Publicado

2025-04-01

Limitations in Exploration and Exploitation Processes during the Emergence of Strategic Decision-Making: A Literature Review

Limitaciones de los procesos de exploración y explotación en la toma de decisiones estratégicas: una revisión de la literatura

Limitações nos processos de exploração e aproveitamento durante o surgimento da tomada de decisões estratégicas: uma revisão de literatura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v35n96.107110

Palabras clave:

ambidexterity, Decision-Making, Exploitation, exploration, Strategy (en)
ambidestreza, Decisiones estrategicas, exploración, Explotación, Estrategia (es)
ambidestria, tomada de decisões, Exploração, estratégia, aproveitamento (pt)

Descargas

Autores/as

Decision problems and their relationship with the moments in time is a theme to be explored in the strategy studies field. In fact, several scholars conceptualize strategy from a decision-making perspective, framing it as a sequence of interconnected decisions that involve the allocation of resources necessary for implementation. One way to understand the timing of strategic decisions is through the lens of deliberate versus emergent strategies. Within this framework, organizational ambidexterity—defined as the dynamic balance between exploration and exploitation processes—has been proposed as a key cognitive dimension influencing managerial decision-making. These processes, grounded in organizational learning theory, are subject to constraints such as temporal myopia, which can hinder the ability to appropriately weigh short-term outcomes against long-term implications. In this context, the present study aims to identify the limitations inherent in exploration and exploitation processes that may influence strategy formulation, as discussed in the existing literature. This objective was pursued through a systematic literature review using the Scopus database. The review focused on scholarly contributions addressing decision-making in relation to exploration and exploitation, and the results were categorized into substantial, applied, and complementary contributions. As a result, this study reveals a set of thematic categories —including resources, term, type of activity, background, structure, knowledge, and strategy— that differentiate exploration from exploitation processes. These categories also help illuminate the limitations of each process and their potential influence on the timing and nature of strategic decisions.

Los problemas en la toma de decisiones y su relación con el momento temporal en el que se presentan constituyen una línea de investigación relevante y aún en desarrollo en el campo de los estudios sobre estrategia. Diversos autores han conceptualizado la estrategia desde una perspectiva basada en la toma de decisiones, entendiéndola como una secuencia de decisiones interconectadas que implican la asignación de recursos necesarios para su implementación. Una forma de comprender el momento oportuno de las decisiones estratégicas es a través del enfoque de estrategias deliberadas versus emergentes. En este marco, la ambidestreza organizacional, entendida como el equilibrio dinámico entre los procesos de exploración y explotación, ha sido propuesta como una dimensión cognitiva clave que influye en la toma de decisiones gerenciales. Estos procesos, fundamentados en la teoría del aprendizaje organizacional, están sujetos a limitaciones como la miopía temporal, la cual puede dificultar la capacidad de valorar adecuadamente los resultados a corto plazo frente a las implicaciones futuras. En este contexto, el presente estudio tiene como objetivo identificar las limitaciones inherentes a los procesos de exploración y explotación que pueden influir en la formulación de estrategias. Este objetivo se abordó mediante una revisión sistemática de literatura en la base de datos Scopus, la cual se centró en contribuciones académicas que abordan la toma de decisiones en relación con los procesos de exploración y explotación. Los resultados se clasificaron en contribuciones sustanciales, aplicadas y complementarias. Con base en los hallazgos, se identifica un conjunto de categorías temáticas—recursos, horizonte temporal, tipo de actividad, antecedentes, estructura, conocimiento y estrategia—que permiten diferenciar los procesos de exploración y explotación. Estas categorías también permiten señalar las limitaciones de cada proceso y su posible efecto en el momento y la naturaleza de las decisiones estratégicas.

Os problemas de decisão e sua relação com os momentos no tempo é um tema a ser explorado no campo dos estudos de estratégia. De fato, vários estudiosos conceituam a estratégia com base em uma perspectiva de tomada de decisão, enquadrando-a como uma sequência de decisões interconectadas que envolvem a alocação dos recursos necessários para a implementação. Uma maneira de entender o momento das decisões estratégicas é por meio das lentes das estratégias deliberadas versus emergentes. Dentro dessa estrutura, a ambidestria organizacional — definida como o equilíbrio dinâmico entre os processos de exploração e aproveitamento — foi proposta como uma dimensão cognitiva fundamental que influencia a tomada de decisões gerenciais. Esses processos, baseados na teoria da aprendizagem organizacional, estão sujeitos a restrições como a miopia temporal, que pode prejudicar a capacidade de ponderar adequadamente os resultados de curto prazo em relação às implicações de longo prazo. Nesse contexto, o presente estudo tem como objetivo identificar as limitações inerentes aos processos de exploração e aproveitamento que podem influenciar a formulação de estratégias, conforme discutido na literatura existente. Esse objetivo foi alcançado por meio de uma revisão sistemática da literatura utilizando o banco de dados Scopus. A revisão se concentrou nas contribuições acadêmicas que abordam a tomada de decisões em relação à exploração e ao aproveitamento, e os resultados foram categorizados em contribuições substanciais, aplicadas e complementares. Como resultado, este estudo revela um conjunto de categorias temáticas — incluindo recursos, prazo, tipo de atividade, histórico, estrutura, conhecimento e estratégia — que diferenciam os processos de exploração dos processos de aproveitamento. Essas categorias também ajudam a esclarecer as limitações de cada processo e sua possível influência sobre o momento e a natureza das decisões estratégicas.

Referencias

Asif, M. (2019). Exploring the role of exploration/exploitation and strategic leadership in organizational learning. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 11(3), 409-423. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-04-2018-0038

Balle, A. R., Oliveira, M., Curado, C., & Nodari, F. (2018). How do knowledge cycles happen in software development methodologies? Industrial and Commercial Training, 50(7-8), 380-392. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-04-2018-0037

Bhupendra, K. V., & Sangle, S. (2021). Benchmarking absorptive capacity for sustainability: A study of Indian firms. Benchmarking, 29(3), 835-855. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-12-2020-0627

Bhupendra, K. V., & Sangle, S. (2022). Structural process model of absorptive capacity for stakeholder’s integration in decision-making: dynamic capability perspective. Society and Business Review, 17(3), 421-440. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-05-2021-0067

Bibikas, D., Paraskakis, I., Psychogios, A., & Vasconcelos, A. (2010). Emerging enterprise social software knowledge management environments: Current practices and future challenges. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 7(3-4), 328-343. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLIC.2010.034372

Binci, D., Belisari, S., & Appolloni, A. (2020). bpm and change management: An ambidextrous perspective. Business Process Management Journal, 26(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-06-2018-0158

Blome, C., Schoenherr, T., & Kaesser, M. (2013). Ambidextrous Governance in Supply Chains: The Impact on Innovation and Cost Performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(4), 59-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12033

Cabrera, R., & González, D. (2019). Influences of technological attributes on sourcing of manufacturing technologies in developing countries: The case of Peru. Management Research, 17(4), 359-378. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-10-2018-0872

Caputo, A., & Kargina, M. (2022). A user-friendly method to merge Scopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 10(1), 82-88. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-021-00142-7

Chi-Han, A., & Hung-Che, W. (2016). Benefiting from external knowledge? A study of telecommunications industry cluster in Shenzhen, China. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(4), 622-645. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-06-2015-0229

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553

Duncan, R. B. (1976). The Ambidextrous Organization: Designing Dual Structures for Innovation. In R. H. Kilman, L. R. Pondy, & Slevin D. P. (Eds.), The Management of Organization Design: Strategies and Implementation (pp. 167-189). North-Holland.

Eide, A., Moen, Ø., Madsen, T., & Azari, M. (2021). Growth aspirations in smes: Managerial determinants and organizational outcomes. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 28(4), 640-665. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-09-2020-0332

Erdey, L., Liu, L., & Nagy, A. (2024). The nonlinear relationship between digital affordances and firm-level export performance: The moderating role of organizational ambidexterity. Managerial and Decision Economics, 45(4), 1944-1964. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4117

Fayos, T., Calderón, H., & Almanzar, M. (2017). Las capacidades dinámicas en la internacionalización de las empresas, y cooperativas agroalimentarias integradas en clusters. ciriec-Espana Revista de Economia Publica, Social y Cooperativa, 89(1), 5-31. https://doi.org/10.7203/CIRIEC-E.89.8905

Fernández‐Pérez de la Lastra, S., & Sánchez‐Gardey, G. (2024). Organizational ambidexterity: A reconceptualization and research agenda for the vuca international context. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12565

Galati, A., Vrontis, D., Giorlando, B., Giacomarra, M., & Crescimanno, M. (2021). Exploring the common blockchain adoption enablers: the case of three Italian wineries. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 33(4), 578-596. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWBR-10-2020-0050

García-Valdecasas, J. (2011). La simulación basada en agentes: una nueva forma de explorar los fenómenos sociales. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 136(136), 91-109. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.136.91

García-Valdecasas, J. (2016). Simulación basada en agentes. Introducción a NetLogo (Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas). Cuadernos metodológicos. https://books.google.com.co/books?id=1X8aDAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_atb&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

García, V. (2005). Análisis de las barreras del aprendizaje organizacional desde la perspectiva de los centros educativos. Dirección y Organización: Revista de Dirección, Organización y Administración de Empresas, 31, 46-63. https://doi.org/10.37610/dyo.v0i31.110

Geiger, S., & Makri, M. (2006). Exploration and exploitation innovation processes: The role of organizational slack in R & D intensive firms. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 17(1), 97-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2006.05.007

Greenstein, G. (2015). Timing and decision making. Euro Working Group Conferences on Decision Support Systems, ewg-dss 2014 and Group Decision and Negotiation, gdn 2014, 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21536-5_8

Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693-706. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083026

He, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481-495. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078

Hernández Betancur, J. E., Montoya Restrepo, I. A., & Montoya Restrepo, L. A. (2016). Substantive and instrumental variables of the moment of decision. Espacios, 37(13). https://www.revistaespacios.com/a16v37n13/16371311.html

Hernández, J. (2020). Momento de la decisión estratégica: una mirada desde una aproximación organizacional a partir de las estrategias deliberadas y emergentes con el uso de simulación basada en agentes [doctoral dissertation]. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/handle/unal/78582/1017163089.2020.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y

Jia, R., Hu, W., & Li, S. (2022). Ambidextrous leadership and organizational innovation: the importance of knowledge search and strategic flexibility. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(3), 781-801. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2020-0544

Ju, M., & Gao, G. (2022). Performance implication of exploration and exploitation in foreign markets: the role of marketing capability and operation flexibility. International Marketing Review, 39(4), 785-810. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-01-2021-0024

Klas, P., & Johan, L. (2017). Key enabling factors for organizational ambidexterity in the public sector. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences Iss, 9(1), 1-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-04-2016-0038

Leitão, J., de Brito, S., & Pereira, D. (2024). Organizational ambidexterity, open innovation and innovation outputs: How do followers and low-flyer eu countries innovate? International Journal of Innovation Studies, 8(2), 186-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2024.01.001

Lewin, A., Long, C., & Carroll, T. (1999). The coevolution of new organizational forms. Organization Science, 10(5), 535-550. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.5.535

Li, Y., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Schoenmakers, W. (2008). Exploration and exploitation in innovation: Reframing the interpretation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17(2), 107-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2008.00477.x

Lin, C.-Y. C. (2012). Strategic Decision-Making with information and extraction externalities: A structural model of the multi-stage investment timing game in offshore petroleum production. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(5), 1601-1621. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00319

March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71

Marín-Idarrága, D. (2017). Entendiendo la explotación y la exploración en el aprendizaje organizacional: una delimitación teórica. Innovar, 27(63), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v26n63.60668

Milán-García, J., Uribe-Toril, J., Ruiz-Real, J. L., & de Pablo Valenciano, J. (2019). Sustainable local development: An overview of the state of knowledge. Resources, 8(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8010031

Nicolau-Juliá, D., Expósito-Langa, M., & Tomás-Miquel, J.-V. (2015). Exploración y explotación de conocimiento en el ámbito empresarial. Validación de escalas en un sector industrial de bajo perfil tecnológico. Investigaciones Europeas de Direccion y Economia de La Empresa, 21(3), 139-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedee.2014.07.001

Oviedo-García, M., Castellanos-Verdugo, M., Riquelme-Miranda, A., & García, J. (2014). La relación entre aprendizaje organizacional y los resultados en la Administración Pública. Revista Europea de Direccion y Economia de La Empresa, 23(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redee.2013.02.001

Paul, S., Saunders, C., & Haseman, W. (2005). A question of timing: The impact of information acquisition on group decision making. Information Resources Management Journal, 18(4), 81-100. https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2005100105

Pellegrini, M., Caputo, A., & Matthews, L. (2018). Knowledge transfer within relationship portfolios: The creation of knowledge recombination rents. Business Process Management Journal, 25(1), 202-218. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-06-2017-0171

Peng, H. (2018). Organizational ambidexterity in public non-profit organizations: interest and limits. Management Decision, 57(1), 248-261. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2017-0086

Pertuz, V., Pérez, A., Geizzelez, M., & Vega, A. (2019). Aprendizaje organizacional: Análisis de la exploración y explotación de conocimiento en medianas empresas. Información Tecnológica, 30(3), 59-66. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-07642019000300059

Prange, C., & Verdier, S. (2011). Dynamic capabilities, internationalization processes and performance. Journal of World Business, 46(1), 126-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2010.05.024

Rodriguez, C., Wise, J., & Martinez, C. (2013). Strategic capabilities in exporting: An examination of the performance of Mexican firms. Management Decision, 51(8), 1643-1663. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2012-0766

Saavedra, J. (2006). El tiempo y la decisión en la organización desde una perspectiva cultural. Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas Investigación y Reflexión, xiv(0121–6805), 44-65. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=90900105

Sanabria, M. (2003). La temporalidad de la decisión, la crisis y la construcción de la realidad organizacional. Innovar, 22, 73-84. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/24997/25540

Severgnini, E., Vieira, V., & Cardoza, E. (2018). The indirect effects of performance measurement system and organizational ambidexterity on performance. Business Process Management Journal, 24(5), 1176-1199. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-06-2017-0159

Sinha, S. (2019). The emergent-strategy process of initiating organizational ambidexterity. Journal of Strategy and Management, 12(3), 382-396. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-12-2018-0140

Smida, A. (2006). Les moments de decision strategique. Un essai de conceptualisation et de modelisation. Xvème Conférence Internationale de Management Stratégique, Annecy/Genève, 13-16. https://www.strategie-aims.com/conferences/8-xveme-conference-de-l-aims/communications_by_author?author=Smida+Ali

Snehvrat, S., Chaudhary, S., & Majhi, S. G. (2022). Ambidexterity and absorptive capacity in boundary-spanning managers: Role of paradox mindset and learning goal orientation. Management Decision, 60(12), 3209-3231. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2021-0328

Turner, N., Swart, J., & Maylor, H. (2013). Mechanisms for managing ambidexterity: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(3), 317-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00343.x

Tzovara, A., Murray, M. M., Bourdaud, N., Chavarriaga, R., Millán, J. D. R., & De Lucia, M. (2012). The timing of exploratory decision-making revealed by single-trial topographic EEGanalyses. NeuroImage, 60(4), 1959-1969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.136

Vrontis, D., Culasso, F., Giacosa, E., & Stupino, M. (2019). Entrepreneurial exploration and exploitation processes of family businesses in the food sector. British Food Journal, 121(11), 2759-2779. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-02-2019-0118

Wang, Y. (2013). Building blocks, exploitation and exploration of sectoral systems of innovation in catch-up of China’s car industry. Journal of Science and Technology Policy in China, 4(2), 152-176. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPC-02-2012-0006

Ye, J., Li, R., & Zhang, B. (2020). RDFuzz: Accelerating directed fuzzing with intertwined schedule and optimized mutation. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7698916

Yunita, T., Sasmoko, S., Bandur, A., & Alamsjah, F. (2023). Organizational ambidexterity: The role of technological capacity and dynamic capabilities in the face of environmental dynamism. Heliyon, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14817

Zhu, J., & Liu, W. (2020). A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics, 123(1), 321-335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8

Cómo citar

APA

Hernández-Betancur, J.-E., García-Valdecasas, J. I., Montoya-Restrepo, I. A. & Zuluaga Álvarez, A. M. (2025). Limitations in Exploration and Exploitation Processes during the Emergence of Strategic Decision-Making: A Literature Review. Innovar, 35(96), e107110. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v35n96.107110

ACM

[1]
Hernández-Betancur, J.-E., García-Valdecasas, J.I., Montoya-Restrepo, I.A. y Zuluaga Álvarez, A.M. 2025. Limitations in Exploration and Exploitation Processes during the Emergence of Strategic Decision-Making: A Literature Review. Innovar. 35, 96 (abr. 2025), e107110. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v35n96.107110.

ACS

(1)
Hernández-Betancur, J.-E.; García-Valdecasas, J. I.; Montoya-Restrepo, I. A.; Zuluaga Álvarez, A. M. Limitations in Exploration and Exploitation Processes during the Emergence of Strategic Decision-Making: A Literature Review. Innovar 2025, 35, e107110.

ABNT

HERNÁNDEZ-BETANCUR, J.-E.; GARCÍA-VALDECASAS, J. I.; MONTOYA-RESTREPO, I. A.; ZULUAGA ÁLVAREZ, A. M. Limitations in Exploration and Exploitation Processes during the Emergence of Strategic Decision-Making: A Literature Review. Innovar, [S. l.], v. 35, n. 96, p. e107110, 2025. DOI: 10.15446/innovar.v35n96.107110. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/107110. Acesso em: 28 dic. 2025.

Chicago

Hernández-Betancur, Juan-Esteban, J. Ignacio García-Valdecasas, Iván A. Montoya-Restrepo, y Alejandra María Zuluaga Álvarez. 2025. «Limitations in Exploration and Exploitation Processes during the Emergence of Strategic Decision-Making: A Literature Review». Innovar 35 (96):e107110. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v35n96.107110.

Harvard

Hernández-Betancur, J.-E., García-Valdecasas, J. I., Montoya-Restrepo, I. A. y Zuluaga Álvarez, A. M. (2025) «Limitations in Exploration and Exploitation Processes during the Emergence of Strategic Decision-Making: A Literature Review», Innovar, 35(96), p. e107110. doi: 10.15446/innovar.v35n96.107110.

IEEE

[1]
J.-E. Hernández-Betancur, J. I. García-Valdecasas, I. A. Montoya-Restrepo, y A. M. Zuluaga Álvarez, «Limitations in Exploration and Exploitation Processes during the Emergence of Strategic Decision-Making: A Literature Review», Innovar, vol. 35, n.º 96, p. e107110, abr. 2025.

MLA

Hernández-Betancur, J.-E., J. I. García-Valdecasas, I. A. Montoya-Restrepo, y A. M. Zuluaga Álvarez. «Limitations in Exploration and Exploitation Processes during the Emergence of Strategic Decision-Making: A Literature Review». Innovar, vol. 35, n.º 96, abril de 2025, p. e107110, doi:10.15446/innovar.v35n96.107110.

Turabian

Hernández-Betancur, Juan-Esteban, J. Ignacio García-Valdecasas, Iván A. Montoya-Restrepo, y Alejandra María Zuluaga Álvarez. «Limitations in Exploration and Exploitation Processes during the Emergence of Strategic Decision-Making: A Literature Review». Innovar 35, no. 96 (abril 23, 2025): e107110. Accedido diciembre 28, 2025. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/107110.

Vancouver

1.
Hernández-Betancur J-E, García-Valdecasas JI, Montoya-Restrepo IA, Zuluaga Álvarez AM. Limitations in Exploration and Exploitation Processes during the Emergence of Strategic Decision-Making: A Literature Review. Innovar [Internet]. 23 de abril de 2025 [citado 28 de diciembre de 2025];35(96):e107110. Disponible en: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/107110

Descargar cita

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations0

Dimensions

PlumX

Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo

305

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.