Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Publicado
Liderazgo ético: su relación con los conflictos, la confianza y la transferencia de conocimiento
Ethical Leadership and its Relationship with Conflicts, Trust, And Knowledge Transfer
Liderança ética: sua relação com os conflitos, a confiança e a transferência de conhecimento
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v33n88.106279Palabras clave:
confianza, conflictos, liderazgo ético, modelo de ecuaciones estructurales, transferencia de conocimiento (es)Trust, conflicts, ethical leadership, structural equation model, knowledge transfer (en)
confiança, conflitos, liderança ética, modelo de equações estruturais, transferência de conhecimento (pt)
Los líderes éticos son ejemplo de conducta con el que los empleados se identifican y tratan de emular. El interés en este estilo de liderazgo creció fuertemente en la primera década del siglo, pero aun cuando se reconoce su importancia son escasos los estudios empíricos para comprender sus relaciones con otras variables. El propósito de este trabajo es indagar en la influencia del liderazgo ético sobre los conflictos, la confianza y la transferencia de conocimiento en el entorno de la industria maquiladora de exportación, sector industrial relevante para la economía fronteriza norte de México. Para ello, se utilizó un diseño de investigación cuantitativo, no experimental, transversal, descriptivo y correlacional, con una muestra no probabilística por conveniencia. La técnica estadística fue un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales pls. Los resultados indican que el liderazgo ético y la confianza inciden favorablemente sobre la transferencia de conocimiento, los conflictos no inciden sobre la transferencia de conocimiento, y el liderazgo ético no impacta en los conflictos. Estos hallazgos evidencian beneficios del liderazgo ético, en este caso asociados a la confianza y a la transferencia de conocimiento, y destacan que el liderazgo ético implica la justicia y la objetividad en el trato con los miembros del equipo de trabajo, incluso cuando ello pueda resultar difícil o complejo.
Ethical leaders are good conduct role models that employees identify with and try to emulate. Interest in this leadership style grew strongly in the first decade of this century, but even when its importance is recognized, empirical studies on the subject are not enough to understand its relationships with other variables. Hence, this work examines the influence of ethical leadership in conflict management, trust, and knowledge transfer within the context of the maquila export industry, a relevant sector for Mexican northern border economy. For this purpose, we conducted a quantitative, non-experimental, cross-sectional, descriptive, and correlational research, with non-probabilistic sampling and the adoption of a pls structural equation model. The results indicate that ethical leadership and trust favorably impact knowledge transfer, while conflicts do not affect knowledge transfer and ethical leadership does not have influence over conflicts. These findings show some of the benefits of ethical leadership, in this case associated with trust and knowledge transfer, and also highlight that this type of leadership implies fairness and objectivity in dealing with team members, even when this may prove complex.
Os líderes éticos são exemplos de comportamento com o qual os empregados se identificam e tentam imitar. O interesse nesse estilo de liderança cresceu fortemente na primeira década do século 21; contudo, ainda quando sua importância é reconhecida, são escassos os estudos empíricos para compreender suas relações com outras variáveis. O objetivo deste trabalho é questionar sobre a influência da liderança ética nos conflitos, confiança e transparência de conhecimento no ambiente da indústria exportadora, setor industrial relevante para a economia fronteiriça do norte do México. Para isso, foi utilizado um desenho de pesquisa quantitativo, não experimental, transversal, descritivo e correlacional, com uma amostra não probabilística por conveniência. A técnica estatística foi um modelo de equações estruturais PLS. Os resultados indicam que a liderança ética e a confiança incidem favoravelmente na transferência de conhecimento, os conflitos não impactam a transferência de conhecimento, e a liderança ética não impacta os conflitos. Esses achados evidenciam benefícios da liderança ética, nesse caso associados com a confiança e transferência de conhecimento, e destacam que a liderança ética implica a justiça e a objetividade na forma de tratar os membros da equipe de trabalho, inclusive quando isso puder ser difícil ou complexo.
Referencias
Alba Vega, C., & Aziz Nassif, A. (Coords.). (2000). Desarrollo y política en la frontera norte. CIESAS; IRD; UACJ.
Al-Maroof, R. S., Alshurideh, M. T., Salloum, S. A., AlHamad, A. Q. M., & Gaber, T. (2021). Acceptance of Google Meet during the spread of Coronavirus by Arab university students. Informatics, 8(2), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics8020024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics8020024
Ali, S. H., & Sağsan, M. (2021). The moderating effect of ethical leadership between psychological ownership of knowledge and knowledge hiding: An empirical study on the public universities in Northern Iraq. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica, 30(2), 178-188. https://www.revistaclinicapsicologica.com/data-cms/articles/20210324021328amSSCI-588.pdf
Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150-169. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2893 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2893
Awan, U., Khattak, A., Rabbani, S., & Dhir, A. (2020). Buyer-driven knowledge transfer activities to enhance organizational sustainability of suppliers. Sustainability, 12(7), 2993. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072993 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072993
Ayaz, S. (2021). Saudi women perceptions on ethical leadership and trust. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 18(14), 753-761. https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/8441
Babalola, M. T., Stouten, J., Euwema, M. C., & Ovadje, F. (2018). The relation between ethical leadership and workplace conflicts: The mediating role of employee resolution efficacy. Journal of Management, 44(5), 2037-2063. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316638163 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316638163
Bavik, Y. L., Tang, P. M., Shao, R., & Lam, L. W. (2018). Ethical leadership and employee knowledge sharing: Exploring dual-mediation paths. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(2), 322-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.05.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.05.006
Bhatti, S. H., Kiyani, S. K., Dust, S. B., & Zakariya, R. (2021). The impact of ethical leadership on project success: The mediating role of trust and knowledge sharing. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(4), 982-998. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-05-2020-0159 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-05-2020-0159
Bradley, B. H., Klotz, A. C., Postlethwaite, B. E., & Brown, K. G. (2013). Ready to rumble: How team personality composition and task conflict interact to improve performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(2), 385-392. https://doi.org/doi:10.1037/a0029845 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029845
Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595-616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004
Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002
Bulińska-Stangrecka, H., & Bagieńska, A. (2021). The impact of employee training and development on tacit knowledge transfer and the mediating role of trust. International Journal of Learning and Change, 13(4-5), 474-489. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLC.2021.116668 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLC.2021.116668
Chin, W. W. (1998). Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7-16. https://www.jstor.org/stable/249674
Dutrénit, G., Vera-Cruz, A., Arias, A., Sampedro, J. L., & Urióstegui, A. (2006). Acumulación de capacidades tecnológicas en subsidiarias de empresas globales en México El caso de la industria maquiladora de exportación. Miguel Ángel Porrúa.
Eisenbeiss, S. A. (2012). Re-thinking ethical leadership: An interdisciplinary integrative approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 791-808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.03.001
Eisenbeiss, S. A., & Brodbeck, F. (2013). Ethical and unethical leadership: A cross-cultural and cross-sectoral analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(2), 343-359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1740-0
Ellis, K., & Shockley‐Zalabak, P. (2001). Trust in top management and immediate supervisor: The relationship to satisfaction, perceived organizational effectiveness, and information receiving. Communication Quarterly, 49(4), 382-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370109385637 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370109385637
Engelbrecht, A. S., Heine, G., & Mahembe, B. (2014). The influence of ethical leadership on trust and work engagement: An exploratory study. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 40(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v40i1.1210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v40i1.1210
Enwereuzor, I. K., Adeyemi, B. A., & Onyishi, I. E. (2020). Trust in leaders as a pathway between ethical leadership and safety compliance. Leadership in Health Services, 33(2), 201-219. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-09-2019-0063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-09-2019-0063
Evanschitzky, H., Ahlert, D., Blaich, G., & Kenning, P. (2007). Knowledge management in knowledge‐intensive service networks. Management Decision, 45(2), 265-283. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740710727287 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740710727287
Fischer, B., Guerrero, M., Guimón, J., & Schaeffer, P. R. (2021). Knowledge transfer for frugal innovation: Where do entrepreneurial universities stand? Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(2), 360-379. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2020-0040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2020-0040
Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440-452. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378201900406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378201900406
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
García, J., Paz, A., & Cardeño, E. (2018). Liderazgo ético. Una perspectiva en universidades públicas del estado Zulia. Opción, 34(86), 696-730. https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/opcion/article/view/23859
Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2005). A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and annotated example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16(1), 91-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01605
Gilbert, J. A., & Tang, T. L.-P. (1998). An examination of organizational trust antecedents. Public Personnel Management, 27(3), 321-338. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102609802700303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009102609802700303
Gillespie, N. (2012). Measuring trust in organizational contexts: An overview of survey-based measures. En F. Lyon, G. Möllering, & M. N. K. Saunders (Eds.), Handbook of research methods on trust (pp. 175-185). Edward Elgar.
Glaser, M., Blake, O., Bertolini, L., Te Brömmelstroet, M., & Rubin, O. (2021). Learning from abroad: An interdisciplinary exploration of knowledge transfer in the transport domain. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 39, 100531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100531 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100531
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110
Greer, L. L., & Dannals, J. E. (2017). Conflict in teams. En E. Salas, R. Rico, & J. Passmore (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of the psychology of team working and collaborative processes (pp. 317-343). Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118909997.ch14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118909997.ch14
Greer, L. L., Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2008). Conflict transformation: A longitudinal investigation of the relationships between different types of intragroup conflict and the moderating role of conflict resolution. Small Group Research, 39(3), 278-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496408317793 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496408317793
Guaita, J. M., de Castro-Pardo, M., Pérez-Rodríguez, F., & Martín, J. M. (2019). Innovation and multi-level knowledge transfer using a multi-criteria decision making method for the planning of protected areas. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(4), 256-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.01.001
Hair, J. F. (2021). Next-generation prediction metrics for composite-based PLS-SEM. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 121(1), 5-11. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2020-0505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2020-0505
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1999). Análisis multivariante (5.a ed.). Prentice Hall Iberia.
Hair, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.10008574
Henseler, J., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Index. (2021). Información estadística: Empleo empresas IMMEX Cd. Juárez. AMAC-Index Juarez. https://indexjuarez.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Enero-22.pdf
Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática [INEGI]. (2021). México en cifras. Consultado enero 28, 2022, en https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/areasgeograficas/?ag=08
Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256-282. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393638 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393638
Jehn, K. A., & Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 187-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25005-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25005-X
Jehn, K. A., Rispens, S., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (2012). Managing conflict in groups and teams: Conflict about conflict. En M. A. Neale, & E. A. Mannix (Eds.), Looking back, moving forward: A review of group and team-based research (Vol. 15, pp. 133-159). Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1534-0856(2012)0000015009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1534-0856(2012)0000015009
Jaeun, L. (2017). When discordance becomes social capital: The role of task conflicts in sharing knowledge. Seoul Journal of Industrial Relations, 28, 195-229. https://s-space.snu.ac.kr/bitstream/10371/145073/1/7%20%EC%9E%84%EC%9E%90%EC%9D%80-%EC%88%98%EC%A0%95ok.pdf
Joseph, E. E., & Winston, B. E. (2005). A correlation of servant leadership, leader trust, and organizational trust. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(1), 6-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730510575552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730510575552
Kakar, A. K. (2018). How do team conflicts impact knowledge sharing? Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 16(1), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2017.1401194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2017.1401194
Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. A. (1993). Procedural justice, attitudes, and subsidiary top management compliance with multinationals’ corporate strategic decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 502-526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/256590
Ko, C., Ma, J., Bartnik, R., Haney, M. H., & Kang, M. (2017). Ethical leadership: An integrative review and future research agenda. Ethics & Behavior, 28(2), 104-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2017.1318069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2017.1318069
Koohang, A., Paliszkiewicz, J., & Goluchowski, J. (2017). The impact of leadership on trust, knowledge management, and organizational performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3), 521-537. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-02-2016-0072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-02-2016-0072
Le, P. B., & Lei, H. (2018). Fostering knowledge sharing behaviours through ethical leadership practice: The mediating roles of disclosure-based trust and reliance-based trust in leadership. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 16(2), 183-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2018.1445426 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2018.1445426
Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 179-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045756 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045756
Lei, H., Ha, A. T. L., & Le, P. B. (2020). How ethical leadership cultivates radical and incremental innovation: The mediating role of tacit and explicit knowledge sharing. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 35(5), 849-862. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-05-2019-0180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-05-2019-0180
Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477-1490. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0136
Lin, C.-P. (2007). To share or not to share: Modeling tacit knowledge sharing, its mediators and antecedents. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(4), 411-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9119-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9119-0
Luethke, T. N. (2021). “What’sa leader without trust?”: Perceptions of unethical leadership and loss of trust from the experiences of MENA refugee and immigrant women. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 16(1), 18-34. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1msUL52oNDgEgmMWe39CGiYW-HCLxR52L/view
Luo, X. (2002). Trust production and privacy concerns on the Internet: A framework based on relationship marketing and social exchange theory. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(2), 111-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(01)00182-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(01)00182-1
Massaro, M., Moro, A., Aschauer, E., & Fink, M. (2019). Trust, control and knowledge transfer in small business networks. Review of Managerial Science, 13(2), 267-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0247-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0247-y
Mayer, D. M., Aquino, K., Greenbaum, R. L., & Kuenzi, M. (2012). Who displays ethical leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Academy of management Journal, 55(1), 151-171. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.0276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.0276
Máynez-Guaderrama, A. I., Cavazos-Arroyo, J., & Valles Monge, L. (2016). Transferencia de conocimiento dentro de la empresa: análisis de variables precursoras en un entorno lean-kaizen. Nova Scientia, 8(17), 462-491. https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/ns/v8n17/2007-0705-ns-8-17-00462.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.21640/ns.v8i17.478
Nyhan, R. C. (2000). Changing the paradigm: Trust and its role in public sector organizations. The American Review of Public Administration, 30(1), 87-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740022064560 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740022064560
Parris, D. L., & Peachey, J. W. (2013). A systematic literature review of servant leadership theory in organizational contexts. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(3), 377-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1322-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1322-6
Rashid, A., & Hassan, M. (2022). Understanding the role of ethical leadership and workplace conflicts a mediation moderation model: A time-lagged study. IRASD Journal of Management, 4(2), 219-240. https://doi.org/10.52131/jom.2022.0402.0075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52131/jom.2022.0402.0075
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. SmartPLS. Consultado junio 15, 2022, en https://www.smartpls.com
Rossi, P. (2020) Reimagining organisational conflicts through the metaphor of music. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 18(1), 120-130, https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2019.1701961 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2019.1701961
Sarwar, H., Ishaq, M. I., Amin, A., & Ahmed, R. (2020). Ethical leadership, work engagement, employees’ well-being, and performance: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(12), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1788039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1788039
Scott, D. (1980). The causal relationship between trust and the assessed value of management by objectives. Journal of Management, 6(2), 157-175. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638000600205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638000600205
Seidel, G., & Back, A. (2009). Success factor validation for global ERP programmes [Ponencia]. 17th European Conference on Information Systems, Verona, Italia. https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/213715/1/ecis2009-0098.pdf
Shahzad, U., Memon, M. A., Khurram, S., & Tan, K. L. (2019). The role of relationship conflict and mindfulness in the consequences of task conflict. Asian Journal of Business Research, 9(3), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.14707/ajbr.190071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14707/ajbr.190071
Spraggon, M., & Bodolica, V. (2021). On the heterogeneity and equifinality of knowledge transfer in small innovative organizations. Management Decision, 59(6), 1421-1441. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2019-0318 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2019-0318
Tanner, C., Brügger, A., Van Schie, S., & Lebherz, C. (2015). Actions speak louder than words. Journal of Psychology, 218(4), 225-233. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409/a000032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409/a000032
Tjosvold, D., Wong, A. S., & Feng, N. Y. (2014). Constructively managing conflicts in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 545-568. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091306
Tuan, L. T. (2012). Behind knowledge transfer. Management Decision, 50(3), 459-478. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211216232 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211216232
Villavicencio, D., & Casalet, M. (2005). La construcción de un entorno institucional de apoyo a la industria maquiladora. Comercio Exterior, 55(7), 600-611.
Villasmil, M., Romero, F. J., & Socorro, C. (2021). Liderazgo ético en la gestión pública municipal del estado Zulia, Venezuela. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 27(2), 199-216. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v27i2.35907 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v27i2.35907
Wang, W.-T., Wang, Y.-S., & Chang, W.-T. (2019). Investigating the effects of psychological empowerment and interpersonal conflicts on employees’ knowledge sharing intentions. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(6), 1039-1076. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2018-0423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2018-0423
Xu, A. J., Loi, R., & Ngo, H.-Y. (2016). Ethical leadership behavior and employee justice perceptions: The mediating role of trust in organization. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(3), 493-504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2457-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2457-4
Yang, J., Brashear. T. G., & Boles, J. S. (2011). The role of social capital and knowledge transfer in selling center performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 26(3), 152-161. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858621111115877 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/08858621111115877
Yukl, G. (2008). Liderazgo en las organizaciones. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Yukl, G., Mahsud, R., Hassan, S., & Prussia, G. E. (2011). An improved measure of ethical leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20(1), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051811429352 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051811429352
Zeffane, R. (2010). Towards a two‐factor theory of interpersonal trust: A focus on trust in leadership. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 20(3), 246-257. https://doi.org/10.1108/10569211011076938 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10569211011076938
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Rosana Alejandra Melean Romero, Carlos Aníbal Manosalvas Vaca, María Auxiliadora Guerrero Bejarano, Arturo Mercado Hermenegildo, José Abel De la Torre Tejada. (2023). LEADERSHIP STYLES IN ECUADORIAN COMPANIES: APPLICATION OF THE MULTIFACTOR LEADERSHIP QUESTIONNAIRE (MLQ). Business: Theory and Practice, 24(2), p.544. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2023.18987.
2. Edelia Guillermina Núñez-Barahona, Juan Felipe Espinosa-Cristia. (2024). Ethical leadership and employee behavior. Scientometric analysis in scientific production. Región Científica, https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2024295.
Dimensions
PlumX
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Innovar
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Todos los artículos publicados por Innovar se encuentran disponibles globalmente con acceso abierto y licenciados bajo los términos de Creative Commons Atribución-No_Comercial-Sin_Derivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Una vez seleccionados los artículos para un número, y antes de iniciar la etapa de cuidado y producción editorial, los autores deben firmar una cesión de derechos patrimoniales de su obra. Innovar se ciñe a las normas colombianas en materia de derechos de autor.
El material de esta revista puede ser reproducido o citado con carácter académico, citando la fuente.
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons:
