Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Publicado
Revisión del concepto de comportamiento innovador y comportamiento innovador en el trabajo
A Review Of The Concept Of Innovative Behavior And Innovative Work Behavior
Revisão do conceito de comportamento inovador e comportamento inovador no trabalho
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v33n89.107043Palabras clave:
bibliometría, comportamiento innovador, comportamiento innovador en el trabajo, innovación, revisión de literatura (es)Bibliometrics, innovative behavior, innovative work behavior, innovation, literature review (en)
bibliometria, comportamento inovador, comportamento inovador no trabalho, inovação, revisão de literatura (pt)
El comportamiento innovador (ci) y el comportamiento innovador en el trabajo (iwb) son constructos de gran relevancia para las organizaciones humanas; debido a esto, se hace necesario conocer su definición teórica integrando conceptos propios de la psicología y el comportamiento organizacional (co), como complementos necesarios para su comprensión. Se realizó un estudio bibliométrico con el apoyo de la base de datos de Scopus, identificándose artículos desde el periodo de 1963 al 2021, seguido de una revisión de literatura de artículos científicos de alto impacto para delimitar la definición conceptual del ci y del iwb, además de conocer algunas formas en que se han medido estos comportamientos. Los resultados muestran que el ci y el iwb son recientes y se caracterizan por ser una serie de comportamientos complejos que culminan con la implementación de una idea tanto a nivel organizacional como individual, los cuales pueden ser aplicados en otras áreas distintas a las organizaciones empresariales. Se concluye que el ci y el iwb están más ligados al co, pero existe otra posible perspectiva que se escapa de este ámbito, además que se identifican importantes limitaciones en cómo se han medido, a pesar a los retos que implicó acceder a algunos trabajos académicos de alto impacto. Este trabajo aporta una clarificación conceptual del ci y del iwb, además de proponer nuevos debates.
Innovative Behavior (ib) and Innovative Behavior at Work (ibw) are highly relevant constructs for organizations. Therefore, it is essential to know their theoretical definition by integrating concepts from psychology and organizational behavior (ob) as necessary complements for their comprehension. To that end, we conducted a bibliometric study in Scopus that allowed identifying a series of articles on the matter that were published in the period 1963-2021. Afterwards, a literature review of high-impact scientific articles was performed in order to frame the conceptual definition of ib and ibw, in addition to acknowledge some ways in which this type of behaviors have been measured. Results show that the ib and the ibw are recent insights characterized by being made-up of a series of complex behaviors that lead to the implementation of an idea both at the organizational and individual levels, which can also be applied in areas other than business organizations. Authors conclude that ib and ibw are more linked to ob, although there is another perspective beyond this area. Important limitations in the way these constructs have been measured, despite the challenges involved in accessing high-impact academic papers, were also observed. This work provides a conceptual clarification of ib and ibw while proposing new debates around the subject at the same time.
O comportamento inovador (CI) e o comportamento inovador no trabalho (CIT) são constructos de grande relevância para as organizações humanas; devido a isso, faz-se necessário conhecer sua definição teórica integrando conceitos próprios da psicologia e do comportamento organizacional (CO), como complementos necessários para sua compreensão. Foi realizado um estudo bibliométrico com o apoio da base de dados Scopus, identificando-se artigos desde 1963 até 2021, seguido de uma revisão de literatura de artigos científicos de alto impacto para delimitar a definição conceitual do CI e do CIT, além de conhecer algumas formas em que esses comportamentos vêm sendo medidos. Os resultados mostram que o CI e o CIT são recentes e são caracterizados por serem uma série de comportamentos complexos que culminam com a implementação de uma ideia tanto no âmbito organizacional quanto no individual, os quais podem ser aplicados em outras áreas diferentes das organizações empresariais. Conclui-se que o CI e o CIT estão mais ligados ao CO, mas existe outra possível perspectiva que se desvia desse âmbito, além de serem identificadas importantes limitações em como foram medidas, apesar dos desafios que acessar alguns trabalhos acadêmicos de alto impacto implicou. Este trabalho contribui com um esclarecimento conceitual do CI e do CIT, além de propor novos debates.
Referencias
Acs, Z., Åstebro, T., Audretsch, D., & Robinson, D. T. (2016). Public policy to promote entrepreneurship: A call to arms. Small Business Economics, 47(1), 35-51. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9712-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9712-2
Afsar, B., Badir, Y. F., & Bin Saeed, B. (2014). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(8), 1270-1300. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-05-2014-0152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-05-2014-0152
Agarwal, U. A., Datta, S., Blake-Beard, S., & Bhargava, S. (2012). Linking LMX, innovative work behaviour and turnover intentions. The mediating role of work engagement. Career Development International, 17(3), 208-230. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/13620431211241063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431211241063
Agarwal, U. A. (2016). Examining perceived organizational politics among Indian managers. Engagement as mediator and locus of control as moderator. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 24(3), 415-437. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-07-2014-0786 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-07-2014-0786
Al-Ghazali, B. M., & Afsar, B. (2021). Investigating the mechanism linking task conflict with employees’ innovative work behavior. International Journal of Conflict Management, 32(4), 599-625. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-07-2020-0119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-07-2020-0119
Amorós, E. (2007). Comportamiento organizacional: en busca del desarrollo de ventajas competitivas. Universidad Católica Santo Toribio de Mogrovejo.
Andreu-Andrés, M. A., Marín-García, J. A., & García-Carbonell, A. (2017). El Barómetro INCODE como herramienta de autoevaluación de las competencias de innovación. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 15(2), 275-294. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2017.7746 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2017.7746
Ayoub, A., Almahamid, S. M., & Al-Salah, L. F. (2021). Innovative work behavior scale: Development and validation of psychometric properties in higher education in the GCC countries. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2021-0176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2021-0176
Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F. O., Zhou, Q., & Hartnell, C. A. (2012). Transformational leadership, innovative behavior, and task performance: Test of mediation and moderation processes. Human Performance, 25(1), 1-25. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2011.631648 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2011.631648
Aznar-Mas, L. E., Montero-Fleta, B., Pérez-Peñalver, M. J., Watts, F., García-Carbonell, A., & Marín-García, J. A. (2015). De proyecto INCODE a FINCODA: Utilización del Barómetro INCODE en alumnos universitarios y en empleados con competencias de innovación. Congreso In-Red 2015. https://dx.doi.org/10.4995/INRED2015.2015.1620 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/INRED2015.2015.1620
Bandalos, D. (2018). Measurement theory and applications for the social sciences. The Guilford Press.
Binyamin, G., Friedman, A., & Carmeli, A. (2018). Reciprocal care in hierarchical exchange: Implications for psychological safety and innovative behaviors at work. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(1), 79-88. https://www.doi.org/10.1037/aca0000129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000129
Bos-Nehles, A., Renkema, M., & Janssen, M. (2017). HRM and innovative work behaviour: A systematic literature review. Personnel Review, 46(7), 1228-1253. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-09-2016-0257 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-09-2016-0257
Briganti, S. E., & Samson, A. (2019). Innovation talent as a predictor of business growth. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(2), 261-277. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-10-2018-0102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-10-2018-0102
Brown, T. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. The Guilford Press.
Carmeli, A., Meitar, R., & Weisberg, J. (2006). Self-leadership skills and innovative behavior at work. International Journal of Manpower, 27(1), 75-90. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/01437720610652853 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720610652853
Chandra, Y. (2018). Mapping the evolution of entrepreneurship as a field of research (1990–2013): A scientometric analysis. PloS One, 13(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190228
Chen, Z. X., & Aryee, S. (2007). Delegation and Employee work outcomes: An examination of the cultural context of mediating processes in China. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 226-238. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20159849 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24162389
Dailey, R. (2012). Comportamiento organizacional (7.a ed.). Escuela de Negocios de Edimburgo.
De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2007). How leaders influence employees’ innovative behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41-64. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/14601060710720546 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060710720546
De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behavior. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x
Franklin, E. B., & Krieger, M. (2011). Comportamiento organizacional. Enfoque para América Latina. Pearson Educación.
Freedheim, D. K., & Weiner, I. B. (2003). Handbook of psychology: Vol. 1, History of psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Fteimi, N., & Lehner, F. (2018). Analysing and classifying knowledge management publications – A proposed classification scheme. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(7), 1527-1554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2017-0284 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2017-0284
Fu, N., Flood, P. C., Bosak, J., Morris, T., & O’Regan, P. (2015). How do high performance work systems influence organizational innovation in professional service firms? Employee Relations, 37(2), 209-231. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-10-2013-0155 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-10-2013-0155
Gaviria-Marín, M., Merigó, J. M., & Baier-Fuentes, H. (2019). Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 140, 194-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006
Geisinger, K. F. (Ed.). (2013). APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology Vol. 1. Test theory and testing and assessment in industrial and organizational psychology. American Psychological Association.
Hernández-Sampieri, R., Fernández-Collado, C., & Baptista-Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6.a ed.). Mc Graw Hill.
Hon, A. H. Y., & Lui, S. S. (2016). Employee creativity and innovation in organizations. Review, integration, and future directions for hospitality research. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(5), 862-885. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-09-2014-0454 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-09-2014-0454
International Test Commission [ITC]. (2017). The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (2.a ed.). https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_adaptation_2ed.pdf
Jacobs, Z., Roberts, R. G., Galbraith, R. F., Deacon, H. J., Grün, R., Mackay, A., Mitchell, P., Vogelsang, R., & Wadley, L. (2008). Ages for the Middle Stone Age of Southern Africa: Implications for human behavior and dispersal. Science, 322(5902), 733-735. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20145173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1162219
Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort–reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287-302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
Johnson, R., & Morgan, G. (2016). Survey scales: A guide to development, analysis, and reporting. The Guilford Press.
Kanter, R. M. (1996). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for in novation in organizations. En P. S. Myers (Ed.), Knowledge management and organisational design (pp. 93-131). Butterworth-Heinemann. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-7506-9749-1.50010-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-9749-1.50010-7
Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T. (2001). Toward a multi‐dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 284-296. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005660 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005660
Krinppendorf, K. (2004). Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology. Sage.
Li, M., & Hsu, C. H. C. (2016). A review of employee innovative behavior in services. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(12), 2820-2841. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2015-0214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2015-0214
Lukes, M., & Stephan, U. (2017). Measuring employee innovation: A review of existing scales and the development of the innovative behavior and innovation support inventories across cultures. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 20(1), 136-158. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2015-0262 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2015-0262
Madrigal-Torres, B. E., Vásquez-Flores, J. M., Montero-Gaytán, V. M., & Madrigal-Torres, R. (2017). Habilidad innovadora y capital social del estudiante de educación superior. Revista Global de Negocios, 6(2), 95-104. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3050148
Madrigal-Torres, B. E., Núñez-Ramírez, M .A., Madrigal-Torres, R., & Arechavala-Vargas, R. (2019). Innovative ability mission of the enterprising university. Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science, 3(2), 32-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2019.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2019.09.001
Marí-Benlloch, M., Martínez-Gómez, M., Giner-Bosch, V., & Marín-García, J.A. (2017a). A multidimensional scaling to assessment innovation competency. Edulearn proceedings. 9th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, 8617-8622. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2017.0610 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2017.0610
Marí-Benlloch, M., Martínez-Gómez, M., Giner-Bosch, V., & Marín-García, J. A. (2017b). Exploring skills and competencies of innovation: A measurement model. Edulearn proceedings. 9th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2017.0922 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2017.0922
Martínez-Gómez, M., Marí-Benlloch, M., & Marín-García, J. A. (2016). Exploring skills and competencies of innovation: The case for a qualitative methodology. 5th International Conference on Research in Humanities, Sociology and Education, 54-59. RHSCE. https://doi.org/10.15242/ICEHM.ED1116046 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15242/ICEHM.ED1116046
Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2020). A short measure of innovative work behavior as a dynamic, context-bound construct. International Journal of Manpower, 41(8), 1251-1267. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-01-2019-0029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-01-2019-0029
Miles, M., Huberman, M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3.a ed.). Sage.
Monge-González, R., Rodríguez-Álvarez, J. A., & Leiva, J. C. (2016). An impact evaluation of a fund to finance innovation in SMEs. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 29(1), 20-43. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-02-2015-0041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-02-2015-0041
Okoli, C., & Schabram, K. (2010). A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 10(26), 1-51. https://bit.ly/3WCYdl1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1954824
Othman, N. (2016). Exploring the innovative personality characteristics among teachers. International Education Studies, 9(4), 1-8. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1095779 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n4p1
Pellegrini, A. D., Dupuis, D., & Smith, P. K. (2007). Play in evolution and development. Developmental Review, 27(2), 261-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.09.001
Pérez-Castañeda, M., Berra-Villaseñor, E., & Cuautle-Parodi, J. R. (2018). Método de innovación educativa para promover desarrollo de invenciones en instituciones de educación superior. Revista UPIICSA Investigación Interdisciplinaria, 4(1), 35-42. http://shorturl.at/mq134
Pérez-Peñalver, M. J., Aznar-Mas, L. E., & Montero-Fleta, B. (2018). Identification and classification of behavioural indicators to assess innovation competence. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 11(1), 87-115. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2552
Pérez-Rodríguez, L. F. (2017). Evaluación de las habilidades innovadoras y gerenciales de los directivos de empresas de los sectores productivos priorizados en la ruta competitiva del departamento de Sucre [Tesis de maestría, Universidad del Norte]. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del Norte. http://hdl.handle.net/10584/8737
Pieterse, A. N., Van Knippenberg, D., Schippers, M., & Stam, D. (2010). Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 609-623. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.650 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.650
Pineda-Ospina, D. (2019). Tendencias en la producción de artículos científicos en innovación en el campo de las ciencias administrativas. Innovar, 29(72), 117-130. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v29n72.77935 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v29n72.77935
Ramamoorthy, N., Flood, P. C., Slattery, T., & Sardessai, R. (2005). Determinants of innovative work behaviour: Development and test of an integrated model. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 142-150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2005.00334.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2005.00334.x
Rowley, J., & Slack, F. (2014). Conducting a literature review. Management Research News, 27(6), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170410784185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170410784185
Salessi, S. (2021). Comportamiento innovador en el trabajo: análisis factorial confirmatorio de la Escala de Janssen. Interdisciplinaria, 38(1), 7-21. https://doi.org/10.16888/interd.2021.38.1.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.16888/interd.2021.38.1.1
Scott, M. K., Bender, M. S., Furstenau, L. B., Machado, L. M., Cobo, M. J., & Bragazzi, N. L. (2020). 100 Years of scientific evolution of work and organizational psychology: A bibliometric network analysis from 1919 to 2019. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.598676 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.598676
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A Path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607. https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/256701 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/256701
Shane, S. (2009). Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small Business Economics, 33, 141-149. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9215-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9215-5
Shin, S. J., Yuan, F., & Zhou, J. (2017). When perceived innovation job requirement increases employee innovative behavior: A sensemaking perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(1), 68-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2111
Smith-Castro, V., & Molina, M. (2011). La entrevista cognitiva: guía para su aplicación en la evaluación y mejoramiento de instrumentos de papel y lápiz [Cuadernos Metodológicos N°. 5]. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas-UCR.
VandenBos, G. R. (Ed.). (2015). APA dictionary of psychology (2.a ed.). American Psychological Association. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/14646-000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/14646-000
Van der Vegt, G. S., & Janssen, O. (2003). Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation. Journal of Management, 29(5), 729-751. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00033-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063_03_00033-3
Wang, X-H., Fang, Y., Qureshi, I., & Janssen, O. (2015). Understanding employee innovative behavior: Integrating the social network and leader–member exchange perspectives. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(3), 403-420. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1994 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1994
Weiner, I. B., Millon, T., & Lerner, M. J. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of psychology. Vol. 5. Personality and social psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385
Woods, S. A., Mustafa, M. J., Anderson, N., & Sayer, B. (2017). Innovative work behavior and personality traits. Examining the moderating effects of organizational tenure. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33(1), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-01-2017-0016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-01-2017-0016
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323-342. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.49388995 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.49388995
Zmud, R. W. (1982). Diffusion of modern software practices: Influence of centralization and formalization. Management Science, 28(12), 1421-1431. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.28.12.1421 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.28.12.1421
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Innovar
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Todos los artículos publicados por Innovar se encuentran disponibles globalmente con acceso abierto y licenciados bajo los términos de Creative Commons Atribución-No_Comercial-Sin_Derivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Una vez seleccionados los artículos para un número, y antes de iniciar la etapa de cuidado y producción editorial, los autores deben firmar una cesión de derechos patrimoniales de su obra. Innovar se ciñe a las normas colombianas en materia de derechos de autor.
El material de esta revista puede ser reproducido o citado con carácter académico, citando la fuente.
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons:
