Publicado

2014-01-01

Gobierno corporativo y sector público: un estudio bibliométrico en las principales revistas ISI

Corporate Governance And The Public Sector: A Bibliometric Study Of The Principal ISI Journals

Governo Coorporativo E Setor Público: Um Estudo Bibliométrico Nas Principais Revistas ISI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v24n51.41489

Palabras clave:

Gobierno Corporativo, Empresas Públicas, Códigos, Revistas Internacionales, Bibliometría (es)
Corporate governance, public-owned enterprises, codes, international journals, bibliometry (en)
governo corporativo, empresas públicas, códigos, revistas internacionais, bibliometria (pt)

Descargas

Autores/as

  • Jesús Mauricio Flórez-Parra Universidad de Granada
  • María Victoria López-Pérez Universidad de Granada
  • Antonio Manuel López-Hernández Universidad de Granada
Este artículo está dirigido a analizar el Gobierno Corporativo (GC) en el área del sector público. El concepto del GC ha venido adquiriendo en los últimos años una gran importancia, convirtiéndose en un tema ampliamente estudiado desde diversos puntos de vista, especialmente en el sector privado. Este interés se pone de manifiesto en el fuerte incremento de trabajos publicados en las diversas revistas internacionales. En el sector público, el estudio del GC presenta una serie de diferencias debido a la naturaleza de las organizaciones y al diferente papel que juegan los grupos de interés, que hacen necesario su estudio en profundidad. Para tal fin, se realiza un análisis bibliométrico comprendido entre los años 2000-2008, donde se analizan las temáticas más relevantes y significativas, los autores más citados y las teorías más empleadas. Para este estudio se toman 26 revistas de diferentes áreas del conocimiento, incluidas en el Social Science Citation Index (SSCI), en las que se aborda el estudio del GC. Este trabajo permite, primero, poner de manifiesto las principales líneas de trabajo desarrolladas en un área de estudio todavía incipiente y, segundo, ver cómo los enfoques sobre la aplicación de códigos de buenas prácticas, ética corporativa y responsabilidad social difieren de los adoptados en el ámbito privado, aunque en estos trabajos pioneros el marco teórico predominante es la teoría de la agencia y no otros que de entrada podrían pensarse más adecuados, como la teoría de los stakeholders o la teoría de stewardship.
This article analyzes Corporate Governance (CG) in the public sector. The concept of CG has become increasingly important in recent years especially in the private sector and has been subject to a wide range of differently-focused research. This growing interest is reflected in the proliferation of papers appearing in international journals. Detailed research into CG in the public sector is important because of the differences with the private sector, resulting from the nature of public sector organizations and the different role played by interest groups. This article contributes to the literature by carrying out a bibliometric analysis covering the 2000-2008 period. It focuses on the most significant topics covered by the research, the most cited authors and the the commonest theoretical approaches. The article analyzes approaches to CG from different disciplines published in 26 journals included in the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI). Firstly, it presents the principal areas of research interest in this still incipient area and secondly it ilustrates the ways in which public sector approaches to codes of good practice, corporate ethics and social responsibility differ from their equivalents in the private sector. It is interesting that these pioneering studies principally employ agency theory rather than other focuses that might have been thought more appropriate, such as stakeholder or stewardship theory.
Este artigo está dirigido a analisar o Governo Corporativo (GC) na área do setor público. O conceito de GC vem adquirindo nos últimos anos uma grande importância ao se converter em um tema amplamente estudado a partir de diversos pontos de vista, especialmente no setor privado. Esse interesse se manifesta no forte aumento de trabalhos publicados nas diversas revistas internacionais. No setor público, o estudo do GC apresenta uma série de diferenças devido à natureza das organizações e ao diferente papel que os grupos de interesse desenvolvem, o que faz necessário seu estudo aprofundado. Para isso, realiza-se uma análise bibliométrica compreendida entre 2000 e 2008, na qual se analisam as temáticas mais relevantes e significativas, os autores mais citados e as teorias mais empregadas. Para este estudo, tomam-se 26 revistas de diferentes áreas do conhecimento, incluídas no Social Science Citation Index (SSCI), nas quais se aborda o estudo do GC. Este trabalho permite, primeiramente, identificar as principais linhas de trabalho desenvolvidas em uma área de estudo ainda incipiente; em segundo lugar, ver como os enfoques sobre a aplicação de códigos de boas práticas, ética corporativa e responsabilidade social diferem dos adotados no âmbito privado, embora nestes trabalhos pioneiros o referencial teórico predominante é a teoria dos stakeholders ou a teoria de stewardship.

Referencias

Aucoin, P. (1990). Administrative Reform in Public Management Paradigms, Principles, Paradoxes, and Pendulums. Governance, 3 (2), 115-137.

Barrett, P. (2000). Balancing Accountability and Efficiency in a More Competitive Public Sector Environment. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 59 (3), 58-71.

Barki, H., Rivard, S. & Talbot, J. (1988). An Information Systems Keyword Classification Scheme. MIS Quarterly, 12 (2), 299-322.

Batista, P. D., Campiteli, M. G. & Konouchi, O. (2006). Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests. Scientometrics, 68 (1), 179-189.

Benz, M. & Frey, B. S. (2007). Corporate Governance: What Can We Learn From Public Governance? Academy of Management Review, vol. 32 (1), pp. 92-104.

Bordons, M. y Zulueta, M. (1999) Evaluación de la actividad científica a través de indicadores bibliométricos. Revista Española de Cardiología, 52 (10), 1-10.

Bowman, J. S. & Hajjar, S. G. (1978). The Literature of American Public Administration: Its Contents and Contributors. Public Administration Review, 38 (2), 156-165.

Bozec, R., Zéghal, D. & Boujenoui, A. (2004) The effect of the reform of Canadian state-owned enterprises on major corporate governance mechanisms. Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 63 (2), 79-94.

Braam, R. R., Moed, H. F. & Van Raan, A. F. (1990a). Mapping of Science by combined co-citation and Word Analysis, I, Structural Aspects. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 42, 233-251.

Braam, R. R., Moed, H. F. & Van Raan, A. F. (1990b). Mapping of Science by combined Cocitation and Word Analysis, II, Dynamical Aspects. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 42, 252-266.

Cadbury, A. S. (2000). The Corporate Governance Agenda. Corporate Governance, 1 (8), 7-15.

Cadbury, A. S. (1992). Informe de Comité sobre los Aspectos Financieros del Gobierno Corporativo. disponible en: http://www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/cadbury.pdf. [24/11/2010]

Carrizo, S. G. (2004) Hacia un Concepto de Bibliometría. Disponible en: http://www.ucm.es/info/multidoc/publicaciones/journal/pdf/bibliometria-esp.pdf. [18/02/2011]

Casado, E. y Moreno, C. (1997). Técnicas Bibliométricas Aplicadas a los Estudios de Usuarios. Revista General de Información y Documentación, 7 (2), 41-68.

Culnan, M., O'Reilly, C. & Chatman, J. (1990). Intellectual structure of research in organizational behavior, 1972-1984: A co-citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41 (6), 453-458.

Cleary, R. (2000). The Public Administration Doctoral Dissertation Reexamined: An Evaluation of the Dissertation of 1998. Public Administration Review, 60 (5), 446-455.

Donuhuse, J. (1972). A Bibliometric Analysis of Certain Information Science Literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Sep-Oct, 313-317.

Durisin, B. & Puzone. F. (2009). Maturation of Corporate Governance Research, 1993-2007: An Assessment. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17, (3), 266-291.

Durisin, B., Calabretta, G. & Parmeggiani, V. (2010). The Intellectual Structure of Product Innovation Research: A Bibliometric Study of the Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1984-2004. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27, 437-451.

Egghe, L. & Rousseau, R. (2002). Co-citation, bibliographic coupling and a characterization of lattice citation networks. Scientometrics, 55 (3), 349-361.

Fieldman, M. & Khademian, A. (2007). The Role of Public Management in Inclusion: Creating Communities of Participation. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institution, 20 (2), 305-324.

Franceschet, M. (2009). A Cluster Analysis of Scholar and Journal Bibliometric Indicators. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (10), 1950-1964.

Frey, B. S. & Benz, M. (2005). Can Private Learn From Public Governance? The Economic Journal, 115, (Noviembre), F377-F396.

Garand, J. C. (1990). An Alternative Interpretation of Recent Polticial Science Journal Evaluations. PS: Political Science and Politics, 23 (3), 448-451.

Gay, K. (2001). A Boardroom Revolution: The impact of the Cadbury nexus on the work of non-executive directors of FTSE 350 companies. Corporate Governance, 9 (3), 152-164.

Gordon, M. D. (1982). Citation Ranking versus Subjective Evaluation in the Determination of Journal Hierachies in the Social Sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33 (1), 55-57.

Guo, L. (2008). Perspective: An analysis of 22 years of research. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, 249-60.

Hepworth, N. (1994). Principles of Corporate Governance and the Public Services. London: CIPFA.

Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for all Seasons? Public Administration, 69 (1), 3-19.

Howard, C & Seth-Purdie, R. (2005). Governance Issues for Public Sector Boards. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 64, (3), 56-68.

Hodges, R., Wright, M. & Keasey, K. (1996). Corporate Governance in the Public Services: Concepts and Issues. Public Money and Management, 16, (2), 7-13.

JCR. (2009). Journal Citation Report. Philadelphia: Institut for Scientific Information. http://www.accesowok.fecyt.es/. [24/10/2010].

Kellough, J. & Pittes, D. (2005). Who Contributes to Public administration Review? Examining the charactristics of Authors Who Submit Manuscripts to the Journal. Public administration Review, 65 (1), 3-7.

Kirkbride, J. & Letza, S. (2003). Corporate Governance and Gatekeeper Liability: the lessons from public authorities. Corporate Governance, 11 (3), 262-271.

Kumar, S. & Naqvi, S. (2010). Research output in the field of natural sciences: A bibliometric case study of Jamia Millia Islamia University, New Delhi. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, 34 (4), 317-324.

Lan, Z. & Anders, K. K. (2000). A Paradigmatic View of Contemporary Public Administration Research: An Empirical Test. Administration and Society, 32 (2), 138-165.

Legge, J. S. Jr. & Devore, J. (1987). Measuring Productivity in U.S. Public Administration and public Affair Programs 1981-1985. Administration and Society, 19 (2), 147-156.

Lin, J. W. & Hwang, M. I. (2010). Audit Quality, Corporate Governance, and Earnings Management: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Auditing, 14, 57-77.

Mordelet, P. (2009). The impact of globalisation on hospital management: Corporate governance rules in both public and private nonprofit hospitals. Journal of Management & Marketing in Healthcare, 2 (1), 7-14.

McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41 (6), 433-443.

McNamee, M. J. & Fleming, S. (2007). Ethics Audits and Corporate Governance: The Case of Public Sector Sports Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 73, 425-437.

McNamee, M. J. & Fleming, S. (2005). The Ethics of Corporate Governance in Public Sector Organizations. Public Management Review, vol. 7 (1), 136-144.

Natera, A. (2004). La Noción de la Gobernanza como Gestión Pública Participativa y Reticular. Política y Gestión, Disponible en: http://e-archivo.uc3m.es/bitstream/10016/590/1/cpa040202.pdf. [17/03/2011].

Nerur, S. P., Rasheed, A. A. & Natarajan, V. (2008). The intellectual structure of the strategic management field. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 319-36.

Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico. (OCDE) (1999). Principios del Gobierno Corporativo. Disponible en: http://www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/principles_sp.pdf. [07/04/2011].

Page, A. L. & Schirr, G. R. (2008). Growth and development of a body of knowledge: 16 years of new product development research. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, 233-248.

Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Podsakoff, N. & Bachrach, D. (2008). Scholarly Influence in the Field of Management: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Determinants of University and Author Impact in the Management Literature in the Past Quarter Century. Journal of Management, 34 (4), 641-720.

Plümber, T. y Radaelli, C. M. (2004). Publish or perish: Publications and Citations of Italian Political Scientists in International Political Socience Jornals, 1990-2002. Journal of European Public Policy, 11 (6), 1112-1127.

Ramos, A. R. & Ruiz, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980-2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25 (10), 981-1004.

Rodríguez, M., Alcaide, L. & López, A. (2010) Trends of e-Government Research Contextualization and Research Opportunities. The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 10 (4), 87-111.

Ryan, C. & Ng, W. (2000). Public Sector Corporate Governance Disclosures: An examination of annual reporting practices in Queensland. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 59 (2),11-23.

Sánchez, J. P. & García, E. (2007a). Ownership Structure, Discretionary Accruals and the Informativeness of Earnings. Corporate Governance, 15 (4), 677-691.

Sánchez, J. P. & García, E. (2007b). A Meta-Analytic Vision of the Effect of Ownership Structure on Firm Performance. Corporate Governance, 15 (5), 879-893.

Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: a measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 24, 265-269.

Small, H. (1998). A General Framework For Creating Large-Scale Maps of Science in Two or Three Dimensions the Sciviz System. Scientometrics, 41, (1-2), 125-133.

Tahai-A. & Meyer, MJ. (1999). A revealed preference study of management journals direct influences. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (3), 279-296.

Torres, L. & Piña, V. (2004). Reshaping Public Administration: The Spanish Experience Compared to the UK. Public Administration, 82 (2), 445-464.

Umut-Al,, Sahiner, M. & Tonta, Y. (2006). Arts and Humanities Literature: Bibliometric Characteristics of Contributions by Turkish Authors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57 (8), 1011-1022.

Vocino, T. & Elliott, H. Robert (1982). Journal Prestige in Public Administration: A Research Note. Administration and Society, 14 (1), 5-14.

Vinten, G. (2002). Public Sector Corporate Governance-the Turnbull Report. Credit Control, 23 (1), 27-30.

Wang, Q., Wong, T. & Xia, L. (2008). State ownership, the institutional environment, and auditor choice: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46, 112-134.

White, H. D. & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49 (4), 327-355.

White, H. D. (1981). Cocited author retrieval online: An experiment with the social indicators literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32, 16-22.

White, H. (2003a). Pathfinder networks and author co-citation analysis: A remapping of paradigmatic information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54 (5), 423-434.

White, H. (2003b). Author Co-citation analysis and Pearson's R. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54 (13), 1250-1259.

Whiteoak, J. (1996). Corporate Governance-Why Local Government Should Manage its Own Agenda". Public Money & Management, 16 (2), 23-29.

Zitt, M. & Bassecoulard, E. (1994) Development of a method for detection and trend analysis of research fronts built by lexical or co-citation analysis. Scientometrics, 30 (1), 333-351.

Dimensions

PlumX

Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo

1583

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Cómo citar

Flórez-Parra, J. M., López-Pérez, M. V., & López-Hernández, A. M. (2014). Gobierno corporativo y sector público: un estudio bibliométrico en las principales revistas ISI. Innovar, 24(51), 79-97. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v24n51.41489

Licencia

Derechos de autor 2014 Innovar

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0.

Todos los artículos publicados por Innovar se encuentran disponibles globalmente con acceso abierto y licenciados bajo los términos de Creative Commons Atribución-No_Comercial-Sin_Derivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

Una vez seleccionados los artículos para un número, y antes de iniciar la etapa de cuidado y producción editorial, los autores deben firmar una cesión de derechos patrimoniales de su obra. Innovar se ciñe a las normas colombianas en materia de derechos de autor.

El material de esta revista puede ser reproducido o citado con carácter académico, citando la fuente.

Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons: