Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Publicado
Organizaciones de patrimonio cultural: un vínculo transdisciplinar indispensable
Cultural Heritage Organizations: An Essential Transdisciplinary Link
Organizações de patrimônio cultural: um vínculo transdisciplinar indispensável
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v33n89.107045Palabras clave:
museos, NGO, organizaciones, patrimonio cultural (es)museus, NGO, organizações, patrimônio cultural (pt)
Museums, NGO, organizations, cultural heritage (en)
El concepto de organización es medular en las ciencias sociales, pues provee una estructura teórica para la agencia colectiva, da perspectivas para una gerencia compleja, innovadora e integradora, y podría ser de gran utilidad para la gestión del patrimonio. Por su parte, los discursos de rentabilidad en la cultura y el patrimonio han llevado a iniciativas como el emprendimiento, la economía naranja y el turismo cultural, tendencias que se debaten entre la sostenibilidad, la financiación y la transgresión de la esencia del patrimonio. Este trabajo analizó la producción académica relativa al concepto organización en la literatura sobre patrimonio cultural. Se desarrolló una revisión sistemática en las principales bases de datos en ciencias sociales a nivel mundial. Se encontraron 64 trabajos que coincidían con la búsqueda. En relación con la organización, los términos más frecuentes fueron empresa, institución, entidad pública o formas específicas como museo, archivo, glam. Aunque la literatura ha crecido en los últimos años, se espera que aparezca mayor investigación transdisciplinaria, imperativa para las organizaciones culturales en estos momentos de crisis.
The concept of organization is essential for the social sciences, as it provides a theoretical framework for collective agency, perspectives for complex, innovative, and inclusive management, and could be really useful for wealth management. On their behalf, the discourse of profitability in the culture and heritage context have led to initiatives such as entrepreneurship, the orange economy, and cultural tourism, trends that generate a debate between sustainability, financial leverage, and the transgression of the essence of heritage. Hence, this work examines the academic production around the concept of organization in the literature on cultural heritage. A systematic review was developed in the main social sciences databases worldwide, obtaining a total of 64 works that matched the search criteria. In relation to the organization construct, the most frequent terms identified were company, institution, public entity, or specific forms such as museum, archive, and glam. Although research works on the subject have increased in recent years, more transdisciplinary studies are expected to appear, which is imperative for cultural organizations in these moments of crisis.
O conceito de organização é medular nas ciências sociais, pois provê uma estrutura teórica para a agência coletiva, dá perspectivas para uma gerência complexa, inovadora e integradora, e poderia ser de grande utilidade para a gestão do patrimônio. Por sua vez, os discursos de rentabilidade na cultura e no patrimônio vêm levando a iniciativas como o empreendedorismo, a economia laranja e o turismo cultural, tendências que são debatidas entre a sustentabilidade, o financiamento e a transgressão da essência do patrimônio. Este trabalho analisou a produção acadêmica relativa ao conceito organização na literatura sobre patrimônio cultural. Foi desenvolvida uma revisão sistemática nas principais bases de dados em ciências sociais em todo o mundo. Foram encontrados 64 trabalhos que coincidiam com a busca. Com relação à organização, os termos mais frequentes foram “empresa”, “instituição”, “entidade pública” ou formas específicas como museu, arquivo, GLAM. Embora a literatura tenha crescido nos últimos anos, espera-se que apareça maior pesquisa transdisciplinar, imperativa para as organizações culturais nestes momentos de crise.
Referencias
Abfalter, D., & Pechlaner, H. (2002). Strategic management and cultural heritage sites: New entrepreneurial challenges for private owners of castles and stately homes. International Journal of Arts Management, 4(3), 8-18. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41064763
Acevedo, F. (2011). ¿Elitismo popular, demagogia populista o tecnocracia aséptica? Sobre la legitimación en la determinación del patrimonio cultural local. Apuntes, 24(2), 138-151. https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revApuntesArq/article/view/8848
Amans, P., & Rascol-Boutard, S. (2008). La performance entre construit social et indicateur simplifié. Finance Controle Strategie, 11(3), 45-63. https://hal.umontpellier.fr/hal-01644299/document
Assi, E. (2012). World heritage sites, human rights and cultural heritage in Palestine. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 18(3), 316-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2012.652975 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2012.652975
Axelrod, R., & Cohen, M. D. (2001). Harnessing complexity. Organizational implications of a scientific frontier. Free Press.
Benhamou, F. (2003). Who owns cultural goods? The case of the built heritage. Forthcoming. En V. A. Ginsburg (Ed.), Economics of the arts and culture (pp. 187-202). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0573-8555(2003)0000260015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781008003.00038
Bernstein, B. (1998). Pedagogía, control simbólico e identidad. Morata.
Blake, J. (2000). On defining the cultural heritage. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 49(1), 61-85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002058930006396X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002058930006396X
Blasco López, M. F., Recuero, N., & San-Martín, S. (2019). The cornerstones of museum performance. A cross-national analysis. Museum Management and Curatorship, 34(2), 211-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2018.1516562 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2018.1516562
Bonini, S., Shoup, D., & Zan, L. (2013). Understanding cultural heritage in Turkey: Institutional context and organisational issues. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 19(7), 728-748. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2012.700283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2012.700283
Cabrera, A., & Vidal, A. (2017) Organización del patrimonio cultural en Colombia: una categoría inexplorada. HiSTOReLo. Revista de Historia Regional y Local, 9(18), 383-421. https://doi.org/10.15446/historelo.v9n18.59638 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/historelo.v9n18.59638
Callegari, F., & Vallega, A. (2002). Coastal cultural heritage: A management tool. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 3(3), 227-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1296-2074(02)01181-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1296-2074(02)01181-0
Castañer, X. (2013). Management challenges of cultural heritage organizations. En I. Rizzo, & A. Mignosa (Eds.), Handbook on the Economics of Cultural Heritage (pp. 209-230). Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857931009.00020
Cho, H. (2014). The challenges and needs of museums in safeguarding underwater cultural heritage. Museum Management and Curatorship, 29(5), 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2014.957480 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2014.957480
Clark, K. (2019). Power of place - heritage policy at the start of the new millennium. The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, 10(3-4), 255-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2019.1696549 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2019.1696549
Codina Mejón, J., Fransi, E. C., & Johansson, A. T. (2004) Marketing management in cultural organizations: A case study of Catalan museums. International Journal of Arts Management, 6(2), 11-22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41064816
Dainelli, F., Manetti, G., & Sibilio, B. (2013) Web-based accountability practices in non-profit organizations: The case of National Museums. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24(3), 649-665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9278-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9278-9
Dameri, P. R., & Moggi, S. (2019). Emerging business models for the cultural commons. Empirical evidence from creative cultural firms. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 19(3), 341-354. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2019.1664945 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2019.1664945
Del Barrio, M. J., Herrero, L. C., & Sanz, J. A. (2009). Measuring the efficiency of heritage institutions: A case study of a regional system of museums in Spain. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 10(2), 258-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2008.08.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2008.08.012
Dias-Sardinha, I., Ross, D., & Calapez-Gomes, A. (2018). The clustering conditions for managing creative tourism destinations: the Alqueva region case, Portugal. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61(4), 635-655. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1327846 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1327846
Dormaels, M. (2016). Participatory management of an urban world heritage site: The Table of Concertation du Vieux-Québec. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 6(1), 14-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-11-2014-0038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-11-2014-0038
Elche, D., Martínez-Pérez, A., & García-Villaverde, P. (2017). Inter-organizational relationships, knowledge strategy and innovation in clusters of cultural tourism. Investigaciones Regionales. Journal of Regional Research, 39, 17-37. https://investigacionesregionales.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2017/12/01-ELCHE.pdf
Eschenfelder, K., Shankar, K., Williams, R. D., Salo, D., Zhang, M., & Langham, A. (2019). A nine dimensional framework for digital cultural heritage organizational sustainability: A content analysis of the LIS literature (2000–2015). Online Information Review, 43(2), 182-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-11-2017-0318 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-11-2017-0318
Eschenfelder, K., & Shankar, K. (2019) Prevalence and use of the term “Business Model” in the digital cultural heritage institution professional literature. En N. Greene Taylor, C. Christian-Lamb, M. H. Martin, B. Nardi (Eds.), Information in Contemporary Society (pp. 391-398). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_37 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_37
Esposito, P. (2014). From accounting to accountability at the virtual museums in Pompeii and Herculaneum. The role of ICT and social reporting towards the financial sustainability of archaeological heritage conservation and usability over time. En L. Aiello (Ed.), Handbook of research on management of cultural products: E-relationship marketing and accessibility perspectives (pp. 245-256). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-5007-7.ch012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-5007-7.ch012
Esposito, P., & Ricci, P. (2016). Virtual museums: International strategies and digital innovation management in global competition-an overview. International Journal of Globalisation and Small Business, 8(2), 117-130. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGSB.2016.078811 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGSB.2016.078811
Etkin, J., & Schvarstein, L. (1989). Identidad de las organizaciones. Paidós.
Etzioni, A. (1997). Organizaciones modernas. Unión Tipográfica Editorial Hispanoamericana.
Ferretti, V., & Comino, E. (2015). An integrated framework to assess complex cultural and natural heritage systems with Multi-Attribute Value theory. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 16(5), 688-697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2015.01.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2015.01.007
García Canclini, N. & Urteaga, M. (Coords.). (2012). Cultura y desarrollo. Una visión crítica desde los jóvenes. Paidós; Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.
Gombault, A., Allal-Chérif, O., & Décamps, A. (2016). ICT adoption in heritage organizations: Crossing the chasm. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5135-5140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.093 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.093
Gómez Villegas, M. (2017). Editorial. Innovar, 27(63), 3-6. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v26n63.60662 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v26n63.60662
Gregory-Smith, D., Wells, V., Manika, D., & McElroy, D. J. (2017a). An environmental social marketing intervention in cultural heritage tourism: a realist evaluation. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 25(7),. 1042-1059. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2017.1288732 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2017.1288732
Gregory-Smith, D., K. Wells, V., Manika, D., & McElroy, D. J. (2017b). A process evaluation of an environmental intervention: The case of a heritage tourism organization. En P. Rossi, & N. Krey (Eds.), Marketing transformation: Marketing practice in an ever-changing world (p. 281). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68750-6_85 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68750-6_85
Guilfoyle, D., Mitchell, M., Morgan, C., Coyne, H., & Gillies, V. (2013). Exploring the role of archaeology within Indigenous natural resource management: A case study from Western Australia. En S. Brockwell, S. O’Connor, & D. Byrne (Eds.), Transcending the culture–nature divide in cultural heritage (pp. 101-116). ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/TA36.12.2013.07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22459/TA36.12.2013.07
Hatch, M. J. (2018). Organization theory. Modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hebz/9780198723981.001.0001
Hatch, M. J., & Schultz, M. (1997). Relations between organizational culture, identity and image. European Journal of Marketing., 31(5/6), 356-365. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb060636 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb060636
Hernández, A. G., Saavedra, J. J., & Sanabria, M. (2007). Hacia la construcción del objeto de estudio De la administración: una visión desde la complejidad. Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas de la Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, 15(1), 91-112. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=90915106
Hernes, T. (2008) Understanding organization as process. Theory for a tangled world. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203934524 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203934524
Hernes, T., & Maitlis, S. (Ed.). (2010) Process, sensemaking, and organizing. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199594566.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199594566.001.0001
Hobsbawm, E. J. (1991) Naciones y nacionalismo desde 1780. Crítica Editores.
Hodgson, G. (2007). La ubicuidad de los hábitos y las reglas. En La economía institucional y evolutiva contemporánea (pp. 89-122). Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.
Jadé, M. (2006). Patrimoine immatériel. Perspectives d’interprétation du concept de patrimoine. L’Harmattan.
Jamal, T., & Tanase, A. (2005). Impacts and conflicts surrounding Dracula Park, Romania: The role of sustainable tourism principles. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 13(5), 440-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580508668572 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580508668572
Jureniene, V., & Radzevicius, M. (2014) Models of cultural heritage management. Transformations in Business & Economics, 13(2), 236-56. https://bit.ly/3FMXebt
Kapsalis, E. (2017). Wikidata: Recruiting the crowd to power access to digital archives. Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 26(1), 134-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/19376529.2019.1559520 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19376529.2019.1559520
Laitinen, M. A. (2018) Net promoter score as indicator of library customers’ perception. Journal of Library Administration, 58(4), 394-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2018.1448655 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2018.1448655
Lampert, C. (2018). Ramping up: Evaluating large-scale digitization potential with small-scale resources. Digital Library Perspectives, 34(1), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-06-2017-0020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-06-2017-0020
Larsen, H. (2018). Archives, libraries and museums in the Nordic model of the public sphere. Journal of Documentation, 74(1), 187-194. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-12-2016-0148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-12-2016-0148
Laven, D., Ventriss, C., Manning, R., & Mitchell, N. (2010). Evaluating U.S. National heritage areas: Theory, methods, and application. Environmental Management, 46(2), 195-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9514-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9514-2
Levin, M. (2008). A strategic organizational behaviour framework to sustain the effective management of world heritage sites [Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Pretoria]. UPSpace Repositorio Institucional. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/23673 .
Li, C., & Ghirardi, S. (2018) The role of collaboration in innovation at cultural and creative organisations. The case of the museum. Museum Management and Curatorship, 34(3), 273-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2018.1520142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2018.1520142
Li, Y., & Hunter, C. (2015). Community involvement for sustainable heritage tourism: A conceptual model. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 5(3), 248-262. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-08-2014-0027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-08-2014-0027
Loach, K., Rowley, J., & Griffiths, J. (2015). Cultural sustainability as a strategy for the survival of museums and libraries. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 23(2), 186-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2016.1184657 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2016.1184657
Luhmann, N. (2005). Organización y decisión. Autopoiésis, acción y entendimiento comunicativo. Anthropos.
Luna, M., & Puga, C. (Coords.). (2010). Nuevas perspectivas para el estudio de las asociaciones. Anthropos.
Lusiani, M., & Zan, L. (2013). Planning and heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 3(2), 108-115. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-06-2013-0026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-06-2013-0026
Matthews, J. R. (2016). Adding value to libraries, archives, and museums: Harnessing the force that drives your organization’s future. Libraries Unlimited.
Moore, M. H. (1998). Gestión estratégica y creación de valor en el sector público. Paidós.
Moore, M. H., & Williams Moore, G. (2005). Creating public value through state arts agencies. Arts Midwest; The Wallace Foundation. https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/Creating-Public-Value-Through-State-Arts-Agencies.pdf
Morel, H. (2011). “Milonga que va borrando fronteras”. Las políticas del patrimonio: un análisis del tango y su declaración como patrimonio cultural inmaterial de la humanidad. Intersecciones en Antropología, 12(1), 163-176. https://www.ridaa.unicen.edu.ar/handle/123456789/1314
Morgan, G. (1990). Imágenes de la organización. Sage.
Myers, D., Dalgity, A., & Avramides I. (2016). The Arches heritage inventory and management system: A platform for the heritage field. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 6(2), 213-223. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-02-2016-0010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-02-2016-0010
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura [Unesco] (1997). Application of the new directives concerning Unesco’s relations with non-governmental organizations, adopted by the General Conference at its twenty-eighth session [Consejo Ejecutivo, 151.a reunión]. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000105871
Papoulias, E., & Zounis, T. P. (2017). Cultural policy and marketing management: The case study of New Museum of Acropolis. En A. Kavoura, D. Sakas, & P. Tomaras (Eds.), Strategic innovative marketing and tourism (pp. 889-897). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33865-1_58 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33865-1_58
Paswan, A., & Troy, L. C. (2004). Non-profit organization and membership motivation: An exploration in the museum industry. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 12(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2004.11658515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2004.11658515
Peacock, D. (2007, octubre 24-26). Digital ICTs: Driver or vehicle of organisational change? [Conference paper]. International Cultural Heritage Informatics Meeting, Toronto, Canadá. http://www.archimuse.com/ichim07/papers/peacock/peacock.html
Peacock, D. (2008). Making ways for change: Museums, disruptive technologies and organisational change. Museum Management and Curatorship, 23(4), 333-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770802517324 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770802517324
Pencarelli, T., Cerquetti, M., & Splendiani, S. (2016). The sustainable management of museums: An Italian perspective. Tourism and Hospitality Management, 22(1), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.20867/thm.22.1.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20867/thm.22.1.6
Pfeffer, J. (2000). Nuevos rumbos en la teoría de la organización. Problemas y posibilidades. Oxford University Press.
Ras, M., & Sierman, B. (2015). Building a future for our digital memory: A collaborative infrastructure for permanent access to digital heritage in The Netherlands. New Review of Information Networking, 20(1-2), 219-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614576.2015.1114828 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13614576.2015.1114828
Riley-Huff, D., Herrera, K., Ivey, S., & Harry, T. (2016). Crowdfunding in libraries, archives and museums. The Bottom Line, 29(2), p67-85. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-03-2016-0014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-03-2016-0014
Roa-Martínez, S., Vidotti, S., & Santana, R. (2017). Estructura propuesta del artículo de datos como publicación científica. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 40(1), e167. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/redc.2017.1.1375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2017.1.1375
Rosas Mantecón, A. (2005). Las disputas por el patrimonio. Transformaciones analíticas y contextuales de la problemática patrimonial en México. En N. García Canclini (Coord.), La antropología urbana en México (pp. 60-95). Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Schvarstein, L. (2001). Psicología social de las organizaciones: nuevos aportes. Paidós.
Slaby, C. M. (2013). Imágenes de “lo propio” y “lo otro”: entre la apropiación y la resistencia en la espacialidad del dominio cultural. Una Interpretación de la procesión del Corpus Christi cusqueño y la serie “Les Incas”. Espaço E Cultura, 34, 173-194. https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/espacoecultura/article/view/12273/9532 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12957/espacoecultura.2013.12273
Stoller, P. (2020) Antropología ralentizada en un mundo acelerado. AIBR Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, 15(1), 11-30. https://doi.org/10.11156/aibr.150102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11156/aibr.150102
Tanackovic, S. F., & Badurina, B. (2009). Collaboration of Croatian cultural heritage institutions: experiences from museums. Museum Management and Curatorship, 24(4), 299-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770903314696 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770903314696
Thorkildsen, A., & Ekman, M. (2013). The complexity of becoming: Collaborative planning and cultural heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 3(2), 148-162. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-10-2012-0053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-10-2012-0053
Tolbert, P., & Hall, R. (2009). Organizations. Structures, processes and outcomes. Prentice Hall.
Tom Dieck, C., & Jung, T. (2017). Value of augmented reality at cultural heritage sites: A stakeholder approach. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 6(2), 110-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.03.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.03.002
Trunfio, M., Campana, S., & Magnelli, A. (2019). Measuring the impact of functional and experiential mixed reality elements on a museum visit. Current Issues in Tourism, 23(16), 1990-2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2019.1703914 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2019.1703914
Tsang, N., & Hsu, C. (2011). Thirty years of research on tourism and hospitality management in China: A review and analysis of journal publications. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(4), 886-896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.01.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.01.009
Vallega, A. (2003). The coastal cultural heritage facing coastal management. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 4(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1296-2074(03)00004-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1296-2074(03)00004-9
Veblen, T. (2005). Fundamentos de economía evolutiva. Ensayos escogidos (A. Supelano, traductor). Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Walker, S., Mullagh, L., Evans, M., & Wang, Y. (2019). Design ecologies: sustaining ethno-cultural significance of products through urban ecologies of creative practice. International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology, 3(10), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41257-019-0025-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41257-019-0025-7
Wickham, M., & Lehman, K. (2015). Communicating sustainability priorities in the museum sector. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(7), 1011-1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2015.1042483 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2015.1042483
Williams, D., Wavell, C., Baxter, G., MacLennan, A., & Jobson, D. (2005). Implementing impact evaluation in professional practice: A study of support needs within the museum, archive and library sector. International Journal of Information Management, 25(6), 533-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2005.08.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2005.08.003
Wilson, P. (2003). Ethnographic museums and cultural commodification: Indigenous organizations, NGOs, and culture as a resource in Amazonian Ecuador. Latin American Perspectives, 30(1), 162-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X02239203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X02239203
Zan, L. (2013). Economic discourse and heritage conservation: Towards an ethnography of administrations. Heritage & Society, 6(2), 167-184. https://doi.org/10.1179/2159032X13Z.00000000012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/2159032X13Z.00000000012
Zan, L., & Bonini, S. (2013). The heritage chain management. General issues and a case study, China. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 14(3), 211-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2012.06.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2012.06.007
Zea, L. F. (2004). La organización como tejido conversacional. Universidad EAFIT.
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Innovar
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Todos los artículos publicados por Innovar se encuentran disponibles globalmente con acceso abierto y licenciados bajo los términos de Creative Commons Atribución-No_Comercial-Sin_Derivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Una vez seleccionados los artículos para un número, y antes de iniciar la etapa de cuidado y producción editorial, los autores deben firmar una cesión de derechos patrimoniales de su obra. Innovar se ciñe a las normas colombianas en materia de derechos de autor.
El material de esta revista puede ser reproducido o citado con carácter académico, citando la fuente.
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons:
