Sustainability, Innovation, and Value Creation in Developing Countries: Evidence from Iraq
Sostenibilidad, innovación y creación de valor en países en desarrollo: la evidencia de Irak
Sustentabilidade, inovação e criação de valor em países em desenvolvimento: evidências do Iraque
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v34n94.116817Palabras clave:
Sustainability, innovation, value creation, innovation performance, sustainability performance (en)sostenibilidad, innovación, creación de valor, desempeño en innovación, desempeño en sostenibilidad (es)
sustentabilidade, inovação, criação de valor, desempenho da inovação, desempenho da sustentabilidade (pt)
Descargas
This paper examines the impact of integrating sustainability performance with innovation performance on value creation in developing countries. The study employs content analysis to assess the levels of sustainability performance and innovation performance in 21 companies listed on the Iraqi Stock Exchange from 2011 to 2022. To test the proposed hypotheses, the study utilizes pooled Ordinary Least Squares (ols) and panel analysis. The findings reveal that sustainability performance and innovation performance positively influence company value, both independently and jointly. Furthermore, the results underscore the importance of investing in innovation processes to achieve a competitive advantage that fosters value creation. The study also highlights the critical balance between the increasing adoption of sustainable technologies in manufacturing and the effective application of diverse innovative technologies across production, operations, marketing, and organizational strategies as integral components of new product development. These findings hold significant implications for strategic decision-making, suggesting that companies in developing nations should pursue sustainable innovation pathways by adopting appropriate technologies and ensuring their long-term viability amid rapid technological advancements.
El presente artículo examina el impacto de integrar el desempeño en sostenibilidad y el desempeño en innovación sobre la creación de valor en países en desarrollo. El estudio emplea un análisis de contenido para evaluar los niveles de desempeño en sostenibilidad e innovación de 21 empresas cotizadas en la Bolsa de Valores de Irak, durante el período 2011-2022. Con el fin de probar las hipótesis formuladas, el estudio utiliza mínimos cuadrados ordinarios agrupados y análisis de panel. Los hallazgos revelan que tanto el desempeño en sostenibilidad como el desempeño en innovación influyen positivamente en el valor de una empresa, tanto de forma independiente como conjunta. Además, los resultados subrayan la importancia de invertir en procesos de innovación para lograr una ventaja competitiva que fomente la creación de valor. Esta investigación destaca el equilibrio crítico entre la creciente adopción de tecnologías sostenibles en los procesos de manufactura y la aplicación efectiva de diversas tecnologías innovadoras para la implementación de las estrategias de producción, operaciones, marketing y organizacionales como componentes integrales del desarrollo de nuevos productos. Estos hallazgos tienen implicaciones relevantes para la toma de decisiones estratégicas, al sugerir que las empresas en países en desarrollo deben seguir caminos de innovación sostenible al adoptar tecnologías adecuadas y garantizar su viabilidad a largo plazo en medio de un entorno de rápidos avances tecnológicos.
Este artigo examina o impacto da integração do desempenho da sustentabilidade com o desempenho da inovação na criação de valor nos países em desenvolvimento. O estudo emprega análise de conteúdo para avaliar os níveis de desempenho de sustentabilidade e desempenho de inovação em 21 empresas listadas na Bolsa de Valores do Iraque de 2011 a 2022. Para testar as hipóteses propostas, o estudo utiliza Mínimos Quadrados Ordinários (mqo) agrupados e análise de painel. Os resultados revelam que o desempenho da sustentabilidade e o desempenho da inovação influenciam positivamente o valor da empresa, tanto de forma independente quanto conjunta. Além disso, os resultados reforçam a importância de investir em processos de inovação para alcançar uma vantagem competitiva que promova a criação de valor. O estudo também destaca o equilíbrio crítico entre a crescente adoção de tecnologias sustentáveis na manufatura e a aplicação efetiva de diversas tecnologias inovadoras na produção, operações, marketing e estratégias organizacionais como componentes integrais do desenvolvimento de novos produtos. Essas descobertas têm implicações significativas para a tomada de decisões estratégicas e sugere que as empresas nos países em desenvolvimento devem buscar caminhos de inovação sustentáveis, adotando tecnologias apropriadas e garantindo sua viabilidade a longo prazo em meio a rápidos avanços tecnológicos.
Referencias
Abernethy, K., Bodin, Ö., Olsson, P., Hilly, Z., & Schwarz, A. (2014). Two steps forward, two steps back: The role of innovation in transforming towards community-based marine resource management in Solomon Islands. Global Environmental Change, 28, 309-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.008
Acosta-Prado, J. C., Longo-Somoza, M., & Lozano, M. B. (2017). Does family ownership affect innovation activity? A focus on the biotechnological industry. Innovar, 27(65), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v27n65.64886
Afeltra, G., Alerasoul, S. A., Minelli, E., Vecchio, Y., & Montalvo, C. (2022). Assessing the integrated impact of sustainable innovation on organisational performance: An empirical evidence from manufacturing firms. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 32(4), 143-166. https://doi.org/10.53703/001c.38515
Al Amin, M., Islam, M. R., & Halim, M. A. (2022). Sustainability reporting based on GRI indicators. Journal of Sustainable Business and Economics, 5(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.30564/jsbe.v5i1.4198
Al-Fatlawi, Q. A., Al Farttoosi, D. S., & Almagtome, A. H. (2021). Accounting information security and it gov-ernance under COBIT 5 framework: A case study. Webology, 18(Special Issue), 294-310. https://doi.org/10.14704/web/v18si02/web18073
Almagtome, A., Khaghaany, M., & Önce, S. (2020a). Corporate governance quality, stakeholders’ pressure, and sustainable development: An integrated approach. International Journal of Mathematical Engineering and Management Sciences, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.33889/ijmems.2020.5.6.082
Ayuningtiyas, I. S., & Mildawati, T. (2023). The effect of intellectual capital and sustainbility report disclosure on company value with profitability as a moderation variable: Empirical Studies in Manufacturing Com-panies 2017-2021. Lead Journal of Economy and Administration, 1(4), 133-143. https://doi.org/10.56403/lejea.v1i4.101
Barnett, J. (2020). Global environmental change II: Political economies of vulnerability to climate change. Progress in Human Geography, 44(6), 1172-1184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519898254
Basu, S. (2012). How can accounting researchers become more innovative? Accounting Horizons, 26(4), 851-870. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-10311
Brusca Alijarde, I., & Montesinos Julve, V. (2014). Accrual financial reporting in the public sector: Is it a reali-ty? Innovar, 24(54), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v24n54.46458
Butt, M. N., Baig, A. S., & Seyyed, F. J. (2023). Tobin’s Q approximation as a metric of firm performance: An empirical evaluation. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 31(3), 532-548. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254x.2021.1947875
Cai, W., & Li, G. (2018). The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 110-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.109
Cardao-Pito, T. (2022). Hypothesis that Tobin’s q captures organizations’ debt levels instead of their growth opportunities and intangible assets. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 2132636. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2132636
Chenhall, R. H., & Moers, F. (2015). The role of innovation in the evolution of management accounting and its integration into management control. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 47, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2015.10.002
Claudia-Larisa, M. (2023). The impact of sustainable reporting on the financial performance of energy and gas companies listed on the Bucharest Stock Exchange. An Empirical Approach. Management of Sustainable De-velopment, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.54989/msd-2023-0004
Dainienė, R., & Dagilienė, L. (2016). Measurement of social innovation at organisation's level: Theoretical issues. Economics & Business, 29(1), 96-103. https://doi.org/10.1515/eb-2016-0027
Denlertchaikul, N., Chatjuthamard, P., Jiraporn, P., & Phiromswad, P. (2022). The interaction effect of text-based corporate innovation and economic policy uncertainty on firm performance. Sage Open, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221139452
Dogaru, L. (2020). Eco-innovation and the contribution of companies to the sustainable development. Proce-dia Manufacturing, 46, 294-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.03.043
dos Santos, G. P. P., Schmidt, S., Gonçalves, M. A., & Bohnenberger, M. C. (2023). Value co-creation and per-formance within Brazilian innovation environments. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 24(2), 292-311. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrme-04-2021-0047
Fadillah, S. N., & Noormansyah, I. (2023). The influence of sustainability report, intellectual capital, liquidi-ty, and firm size on firm value. Research of Finance and Banking, 1(1), 22-33. https://doi.org/10.58777/rfb.v1i1.33
Garcia Pineda, V., & Macías Urrego, J. A. (2022). Analysis of the variables leading to the identification and incorporation of innovation capabilities by firms in the Colombian ICT Sector. Innovar, 32(84), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v32n84.99867
García-Fernández, M. (2016). Influence of quality management over innovation performance through knowledge management. A case study. Innovar, 26(61), 45-63. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0121-50512016000300045&lng=en&nrm=iso
García-Granero, E. M., Piedra-Muñoz, L., & Galdeano-Gómez, E. (2018). Eco-innovation measurement: A re-view of firm performance indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 191, 304-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.215
Ghani, R. A., Samah, A., Baharuddin, N., & Ahmad, Z. (2023). Determinants of firm value as measured by the Tobin’s Q: A case of Malaysian plantation sector. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 13(2), 420-432. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarafms/v13-i2/17268
Hair Jr. J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
Harsanto, B., Kumar, N., & Michaelides, R. (2024). Sustainability‐oriented innovation in manufacturing firms: Implementation and evaluation framework. Business strategy and the Environment, 33(6), 5086-5108- https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3740
Jantana, I., Kufepaksi, M., & Hasnawati, S. (2024). Analysis of Sustainability Performance and its impact on the Firm Value of LQ-45 low carbon leaders indexed companies with profitability as a moderating varia-ble. Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Studies, 6(7), 3486-3496. https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v7-i6-42
Khanchel, I., Lassoued, N., & Baccar, I. (2023). Sustainability and firm performance: The role of environmen-tal, social and governance disclosure and green innovation. Management Decision, (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/md-09-2021-1252 .
Klettner, A., Clarke, T., & Boersma, M. (2014). The governance of corporate sustainability: Empirical insights into the development, leadership and implementation of responsible business strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 122, 145-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1750-y
Kochetkov, D. M. (2023). Innovation: A state-of-the-art review and typology. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 7(4), 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2023.05.004
Lampikoski, T., Westerlund, M., Rajala, R., & Möller, K. (2014). Green innovation games: Value-creation strategies for corporate sustainability. California Management Review, 57(1), 88-116. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2014.57.1.88
Lubberink, R., Blok, V., Van Ophem, J., & Omta, O. (2017). Lessons for responsible innovation in the business context: A systematic literature review of responsible, social and sustainable innovation practices. Sustai-nability, 9(5), 721. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050721
Marcon, A., de Medeiros, J. F., & Ribeiro, J. L. D. (2017). Innovation and environmentally sustainable econo-my: Identifying the best practices developed by multinationals in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 160, 83-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.101
Mehedintu, A., & Soava, G. (2023). Approach to the impact of digital technologies on sustainability reporting through structural equation modeling and artificial neural networks. Electronics, 12(9), 2048. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12092048
Mensah, J. (2019). Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for hu-man action: Literature review. Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1), 1653531. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1653531
Natário, M. M., & Couto, J. (2022). Drivers, enablers, and conditions for public sector innovation in European countries. Innovar, 32(83), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v32n83.99255
Novitasari, M., & Tarigan, Z. J. H. (2022). The role of green innovation in the effect of corporate social re-sponsibility on firm performance. Economies, 10(5), 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10050117
Oikonomaki, E., & Belivanis, D. (2023). A new perspective on the prediction of the innovation performance: A data-driven methodology to identify innovation indicators through a comparative study of Boston’s neighborhoods. In: F. Nah, & K., Siau (Eds.), HCI in Business, Government and Organizations. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14039. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36049-7_28
Pizzurno, E., & Cammarano, F. (2024). Approaches to sustainability-driven innovation in high-performing Italian firms: A cross-case analysis. Journal of Global Business Insights, 9(1), 42-60. https://doi.org/10.5038/2640-6489.9.1.1268
Ranta, V., Keränen, J., & Aarikka-Stenroos, L. (2020). How B2B suppliers articulate customer value proposi-tions in the circular economy: Four innovation-driven value creation logics. Industrial Marketing Man-agement, 87, 291-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.10.007
Roque, A. F., Raposo, M. L., & Alves, M. C. (2021). Management accounting and control systems in the Upp-sala internationalization process model. A case study. Innovar, 31(80), 9-28. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v31n80.93661
Sahetapy, K. (2023). Sustainability report and firm value: An evidence from Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Auditing, 10(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.55963/jraa.v10i1.513
Scott, S. D., Plotnikoff, R. C., Karunamuni, N., Bize, R., & Rodgers, W. (2008). Factors influencing the adop-tion of an innovation: An examination of the uptake of the Canadian Heart Health Kit (HHK). Implementa-tion Science, 3, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-3-41
Sun, Y. (2023). Can the innovation in sustainability disclosures reflect organisational sustainable develop-ment? An integrated reporting perspective from China. Sustainable Development, 31(3), 1668-1680. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2475
Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. R. (2020). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4972(98)80033-3
Tomashuk, I., & Baldynyuk, V. (2023). Eco-innovation as a basis for sustainable development. Three Seas Eco-nomic Journal, 4(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.30525/2661-5150/2023-1-9
Ugalde-Binda, N., Balbastre-Benavent, F., Canet-Giner, M. T., & Escribá-Carda, N. (2014). The role of intel-lectual capital and entrepreneurial characteristics as innovation drivers. Innovar, 24(53), 41-60. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v24n53.43793
Wang, X., Sun, X., Zhang, H., & Xue, C. (2022). Digital economy development and urban green innovation CA-pability: Based on panel data of 274 prefecture-level cities in China. Sustainability, 14(5), 2921. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052921
Widayanto, A. D. R., Harmono, H., Apriyanto, G., & Hidayatullah, S. (2023). Optimizing firm value: the im-pact of intellectual capital with competitive advantage. Jurnal Penelitian, 20(2), 107-124. https://doi.org/10.26905/jp.v20i2.12805
Yuan, J., Al Shraah, A., Kuo, Y. K., Muda, I., Mabrouk, F., Espinoza-Maguiña, M., & Abdulrehman, N. (2023). Effects of ecological innovation, governance structure, and social development on the adoption of sus-tainable reporting in the global tourism industry. Economic Research, 36(2), 2179092. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2023.2179092
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Isabel Abínzano, Lucas Ayres Barreira de Campos Barros, Zuray Melgarejo, Paula Andrea Navarro Pérez, Mary Analí Vera-Colina. (2024). Nota editorial – Número especial “Decisiones financieras empresariales en países emergentes”. Innovar, 34(94), p.e116823. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v34n94.116823.
Dimensions
PlumX
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Innovar
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Todos los artículos publicados por Innovar se encuentran disponibles globalmente con acceso abierto y licenciados bajo los términos de Creative Commons Atribución-No_Comercial-Sin_Derivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Una vez seleccionados los artículos para un número, y antes de iniciar la etapa de cuidado y producción editorial, los autores deben firmar una cesión de derechos patrimoniales de su obra. Innovar se ciñe a las normas colombianas en materia de derechos de autor.
El material de esta revista puede ser reproducido o citado con carácter académico, citando la fuente.
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons: