). Repositório UNISINOS. http://www.repositorio.jesuita.org.br/handle/UNISINOS/9270
Faissal Bassis, N., & Armellini, F. (2018). Systems of innovation and innovation ecosystems: A literature review in search of complementarities. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 28(5), 1053–1080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-018-0600-6
Ferdinand, J. P., & Meyer, U. (2017). The social dynamics of heterogeneous innovation ecosystems: Effects of openness on community–firm relations. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 9, Article 1847979017721617. https://doi.org/10.1177/1847979017721617
Fernández, S. G., Kubus, R., & Pérez-Iñigo, J. M. (2019). Innovation ecosystems in the EU: Policy evolution and Horizon Europe proposal case study (the actors’ perspective). Sustainability, 11(17), Article 4735. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174735
Foguesatto, C. R., Santini, M. A. F., Martins, B. V., Faccin, K., De Mello, S. F., & Balestrin, A. (2021). What is going on recently in the innovation ecosystem field? A bibliometric and content-based analysis. International Journal of Innovation Management, 25(7), Article 2130001. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919621300014
Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. Pinter Publishers.
Galvão, M. C. B., & Ricarte, I. L. M. (2019). Systematic literature review: Concept, production and publication. Logeion: Filosofia da Informação, 6(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.21728/logeion.2019v6n1.p57-73
Gomes, L. A. de V., Facin, A. L. F., Salerno, M. S., & Ikenami, R. K. (2018). Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 30–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009
Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2020). Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition. Technovation, 90–91, Article 102098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102098
Holgersson, M., Baldwin, C. Y., Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2022). The forces of ecosystem evolution. California Management Review, 64(3), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/00081256221086038
Huertas, J. I., Mahlknecht, J., Lozoya-Santos, J. de J., Uribe, S., López-Guajardo, E. A., & Ramírez-Mendoza, R. A. (2021). Campus city project: Challenge living lab for smart cities. Applied Sciences, 11(23), Article 11085. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311085
Ilin, I., Levina, A., & Frolov, K. (2022). Innovative ecosystem model of vaccine lifecycle management. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010005
Konietzko, J., Bocken, N., & Hultink, E. J. (2020). A tool to analyze, ideate and develop circular innovation ecosystems. Sustainability, 12(1), Article 417. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010417
Könnölä, T., Eloranta, V., Turunen, T., & Salo, A. (2021). Transformative governance of innovation ecosystems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, Article 121106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121106
Koslosky, M. A. N., Speroni, R. de M., & Gauthier, O. (2015). Ecossistemas de inovação: Uma revisão sistemática da literatura. Revista Espacios, 36(3). https://www.revistaespacios.com/a15v36n03/15360313.html
Lähteenmäki, S., & Töyli, J. (2023). Platform-based innovation ecosystems: Configuration framework and value networks. Journal of Business Research, 151, 306–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.12.018
Linde, L., Sjödin, D., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2021). Dynamic capabilities for ecosystem orchestration: A capability-based framework for smart city innovation initiatives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, Article 120614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120614
Liu, Z., & Stephens, V. (2019). Exploring innovation ecosystem from the perspective of sustainability: Towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(3), Article 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5030048
Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., & Yousef, W. (2012). Modelling the smart city performance. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.660325
Martins, B. V., Faccin, K., Espindula, E., & Balestrin, A. (2019). Understanding innovation ecosystems: A biomimetic approach. Revue Internationale d’Intelligence Économique, 11(2), 87–104. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02863882/
Matos, G. P. de, & Teixeira, C. S. (2022). Funções do orquestrador nos ecossistemas de inovação. Journal on Innovation and Sustainability RISUS, 13(2), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.23925/2179-3565.2022v13i2p4-13
Mineiro, A. A. da C., Souza, D. L., Vieira, K. C., Castro, C. C., & de Brito, M. J. (2019). From triple helix to quintuple helix: A systematic review. Revista Economia & Gestão, 18(51), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.5752/P.1984-6606.2018v18n51p77-93
Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86. https://hbr.org/1993/05/predators-and-prey-a-new-ecology-of-competition
Morandi, M. I. W. M., & Camargo, L. F. R. (2015). Revisão sistemática da literatura. In A. Dresch, D. P. Lacerda, & J. A. V. Antunes Júnior (Eds.), Design science research: A method for science and technology advancement (pp. 141–172). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07374-3
Motta, F. C. P., & Vasconcelos, I. F. G. de. (2006). Teoria geral da administração. Pioneira Thomson Learning.
Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press.
Nouman, M., Yunis, M. S., Atiq, M., Mufti, O., & Qadus, A. (2022). The forgotten sector: An integrative framework for future research on low- and medium-technology innovation. Sustainability, 14(6), Article 3572. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063572
Pustovrh, A., Jaklič, M., Bole, D., & Zupan, B. (2019). How to create a successful regional startup ecosystem: A policy-making analysis. Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government, 17(3), 749–770. https://doi.org/10.4335/17.3.747-768(2019)
Russell, M. G., & Smorodinskaya, N. V. (2018). Leveraging complexity for ecosystemic innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 114–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.024
Sahasranamam, S., Rentala, S., & Rose, E. L. (2019). Knowledge sources and international business activity in a changing innovation ecosystem: A study of the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Management and Organization Review, 15(3), 595–614. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2019.35
Shaw, D. R., & Allen, T. (2018). Studying innovation ecosystems using ecology theory. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.030
Shmeleva, N., Gamidullaeva, L., Tolstykh, T., & Lazarenko, D. (2021). Challenges and opportunities for technology transfer networks in the context of open innovation: Russian experience. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3), Article 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7030197
Silva, J. F., Costa, J. S., Pereira, R. S., & Nunes, M. P. (2022). Decision making in the process of choosing and deploying industry 4.0 technologies. Gestão & Produção, 29, Article e163. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9649-2022v29e163
Silva, P. J., & Ramos, K. S. (2018). Academic medical centers as innovation ecosystems: Evolution of industry partnership models beyond the Bayh-Dole Act. Academic Medicine, 93(8), 1135–1141. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002259
Stahl, B. C. (2022). Responsible innovation ecosystems: Ethical implications of the application of the ecosystem concept to artificial intelligence. International Journal of Information Management, 62, Article 102441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102441
Stasiškienė, Ž., Petkevičienė, J., Meilienė, E., & Čiutienė, R. (2021). Innovation ecosystem for sustainable business model development: Practical insights. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, 77(2), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.erem.77.2.29056
Suominen, A., Seppänen, M., & Dedehayir, O. (2019). A bibliometric review on innovation systems and ecosystems: A research agenda. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(2), 335-360. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2017-0188
Ribeiro, J. L., Santos, M. A., Peres, J. P., & Galdino, J. R. (2022). Driving innovation initiatives in a multinational company subsidiary: A case study and conceptual framework for further application. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(4), Article 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8040187
Talmar, M., Walrave, B., Podoynitsyna, K. S., Holmström, J., & Romme, A. G. L. (2020). Mapping, analyzing and designing innovation ecosystems: The ecosystem pie model. Long Range Planning, 53(4), Article 101850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.09.002
Trischler, J., Johnson, M., & Kristensson, P. (2020). A service ecosystem perspective on the diffusion of sustainability-oriented user innovations. Journal of Business Research, 116, 552–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.011
Wolfert, S., Verdouw, C., van Wassenaer, L., Dolfsma, W., & Klerkx, L. (2023). Digital innovation ecosystems in agri-food: Design principles and organizational framework. Agricultural Systems, 204, 103558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103558
Wu, R., Wang, Z., & Shi, Q. (2021). Increment of heterogeneous knowledge in enterprise innovation ecosystem: An agent-based simulation framework. Complexity, 2021, Article 9550232. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9550232
Xu, G., Hu, W., Qiao, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Mapping an innovation ecosystem using network clustering and community identification: A multi-layered framework. Scientometrics, 124(3), 2057–2081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03543-0
Yang, W., Liu, J., Li, L., Zhou, Q., & Ji, L. (2021). How could policies facilitate digital transformation of innovation ecosystem: A multi-agent model. Complexity, 2021, Article 8835067. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8835067
Yun, J. J., & Liu, Z. (2019). Micro- and macro-dynamics of open innovation with a quadruple-helix model. Sustainability, 11(12), Article 3301. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123301
Zhang, X., Cui, R., & Ji, Y. (2024). Exploring innovation ecosystem with multi-layered heterogeneous networks of global 5G communication technology. Sustainability, 16(4), Article 1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041380
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Innovar
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Todos los artículos publicados por Innovar se encuentran disponibles globalmente con acceso abierto y licenciados bajo los términos de Creative Commons Atribución-No_Comercial-Sin_Derivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Una vez seleccionados los artículos para un número, y antes de iniciar la etapa de cuidado y producción editorial, los autores deben firmar una cesión de derechos patrimoniales de su obra. Innovar se ciñe a las normas colombianas en materia de derechos de autor.
El material de esta revista puede ser reproducido o citado con carácter académico, citando la fuente.
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons:
